Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z21100018
Project Number Z21100018
Review Stop L
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2022-09-20 16:14:42FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: CURRIE PARK Z21100018
 SEPTEMBER 20, 2022
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE
 DISPOSITION PLAN:
 ??? SATISFIED. X SYMBOL ON TREE DISPOSITION PLANS
 REPRESENTS REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS. USE THE X SYMBOL
 FOR REMOVALS ONLY AND PROVIDE A DIFFERENT SYMBOL FOR
 RELOCATIONS.
 ??? SATISFIED. PLACE HEADINGS FOR COLUMNS ON ALL
 DISPOSITION LIST SHEETS.
 ??? NOT SATISFIED. ADD A COLUMN FOR TREE CATEGORY TO
 THE DISPOSITION LIST SHEETS.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
 NOT SATISFIED. FOR TREES LESS THAN 20 FEET CANOPY
 DIAMETER AND PALMS THE CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO BE
 MITIGATED IS BASED ON CATEGORY. LIVE OAK CATEGORY 1 IS
 300 SQ FT, CATEGORY 2 IS 150 SQ FT, CATEGORY 3 IS 100
 SQ FT, CATEGORY 4 IS 50 SQ FT. COUNT NUMBER OF TRUNKS
 TIMES CATEGORY VALUE. APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE
 PROVIDED IN A LATER SUPPLEMENT.
  
 NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 MITIGATION DUE FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE
 REMOVED ONCE CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE. APPLICANT HAS
 STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER SUPPLEMENT.
  
 ??? SATISFIED. TREE CANOPY AREA MEASUREMENT CHART ON
 SHEET L3.13 IS NOT CORRECT, VALUES SHOWN ARE FOR THE
 DMP OPEN SPACE CANOPY CREDITS. SEE CATEGORY LIST AND
 VALUES ABOVE.
 ??? SATISFIED. TOTAL REPLACEMENT CANOPY CREDITS BY
 CATEGORY WILL NEED TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE FINAL
 PLANT LIST TO SHOW THAT MITIGATION IS MET.
  
 2. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE
 TREES (AND PALMS) IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON
 SITE OR RELOCATED. PROVIDE AN ARBORIST REPORT FOR THE
 NATIVE TREES AND PALMS THAT ARE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED
 DUE TO CONDITION OR UNABLE TO RELOCATE.
 3. SATISFIED. LIGNUM VITAE IS A SMALL TREE AT THE NORTH
 EDGE OF ITS VIABLE RANGE, AND ORANGE GEIGER MAY NOT DO
 WELL IN THIS LOCATION. IT IS BETTER TO CHOOSE A MEDIUM
 NATIVE TREE SUCH AS SILVER BUTTONWOOD THAT WILL THRIVE
 AT THIS LOCATION.
 REDUCTION OF QUANTITIES IS NOTED. THIS LOCATION IS
 ADJACENT TO SALT WATER AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO HIGH WIND
 AND SALT SPRAY DURING WIND EVENTS SO IS NOT COMPARABLE
 TO PROTECTED LOCATIONS.
  
 4. SATISFIED. FINAL SPECIES TREE COUNTS WILL NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED AND SUBSTITUTIONS CAN BE MADE LATER.
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. IN A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART,
 PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE AND SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS
 FOR:
 ??? TOTAL NON-BUILDING OPEN SPACE, MUST BE AT LEAST 50%
 ??? TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA, CANNOT EXCEED 75%
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. USING THE 50% OPEN SPACE SQUARE
 FOOTAGE, CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES
 AND SHRUBS REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-442(C)(2)B. PROVIDE
 THE INFORMATION IN THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SECTION 94-443(C)(3) REQUIRES
 THAT A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF ALL TREES THAT ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF AN OFF
 STREET PARKING AREA SHALL BE CATEGORY 1 SHADE TREES.
 PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS IN A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT
 CHART.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE
 PARKING AREA SURFACE CALCULATIONS, PARKING SPACE AREAS
 AND LANDSCAPE AREAS PROVIDED TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH SECTIONS 94-443 (C)(3) AND (4). PROVIDE THE
 CALCULATIONS IN A LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT CHART.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
 9. SATISFIED. LOCATIONS OF SOME EXISTING UTILITIES ARE
 IN QUESTION. ONCE FINALIZED ON PLANS, TREE CONFLICTS
 MUST BE ADDRESSED.
  
 10. ONGOING. SEE COMMENT 6. 50% OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT
 SQUARE FOOTAGE IS TO BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE ENTIRE
 SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 11. SATISFIED. CONSIDER SHIFTING TREES TO LOCATIONS TO
 ELIMINATE THE USE OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS REQUIRED TO
 PROTECT UTILITY LINES. THIS IS BETTER FOR THE TREES AND
 SAVES ON COST.
  
 12. NOT SATISFIED. COMPLETE THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN
 OPTION LIST TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED 50 POINTS.
 APPLICANT HAS STATED THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A LATER
 SUPPLEMENT.
  
 13. NOT SATISFIED. ARTIFICIAL TURF IS LIMITED TO THE
 LOCATIONS AS LISTED IN SECTION 94-451.
 THE CODE DOES NOT ALLOW FOR ARTIFICIAL TURF FOR CITY
 OWNED LOCATIONS. IF PARKS AND RECREATION DESIRES TO
 ALLOW IT IN PARK SETTINGS AND DESIRES TO AMEND THE
 CODE, STAFF NEEDS TO BE NOTIFIED OF THIS. ANY PROPOSED
 LOCATION NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED, AS IT APPEARS THAT THE
 ARTIFICIAL TURF IN THE EXERCISE AREA HAS BEEN CHANGED
 TO RUBBERIZED SURFACE ON SHEET C-3.02.
  
 14. SATISFIED. SHOW LIGHTING LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS.
  
 15. SATISFIED. SHEET L2.11 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS IS
 BLANK.
  
 16. SATISFIED. PARKING AREA LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE LACKS THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND SHADE
 TREES AT THE ENDS OF THE ROW OF 7 PARKING SPACES.
 SCREENING HEDGE IS ALSO LACKING ALONG THE WESTERNMOST
 SPACE.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 9/20/22:
  
 17. TERMINAL ISLAND TREE MISSING AT SOUTH END OF ROW OF
 PARKING FOR THE SOUTH PARKING LOT. IF THE SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD IS INTENDED TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT A
 LARGER SHADE TREE WOULD BE BETTER PLACED TO PROVIDE
 SHADE FOR THE PARKING.
  
 18. THERE ARE MORE THAN 10 SPACES IN A ROW OF THE
 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES IN THE NORTH PARKING LOT.
 SECTION 94-443(C)(3)B. REQUIRES AN INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND FOR EVERY 10 SPACES IN A ROW. AN ALTERNATIVE
 OPTION IS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 94-443(C)(6) TO
 PROVIDE ADDITIONAL TREE CANOPY IN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
  
 19. EXISTING PODOCARPUS HEDGE NEEDS TO BE SHOWN FOR THE
 EXISTING LIFT STATION SCREENING.
  
 20. ALL PROPOSED TREES MUST MEET THE MINIMUM 12 FT
 HEIGHT REQUIREMENT.
  
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved