City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Notes

Plan Review Notes For Project Z21120018
Project Number	Z21120018
Review Stop	STORM
Sequence Number	4

Notes

Date	Text
2022-12-13 10:46:28	CONDITIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL:

	1. SHOW OUTLINE OF EXFILTRATION TRENCHES ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLANS. CONFIRM THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING WILL
	NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
	2. CONFIRM THE CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE 6 FEET WIDE
	EXFILTRATION TRENCH EAST OF BUILDING A BETWEEN THE
	EXISTING RETAINING WALL AND THE FOOTER FOR THE
	BUILDING. FUTURE MAINTENANCE (I.E. REPLACEMENT) OF THE
	EXFILTRATION TRENCH NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED IF THE
	TRENCH WILL BE LOCATED UNDER ANY BUILDING OVERHANGS.
	3. SHOW AND LABEL (SIZE AND MATERIAL) ALL EXISTING
	UTILITIES IN THE R/W.
	4. CONFIRM THE EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TO BE
	CONNECTED TO IS NOT A BUBBLE-UP STRUCTURE. SHOW
	EXISTING DRAINAGE PIPE CONNECTIONS. PROVIDE PROPOSED
	INVERT ELEVATION FOR PIPE CONNECTION TO EXISTING INLET.
	PROVIDE THE BOTTOM ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION FOR THE
	EXISTING PIPE(S) CONNECTED TO THE INLET.
	5. CALLOUT THE FDOT CURB RAMP STYLE FOR THE MIDBLOCK
	CROSS WALK ON BOTH SIDES OF TAMARIND AVE.
	6. COORDINATE CURBING CALLOUTS ON SHEET C2.3 WITH THE
	CROSS SECTIONS AND THE GRADES ON SHEET C2.1.
	7. COORDINATE THE EAST-WEST LOCATION OF THE DRAINAGE
	STRUCTURES IN THE PARKING LOT WITH THE SECTION A.
	8. PROVIDE SIGNING AND STRIPING FOR THE MIDBLOCK CROSS
	WALK. LABEL THE FDOT CURB RAMP STYLE.
	9. COORDINATE DETAILS FOR THE CONTROL STRUCTURES WITH
	THE DRAINAGE PLAN.
	10. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION AT THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
	FROM THE CNETERLINE OF THE R/W TO 5 FEET PAST THE HIGH
	POINT OF THE DRIVEWAY. SHOW BREAK POINTS, SURFACE
	FEATURES, R/W LINE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM THE R/W TO
	THE DRIVEWAY HIGH POINT AND OTHER BREAK POINTS, TO THE
	BACK OF CURB/EDGE OF PAVEMENT, TO THE R/W CENTERLINE.
	SHOW AND DIMENSION WHERE THE SIDEWALK WILL CROSS THE
	DRIVEWAY.


	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
	11/4/2022 SUBMITTAL. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED COMMENTS ARE
	NOT INCLUDED.

	5. [SATISFIED - SEE COMMENTS UNDER NEW COMMENTS BELOW]
	PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM:
	A. FACE OF BUILDING TO TAMARIND AVE CENTERLINE
	B. FACE OF BUILDING TO GRANT ST CENTERLINE
	C. FACE OF BUILDING TO 19TH ST CENTERLINE
	D. AT PROPOSED DRIVEWAY
	E. FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING ?A?
	F. FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING ?B?

	LABEL STREETS, PROPERTY LINES, SURFACE FEATURES AND
	GENERAL SURFACE SLOPES. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR
	CURBS/CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALKS AND DISTANCE FROM
	PROPERTY LINE TO FACE OF BUILDING. INCLUDE PROPOSED
	PARALLEL PARKING AREAS.




	9. [SATISFIED - NO NEW SIDEWALKS PER PREVIOUS RESPONSE]
	PROVIDE HATCHING PATTERNS FOR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN AND
	FOR NEW/REPLACEMENT SIDEWALKS. ADDITIONAL COMMENT:
	SECTION A ON SHEET C3.2 CALLS OUT NEW SIDEWALK ALONG
	19TH ST AND ALONG GRANT AVE. REVISE SECTION OR ADD
	PROPOSED SIDEWALK HATCH PATTERN ON SHEETS C2.1 AND C2.3
	AND HATCH THE PROPOSED SIDEWALKS.

	10. [SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW ACCESS FROM THE BUILDINGS
	TO THE PARKING LOT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE 4 FT+/-
	GRADE DIFFERENTIAL. ADDITIONAL COMMENT (REVISED FOR
	7/19 SUBMITTAL): PARKING LOT ELEVATION AT EAST END OF
	HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE IS APPROX.. 27.7 FT NAVD. THE
	LANDING AT THE BOTTOM OF 19.0 FT LONG RAMP IS AT
	ELEVATION 26.0 FT NAVD. RAMP SLOPE CALCULATES TO 8.9%,
	WHICH IS STEEPER THAN THE 1:12 ALLOWED FOR NEW
	CONSTRUCTION. THE SOUTH END OF THE 10 FT LONG RAMP IS
	47.5 FEET FROM THE NORTH CORNER OF THE BUILDING B. THE
	SOUTH SIDE OF THE DOOR FRAME OF THE APARTMENT ADJACENT
	TO THE RETAIL SPACE IS 47.08 FEET FROM THE NORTH CORNER
	OF BUILDING B SO THAT THE RAMP WILL BE IN FRONT OF THE
	DOOR.


	20. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? SHOW OUTLINE OF
	EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLANS.



	NEW COMMENTS:

	26. [NOT SATISFIED ??? ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAY NOT
	CONNECT TO THE STRUCTURE IF THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IS
	NOT CONNECTED TO A POSITIVE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.] SHOW ALL
	EXISTING PIPE CONNECTIONS (WITH PIPE SIZES) TO THE
	EXISTING CURB INLET AND THE STRUCTURES THESE PIPES ARE
	CONNECTED TO.

	30. - 33 [NOT SATISFIED ? NOTE PREVIOUS SECTIONS WERE
	REPLACED WITH NEW SECTIONS ON THE 7/19 SUBMITTAL. THE
	COMMENTS BELOW ARE FOR THE NEW SECTIONS.

	30. SECTION A (SHEET C3.2):
	A. SECTION APPEARS TO CORRESPOND TO SECTION B SYMBOL ON
	SHEET C2.1.
	B. CHANGE LABEL OF GRANT AVE TO GRANT ST.
	C. SIDEWALKS ON GRANT ST AND 19TH ST APPEAR TO HAVE
	THICKENED EDGE AT BACK OF SIDEWALK. PROVIDE A DETAIL
	FOR THE SIDEWALK.
	D. DOOR AND WINDOW LAYOUT FOR BUILDINGS A AND B DO NOT
	MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION DRAWINGS.
	E. CONFIRM THE GRADES PROVIDED FOR GRANT ST. THE EP IS
	SHOWN HIGHER THAN THE CENTERLINE.

	31. SECTION B (SHEET C3.2):
	A. [SATISFIED] SECTION APPEARS TO CORRESPOND TO SECTION
	A SYMBOL ON SHEET C2.1.
	B. [SATISFIED] VERIFY ELEVATION FOR EAST SIDE OF DRIVE
	AISLE (29.7).
	C. [SATISFIED] SIDEWALK ALONG TAMARIND AVE APPEARS TO
	HAVE A THICKENED EDGE.
	D. [NOT SATISFIED] CENTER OF DRIVE AISLE APPEARS TO BE
	LOW SPOT (INVERTED CROWN) BUT THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
	ON SHEET C2.1 ARE 14+ FEET FROM THE EAST EDGE OF THE
	PARKING LOT.

	32.[SATISFIED] SECTION C (SHEET C3.2):
	A. THIS SECTION DOESN???T APPEAR TO BE FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING A WIDTH IS CALLED OUT AS 132 FEET
	WHEREAS IN SECTION A THE BUILDING A WIDTH IS 88 FEET.
	B. PROVIDE A SECTION CORRESPONDING TO THE SECTION C
	SYMBOL ON SHEET C2.1.

	36. [NOT SATISFIED] ARCHITECTURAL NORTH AND SOUTH
	ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE MISLABELED ON SHEETS
	A-2.1/A2.2B AND SHEETS A-2.1A/A-2.2A.

	NEW COMMENTS ON 7/19/22 SUBMITTAL:

	37. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE CENTER
	OF THE PARKING LOT TO THE EAST FACE OF BUILDING,
	CENTERED ON THE RAMP FROM THE PARKING LOT TO THE FIRST
	FLOOR SIDEWALK. PROVIDE HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND
	ELEVATIONS AT EACH GRADE BREAK.

	38.[SATISFIED[ LABEL BUILDING A AND BUILDING B ON THE
	CIVIL DRAWINGS.

	39. [NOT SATISFIED] LABEL THE EXISTING UTILITIES (PIPE
	SIZE AND MATERIAL) IN THE RIGHTS OF WAYS.

	40. [SATISFIED] HOW DOES ONE ACCESS BUILDING A FROM THE
	PARKING LOT? THERE DOESN?T APPEAR TO BE A SIDEWALK
	CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS ON THE EAST SIDE
	OF THE BUILDINGS.

	41. [NOT SATISFIED] CALLOUT THE FDOT CURB RAMP STYLE
	FOR THE MIDBLOCK CROSS WALK ON BOTH SIDES OF TAMARIND
	AVE.

	42. [NOT SATISFIED] PROVIDE PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATION
	FOR PIPE CONNECTION TO EXISTING INLET. PROVIDE THE
	BOTTOM ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION FOR THE EXISTING
	PIPE(S) CONNECTED TO THE INLET.

	43. [SATISFIED] SOUTH STAIRWELL OF BUILDING B APPEARS
	TO CONFLICT WITH THE WEST RETAINING WALL OF THE PARKING
	LOT.

	44. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A YARD DRAIN AT WEST END OF THE
	AREA BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS TO COLLECT RUNOFF BEFORE
	IT FLOWS OVER THE SIDEWALK.

	45. [SATISFIED ??? SUGGEST MOVING STRUCTURES S-101 AND
	S-102 SOUTHWARD] SLOPE OF PARKING LOT BETWEEN S-101 AND
	BACK OF SIDEWALK APPEARS TO BE CLOSE TO 9%.

	46. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ??? DOUBLE PROPOSED SPOT
	GRADES PROVIDED FOR EAST EDGE OF PARKING LOT.] SHOW
	CURBING ALONG SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF PARKING LOT ON
	THE CIVIL DRAWINGS. SHEET C2.3 CALLS OUT TYPE D CURB.

	46. [NOT SATISFIED] BIKE LANE STRIPING SHALL FOLLOW THE
	CITY STANDARD DETAILS AND THE MUTCD.

	47. [NOT SATISFIED] SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NEEDED FOR THE
	MID-BLOCK CROSS WALK.

	48. [NOT SATISFIED] REVIEW PIPE SIZES AND INVERT
	ELEVATIONS LISTED ON THE CONTROL STRUCTURE S-104
	DETAILS.

	49. [NOT SATISFIED] REVIEW PIPE MATERIAL LISTED ON THE
	CONTROL STRUCTURE S-102 DETAILS.

	50. [SATISFIED] MOVE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS AREA OUTSIDE
	OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY.

	NEW COMMENT (11/4/2022 SUBMITTAL)
	51. CONFIRM THERE IS SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR THE 6-FOOT
	WIDE EXFILTRATION TRENCH BETWEEN THE EXISTING RETAINING
	WALL AND THE BUILDING A FOOTER AS WELL AS INSTALL THE
	PERIMETER LANDSCAPING.

	TRACY WARD, PE
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	561-494-1120 (O)
	561-351-0510 (M)
	[email protected]



	Print