| Date |
Text |
| 2022-09-22 12:58:14 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY'S |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE REQUIRED |
| | LETTER FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS NOT |
| | BEEN PROVIDED. THE LETTER SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO |
| | THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THEIR UTILITY EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE |
| | WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPL, FPU |
| | AND COMCAST. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REAPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE |
| | REQUIRED LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITIES HAVE NOT |
| | BEEN PROVIDED IN THE RESUBMITTAL. THE LETTERS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVAL LETTER.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 3.) IS THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION AWARE |
| | THAT THE PROPOSED PARK REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT INCLUDES A |
| | NEW 8,795 SQ. FT. RESILIENCY HUB AND A 9,387 SQ. FT. |
| | CAFE/RESTAURANT? THE TPS LETTER PROVIDED (DATED |
| | 11/18/2021) TO STAFF DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THESE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE EMAIL DOCUMENTATION WITH |
| | THE COUNTY'S TRAFFIC DIVISION THAT THEY ACKNOWLEDGE |
| | THESE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE 11/18/2021 TPS LETTER OR |
| | OBTAIN A REVISED TPS LETTER WITH THE PROPOSED |
| | IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PARK CLEARLY NOTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH PLANNING STAFF ON THE |
| | ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN PARK ENTRANCE WITH THE FUTURE |
| | NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: ALTHOUGH THE DETAILS ON THE |
| | EXACT ALIGNMENT WITH THE FUTURE NORTHWOOD ROAD |
| | EXTENSION IS STILL BEING WORKED OUT, A NOTE SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED IN THE PLANS THAT STATES THAT THE MAIN PARK |
| | ENTRANCE (SOUTHERN ENTRANCE) INTO THE PARK SHALL ALIGN |
| | WITH FUTURE NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 2.) THE NOTED "PROPOSED SUN TRAIL" (SEE SHEET C0.01) |
| | APPEARS TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH THE LINKAGE TO THE |
| | ACTUAL SUN TRAIL NETWORK AS PROVIDED ON THE FDOT |
| | WEBSITE. PLEASE ADDRESS IN THE PLANS. THE PROPOSED |
| | TRAIL SHOULD LINK TO THE ACTUAL NETWORK. IF THE INTENT |
| | IS TO REROUTE THE SUN TRAIL, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE |
| | INFORMATION, STEPS TO MODIFY AND COORDINATION WITH FDOT |
| | TO ACHIEVE THE REROUTE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INCONSISTENCIES IN THE |
| | KEY PLAN (SHEET C0.01) AND THE OVERALL SITE PLAN (SHEET |
| | 3.00). PLEASE ENSURE ALL ENLARGEMENT/DETAILS SHEETS |
| | ALSO MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY: A) PROPOSED GAME |
| | COURT/FITNESS LAWN OR JUST FITNESS LAWN? B) LOCATION OF |
| | THE KAYAK LAUNCH C) PROPOSED OUTDOOR CLASSROOMS OR |
| | PLAZA WITH SEATING. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4.) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE (SHEET C3.00) |
| | APPEARS TO BE MISSING INFORMATION ON THE: A) PROVIDED |
| | LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDINGS B) PROVIDED LOT COVERAGE OF |
| | IMPERVIOUS SURFACE C) PROVIDED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT |
| | D) PROVIDED FAR. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5.) IS THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE PROPOSED 15 |
| | FT. X 30 FT. STORAGE BUILDING/KIOSK LOCATED IN THE AREA |
| | OF THE FITNESS LAWN INCLUDED IN THE BUILDING |
| | CALCULATIONS? IT IS NOT CLEAR IN THE ZONING INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED ON SHEET C3.00 (OVERALL SITE PLAN). |
| | |
| | |
| | 6.) PLANS STILL SHOWS THAT ARTIFICIAL TURF WILL BE USED |
| | IN THE FITNESS LAWN AREA. AS DISCUSSED AT PREVIOUS |
| | MEETINGS WITH STAFF, ARTIFICIAL TURF IS NOT A PERMITTED |
| | MATERIAL. [ZLDR S.94-451] |
| | |
| | |
| | 7.) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC ART PLATFORM IS CURRENTLY |
| | LOCATED BETWEEN THE SPORTS COURTS AND RESILIENCY HUB. |
| | CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PLATFORM TO AN AREA THAT COULD |
| | GENERATE BETTER INTERACTION WITH PARK USERS OR CREATE |
| | SPACE AROUND THE PLATFORM THAT WOULD GENERATE |
| | PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY IF THE PUBLIC ART PLATFORM HAS BEEN REMOVED |
| | FROM THE PROJECT. THE RESPONSE COMMENTS TO PPRC STATES |
| | THAT THE COMMENT HAS BEEN "ACKNOWLEDGED"; HOWEVER, THE |
| | ART PLATFORM HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE LATEST REVISIONS |
| | TO THE PLANS. IF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC ART PLATFORM HAS |
| | BEEN REMOVED, COORDINATION ON HOW TO ADDRESS THE ART IN |
| | PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENT WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE |
| | CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART AND |
| | CULTURE, (561) 822-1521.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 8.) WHAT IS THE BUILDING SEPARATION BETWEEN THE |
| | PROPOSED RESILIENCY HUB AND CAFE PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | DIMENSION IN THE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE MINIMUM 25 FT. BUILDING SEPARATION. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. |
| | ALTHOUGH THE DIMENSION IS REFERENCED IN THE RESPONSE TO |
| | PPRC'S COMMENTS, STAFF HAD SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED THAT |
| | THE DIMENSION IS PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SET TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 9.) PER ZLDR S.94-312(1), ONLY ONE (1) ACCESS POINT IS |
| | PERMITTED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| | DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN |
| | CONFIRMATION THAT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS |
| | INTO THE SITE. [ZLDR S.94-312(3)] |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE COMMENT |
| | HAS BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED, BUT THE DOCUMENTATION MUST BE |
| | PROVIDED TO STAFF TO SATISFY THE COMMENT.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 10.) THERE IS A PROPOSED STORAGE/KIOSK BUILDING LOCATED |
| | IN THE VICINITY OF THE FITNESS LAWN. THE BUILDING |
| | SETBACK DISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT A MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK OF 25 FT. FROM THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE(S) IS REQUIRED. [ZLDR S.94-204] |
| | |
| | |
| | 11.) THE RECONSTRUCTION OF 26TH STREET IS NEAR |
| | COMPLETION AND THE NEW LAYOUT OF 26TH STREET SHALL BE |
| | REFLECTED ACCURATELY IN THE PLANS TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE |
| | IMPROVEMENT WILL IMPACT THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT INTO |
| | THE PARK???S NORTH ENTRANCE. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: ALIGNMENT/IMPROVEMENTS OF |
| | 26TH STREET NOT PROVIDED CONSISTENTLY IN ALL PLAN |
| | SHEETS. TO ENSURE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY TO |
| | THE PARK, CROSSWALKS SHOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED AT THE NEW |
| | SIDEWALK TO CONNECT TO THE PARK ON FLAGLER DRIVE. |
| | PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| | DEPARTMENT TO DETERMINE FEASIBILITY. PROVIDE ANY |
| | DOCUMENTATION NECESSARY.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 12.) THERE APPEARS TO BE A NEW STRUCTURE ATTACHED TO |
| | THE NORTHERN MOST EXISTING DOCK TO REMAIN. WHAT IS THIS |
| | STRUCTURE? PLEASE IDENTIFY IN THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 13.) PLEASE CLARIFY HOW BOAT TRAILER TRAFFIC WILL ENTER |
| | AND CIRCULATE THROUGH THE PARK SITE. PER THE CHANGES TO |
| | THE CMUD REGULATIONS AND VISION, THE INTENT IS TO KEEP |
| | BOAT TRAILER TRAFFIC OFF THE NORTHWOOD ROAD EXTENSION. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NO DETAILED INFORMATION |
| | PROVIDED. INFORMATION MUST BE CLEAR AND DOCUMENTED. |
| | ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE LETTER, IT IS |
| | STILL A WORK IN PROGRESS WITH CITY STAFF AND THE |
| | CONCERNS OF PLANNING STAFF HAVE BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 14.) CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE OF ALL |
| | STRUCTURES. ALL STRUCTURES MUST COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM |
| | SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 MODIFIED COMMENT: ALL STRUCTURES INCLUDING |
| | THE TENNIS COURT, FENCE, ETC. MUST COMPLY WITH THE |
| | MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE ROS ZONING |
| | DISTRICT. ALSO, PLEASE NOTATE THE HEIGHT OF THE TENNIS |
| | COURT FENCE AND FENCE AROUND THE PICKLEBALL COURTS. THE |
| | HEIGHT OF THE FENCES SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | HEIGHT AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR FENCES IN THE |
| | ZLDRS.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 15.) AN AUTO-TURN DIAGRAM FOR LARGER VEHICLES/BOAT |
| | TRAILERS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE THE SAFE |
| | MANEUVERING OF LARGER VEHICLES/TRAILERS THROUGH THE |
| | PARK SITE. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: AN AUTO TURN DIAGRAM WAS |
| | PROVIDED FOR A SANITATION TRUCK; HOWEVER, MODIFICATIONS |
| | HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE PARKING AREA FOR BOAT TRAILERS |
| | AND IT IS IMPORTANT TO DEMONSTRATE HOW BOAT TRAILERS |
| | CAN MANEUVER THE SITE SAFELY AND WITHOUT DAMAGE TO THE |
| | SITE (I.E. LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, CURBS, ETC.). |
| | |
| | |
| | 16.) BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED THROUGH |
| | THE PARK. CONSIDER ADDING ADDITIONAL RACKS NEAR THE |
| | SPORTS COURTS. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: ALTHOUGH THE APPLICANT HAS |
| | ACKNOWLEDGED STAFF'S COMMENT, IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO |
| | PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET (GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF DETAIL |
| | FOR THE PROJECT) SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE BICYCLE |
| | RACKS PLANNED FOR THE PROJECT TO CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE |
| | THE EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF RACKS THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT |
| | SITE. ALSO, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE NUMBER OF RACKS |
| | PROVIDED IN THE PLANS MUST MATCH THE BICYCLE PARKING |
| | CALCULATIONS.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 17.) A BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IS REQUIRED. THE RACK DETAIL |
| | SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY'S |
| | BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. CONTACT PLANNING STAFF FOR |
| | THE BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES MANUAL. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 MODIFIED COMMENT: ALTHOUGH A DETAIL HAS |
| | BEEN PROVIDED, MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON THE RACK |
| | DETAIL, INCLUDING REQUIRED SPACING BETWEEN EACH POST.] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PARKING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE PARKING CALCULATIONS STILL DOES NOT ADD UP IN |
| | THE PLAN SET. CALCULATIONS PROVIDED MUST MATCH THE |
| | PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS THE PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR THE |
| | FOLLOWING: A) ON SITE BOAT AND TRAILER PARKING; B) ON |
| | SITE SINGLE VEHICLE PARKING C) ON STREET PARKING D) |
| | BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 2.) A PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | THE STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | STRIPING REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. [ZLDR S.94-485] |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE DETAIL |
| | MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN SET TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | CONSISTENCY WITH THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS. |
| | ALSO, WILL THE PARKING STALLS HAVE WHEEL STOPS? IF SO, |
| | THE WHEEL STOPS MUST BE ILLUSTRATED IN THE PLAN SHEETS |
| | AND STALL STRIPING DETAIL.] |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A NOTE ON THE ELEVATIONAL DRAWINGS STATING THAT |
| | "ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH ARTICLE XIII, |
| | SIGN REGULATIONS, OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS)" SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | [11/15/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. THE PLANS DO |
| | NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED NOTE. THE NOTE IS NECESSARY TO |
| | ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS FOR ANY PROJECT |
| | SIGNAGE.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 2.) BUILDING HEIGHT DIMENSIONS MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE |
| | HIGHEST POINT OF THE BUILDING. THIS WAS NOT PROVIDED IN |
| | THE LATEST SET OF ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 3.) THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS ARE STILL |
| | INCONSISTENT BETWEEN THE BUILDING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED |
| | IN THE SITE PLAN AND THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. THE |
| | BUILDING CALCULATIONS MUST MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 4.) FINAL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED ARCHITECT. THE LATEST |
| | PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * ENSURE ALL PLAN SHEETS MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY PRIOR TO |
| | RESUBMITTING. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) FULL COLORED PAPER COPIES, AND ONE COPY IN 11 |
| | INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS |
| | AND DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES TO THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTES AND CONDITIONS: |
| | |
| | * PRIVATE USES OR STRUCTURES WITHIN THIS DISTRICT ARE |
| | PROHIBITED UNLESS A CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR SUCH |
| | ACTIVITIES IS GRANTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-204 ??? APPLICANT HAS ALSO NOTED AND ACKNOWLEGED |
| | STANDARD IN THE PLANS.] |
| | |
| | * ADDITIONAL APPROVAL FROM THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER |
| | MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SFWMD) SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. |
| | SUCH APPROVAL SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE |
| | OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED |
| | WITHIN THE INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. |
| | |
| |
Print |