| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-09 23:16:25 | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SUBMISSION ACKNOWLEDGED. |
| | PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE. LATEST |
| | SUBMISSION DID NOT HAVE THE LETTER IN THE DOCUMENTATION |
| | FOLDER |
| | 3) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN WITH |
| | TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, SIDEWALK, CURB, |
| | DRIVEWAY) PROPERLY LABELED AND DIMENSIONED. IF ALREADY |
| | PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SPECIFIC FILE NAME AND/OR |
| | SHEET NUMBER(S). |
| | 4) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC |
| | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE |
| | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET |
| | NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. |
| | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES |
| | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A |
| | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND |
| | SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS |
| | WAS NOT PROVIDED IN A SEPARATE FILE. BOTH VEHICLES? |
| | PATH AND MANEUVERING MOVEMENTS ARE NOT CLEAR. IF |
| | NEEDED, ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF |
| | AN ACCEPTABLE ANALYSIS. |
| | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. THE PARKING TABLE IS |
| | NOT COMPLETELY VISIBLE IN SP-1 |
| | 7) SATISFIED. THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN ENVISIONS |
| | SHARED BICYCLE LANES ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. IF NEEDED |
| | OR MISSING, PROVIDE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS ACCORDING TO CITY STANDARDS ALONG THE BLOCK |
| | FRONTING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. INSERT REQUIRED |
| | PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN LOCATIONS IN THE SITE PLAN |
| | 8) NOT SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY INBOUND-OUTBOUND LANES HAVE |
| | DIFFERENT WIDTHS. CORRECT OR PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION. |
| | WRONG SITE PLAN SUBMITTED. |
| | 9) SATISFIED. SIDEWALK. MINIMUM UN-OBSTRUCTED WALKABLE |
| | AREA WIDTH MUST BE 5 FEET. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN |
| | ACCORDINGLY AND CLEARLY DEPICT SIDEWALK MEASUREMENTS |
| | 10) NOT SATISFIED. STOP BAR AT THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY IS |
| | MISPLACED. PLEASE CORRECT. LATEST SUBMISSION DOES NOT |
| | DEPICT THE CORRECT SITE PLAN |
| | 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PATTERNED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK |
| | ACROSS 21ST STREET. PLEASE MATCH EXISTING CROSSWALKS |
| | PATTERN IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
