| Date |
Text |
| 2023-06-22 02:40:52 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER |
| | 2) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. A COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE SCHEDULE A METHODOLOGY MEETING |
| | WITH THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING GROUP, PRIOR TO REVISING |
| | OR RESUBMITTING THE TRAFFIC STUDY. PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | 3) NOT SATISFIED. IN THE TRIP GENERATION TABLE ADD THE |
| | CAF?? PAVILION AS A TRIP GENERATOR. EMAIL EXCHANGE DID |
| | NOT WAVE THIS ITEM |
| | 4) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A FIGURE SHOWCASING |
| | DRIVEWAY(S) VOLUMES AND DIRECTIONAL SPLIT, BOTH INBOUND |
| | AND OUTBOUND. EMAIL EXCHANGE DID NOT WAVE THIS ITEM |
| | 5) SATISFIED. PROVIDE EXISTING WEEKEND TRAFFIC COUNTS. |
| | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN IN |
| | THE TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | 7) NOT SATISFIED. A DETAILED INTERNAL CIRCULATION |
| | ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY OR AS |
| | A SEPARATE DOCUMENT |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 8) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAN SITE PLAN, SHOWCASING |
| | ONLY TRANSPORTATION FEATURES (I.E. ROAD, CURB, GUTTER, |
| | SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKING, SIGNAGE, PATHWAY, |
| | WALKWAY, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, LOADING ZONE, |
| | PICK-UP/DROP-OFF AREA) AND CORRESPONDING DIMENSIONS. A |
| | SPECIFIC AND SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHEET SHOULD BE |
| | PROVIDED TO FULFILL THIS COMMENT, AS SEVERAL DIMENSIONS |
| | ARE MISSING FOR KEY TRANSPORTATION ITEMS. PAVEMENT |
| | MARKINGS AND DIMENSIONS SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR ALL |
| | TRAVEL LANES; THE LATEST PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGNAGE |
| | PLANS ARE DEFICIENT. |
| | 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS |
| | AND TYPOLOGY (I.E. NORMAL, COMPACT, TRAILER). MARK OR |
| | PROPERLY LABEL EACH OF THEM ON THE SITE PLAN |
| | 10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE |
| | SHOWCASE BASIC CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING |
| | STALLS IF ANY) ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS |
| | SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. PARKING STALL |
| | MARKINGS ARE MISSING. PLEASE INCLUDE THEM IN THE |
| | PAVEMENT MARKING AND SIGNAGE PLANS |
| | 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES |
| | CLEARLY DEFINED. ALSO PROVIDE ANALYSIS FOR TYPICAL |
| | TRUCK WITH BOAT TRAILER. INSERT DESIGN VEHICLES DETAILS |
| | IN THE DRAWING. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET |
| | NUMBER SHOWCASING THE ANALYSIS. LATEST ANALYSIS IS NOT |
| | PROPER, ENGINEERING SERVICES CAN PROVIDE A SAMPLE |
| | ANALYSIS FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES |
| | 12) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 |
| | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS. FOR |
| | THE LATTER ITEM, MORE SPECIFICALLY: A CONDUIT (2??? |
| | SCHEDULE 40 PVC) TO THE POWER SOURCE WITH AN ELECTRICAL |
| | PULL BOX (240V CIRCUIT). |
| | 13) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF DESIGNATED PARKING SPACES, INCLUSIVE OF ADA, |
| | SPECIALTY OR RESTRICTED SUCH AS TRAILERS, AND BICYCLE |
| | ONES. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENT NAME AND SHEET NUMBER |
| | SHOWCASING SUCH TABLE |
| | 14) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AND INDICATE FREIGHT |
| | DELIVERY LOADING ZONE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS IN THE |
| | TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN. NOTE: THE DESIGNATED |
| | AREA SHOULD BE STRICTLY FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES AND |
| | SHOULD BE MARKED AND SIGNED ACCORDINGLY |
| | 15) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SIDEWALK WITH 10 FEET MINIMUM |
| | WIDTH ALONG SITE FRONTAGE. IMPLEMENTATION OF A MULTIUSE |
| | PATHWAY, WITH DISTINCT BICYCLE LANES IS STRONGLY |
| | ENCOURAGED, MINIMUM WIDTH SHOULD BE 15-FEET |
| | 16) SATISFIED. ARE THERE ANY DESIGNATED |
| | PICK-UP/DROP-OFF OR VALET AREAS? IF SO CLEARLY INDICATE |
| | THEM ON THE SITE PLAN. COMMENT IS REFERRING TO |
| | PASSENGER PICK-UP/DROP-OFF OPERATIONS, NOT COMMERCIAL |
| | LOADING/UNLOADING. IN CASE OF THE FORMER, A VALET |
| | OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED |
| | 17) SATISFIED. THERE IS A CONCEPT TO EXTEND NORTHWOOD |
| | RD TO FLAGLER, AND POTENTIALLY INSTALL A ROUNDABOUT IN |
| | LIEU OF AN INTERSECTION. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH |
| | PLANNING AND CRA ON THIS ITEM, AS IT MAY AFFECT THE |
| | LAYOUT OF THE PARKING AREA AND THE ALIGNMENT OF THE |
| | DRIVEWAYS. |
| | 18) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A PAVEMENT MARKING AND |
| | SIGNAGE PLAN. THIS SHOULD BE A SEPARATE SITE PLAN SHEET |
| | OR INCLUDED IN THE TRANSPORTATION SPECIFIC SITE PLAN. |
| | LATEST PLANS ARE MISSING SEVERAL MARKINGS AND |
| | DIMENSIONS |
| | 19) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATED AND PROTECTED |
| | TWO-WAY BIKE LANE ALONG THE EASTERN SIDE OF FLAGLER DR |
| | ACCORDING TO THE CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN. THIS IS A |
| | MAJOR ITEM, PLEASE CONTACT ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR |
| | FURTHER DISCUSSION OR CLARIFICATIONS. DUE TO FULL |
| | REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PARK, THERE ARE NO REASONS THAT |
| | PRECLUDE ESTABLISHING A 14-FEET WIDE SHARED USE PATHWAY |
| | THROUGHOUT. PER FDOT SHARED USE PATHWAY GUIDELINES |
| | SECTION 224.7: PROVIDE A 4-FOOT CLEAR AREA ADJACENT TO |
| | BOTH SIDES OF THE PATH, INCLUDING PLACEMENT OF SIGNS. |
| | FOR RESTRICTED CONDITIONS, BRIDGE ABUTMENTS, SIGNPOSTS, |
| | FENCING AND RAILING MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN 4 FEET OF THE |
| | EDGE OF PAVEMENT, BUT NOT LESS THAN 2 FEET. PLEASE |
| | REVISE ACCORDINGLY |
| | 20) SHEET C5.00. BASED ON THE PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, |
| | SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS, THE OVERALL INTERNAL |
| | CIRCULATION ESPECIALLY NEARBY THE BOAT LAUNCH AREA DOES |
| | NOT SEEM OPTIMAL NOR CONDUCIVE TO SAFE OPERATIONS. |
| | GENERAL VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS MIXED WITH THE |
| | BOAT-TRAILING ONE. IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED TO |
| | REDESIGN THE PARKING LOT LAYOUT AND VALIDATE ITS |
| | CONFIGURATION WITH A PROPER INTERNAL CIRCULATION |
| | ANALYSIS |
| | 21) SHEET C5.01. SEVERAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND |
| | DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING, PROVIDE A 14-FEET WIDE MULTIUSE |
| | PATHWAY. THE INTERSECTION OF BUTLER AND FLAGLER MUST BE |
| | PROPERLY AND ENTIRELY DEPICTED, INCLUSIVE OF ALL |
| | PERTINENT TRANSPORTATION FEATURES; THAT IS NECESSARY TO |
| | VALIDATE THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN DRIVEWAY LOCATION AND |
| | CONFIGURATION |
| | 22) SHEET C5.02. SEVERAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND |
| | DIMENSIONS FOR KEY TRANSPORTATION ITEMS (I.E. TRAVEL |
| | LANES, OPPOSITE SIDE MARKINGS) ARE MISSING |
| | 23) SHEET C.5.03. PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS 14-FEET SHARED |
| | USE PATHWAY |
| | 24) SHEET C5.04. TRANSPORTATION FEATURES SUCH AS RAMPS |
| | AND CROSSWALKS FOR THE INTERSECTION OF 23RD AND FLAGLER |
| | ARE EITHER MISSING OR GROSSLY DEPICTED. SEVERAL OTHER |
| | MARKINGS AND DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING |
| | 25) SHEET C5.06. DRAFT ROADWAY CONFIGURATIONS FOR THE |
| | PLANNED NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION SHOULD BE AVAILABLE |
| | FOR INTEGRATION AND PROPER CONFIGURATION OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DRIVEWAY; PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. SEVERAL |
| | DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING (I.E. TRAVEL LANES, DRIVE |
| | AISLES). THE CROSSWALK BY THE INTERNAL DRIVE AISLE |
| | SHOULD BE BETTER DEPICTED AND CONFIGURED AS A RAISED |
| | ONE. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES ARE NOT PERTINENT, |
| | PLEASE DO NOT SHOW THAT LAYER |
| | 26) SHEET C5.08. PROPERLY RE-ALIGN THE DRIVEWAY |
| | CROSSWALK, SEVERAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND DIMENSIONS |
| | MISSING |
| | 27) SHEET C5.09. A FEW DIMENSIONS MISSING. INSTALL |
| | DO-NOT-ENTER AND/OR DIRECTIONAL ARROW SIGNAGE AT THE |
| | INTERNAL INTERSECTION ALONG THE NORTHERN ONE-WAY DRIVE |
| | AISLE |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
