| Date |
Text |
| 2023-04-20 11:51:40 | CASE NO. PB 1895 FORMAL SITE PLAN - APRIL 6, 2023 |
| | RESUBMITTAL |
| | NORTHWOOD COMMONS |
| | 2501 BROADWAY |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE TWO (2) PAPER |
| | COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT OF ALL |
| | PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED |
| | PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS |
| | THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | THE LEVEL III SPECIAL REVIEW, INCLUDING THE VARIANCES, |
| | WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD ON NOVEMBER 15, |
| | 2022. THE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS, |
| | COLLECTIVELY, THE FORMAL SITE PLAN, IS NOT APPROVED. |
| | THE PLANS REVIEWED BY STAFF FOR THE NOVEMBER 15, 2022 |
| | PLANNING BOARD MEETING WERE USED TO DETERMINE THE |
| | REQUESTED VARIANCES AND WAIVERS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT |
| | AND TO VERIFY GENERALLY THAT THE PROJECT MET NMUD CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. TWO CONDITIONS OF THE LEVEL III SPECIAL |
| | REVIEW APPROVAL WERE, "FINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS |
| | MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION AND PASS THE |
| | FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS." AND "THE FINAL |
| | ELEVATIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE HISTORIC |
| | PRESERVATION DIVISION PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THE |
| | FORMAL SITE PLAN." |
| | |
| | THE PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THE HISTORIC REVIEW ON DECEMBER |
| | 5, 2022, INCLUDED CHANGES TO BUILDING C. PLANNING STAFF |
| | REQUESTED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO VERIFY THAT THE |
| | CHANGES STILL MET BOTH THE NMUD REGULATIONS AND THE |
| | VARIANCES THAT WERE GRANTED BY THE PLANNING BOARD. ON |
| | JANUARY 3, 2023, PLANNING STAFF WAS PROVIDED WITH |
| | REVISED PLANS FOR BOTH BUILDINGS A AND C AND INFORMED |
| | THAT THE ARCHITECT HAD MADE SOME CHANGES. STAFF ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS AND REVIEWED ADDITIONAL PARTIAL SUBMITTALS |
| | MADE ON JANUARY 19, 2023 AND FEBRUARY 28, 2023. EACH |
| | SET OF PLANS INCLUDED SOME CORRECTIONS, BUT ALSO |
| | INCLUDED NEW CHANGES. NONE OF THE NEW CHANGES WERE |
| | HIGHLIGHTED AND THE PLANS THAT WERE INCLUDED WERE |
| | INTERNALLY INCONSISTENT. |
| | |
| | THE APRIL 6, 2023 SUBMITTAL WAS TO INCLUDE ALL THE PLAN |
| | REVISIONS MADE TO DATE IN ONE SET OF INTERNALLY |
| | CONSISTENT PLANS SO THAT THE FORMAL SITE PLAN COULD BE |
| | ISSUED. STAFF BEGAN TO REVIEW THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN |
| | SET AND NOTED THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE PLANS REVERTED |
| | TO THE OUTDATED NOVEMBER 15, 2022 PLANS. THE SUBMITTAL |
| | DID INCLUDE A FEW UPDATED PLANS TO ADDRESS THE LATEST |
| | ROUND OF COMMENTS; HOWEVER, SINCE NOT ALL THE PLANS ARE |
| | THE MOST RECENT PLANS, THE PLANS REMAIN INTERNALLY |
| | INCONSISTENT. ADDITIONALLY, THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED ON APRIL 6, 2023, DO NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE |
| | AND CIVIL PLANS SUBMITTED ON APRIL 6, 2023. |
| | |
| | THE KIMLEY-HORN CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS APPEAR TO |
| | MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SUBMITTED TO STAFF ON |
| | FEBRUARY 28, 2023. STAFF IDENTIFIED ONE COMMENT ON |
| | THESE PLANS THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | HARDSCAPE |
| | |
| | 1) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE SEATING |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AREA ON SHEET |
| | L2.00. THERE IS A 21-FOOT 1-INCH LENGTH OF PLANTER |
| | SEATING IN THE WESTERN SECTION OF THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE |
| | THAT DIRECTLY CONFLICTS WITH THE MICRO MOBILITY STATION |
| | LOCATION. THIS SEATING AREA MAY NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD |
| | MEETING THE SEATING REQUIREMENT AS IT WILL BE BLOCKED |
| | BY THE MICRO MOBILITY STATION. THE SEAT WALL MAY |
| | REMAIN, BUT IT MAY NOT COUNT TOWARD MEETING THE PUBLIC |
| | OPEN SPACE SEATING REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | LIGHTING |
| | |
| | 2) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE LIGHTING PLANS. ANA |
| | MARIA APONTE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT |
| | AGENCY IS VERIFYING THAT THE FIXTURES BEING USED COMPLY |
| | WITH THE DISCUSSIONS SHE HAD WITH YOUR TEAM. PLANNING |
| | HAS VERIFIED THAT THE LOCATIONS FOR THE NEW POLES DO |
| | NOT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED TREES. |
| | |
| | THE NEXT SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE THE CURRENT VERSIONS |
| | OF ALL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. ALL OF THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL BE INTERNALLY CONSISTENT AND |
| | COMPLY WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS AND THE APPROVED WAIVERS |
| | AND VARIANCES. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY CHANGES THAT STAFF |
| | HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED TO THE PLANS SHALL BE |
| | CLOUDED AND PROVIDED IN A NARRATIVE. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | NEW CHANGES WILL DELAY THE REVIEW. ALL PLANS SUBMITTED |
| | FOR THE FORMAL SITE PLAN SHALL BE INTERNALLY |
| | CONSISTENT, TO INCLUDE ADDRESSING THE OUTSTANDING |
| | SEATING COMMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
