| Date |
Text |
| 2023-01-06 17:00:12 | CASE NO. PB 1895 FORMAL SITE PLAN |
| | NORTHWOOD COMMONS |
| | 2501 BROADWAY |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO |
| | (2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | THE LEVEL III SPECIAL REVIEW WAS APPROVED, INCLUDING |
| | THE VARIANCES. THE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL |
| | PLANS, COLLECTIVELY, THE FORMAL SITE PLAN, HAS THE |
| | FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE CORRECTED. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT INCLUDED ARE THE CONDITIONS THAT WILL BE INCLUDED |
| | WITH THE FINAL APPROVAL LETTER. IF ANY OF THOSE ITEMS |
| | CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL (EXAMPLE |
| | TRANSPORTATION PLANNER CONDITIONS) STAFF WOULD PREFER |
| | TO SEE IT AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 1) THERE IS AN OUTSTANDING FEE BALANCE OF $2,568. THIS |
| | NEEDS TO BE PAID PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FORMAL |
| | SITE PLAN APPROVAL. IT IS STAFF'S UNDERSTANDING THAT |
| | THIS SOON TO BE PAID. |
| | |
| | 2) SINCE THE APPROVAL OF THE LEVEL III SITE PLAN |
| | REVIEW, STAFF WAS PROVIDED UPDATES TO THE ELEVATION |
| | DRAWINGS FOR BUILDINGS A AND C. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE |
| | DRAWINGS AND NOTED THAT THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO THE |
| | PLANAR BREAKS; HOWEVER, THERE ARE CHANGES TO THE |
| | FENESTRATION: |
| | |
| | A. BUILDING A - FENESTRATION ALONG BROADWAY, 25TH AND |
| | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE COMPLY. |
| | B. BUILDING A - PROVIDE THE FENESTRATION DRAWINGS AND |
| | PERCENTAGES FOR NEW PINEWOOD (EAST AND WEST - 50% |
| | REQUIRED) AND THE PUBLIC PASEO (NORTH AND SOUTH - 70% |
| | REQUIRED). |
| | C. BUILDING C - FENESTRATION ALONG 24TH STREET COMPLIES |
| | |
| | *** PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DATA TABLES SHOW THE SAME |
| | ACCURATE VALUES ACROSS ALL PLAN SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 3) THE BASE PLANS USED BY KIMLEY HORN WERE NOT UPDATED |
| | TO SHOW THE NEW NORTHERN BUILDING WALL OF BUILDING A |
| | THAT IS SHOWN ON THE LATEST ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. THE |
| | NEW WALL IS LOCATED 1.3 FEET FURTHER SOUTH THAN THE |
| | CURRENT KIMLEY HORN PLANS SHOW. THIS OCCURS ON THE |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THE ENGINEERING REVIEW AS WELL AS |
| | THE LATEST PLANNING FORMAL SITE PLAN. THESE PLANS MUST |
| | BE CORRECTED TO MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT THERE IS AN FDC AND BACKFLOW THAT WILL NEED |
| | TO BE ADJUSTED SO THEY ARE NOT LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF |
| | THE NEW, WIDER SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 4) THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FINAL ORDER REQUIRES THAT |
| | THE DOORWAY SECTION OF THE BUILDING LOCATED AT 550 |
| | NORTHWOOD ROAD BE PRESERVED IN PLACE. THE DEMOLITION |
| | PLAN SHOWS THE DOORWAY BEING REMOVED, WHICH IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED. THE DEMOLITION PLANS MUST CLEARLY CALL OUT |
| | THE PRESERVATION OF THE DOORWAY AND INCLUDE DETAILS NOT |
| | ONLY OF HOW THE DOORWAY IS TO BE PRESERVED DURING THE |
| | DEMOLITION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING, BUT ALSO |
| | THE DETAILS OF THE PRESERVED DOORWAY. THE DETAILS SHALL |
| | INCLUDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE HEIGHT, WIDTH AND DEPTH OF |
| | THE DOORWAY PORTION OF BE PRESERVED. THIS SHALL BE |
| | SHOWN IN PLAN AND IN ELEVATION ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AND |
| | CIVIL PLANS. |
| | LANDSCAPE |
| | |
| | 5) REVIEW AND ADDRESS THE COMMENTS THAT WERE ENTERED BY |
| | THE CITY LANDSCAPE PLANNER ON JANUARY 6, 2023. |
| | |
| | 6) A BACKFLOW METER ALONG 23RD STREET (AT MATCH LINE |
| | BETWEEN SHEETS C2.03 AND C2.04) CONFLICTS WITH A |
| | REQUIRED TREE AND NEEDS TO BE SHIFTED. THIS SHALL BE |
| | CORRECTLY SHOWN ON ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | 7) ROOT BARRIERS NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS WHERE TREES AND PALMS ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO |
| | STORM, SEWER AND WATER LINES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE. |
| | THIS ONLY OCCURS IN A FEW LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | HARDSCAPE |
| | |
| | 8) THE FINAL LOCATION OF THE NEW CROSSWALK ACROSS 23RD |
| | STREET AT THE BROADWAY EXTENSION MAY NOT ANGLE ACROSS |
| | 23RD STREET AS SHOWN. IT NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED TO THE |
| | WEST SIDE OF THE BROADWAY EXTENSION AND BE |
| | PERPENDICULAR TO THE SIDEWALK. THE OBSOLETE CURB CUT ON |
| | THE SOUTH SIDE OF 23RD STREET (IN FRONT OF THE CRA |
| | OWNED PARCEL) WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED TO FACILITATE A |
| | SAFE CROSSING LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 9) THE HARDSCAPE AND CONTROL PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE |
| | BOX, WITH DIMENSIONS, FOR THE BICYCLE RACK OFFSETS ON |
| | THE PLANS, NOT JUST ON THE DETAIL PAGE. SCALING THE |
| | PLANS SHOWS THE OFFSETS NOT MET IN SOME INSTANCES. |
| | |
| | 10) BOLLARDS MAY NOT BE LOCATED AT THE MIDDLE OF THE |
| | PARKING SPACE AS THEY WILL OBSTRUCT DOOR OPENINGS. |
| | |
| | 11) BICYCLE RACKS MAY NOT BE ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES |
| | (ONE AT NORTH END OF NEW PINEWOOD). |
| | |
| | 12) ALL ABOVEGROUND HARDSCAPE FEATURES NEED TO BE SHOWN |
| | ON THE CONTROL PLAN, WITH DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | STORMWATER |
| | |
| | 13) REVIEW THE COMMENTS MADE BY THE CITY STORMWATER |
| | ENGINEER AS THERE ARE A NUMBER OF ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE |
| | REFLECTED ON THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. PLEASE |
| | ENSURE THAT ANY CHANGES MADE TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS |
| | THAT AFFECT ABOVE GROUND CONDITIONS ARE PROVIDED TO |
| | PLANNING AS WELL. |
| | |
| | PUBLIC WORKS - SANITATION. |
| | |
| | 14) PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLAN THAT INCLUDES THE |
| | CONTAINER SIZE/TYPE FOR THE SOLID WASTE. |
| | |
| | 15) PROVIDE THE HEIGHT CLEARANCE OVER THE LOADING ZONE |
| | WHERE THE SOLID WASTE CONTAINER(S) GET SERVICED AND THE |
| | BULK WASTE GETS PICKED UP. |
| | |
| | THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN COMMENT #S 14 AND 15 ABOVE |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE WASTE |
| | MANAGEMENT LETTER DATED OCTOBER 25, 2022. THE LETTER |
| | WILL BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | POTENTIAL DRAFT CONDITIONS |
| | |
| | 1) PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR |
| | VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS A OR B, THE |
| | SUBMITTED PLAT NEEDS TO BE RECORDED AND THE |
| | RIGHTS-OF-WAY WITHIN THE SITE NEED TO BE ABANDONED. |
| | |
| | 2) ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES |
| | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO |
| | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL |
| | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE |
| | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED |
| | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR |
| | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. |
| | |
| | 3) IF AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION/PARKING SPACE STRIPING |
| | ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE IDENTIFIED AS LESS THAN ONE FOOT |
| | FROM A WALL, THE SPACES WILL ALSO NEED TO BE MARKED AS |
| | COMPACT WITH AN AMENDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN AT THAT |
| | TIME. |
| | |
| | 4) CONTRACTOR VEHICLE PARKING. PROPERTY OWNER AND |
| | CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR PARKING OF |
| | CONTRACTOR VEHICLES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON ALL |
| | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | 5) PROTECTION OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. PROPERTY OWNER |
| | AND CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, |
| | INCLUDING VEHICLES, FROM DAMAGE OR DIRT CAUSED BY THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE OCCUPANTS OF |
| | NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ABOUT ALL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION |
| | THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THEIR PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 6) PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 7) THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE |
| | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND |
| | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. |
| | |
| | 8)THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF |
| | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A |
| | SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. |
| | |
| | 9) THERE ARE UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN IN LOCATIONS IN |
| | CONFLICT WITH REQUIRED TREES. THIS OCCURS AT THE |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE ALONG THE FEC RR, ALONG |
| | 23RD STREET, AND THE WEST SIDE OF BROADWAY EXTENSION. |
| | ANY UTILITIES INSTALLED IN THIS AREA MUST BE AT LEAST |
| | 36 INCHES BELOW GRADE OR OTHERWISE LOCATED TO AVOID THE |
| | REQUIRED TREE ROOT SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | 10) PRIOR TO THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE |
| | SITE: |
| | |
| | A. ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS, APPROVED BY THE |
| | CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ARE REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED FOR |
| | ANY PORTIONS OF SIDEWALKS, ROADWAYS, PARKING SPACES AND |
| | STREET LIGHTING LOCATED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SITE. |
| | B. AN AERIAL EASEMENT, APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S |
| | OFFICE, IS REQUIRED TO BE RECORDED. |
| | |
| | 11) IN THE EVENT THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF |
| | TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) DOES NOT ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS, TO INCLUDE THE LANDSCAPE, SHOWN WITHIN |
| | THE BROADWAY ROW, THEN CODE COMPLIANT IMPROVEMENTS MUST |
| | BE INSTALLED ON THE SITE AFTER THE APPROVAL OF A SITE |
| | PLAN AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 12) THE HARDSCAPE ITEMS WITHIN THE FDOT ROW REQUIRE |
| | PERMIT APPROVAL BY FDOT. THIS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | TRANSPORTATION PLANNER CONDITIONS |
| | |
| | 1) PROVIDE A CLEAN, DEDICATED TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | DEPICTING ALL RELATED ROADWAY AND TRANSPORTATION |
| | FEATURES, FULLY DIMENSIONED AND SHOWCASING CURB DETAILS |
| | ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD FRONTING THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS COMMENT WAS |
| | PROVIDED AT THE VERY FIRST PPRC REVIEW AND WAS NEVER |
| | COMPLETELY FULFILLED |
| | 2) PROVIDE A REVISED AUTOTURN ANALYSIS SHOWCASING |
| | SERVICE VEHICLES ACCESSING/EXITING THE FACILITY, |
| | MANEUVERING AT EACH POSSIBLE LOADING OR SANITATION |
| | ZONE(S), WITH BOTH DYNAMIC AND WHEEL PATHS HIGHLIGHTED |
| | IN SEPARATE COLORS |
| | 3) PROVIDE A LIST OF ON-GOING ITEMS UNDER DISCUSSION OR |
| | REVIEW WITH COUNTY AND FDOT. OBTAIN COUNTY AND/OR FDOT |
| | APPROVAL PERTAINING THE PORTION OF THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT IMPACTING THEIR RIGHT OF WAY |
| | 4) INSTALL AND SHOW SHARROW MARKINGS ALONG 23RD ST AND |
| | PINEWOOD AVE |
| | 5) 25TH ST ROADWAY DESIGN SHOULD ACCOMMODATE THE |
| | PLANNED SEPARATED AND ELEVATED BICYCLE LANES FROM |
| | AUSTRALIAN TO BROADWAY. PLEASE REFER TO THE CITY |
| | BICYCLE MASTERPLAN FOR TYPICAL SECTION(S) AND UPDATE |
| | THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: CITY MAY NOT REQUIRE |
| | THE DEVELOPER TO IMPLEMENT SUCH FEATURE ALONG SITE |
| | FRONTAGE; HOWEVER, ROW MUST BE PRESERVED AND PROVIDED |
| | TO ACCOMMODATE ITS FUTURE IMPLEMENTATION |
| | 6) THE PROPOSED PINEWOOD AVENUE RE-ALIGNMENT IS NOT |
| | CONDUCIVE TO A SAFE VEHICULAR STRAIGHT-THROUGH MOVEMENT |
| | ACROSS THE 25TH AND 23RD INTERSECTIONS. SUCH MOVEMENT |
| | SHOULD BE EITHER FORBIDDEN OR FACILITATED BY SIGNAGE, |
| | STRIPING AND ROADWAY FEATURES SUCH AS FLEXIBLE POLES, |
| | MIDDLE RAISED ISLANDS AND CHANNELIZATION. PLEASE REVISE |
| | THE SITE PLANS ACCORDINGLY |
| | 7) INSTALL AND SHOWCASE STOP BARS AND SIGNS ON EACH |
| | GARAGE LEVEL. IT IS RECOMMENDED TO TREAT THE NORTHERN |
| | AND SOUTHERN EAST-WEST DRIVE AISLES AS THE MAIN ONES, |
| | WHILE THE NORTH-SOUTH AS MINOR |
| | 8) DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE MISSING. |
| | PLEASE INSERT THEM IN THE TRANSPORTATION SITE PLAN |
| | THROUGHOUT WERE NEEDED (E.G. RIGHT ARROW FOR THE |
| | SOUTHBOUND MOVEMENT, LEFT ARROW FOR THE EASTBOUND |
| | MOVEMENT AT THE 23RD AND PINEWOOD INTERSECTION) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
