| Date |
Text |
| 2023-05-17 14:03:04 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) SATISFIED - PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL |
| | FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY'S |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040. |
| | |
| | 2.) SATISFIED - PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT |
| | DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR UTILITY EASEMENTS OR |
| | OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR |
| | SERVICES: AT&T, FPL, FPU AND COMCAST. |
| | |
| | 3.) SATISFIED - IS THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC |
| | DIVISION AWARE THAT THE PROPOSED PARK REDEVELOPMENT |
| | PROJECT INCLUDES A NEW 8,795 SQ. FT. RESILIENCY HUB AND |
| | A 9,387 SQ. FT. CAFE/RESTAURANT? THE TPS LETTER |
| | PROVIDED (DATED 11/18/2021) TO STAFF DOES NOT |
| | ACKNOWLEDGE THESE IMPROVEMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE EMAIL |
| | DOCUMENTATION WITH THE COUNTY'S TRAFFIC DIVISION THAT |
| | THEY ACKNOWLEDGE THESE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE 11/18/2021 |
| | TPS LETTER OR OBTAIN A REVISED TPS LETTER WITH THE |
| | PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PARK CLEARLY NOTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PARTIALLY SATTISFIED - A NOTE STATING: "MAIN PARK |
| | ENTRANCE SHALL ALIGN WITH FUTURE NORTHWOOD ROAD |
| | EXTENSION" ADDED IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET C3.06). THE |
| | APPLICANT SHALL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH CITY STAFF ON THE |
| | ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN PARK ENTRANCE WITH THE ROADWAY |
| | EXTENSION ONCE THE DETAILS ON THE ROADWAY EXTENSION HAS |
| | BEEN FINALIZED (CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS). AT THAT TIME, |
| | THE SITE PLAN SHALL BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THE FINAL |
| | PARK ENTRANCE CONFIGURATION AT THE NORTHWOOD ROAD |
| | EXTENSION. A CONDITION OF APPROVAL WILL BE ADDED. THE |
| | APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH PLANNING STAFF ON THE |
| | ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN PARK ENTRANCE WITH THE FUTURE |
| | NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION. A NOTE STATING |
| | |
| | 2.) SATISFIED - EMAIL CONFORMATION FROM SAMANTHA BROWNE |
| | OF FDEP ON 01.12.2023, CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | SUNTRAIL REROUTE DOES NOT NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE FLORIDA |
| | GREENWAYS AND TRAILS (FGTS) PLANNING CORRIDOR. THE FGTS |
| | PLANNING COORIDOR IS MAPPED BY FDEP. THE NOTED |
| | "PROPOSED SUN TRAIL" (SEE SHEET C0.01) APPEARS TO BE |
| | INCONSISTENT WITH THE LINKAGE TO THE ACTUAL SUN TRAIL |
| | NETWORK AS PROVIDED ON THE FDOT WEBSITE. PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | IN THE PLANS. THE PROPOSED TRAIL SHOULD LINK TO THE |
| | ACTUAL NETWORK. IF THE INTENT IS TO REROUTE THE SUN |
| | TRAIL, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION, STEPS TO MODIFY |
| | AND COORDINATION WITH FDOT TO ACHIEVE THE REROUTE. |
| | |
| | 3.) PARTIALLY SATISFIED - CHANGES FROM LAST REVIEW |
| | CYCLE HAVE BEEN DETECTED IN THE REVISED PLAN SHEETS. |
| | ALL KEY PLANS AND DETAIL SHEETS SHALL BE CONSISTENT AND |
| | ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 3.1) THE PROPOSED "OUTDOOR DINING PLAZA" (#13 IN THE |
| | KEY PLAN) SHOULD ALSO REFERENCE THE CAFE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 3.2) #15 IN THE KEY PLAN REFERENCES A PUMP STATION; |
| | HOWEVER, THIS SHOULD BE CORRECTED TO LIFT STATION FOR |
| | ACCURACY. |
| | |
| | 3.3) THE PROPOSED MICROMOBILITY STATION (#16 IN THE KEY |
| | PLAN) IS NOT PROVIDED IN THE DETAIL SHEETS. AT MINIMUM, |
| | A PLACEHOLDER SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 3.4) PER DISCUSSION WITH THE ADMINSTATOR OF PUBLIC ART |
| | AND CULTURE, THE KEY PLAN AND DETAILS SHALL REFERENCE |
| | THE LOCATION OF THE INTERACTIVE SCULPTURE/PUBLIC ART. |
| | |
| | 4.) SATISFIED - GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE |
| | (SHEET C3.00) APPEARS TO BE MISSING INFORMATION ON THE: |
| | A) PROVIDED LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS B) PROVIDED LOT |
| | COVERAGE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE C) PROVIDED MAXIMUM |
| | BUILDING HEIGHT D) PROVIDED FAR. |
| | |
| | 5.) PARTIALLY SATIFISFIED - STORAGE BUILDING/KIOSK |
| | BUILDING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED BUT ARE INCONSISTENT |
| | WITH THE ARCHITECTURL DRAWINGS. IS THE BUILDING SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE FOR THE PROPOSED 15 FT. X 30 FT. STORAGE |
| | BUILDING/KIOSK LOCATED IN THE AREA OF THE FITNESS LAWN |
| | INCLUDED IN THE BUILDING CALCULATIONS? |
| | |
| | 6.) SATISFIED - ARTIFICIAL TURF REMOVED FROM THE PLANS. |
| | PLANS STILL SHOWS THAT ARTIFICIAL TURF WILL BE USED IN |
| | THE FITNESS LAWN AREA. AS DISCUSSED AT PREVIOUS |
| | MEETINGS WITH STAFF, ARTIFICIAL TURF IS NOT A PERMITTED |
| | MATERIAL. [ZLDR S.94-451] |
| | |
| | 7.) PARTIALLY SATISFIED - LOCATION OF ART BETWEEN THE |
| | SPLASH PAD AND RESILIENCY HUB APPROVED BY THE |
| | ADMINSTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND CULTURE ON 05.16.2023. |
| | PLEASE LABEL IN ALL PLAN SHEETS AND KEY PLAN SHEETS THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE "INTERACTIVE SCULPTURE/PUBLIC ART." THE |
| | PROPOSED PUBLIC ART PLATFORM IS CURRENTLY LOCATED |
| | BETWEEN THE SPORTS COURTS AND RESILIENCY HUB. CONSIDER |
| | RELOCATING THE PLATFORM TO AN AREA THAT COULD GENERATE |
| | BETTER INTERACTION WITH PARK USERS OR CREATE SPACE |
| | AROUND THE PLATFORM THAT WOULD GENERATE PEDESTRIAN |
| | ACTIVITY. |
| | |
| | 8.) SATISFIED - PLANS NOW SHOWS A BUILDING SEPARATION |
| | OF 69.33 FT. BETWEEN THE RESILIANCY HUB AND CAF?? |
| | BUILDING. WHAT IS THE BUILDING SEPARATION BETWEEN THE |
| | PROPOSED RESILIENCY HUB AND CAFE PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | DIMENSION IN THE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE MINIMUM 25 FT. BUILDING SEPARATION. |
| | |
| | 9.) SATISFIED - 05.09.2023 EMAIL FROM KEVIN VOLBRECHT, |
| | DIRECTOR OF EGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, STATING |
| | THAT THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS (FOUR (4) IN TOTAL) ARE |
| | APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE |
| | CURRIE PARK REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO |
| | S.94-312(3) OF THE ZLDRS. PER ZLDR S.94-312(1), ONLY |
| | ONE (1) ACCESS POINT IS PERMITTED UNLESS APPROVED BY |
| | THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED |
| | NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS INTO THE SITE. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-312(3)] |
| | |
| | 10.) SATISFIED - PLAN SHOWS 122.58 FT. FROM THE |
| | STORAGE/KIOSK TO THE PROPERTY LINE. THERE IS A PROPOSED |
| | STORAGE/KIOSK BUILDING LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE |
| | FITNESS LAWN. THE BUILDING SETBACK DISTANCE HAS NOT |
| | BEEN PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT A MINIMUM BUILDING |
| | SETBACK OF 25 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S) IS |
| | REQUIRED. [ZLDR S.94-204] |
| | |
| | 11.) SATISFIED - THE RECONSTRUCTION OF 26TH STREET IS |
| | NEAR COMPLETION AND THE NEW LAYOUT OF 26TH STREET SHALL |
| | BE REFLECTED ACCURATELY IN THE PLANS TO ILLUSTRATE HOW |
| | THE IMPROVEMENT WILL IMPACT THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT |
| | INTO THE PARKS NORTH ENTRANCE. |
| | |
| | 12.) SATISFIED - STRUCTURE IDENTIFIED AS A "SMALL CRAFT |
| | SELF LAUNCH" IN THE PLANS. THERE APPEARS TO BE A NEW |
| | STRUCTURE ATTACHED TO THE NORTHERN MOST EXISTING DOCK |
| | TO REMAIN. WHAT IS THIS STRUCTURE? PLEASE IDENTIFY IN |
| | THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 13.) SATISFIED - AUTOTURN DIAGRAM PROVIDED. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY HOW BOAT TRAILER TRAFFIC WILL ENTER AND |
| | CIRCULATE THROUGH THE PARK SITE. PER THE CHANGES TO THE |
| | CMUD REGULATIONS AND VISION, THE INTENT IS TO KEEP BOAT |
| | TRAILER TRAFFIC OFF THE NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION. |
| | |
| | 14.) SATSIFIED - CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE OF |
| | ALL STRUCTURES. ALL STRUCTURES MUST COMPLY WITH THE |
| | MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 15.) SATISFIED - AUTOTURN DIAGRAM PROVIDED. AN |
| | AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM FOR LARGER VEHICLES/BOAT TRAILERS |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE SAFE MANEUVERING |
| | OF LARGER VEHICLES/TRAILERS THROUGH THE PARK SITE. |
| | |
| | 16.) SATISFIED - BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE EVENLY |
| | DISTRIBUTED THROUGH THE PARK. CONSIDER ADDING |
| | ADDITIONAL RACKS NEAR THE SPORTS COURTS. |
| | |
| | 17.) SATISFIED - DETAILS PROVIDED IN SHEET C3.10. |
| | BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IS REQUIRED. THE RACK DETAIL SHALL |
| | BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY'S BICYCLE |
| | PARKING GUIDELINES. CONTACT PLANNING STAFF FOR THE |
| | BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES MANUAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | PARKING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PARTIALLY SATISFIED - INCONSISTENCIES STILL |
| | DETECTED IN THE BOAT TRAILER PARKING NUMBERS AND ON |
| | STREET/OFFSITE PARKING. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS STILL |
| | DOES NOT ADD UP IN THE PLAN SET. CALCULATIONS PROVIDED |
| | MUST MATCH THE PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS THE PARKING |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING: A) ON SITE BOAT AND |
| | TRAILER PARKING; B) ON SITE SINGLE VEHICLE PARKING C) |
| | ON STREET PARKING D) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 2.) NOT SATISFIED - STALL STRIPING DETAIL PROVIDED IS |
| | NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S STRIPING STANDARDS FOR |
| | PARKING. A PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. THE STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH |
| | THE STRIPING REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. [ZLDR S.94-485] |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: |
| | |
| | 1.) SATISFIED - ALL SIGNAGE PLACE HOLDERS REMOVED IN |
| | ELEVATIONS. A NOTE ON THE ELEVATIONAL DRAWINGS STATING |
| | THAT "ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH ARTICLE |
| | XIII, SIGN REGULATIONS, OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS)" SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2.) PARTIALLY SATISIFED - BUILDING HEIGHT TO THE TOP OF |
| | THE PARAPET FOR THE EVENT PAVILION PROVIDED; HOWEVER, |
| | THE BUILDING HEIGHT (TOP OF PARAPET) NOT PROVIDED FOR |
| | THE CAF?? BUILDING. BUILDING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS MUST BE |
| | PROVIDED TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE BUILDING. THIS WAS |
| | NOT PROVIDED IN THE LATEST SET OF ARCHITECTURAL |
| | DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 3.) NOT SATISFIED. THE KEY PLAN AND BUILDING SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGES PROVIDED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (EVENT |
| | PAVILION, CAFE BUILDING AND KIOSK) ARE STILL |
| | INCONSISTENT WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE DATA |
| | TABULARS. THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | STILL INCONSISTENT BETWEEN THE BUILDING CALCULATIONS |
| | PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN AND THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. |
| | THE BUILDING CALCULATIONS MUST MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | |
| | 4.) NOT SATISFIED - ALTHOUGH THE PLANS ARE STILL A WORK |
| | IN PROGRESS, SIGNED AND SEALED FINAL PLANS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A SITE PLAN APPROVAL |
| | LETTER. FINAL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED ARCHITECT. THE LATEST |
| | PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | 6.) NEW COMMENT - HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE |
| | MEASURED FROM THE GROUND ELEVATION FROM THE OUTSIDE OF |
| | THE WALL (NOT THE FFE) TO THE TOP OF THE PARPAPET OF |
| | EACH BUILDING. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY PRIOR TO |
| | RESUBMITTING. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE INCLUDE ALL REVISION DATES IN THE PLAN SHEETS. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) |
| | FULL COLORED PAPER COPIES, AND ONE COPY IN 11 INCHES X |
| | 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES TO THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTES AND CONDITIONS: |
| | |
| | * PRIVATE USES OR STRUCTURES WITHIN THIS DISTRICT ARE |
| | PROHIBITED UNLESS A CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR SUCH |
| | ACTIVITIES IS GRANTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-204 - APPLICANT HAS ALSO NOTED AND ACKNOWLEGED |
| | STANDARD IN THE PLANS.] |
| | |
| | * ADDITIONAL APPROVAL FROM THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER |
| | MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SFWMD) SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. |
| | SUCH APPROVAL SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE |
| | OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED |
| | WITHIN THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. |
| | |
| |
Print |
