Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z21120021
Project Number Z21120021
Review Stop STORM
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2022-04-27 15:36:17THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 3/24/2022 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. [SATISFIED] REMOVE REFERENCES TO VOW (VILLAGE OF
 WELLINGTON?) ON COVER.
  
 2. [NOT SATISFIED] PROJECT SITE ON PROJECT LOCATION MAP
 IS SHOWN ON THE EAST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE. THE SITE IS
 ON THE WEST SIDE OF TAMARIND AVE.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN IS CONFUSING
 WITH EXISTING FEATURES SHOWN AND NOT SCREENED.
  
 4. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] PROVIDE FLOW ARROWS SHOWING
 DIRECTION OF SURFACE RUNOFF. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - ADD
 FLOW ARROWS FOR THE AREAS AROUND THE BUILDING.
  
 5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE COMMENTS UNDER NEW
 COMMENTS BELOW] PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:
 A. BUILDING TO EACH R/W CENTERLINE
 B. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
 C. FROM GRANT ST CENTERLINE TO PARKING LOT
 D. FROM WEST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING.
 E. BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS
  
 LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND
 GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
 CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
 PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
 PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.
  
 6. {PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING
 LIMITS WITHIN THE STREETS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT - THE
 EXISTING WATER SERVICE ON GRANT STREET MAY NEED TO BE
 REMOVED AND PLUGGED AT THE WATER MAIN.
  
 7. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] IDENTIFY ON THE CONCEPTUAL
 ENGINEERING PLAN WHERE THE SPECIAL TYPE 'F' CURB AND
 GUTTER WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. REDRAW THE DETAIL IN ACAD
 AND PROVIDE ENGLISH UNITS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: IF
 SPECIAL TYPE ?F? CURB AND GUTTER IS NOT BEING
 CONSTRUCTED THEN DO NOT INCLUDE THE DETAIL FOR THE
 ITEM.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] LABEL WHERE THE DRAINAGE CONTROL
 STRUCTURE WILL BE LOCATED AND PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE
 STRUCTURE. NOTE THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF
 BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 9. [NOT SATISFIED] CONFIRM THE OUTFALL PIPE WILL NOT
 ENTER THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AT A CORNER OF THE
 STRUCTURE.
  
 10. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR
 SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] PER FIGURE XV-2: GENERAL PARKING
 DIMENSIONS IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, THE CURB LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES
 IS 22 FEET. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 25 FEET AND GAPS IN THE
 PARKING SPACES ON TAMARIND AVE.
  
 12. [NOT SATISFIED] CONSIDER ANGLING THE CURBING AT
 EACH END OF PROPOSED PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO
 FACILITATE ACCESS TO AND FROM THE END SPACES.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENT - INCREASE THE ANGLE OF THE END
 CURBING FROM 16 DEGREES FROM PERPENDICULAR TO 45
 DEGREES FROM PERPENDICULAR AT BOTH ENDS OF THE PARKING
 AREA ON GRANT STREET.
  
 13. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CITY?S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM
 IS NGVD1929. THE CITY HAS ALLOWED THE USE OF NAVD1988
 AS LONG AS THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO NGVD1929 AT THE
 PROJECT LOCATION IS PROVIDED. PROVIDE THE NAVD1988 TO
 NGVD1929 CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY.
  
 14. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] LABEL ANY NEW GUTTER OR CURB
 AND GUTTER IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. ADDITIONAL COMMENT -
 SHOW THE LINEWORK FOR THE PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER ON
 GRANT ST. LABELED THE PROPOSED CURBING CREATED FOR THE
 ON-STREET PARKING. USE DIFFERENT LINE TYPE/WEIGHT
 BETWEEN EXISTING CURBING AND PROPOSED CURBING.
  
 15. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN LIEU OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 16. [SATISFIED] EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR THE SIDEWALK
 AND PARKING ON GRANT ST.
  
 17. [NO LONGER APPLICABLE - SIDEWALK AREA NOT BEING
 MODIFIED FOR PARKING ON N. TAMARIND AVE] REVIEW
 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS FOR THE ARV TO DETERMINE IF THE
 STRUCTURE CAN BE MODIFIED TO LOWER THE RIM TO PROPOSED
 GRADE.
  
 18. [NOT SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
  
 19. REVISE FDOT INDEX NUMBERS TO CURRENT FDOT STANDARD
 PLAN NUMBERS ON THE SITE PLAN SHEETS AND ENGINEERING
 SHEETS.
  
 20. SHEET SP-1 CALLS OUT A DETAIL NO. 4 ON SHEET SP-3.
 SHEET SP-3 DOES NOT HAVE A DETAIL NO. 4.
  
 21. REMOVE THE HATCHING FOR THE PROPOSED R/W
 ABANDONMENT AREA ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN SHEETS.
  
 22. PROVIDE THE EXISTING INVERT ELEVATION OF THE
 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE THE OUTFALL PIPE WILL CONNECT TO.
  
 23. LIST THE WEIR ELEVATION WITH THE INFORMATION FOR
 STRUCTURE S-102.
  
 24. CONFIRM THERE WILL BE SUFFICIENT VERTICAL CLEARANCE
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED 15 INCH RCP OUTFALL PIPE AND 6
 INCH SANITARY SEWER LATERAL.
  
 25. CAN S-102 AND S-101 SHIFT TO THE NORTH, AWAY FROM
 THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THIS WILL REDUCE THE ANGLE OF
 THE OUTFALL PIPE CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING INLET.
  
 26. SHOW THE 2-FT LANDSCAPE OVERHANG AT THE END OF THE
 PARKING SPACES.
  
 27. SHOW CONCRETE FOR THE DRIVEWAY APRON AND SIDEWALK
 WITHIN THE R/W.
  
 28. SHOW WATER MAIN ON STATE STREET IN THE CORRECT
 LOCATION. SHOW THE VALVES FROM THE SURVEY.
  
 29. SHEET C2.3 GEOMETRIC, SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN:
 A. PROVIDE STRIPING PLAN FOR MILL AND RESURFACE AREAS.
 B. SHOW EXISTING STOP SIGNS FOR STATE STREET AND FOR
 GRANT STREET.
 C. MOVE STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN FOR PARKING LOT TO
 BEHIND THE SIDEWALK.
 D. REMOVE REFERENCE TO CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH LAND
 DEVELOPMENT CODE FROM NOTES.
 E. REFERENCE THE CWPB TYPICAL 90 DEGREE PARKING STALL
 DETAIL.
 F. TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT FOR WEST EDGE OF PARKING LOT
 BUT THIS CURB IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PGD PLAN.
 G. TYPE D CURB CALLED OUT ACROSS SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE
 OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY.
  
 30. SECTION A (SHEET C3.2)
 A. VALLEY GUTTER SHOWN.
 B. ADD STREET NAME TO PUBLIC R/W.
 C. SHOW AND LABEL EXISTING AND PROPOSED R/W ? PROPERTY
 LINES AND THE WIDTH BETWEEN THE TWO.
 D. DIMENSION THE SIDEWALK WIDTH IN THE PUBLIC R/W,
 PROVIDE THE DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO THE
 PROPOSED R/W LINE, DISTANCE FROM PROPOSED R/W TO FACE
 OF BUILDING.
 E. SHOW AND DIMENSION PATIO IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING.
  
 31. SECTION B (SHEET C3.2)
 A. SHOW, CALLOUT AND DIMENSION PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER,
 PARKING AREA, CURBING BETWEEN PARKING AND SIDEWALK AND
 SIDEWALK.
 B. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM GRANT STREET CENTERLINE TO
 PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER.
 C. ADD STREET NAME TO PUBLIC R/W
 D. EXTEND SECTION TO INCLUDE PART OF THE PARKING LOT.
  
 32. SECTION C (SHEET C3.2)
 A. PARKING LOT GRADE DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON
 THE PGD PLAN.
 B. SHOW PROPOSED FENCE
 C. TYPE D CURB SHOWN ON THE SECTION BUT NOT SHOWN ON
 THE PGD PLAN.
 D. EXTEND SECTION TO WEST FACE OF THE BUILDING. SHOW
 GRADE BREAKS, DIMENSIONS, ETC.
 E. VALLEY GUTTER CALLED OUT FOR PARKING AREA.
  
 33. SECTION D (SHEET C3.2)
 A. DETAIL SHOULD MATCH PROPOSED DRIVEWAY.
 B. PROVIDE DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT TO R/W
 C. ADD STREET NAME TO PUBLIC R/W.
 D. GRADES DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH PGD PLAN.
  
 34. PROVIDE SECTION FROM CENTERLINE OF STATE STREET TO
 SOUTH FACE OF BUILDING. SHOW GROUND FEATURES, SURFACE
 SLOPE DIRECTIONS, GRADE BREAKS, DIMENSIONS, STREET
 NAME, ETC.
  
 35. PROVIDE SECTION FROM CENTERLINE OF GRANT STREET TO
 NORTH FACE OF THE BUILDING, OUTSIDE OF THE PROPOSED
 ON-STREET PARKING. SHOW AND LABEL GROUND FEATURES,
 SURFACE SLOPE DIRECTIONS, GRADE BREAKS, DIMENSIONS,
 STREET NAME, ETC.
  
 36. SIZE OF OUTFALL PIPE SHOWN ON THE CONTROL STRUCTURE
 DETAIL DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS CALLED OUT ON THE PGD
 PLAN. JUSTIFY ANY OUTFALL PIPE DIAMETER LARGER THAN 15
 INCH.
  
 37. . SHEET C4.1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN (CAN BE ADDRESSED
 WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL):
 A. PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE TO HAY BALES FOR INLET
 PROTECTION.
 B. IDENTIFY WHICH INLETS ARE TO BE PROTECTED (ONSITE
 AND WITHIN R/W)
 C. MOVE HATCHING FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OUT OF THE
 R/W.
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 [email protected]
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved