| Date |
Text |
| 2022-02-10 08:43:47 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG. |
| | SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] : |
| | |
| | PLEASE SEND CCTV FILES AND REPORTS TO ME AT RICK |
| | ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG. SERVICES DEPT., 401 |
| | CLEMATIS ST., 4TH FL., 561-494-1098 [email protected]. |
| | FLASH DRIVE, DISC OR D/L LINK ARE ALL OK. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE |
| | SUPERVISOR, [email protected]; 561-822-2262 |
| | |
| | -EXISTING FIRELINE LOCATED NORTH OF RESTAURANT SHOWING |
| | AS 8 INCH IN OUR COMPUTER SYSTEM. SECTION OF WATER |
| | PIPING RUNNING SOUTH FROM NORTH ENTRANCE CANNOT |
| | ACCOMMODATE TWO ADDITIONAL FIRELINES SINCE THE WATER |
| | MAIN BRANCH IS ONLY 8 INCH. UPGRADES OR REVISIONS ARE |
| | NEEDED. |
| | |
| | -ON WATER PLAN, PLEASE LABEL ABOVE-GROUND CATV UTILITY |
| | BOX SOUTHEAST OF FIRE HYDRANT NEAR NORTH ENTRANCE. |
| | |
| | -PER WPB SANITARY COLLECTIONS DEPARTMENT, CITY |
| | INFRASTRUCTURE RUNS FROM EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE |
| | NUMBER 8 NORTHWARD. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SANITARY |
| | SEWER PIPES AND MANHOLES RUNNING SOUTHWEST AND |
| | SOUTHEAST FROM SANITARY MANHOLE NUMBER 8 WOULD BE |
| | PRIVATELY-OWNED. |
| | |
| | -UTILITY EASEMENTS NOT REQUIRED FOR PRIVATELY-OWNED |
| | SANITARY SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE ON SITE. |
| | |
| | -ARE THERE ANY SEWER LATERALS BETWEEN EXISTING BUILDING |
| | AND EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE NUMBER 10? |
| | |
| | -IS THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORAGE FOR OBJECTS OR FOR |
| | STORMWATER? |
| | |
| | -CIVIL PLANS SHOW FOUR LARGE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS IN |
| | THE ROUNDABOUT NEAR SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | -CONTRACTORS ARE CURRENTLY REPLACING THE LARGE UTILITY |
| | POLES NEAR EAST SIDE OF PROPERTY WITH BIGGER POLES. |
| | SHOW THE POLES ON THE CIVIL PLANS AND ENSURE NO |
| | CONFLICTS. ENSURE THAT ANY TREES PLANTED NEAR THEM WILL |
| | NOT TOUCH THE OVERHEAD WIRES. |
| | |
| | -PLANS SHOW CAF? IN PROPOSED CONFERENCE BUILDING. |
| | VERIFY IF GREASE TRAP NEEDED AND SHOW ON PLANS IF |
| | OUTDOORS. |
| | |
| | -PRIOR SUBMITTED REVIEW COMMENT ABOUT CONCRETE PAD. |
| | STILL DO NOT SEE IT ON PLANS. IT?S LOCATED AT THE FAR |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY NORTH OF CHILLER. |
| | |
| | -SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FDC. THERE ARE SOME |
| | NEAR THE NORTHWEST AREA OF EXISTING BUILDING NOT SHOWN |
| | ON WATER PLAN. CANNOT SEE ANY FOR GARAGE BUILDING OR 25 |
| | STORY BUILDING. |
| | |
| | -LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW IMPROVEMENTS ON CITY PROPERTY AT |
| | EAST SIDE. DID APPLICANT GET APPROVAL FROM CITY WPB AND |
| | LESSEE? |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED LANDSCAPING APPEARS TO ENCROACH ONTO FDOT |
| | PROPERTY AT NORTHEAST AREA OF PROPERTY. DOES FDOT |
| | APPROVE OF THAT? |
| | |
| | -SOME ASPECTS OF CIVIL PLANS DO NOT MATCH LANDSCAPING |
| | PLANS. PLEASE ENSURE THEY ARE BOTH UPDATED. CIVIL PLANS |
| | DO NOT SHOW CROSSWALK GOING TO GARAGE BUILDING FROM THE |
| | EAST OR THE LONG SIDEWALK ON CITY PARCEL. |
| | |
| | -CROSSWALK NEAR SOUTHEAST CORNER OF GARAGE BUILDING |
| | SEEMS TO DEADEND DUE TO LANDSCAPING BUSHES. |
| | |
| | -ENSURE NO TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE PLANTED ABOVE 36 |
| | INCH WATER MAIN. |
| | |
| | -LANDSCAPING APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED METERS |
| | AND BACKFLOWS FOR 25 STORY BUILDING. |
| | |
| | -DOES THE GARAGE BUILDING NEED A METERED WATER SERVICE |
| | FOR DOMESTIC WATER? |
| | |
| | -IS A METERED WATER SERVICE FOR IRRIGATION NEEDED? |
| | |
| | -PLEASE PROVIDE THE VEHICLE CLEARANCE HEIGHT OF THE |
| | PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AND THE GARAGE CROSSING. |
| | |
| | -WILL 25 STORY BUILDING HAVE RESTAURANT OR FOOD SERVICE |
| | REQUIRING GREASE TRAP? IF ONE REQUIRED AND WILL BE |
| | INSTALLED OUTDOORS, SHOW ON CIVIL PLANS. |
| | |
| | -SITE PLANS INDICATE WATER FEATURES IN ROUNDABOUT |
| | ISLANDS NEAR SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY, BUT LANDSCAPING |
| | PLANS SHOW TREES THERE. ARE THEY INCORRECT, OR ARE |
| | THERE BOTH TREES AND WATER FEATURES IN THE ISLANDS? |
| | |
| | -RECEIVED REVIEW COMMENT RESPONSE THAT EXISTING |
| | FIRELINE HAS A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. VISITED SITE AND |
| | COULD ONLY LOCATE SWING CHECK IN SIDEWALK VAULT. IT IS |
| | NOT A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AND DOES NOT OFFER THAT LEVEL |
| | OF WATER SYSTEM PROTECTION. UPON FURTHER REVIEW MAY |
| | NEED TO BE UPGRADED TO ABOVE-GROUND DCDA BACKFLOW |
| | ASSEMBLY. RECOMMEND PLANNING AHEAD OF TIME ESPECIALLY |
| | BECAUSE RELOCATION OUT OF SIDEWALK WOULD BE LIKELY. |
| | |
| | -SOME ASPECTS OF PROPOSED WATER SERVICES FOR 25 STORY |
| | BUILDING AND CONFERENCE BUILDING SEEM PROBLEMATIC AND |
| | SUBOPTIMAL. WOULD LIKE TO REVIEW IN MORE DETAIL WITH |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD NOW TO PREVENT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES |
| | AT FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CONTACT |
| | [email protected]. |
| | |
| |
Print |
