| Date |
Text |
| 2023-02-13 16:08:56 | CASE NO. PB 1895 FORMAL SITE PLAN |
| | NORTHWOOD COMMONS |
| | 2501 BROADWAY |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO |
| | (2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | THE LEVEL III SPECIAL REVIEW WAS APPROVED, INCLUDING |
| | THE VARIANCES. THE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL |
| | PLANS, COLLECTIVELY, THE FORMAL SITE PLAN, HAS THE |
| | FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE CORRECTED. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT INCLUDED ARE THE CONDITIONS THAT WILL BE INCLUDED |
| | WITH THE FINAL APPROVAL LETTER. IF ANY OF THOSE ITEMS |
| | CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL (EXAMPLE |
| | TRANSPORTATION PLANNER CONDITIONS) STAFF WOULD PREFER |
| | TO SEE IT AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 1) UPDATED COMMENT: SINCE THE APPROVAL OF THE LEVEL III |
| | SITE PLAN REVIEW, STAFF WAS PROVIDED UPDATES TO THE |
| | ELEVATION DRAWINGS FOR BUILDINGS A AND C. STAFF HAS |
| | REVIEWED THE DRAWINGS AND NOTED THAT THERE ARE NO |
| | CHANGES TO THE PLANAR BREAKS; HOWEVER, THERE ARE |
| | CHANGES TO THE FENESTRATION: |
| | |
| | A. BUILDING A - FENESTRATION ALONG BROADWAY, 25TH AND |
| | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE COMPLY. |
| | B. BUILDING A - PROVIDE THE FENESTRATION DRAWINGS AND |
| | PERCENTAGES FOR NEW PINEWOOD (EAST AND WEST - 50% |
| | REQUIRED) AND THE PUBLIC PASEO (NORTH AND SOUTH - 70% |
| | REQUIRED). ***** NEW DRAWINGS WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE |
| | TABLE FOR THE PINEWOOD FENESTRATION WAS UPDATED, BUT |
| | SINCE THE PLANS ARE THE SAME, STAFF IS NOT SURE HOW |
| | THIS IS POSSIBLE. |
| | C. BUILDING C - FENESTRATION ALONG 24TH STREET COMPLIES |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DATA TABLES SHOW THE SAME |
| | ACCURATE VALUES ACROSS ALL PLAN SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 2) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR UPDATING THE KIMLEY |
| | HORN BASE PLAN TO CORRECTLY SHOW THE BUILDING A |
| | NORTHERN BUILDING WALL TO MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE |
| | LATEST ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. HOWEVER, THE DIMENSION |
| | LINES WERE NOT UPDATED TO REFLECT THE SETBACK |
| | DIMENSIONS TO THE WALL (SHEETS C1.50, C1.51 AND C1.52). |
| | THE DIMENSION LINES MUST SHOW THE SETBACK, NOT A RANDOM |
| | SPOT IN THE SIDEWALK. SECTION DETAIL C-C ON SHEET C2.09 |
| | WAS NOT UPDATED TO REFLECT THE CORRECT SETBACK. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT THERE IS AN FDC AND BACKFLOW THAT WILL NEED |
| | TO BE ADJUSTED SO THEY ARE NOT LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF |
| | THE NEW, WIDER SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 3) UPDATED COMMENT: THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FINAL |
| | ORDER REQUIRES THAT THE DOORWAY SECTION OF THE BUILDING |
| | LOCATED AT 550 NORTHWOOD ROAD BE PRESERVED IN PLACE. |
| | ***** THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS MUST INCLUDE DETAILS NOT |
| | ONLY OF HOW THE DOORWAY IS TO BE PRESERVED DURING THE |
| | DEMOLITION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING, BUT ALSO |
| | THE DETAILS OF THE PRESERVED DOORWAY. THE DETAILS SHALL |
| | INCLUDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE HEIGHT, WIDTH AND DEPTH OF |
| | THE DOORWAY PORTION OF BE PRESERVED. THE HISTORIC |
| | PRESERVATION PLANNER IS REQUIRING THIS TO BE SHOWN IN |
| | PLAN AND IN ELEVATION ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AS |
| | PART OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | HARDSCAPE |
| | |
| | 4) UPDATED REPEAT COMMENT: THE BOLLARDS MAY NOT BE |
| | LOCATED AT THE MIDDLE OF THE PARKING SPACE AS THEY WILL |
| | OBSTRUCT DOOR OPENINGS, REGARDLESS OF THE FACT THAT |
| | THEY HAVE BEEN MOVED 2.5 FEET FROM THE EDGE OF THE |
| | SPACE. THE BOLLARDS SHALL BE PLACES SIMILAR TO HOW THE |
| | CITY HAS INSTALLED BOLLARDS ALONG CLEMATIS STREET, |
| | CLOSER TO THE ENDS OF THE PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 5) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE DIMENSION BOXES AROUND |
| | THE BICYCLE PARKING. THE TWO BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AT |
| | THE NORTH END OF PINEWOOD DO NOW SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED |
| | 60-INCH CLEAR PATH REQUIRED BY THE NMUD REGULATIONS |
| | WILL BE MAINTAINED WHILE THE BICYCLE RACK IS IN USE AND |
| | SHALL BE RELOCATED. THE ONE ON THE EAST SIDE OF |
| | PINEWOOD COULD BE SHIFTED TO THE SOUTH END OF THE |
| | LANDSCAPE BED AND BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO THE |
| | STREET. THE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE THAT HAS THE |
| | DIMENSIONED BOX, SOUTH OF THE PASEO, ALSO DOES NOT HAVE |
| | THE 60-INCH CLEAR AREA. THIS COULD ALSO BE SHIFTED |
| | ADJACENT TO THE PLANTER. |
| | |
| | 6) BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF PROVIDED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, |
| | 430 LINEAR FEET OF SEATING IS REQUIRED (TABLE ON SHEET |
| | L1.02). IT WAS STAFF'S UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS WAS |
| | BEING PROVIDED AS SEAT WALLS AROUND THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANTERS. STAFF HAD MEASURED THESE AREAS AND THE 430 |
| | FEET WAS EXCEEDED, HOWEVER, WHEN COMPARING DIFFERENT |
| | PLANS SOME OF THESE AREAS NO LONGER LOOK TO HAVE |
| | SEATING AREAS. THE PROVISION OF THE BENCHES AS SEATING |
| | ONLY PROVIDES 144 LINEAR FEET OF SEATING, WHICH DOES |
| | NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE CLARIFY AND |
| | INCLUDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE SEATING AREA THAT ARE BEING |
| | CLAIMED TO COMPLY WITH THE SEATING REQUIREMENT. NOTE: |
| | THE LEG ROOM FOR ONE BENCH SEEMS TO BE OBSTRUCTED BY A |
| | BICYCLE RACK AND ANOTHER BY A BOLLARD. PLEASE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | PARKING |
| | |
| | 7) WHILE REVIEWING THE HARDSCAPE DIMENSIONS, STAFF |
| | NOTED THAT THERE ARE TWO PARKING SPACES ON THE WEST |
| | SIDE OF PINEWOOD THAT DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM 22-FOOT |
| | CURB LENGTH FOR PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. THESE SPACES |
| | ARE APPROXIMATELY 16.5 FEET IN LENGTH AND THUS DO NOT |
| | MEET THE CODE MINIMUM. THIS WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY NOTED |
| | SINCE THE ONE SAMPLE SPACE DIMENSION ON SHEET A103.0 IS |
| | SHOWN FOR A CONFORMING 22-FOOT LONG SPACE. THIS IS A |
| | PROBLEM SINCE THE SITE IS NOW TWO PARKING SPACES SHORT |
| | OF MEETING CODE. |
| | |
| | PUBLIC WORKS - SANITATION. |
| | |
| | 8) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE |
| | NOTATIONS REGARDING THE SOLID WASTE CONTAINER SIZE/TYPE |
| | AND THE HEIGHT CLEARANCE OVER THE LOADING ZONE WHERE |
| | THE SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) GET SERVICED AND THE BULK |
| | WASTE GETS PICKED UP. ***** THE PLANS SHOW THAT THE |
| | SOLID WASTE FACILITY WILL OVERLAP WITH THE REQUIRED |
| | LOADING ZONE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | CONDITION: COMPLIANCE WITH THE WASTE MANAGEMENT LETTER |
| | DATED OCTOBER 25, 2022, WILL BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITION |
| | OF APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | POTENTIAL DRAFT CONDITIONS |
| | |
| | 1) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR |
| | VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS A OR B, THE |
| | SUBMITTED PLAT NEEDS TO BE RECORDED AND THE |
| | RIGHTS-OF-WAY WITHIN THE SITE NEED TO BE ABANDONED. |
| | |
| | 2) ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES |
| | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO |
| | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL |
| | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE |
| | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED |
| | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR |
| | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. |
| | |
| | 3) IF AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION/PARKING SPACE STRIPING |
| | ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE IDENTIFIED AS LESS THAN ONE FOOT |
| | FROM A WALL, THE SPACES WILL ALSO NEED TO BE MARKED AS |
| | COMPACT WITH AN AMENDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN AT THAT |
| | TIME. |
| | |
| | 4) CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND |
| | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF |
| | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL |
| | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | 5) PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER |
| | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, |
| | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF |
| | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 6) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 7) THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE |
| | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND |
| | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. |
| | |
| | 8)THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF |
| | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A |
| | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. |
| | |
| | 9) THERE ARE UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN IN LOCATIONS IN |
| | CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES. THIS OCCURS AT THE |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE ALONG THE FEC RR, ALONG |
| | 23RD STREET, AND THE WEST SIDE OF BROADWAY EXTENSION. |
| | ANY UTILITIES INSTALLED IN THIS AREA MUST BE AT LEAST |
| | 36 INCHES BELOW GRADE OR OTHERWISE LOCATED TO AVOID THE |
| | REQUIRED TREE ROOT SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | 10) PRIOR TO THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE |
| | SITE: |
| | |
| | A. ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS, APPROVED BY THE |
| | CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ARE REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED FOR |
| | ANY PORTIONS OF SIDEWALKS, ROADWAYS, PARKING SPACES AND |
| | STREET LIGHTING LOCATED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. |
| | B. AN AERIAL EASEMENT, APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S |
| | OFFICE, IS REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED. |
| | |
| | 11) IN THE EVENT THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF |
| | TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) DOES NOT ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS, TO INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE, SHOWN WITHIN |
| | THE BROADWAY ROW, THEN CODE COMPLIANT IMPROVEMENTS MUST |
| | BE INSTALLED ON THE SITE AFTER THE APPROVAL OF A SITE |
| | PLAN AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 12) THE HARDSCAPE ITEMS WITHIN THE FDOT ROW REQUIRE |
| | PERMIT APPROVAL BY FDOT. THIS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | STORMWATER |
| | |
| | CONDITION: REVIEW THE COMMENTS MADE BY THE CITY |
| | STORMWATER ENGINEER AS THERE ARE A NUMBER OF ITEMS THAT |
| | NEED TO BE REFLECTED ON THE ENGINEERING PERMIT |
| | SUBMITTAL. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ANY CHANGES MADE TO THE |
| | ENGINEERING PLANS THAT AFFECT ABOVE GROUND CONDITIONS |
| | ARE PROVIDED TO PLANNING AS WELL. |
| | |
| | TRANSPORTATION PLANNER CONDITIONS |
| | |
| | 1) PROVIDE A CLEAN, DEDICATED TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | DEPICTING ALL RELATED ROADWAY AND TRANSPORTATION |
| | FEATURES, FULLY DIMENSIONED AND SHOWCASING CURB DETAILS |
| | ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD FRONTING THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS COMMENT WAS |
| | PROVIDED AT THE VERY FIRST PPRC REVIEW AND WAS NEVER |
| | COMPLETELY FULFILLED |
| | 2) PROVIDE A REVISED AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING |
| | SERVICE VEHICLES ACCESSING/EXITING THE FACILITY, |
| | MANEUVERING AT EACH POSSIBLE LOADING OR SANITATION |
| | ZONE(S), WITH BOTH DYNAMIC AND WHEEL PATHS HIGHLIGHTED |
| | IN SEPARATE COLORS |
| | 3) PROVIDE A LIST OF ON-GOING ITEMS UNDER DISCUSSION OR |
| | REVIEW WITH COUNTY AND FDOT. OBTAIN COUNTY AND/OR FDOT |
| | APPROVAL PERTAINING THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THEIR RIGHT OF WAY |
| | 4) INSTALL AND SHOW SHARROW MARKINGS ALONG 23RD ST AND |
| | PINEWOOD AVE |
| | 5) 25TH ST ROADWAY DESIGN SHOULD ACCOMMODATE THE |
| | PLANNED SEPARATED AND ELEVATED BICYCLE LANES FROM |
| | AUSTRALIAN TO BROADWAY. PLEASE REFER TO THE CITY |
| | BICYCLE MASTERPLAN FOR TYPICAL SECTION(S) AND UPDATE |
| | THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: CITY MAY NOT REQUIRE |
| | THE DEVELOPER TO IMPLEMENT SUCH FEATURE ALONG SITE |
| | FRONTAGE; HOWEVER, ROW MUST BE PRESERVED AND PROVIDED |
| | TO ACCOMMODATE ITS FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION |
| | 6) THE PROPOSED PINEWOOD AVENUE RE-ALIGNMENT IS NOT |
| | CONDUCIVE TO A SAFE VEHICULAR STRAIGHT-THROUGH MOVEMENT |
| | ACROSS THE 25TH AND 23RD INTERSECTIONS. SUCH MOVEMENT |
| | SHOULD BE EITHER FORBIDDEN OR FACILITATED BY SIGNAGE, |
| | STRIPING AND ROADWAY FEATURES SUCH AS FLEXIBLE POLES, |
| | MIDDLE RAISED ISLANDS AND CHANNELIZATION. PLEASE REVISE |
| | THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY |
| | 7) INSTALL AND SHOWCASE STOP BARS AND SIGNS ON EACH |
| | GARAGE LEVEL. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO TREAT THE NORTHERN |
| | AND SOUTHERN EAST-WEST DRIVE AISLES AS THE MAIN ONES, |
| | WHILE THE NORTH-SOUTH AS MINOR |
| | 8) DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE MISSING. |
| | PLEASE INSERT THEM IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | THROUGHOUT WERE NEEDED (E.G. RIGHT ARROW FOR THE |
| | SOUTHBOUND MOVEMENT, LEFT ARROW FOR THE EASTBOUND |
| | MOVEMENT AT THE 23RD AND PINEWOOD INTERSECTION) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
