Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z21120019
Project Number Z21120019
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2022-01-13 11:20:00PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.13.2022
 PROJECT NO.: Z21120019
 CASE NO.: ISPR 21-14
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY SHALL BE
 PROVIDED INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH THE
 TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY).
  
 2. APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. LETTERS FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED
 INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THEIR
 ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES.
  
 4. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS TO INCLUDE RESPONSES
 INDICATING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH
 THE SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE
 [SEC. 94-35(C)].
  
 5. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO WORK WITH THE ARCHITECT ON THE
 VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLING. CONCERNS
 INCLUDE:
  
 5.1. ALL OF THE PROJECTS IS EXACTLY THE SAME.
 ALTERNATIVE STYLES, OR VARIATIONS, SHOULD BE CONSIDERED
 ACROSS ALL OF THE PROJECTS AS THEY ARE SEPARATE SITES
 ALONG THE CORRIDOR AND READ INDEPENDENTLY OF ONE
 ANOTHER.
  
 5.2. ADDITIONAL WINDOWS/OPENING ARE NEEDED ON THE
 SIDES/REAR OF THE BUILDING TO PROVIDE BETTER
 ARCHITECTURAL STYLING, NATURAL SURVEILLANCE, VISUAL
 ENHANCEMENT TO THE NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACES, ETC.
  
 5.3. GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FACING TAMARIND
 AVENUE SHOULD INDIVIDUALLY READ AS WALK-UP UNITS WITH
 THEIR FRONT/MAIN ENTRANCE FACING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 6. PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN AT THE PROPERTY
 LINE. LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES WHEN
 MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL
 ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 7. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(5) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 VERTICAL OR SQUARE IN PROPORTION.
  
 8. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(6) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE
 OF THE FA?ADE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL.
  
 9. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(7) ALL WINDOWS ARE TO BE
 OPERABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL/NOTE.
  
 10. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-222(H)(10) SLIDING DOORS ARE
 ONLY ALLOWED ON THE REAR FA?ADE.
  
 11. THE FAR CALCULATION IS INCORRECT.
  
 12. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW ON-STREET PARKING IS
 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY?S ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 13. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PROPERTY LINE ALONG
 TAMARIND AVENUE IS PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS THE SURVEY IS
 SHOWING A PORTION OF THE TAMARIND AVENUE SIDEWALK
 EXTENDING ONTO THE PRIVATE PROPERTY, BUT A MAINTENANCE
 MAP WAS FILED SEVERAL YEARS AGO AND SHOULD HAVE
 CORRECTED THIS.
  
 14. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SEC. 94-485(Q). INDICATE ALL LOCATIONS.
  
 15. ENSURE THAT PLANS SHOW ALL WALLS, FENCES, ETC. IF
 RETAINING WALLS ARE PROPOSED, DETAILS/CROSS SECTIONS
 NEED TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 16. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE
 CITY?S MINIMUM STANDARDS.
  
 17. PLEASE CLARIFY THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL, IT
 LOOKS LIKE THE GATES CONSIST OF CHAIN LINK; SUCH
 MATERIAL IS NOT PERMITTED. THE GATE NEEDS TO BE A
 SOLID/OPAQUE MATERIAL.
  
 18. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES (AS
 DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS) AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF
 THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO OBJECTS WITHIN THE VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLE SHALL EXIST BETWEEN A HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES AND
 8 FEET.
  
 19. SCREEN WALLS SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EAST
 PROPERTY LINE SEPARATING THE PARKING FROM THE ADJACENT
 RESIDENTIAL USES [SEC. 94-443(A)(1)].
  
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION THROUGH THE ENTIRE
 SITE TO SHOW THE ELEVATION PROFILE, ETC. AS THE
 PROPERTY SLOPES EAST/WEST.
  
 21. ALL BALCONIES, ROOF OVERHANGS, AWNINGS, ETC. NEED
 TO BE SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED ON THE SITE PLAN. PURSUANT
 TO SEC. 94-305(B)(2) SUCH ENCROACHMENTS SHALL NOT
 EXTEND MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 22. CONFIRM THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ACCURATE AND CONSISTENT. THE
 SITE PLAN DOESN?T APPEAR TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN, DATA
 TABLE, ETC.
  
 23. THE DESIGN OF THE DOT?S MOTEL MONUMENT LOCATION
 WILL NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE COLEMAN PARK
 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN IT IS PROPOSED TO BE
 IN A UTILITY EASEMENT WITH OVERHEAD POWER LINES, ETC.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UPON RESUBMITTAL.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved