| Date |
Text |
| 2022-03-25 16:56:18 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE AVAILABLE. |
| | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FULL TRAFFIC STUDY ACCORDING TO |
| | ARTICLE 12. EXCEPTION FROM COUNTY CONCURRENCY DOES NOT |
| | PRECLUDE THE CITY TO REQUIRE AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS. |
| | MAJOR INTERSECTIONS WITHIN THE RDI SHALL BE INCLUDED IN |
| | THE ANALYSIS |
| | A. SATISFIED. PLEASE CAPTION EACH FIGURE. FIGURE 1 |
| | SHOWCASING THE RDI SEEMS MISSING |
| | B. SATISFIED. PLEASE CLEARLY DENOMINATE AND ANALYZE |
| | EACH OF THE FOLLOWING SCENARIO IN THE ANALYSIS: |
| | EXISTING, FUTURE, FUTURE PLUS PROJECT |
| | C. SATISFIED. COORDINATE WITH COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL |
| | DIVISION PERTAINING THE VALIDITY AND FEASIBILITY OF THE |
| | ADOPTED TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | PROOF OF APPROVAL/ACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM THE COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC SIGNAL DIVISION. |
| | D. SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE FUTURE SCENARIO FOR |
| | THE AUSTRALIAN/CLEARWATER INTERSECTION INCLUSIVE OF THE |
| | FERN ST EXTENSION. TO BE FURTHER DISCUSSED. |
| | E. SATISFIED. THE FERN STREET EXTENSION SHALL BE |
| | CAPTURED AND ANALYZED. TO BE FURTHER DISCUSSED. |
| | F. SATISFIED. PER THE OKEECHOBEE BLVD EASTBOUND LEFT |
| | TURN LANE EXTENSION. PROVIDE MORE DETAILED ENGINEERING |
| | DRAWINGS. TO BE FURTHER DISCUSSED. |
| | G. SATISFIED. PER THE OKEECHOBEE BLVD EASTBOUND LEFT |
| | TURN LANE EXTENSION. PROVIDE A MORE IN-DEPTH QUEUE |
| | ANALYSIS, SHOWCASING RESULTS (I.E. BACK OF THE QUEUE) |
| | IN TABULAR AND GRAPHICAL FORM |
| | 3) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS |
| | GENERATING A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS, WHICH MAY |
| | SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM. IN |
| | THAT CASE, PROVIDE TDM STRATEGIES AND ROADWAY |
| | IMPROVEMENTS TO MITIGATE SUCH IMPACTS. FURTHER TDM |
| | MEASUREMENTS SHALL BE DISCUSSED AND ADOPTED. TO BE |
| | FURTHER DISCUSSED. APPLICANT TO PROVIDE A DRAFT TDM |
| | DOCUMENT PRIOR TO CONDITIONAL APPROVAL. |
| | 4) SATISFIED. A METHODOLOGY MEETING SHOULD BE SCHEDULED |
| | PRIOR TO THE TRAFFIC STUDY REVISION AND TDM STRATEGIES |
| | PROPOSAL. |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING |
| | ONLY TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER, |
| | SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY, |
| | WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE, |
| | PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS. |
| | LATEST SUBMISSION (2/21/2022) DOES NOT SHOW STOP OR |
| | YIELD PAVEMENT MARKINGS, NOR THE CORRESPONDING SIGNAGE. |
| | LATEST SUBMISSION (3/11/2022) DOES NOT HAVE ALL THE |
| | REQUESTED FEATURES OR THEY ARE NOT CLEARLY LEGIBLE & |
| | IDENTIFIABLE, PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLAN WITHIN THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION FOLDER, WITHOUT NON-RELEVANT ITEMS (E.G. |
| | DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, ETC.) |
| | 6) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC |
| | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE |
| | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET |
| | NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURES. |
| | 7) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES |
| | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A |
| | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND |
| | SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. |
| | 8) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 |
| | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR |
| | THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2? |
| | SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL |
| | PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT). PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME |
| | AND SHEET NUMBER SHOWCASING SUCH FEATURE. THE PROPOSED |
| | PAD IS NOT EASILY ACCESSIBLE BY THE PUBLIC, IT MUST BE |
| | RELOCATED NEARBY THE HOTEL OR CONFERENCE CENTER |
| | ENTRANCES BY THE ROUNDABOUT. CONSIDERING THE EXTENT OF |
| | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT A LARGER AREA SHOULD BE |
| | DEDICATED (E.G. 15 X 30) |
| | 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES. JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT DOES NOT PROVIDE ADA NOR BICYCLE PARKING |
| | BREAKDOWN. PLEASE REVISE AND PROPERLY MARK THE LOCATION |
| | OF BICYCLE STALLS AND CORRESPONDING DOCUMENT NAME AND |
| | SHEET NUMBER. PERTAINING ADA PARKING REQUIREMENTS, |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE EXACT TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES, AS "OVER |
| | 1,000" IS NOT ACCEPTABLE CONSIDERING THE ADA CRITERIA |
| | (ONE FOR EACH 100 OVER 1,000). NOTE: THE ADA PARKING |
| | SPACES FOR GATEWAY PARK SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | REQUIRED TOTAL FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. SHEET |
| | A0.02 DOES NOT CONTAIN THE REQUESTED INFORMATION. |
| | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A DECELERATION LANE FOR THE |
| | OKEECHOBEE BLVD DRIVEWAY |
| | 11) SATISFIED. PLEASE INSTALL A FULL ROUNDABOUT SO TO |
| | ALLOW ALL MOVEMENTS |
| | 12) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MULTIUSE PATH ALONG OKEECHOBEE |
| | BLVD SIMILAR, IF NOT EXACTLY AS THE ONE EAST OF |
| | TAMARIND AVE. COMMENT WILL BE SATISFIED ONCE THE |
| | MULTIUSE PATH IS SHOWN ON SITE PLANS AND A DETAILED |
| | PROFILE DRAWING PROVIDED. COMMENT WILL BE SATISFIED |
| | ONCE PACKAGE IS PROVIDED OR WILL BE CONVERTED AS A |
| | CONDITIONAL APPROVAL |
| | 13) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE DETAILS OF SIGNAGE AND |
| | WAYFINDING FOR PARK PATRONS NEARBY SITE ENTRANCE AND BY |
| | THE SURFACE PARKING LOT. COMMENT WILL BE SATISFIED ONCE |
| | PACKAGE IS PROVIDED OR WILL BE CONVERTED AS A |
| | CONDITIONAL APPROVAL |
| | 14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. INSTALL SIGNAGE RESTRICTING |
| | USAGE OF CITY STALLS TO PARK PATRONS ONLY AND |
| | PROHIBITING OVERNIGHT PARKING. COMMENT WILL BE |
| | SATISFIED ONCE PACKAGE IS PROVIDED OR WILL BE CONVERTED |
| | AS A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL |
| | 15) SATISFIED. DESIGNATE TWO OF THE CITY STALLS NEARBY |
| | THE PARK ENTRANCE AS HANDICAP, DESIGN THEM PER ADA |
| | STANDARDS ACCORDINGLY. PLEASE MOVE SUCH SPACES CLOSER |
| | OR IN FRONT OF PARK ENTRANCE |
| | 16) SATISFIED. ON SHEET A0.06 THE PARKING STALLS ON THE |
| | NORTH-EAST CORNER OF THE GARAGE SEEMS IN CONFLICT, |
| | PLEASE REVISE AND CLEARLY INDICATE THE PEDESTRIAN-ONLY |
| | AREA SURROUNDING THE STAIRCASE ACCESS |
| | 17) SATISFIED. INSERT VEHICULAR DIRECTIONAL MARKINGS IN |
| | SHEET A0.08, SIMILAR TO SHEET A0.05 |
| | 18) SATISFIED. THE TURNING RADIUS AND VEHICLE |
| | MANEUVERING ON AND OFF THE GARAGE RAMP SEEMS EXTREMELY |
| | TIGHT AND DANGEROUS. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS |
| | DEPICTING A VEHICLE ACCESSING THE GARAGE, DRIVING UP |
| | AND THROUGH THE SECOND FLOOR AND BACK OUT. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE GARAGE AUTOTURN DRAWINGS AS MENTIONED IN THE |
| | COMMENT RESPONSE OR INDICATE SHEET NUMBER IF ALREADY |
| | PROVIDED |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
