Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z21080015
Project Number Z21080015
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 4
Notes
Date Text
2022-08-17 15:33:49CASE NO. 1895 ? JULY 19, 2022 RESUBMITTAL
 NORTHWOOD COMMONS - NMUD ANCHOR SITE
 BROADWAY & 24TH STREET
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE THREE (3) PAPER
 COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF AND .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - ONCE THE COMMENTS ARE RESUBMITTED AND DEEMED
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE CASE WILL BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY OCTOBER 17, 2022), THE
 PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
 CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE
 WERE NOT ADDRESSED, SO THE APPLICANT IS ASSESSED A
 RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES AMENDMENTS TO THE
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, WHICH MUST BE
 ADOPTED PRIOR TO THE FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. THE
 RECENTLY ADOPTED CHANGE TO THE NMUD APPROVAL PROCESS
 WILL SEE THIS APPLICATION BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING
 BOARD AS A SPECIAL REVIEW, WHICH INCLUDES THEIR ABILITY
 TO GRANT WAIVERS AND VARIANCES. STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED
 MORE THAN THE THREE LISTED ON SHEET A0.02. NO
 JUSTIFICATION WAS PROVIDED FOR EACH WAIVER AND VARIANCE
 REQUESTED/REQUIRED. UNTIL ALL INFORMATION IS PROVIDED,
 STAFF IS WITHHOLDING DETERMINATION ON SUPPORT/NOT
 SUPPORT OF EACH INDIVIDUAL WAIVER AND VARIANCE.
  
 1) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE A REVISED TRAFFIC
 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE PALM
 BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION FOR THE SCOPE OF THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE UPDATED PLANS AND
 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (66,200 SF RETAIL AND 381 DU).
 THE TRAFFIC LETTER NEEDS TO REFLECT THAT THE ANCHOR
 SITE PROJECT BOUNDARIES ARE NOT VACANT, BUT THAT THE
 CONTAIN BUILDINGS (3) AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. *** THE
 LATEST TIA SHOWS THE NEW USE MIX HAVING LESS IMPACT
 THAN WHAT THE CURRENT TPS LETTER, DATED MAY 13, 2022,
 SHOWS; HOWEVER, THAT UNDER THE NEW SPECIAL REVIEW
 PROCESS, THE PLANNING BOARD IS THE APPROVING AUTHORITY,
 SO THE TPS LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE
 CASE BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD.
  
 2) THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT ARE
 LISTED IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS:
  
 A. ADDITION OF 80-FOOT EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND LEFT
 TURN LANES ON 25TH STREET, AT THE INTERSECTION OF 25TH
 STREET AND PINEWOOD AVENUE.
 B. CONVERSION OF 23RD STREET FROM ONE-WAY FLOW TO
 TWO-WAY FLOW BETWEEN PINEWOOD AVENUE AND THE PROPOSED
 BROADWAY EXTENSION.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A PREDETERMINATION LETTER
 FROM FDOT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE FDOT
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY OF BROADWAY AND 24TH AND 25TH STREETS
 ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT. *** THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
 SCHEDULING A PLANNING BOARD HEARING.
  
 4) THE UNIT COUNT HAS INCREASED, SO AN UPDATED SCAD IS
 REQUIRED.
  
 5) BUILDING C: PLANNING STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THE
 COMMENT BY THE CITY SURVEYOR REQUIRING 25-FOOT
 CLEARANCE OVER THE ALLEY HAS NOT BEEN MET. THIS
 CLEARANCE IS REQUIRED SO THAT THERE IS ADEQUATE
 CLEARANCE FOR ANY UTILITY MAINTENANCE WITHIN THE ALLEY.
 PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE MAXIMUM FIRST STORY HEIGHT IS
 20 FEET.
  
 6) ELEMENTS OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING B
 ENCROACHES INTO THE REQUIRED 10-FOOT PRIMARY A SETBACK
 FROM BROADWAY. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED OR A VARIANCE
 REQUESTED.
  
 7) THE WAIVER/VARIANCE TABLE ON SHEET A0.02 NEEDS TO
 CORRECTLY SHOW THAT THE MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOORPLATE IS
 DEPENDENT ON THE TOWER'S PRIMARY USE, WHICH IS
 RESIDENTIAL - 30,000 SQUARE FEET FOR ANY SINGLE
 FLOORPLATE WITH AND AVERAGE FLOORPLATE OF UP TO 20,000
 SQUARE FEET.
  
 8) THE BUILDING B ELEVATION DRAWINGS SHOW THE
 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE WITH A BASE ELEVATION OF 20 FEET IN
 LINE WITH LEVEL 2; HOWEVER, THE BUILDING A ELEVATION
 DRAWINGS SHOW THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE WITH A BASE
 ELEVATION OF 27 FEET. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CROSS SLOPES
 SO THAT ADA COMPLIANCE CAN BE VERIFIED.
  
 DESIGN STANDARDS
  
 9) UPDATED COMMENT: ACTIVE USE STANDARDS -
  
 A. BUILDING B - THE ELEVATION LABELS AND THE SCALE ARE
 INCORRECT ON SHEET A101.2. BY DEFINITION, THE ENTIRE
 GROUND FLOOR IS DEFINED AS STOREFRONT, REGARDLESS OF
 THE USE; THEREFORE, THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE
 BUILDING MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE STOREFRONT GLAZING
 CALCULATIONS.
 B. BUILDING C - THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE BUILDING
 MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE STOREFRONT GLAZING
 CALCULATIONS. THE NORTHWEST CORNER NEEDS TO BE
 INCLUDED. THE EAST ELEVATION TABLE INFORMATION IS
 BACKWARDS (NOT 100% FENESTRATION).
 C. CODE TEXT WILL INCLUDE CLARIFICATION THAT ACTIVE
 USES ARE NOT REQUIRED ALONG THE RR.
  
 10) UPDATED COMMENT: SECTION 94-209.J.A. REQUIRES THE
 PROVISION OF PLANAR BREAKS FOR FRONTAGES EXCEEDING 150
 FEET IN LENGTH. THE PLANAR BREAK CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 FRONTAGES OF BUILDINGS B AND C THAT EXCEED 150 FEET
 WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE PLANAR BREAK CALCULATIONS WERE
 NOT PROVIDED FOR THE GROUND FLOOR OF BUILDING A. PLANAR
 BREAKS ARE REQUIRED, REGARDLESS OF THIS BEING
 STOREFRONT.
  
 11) PLANAR BREAKS ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF THREE
 FEET IN DEPTH. THE DEPTH SHOWN FOR THE PLANAR BREAKS ON
 LEVELS 1.5 AND 2 OF BUILDING A ALONG 25TH STREET AND
 BROADWAY ARE ONLY 1.6 FEET IN DEPTH, WHICH REQUIRES THE
 APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE. STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO
 SUPPORT THIS VARIANCE REQUEST AS NO JUSTIFICATION HAS
 BEEN PROVIDED FOR WHY THESE CANNOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENT. IF THE PLAN IS TO PROCEED WITH A VARIANCE
 REQUEST, THEN YOU MUST PROVIDE NOT ONLY THE
 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE VARIANCE, BUT ALSO BETTER DETAILS
 AS TO WHAT THE ELEVATIONS WILL LOOK LIKE IF THE
 VARIANCE IS APPROVED, TO INCLUDE THE SPECIFIC
 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT THAT WILL OFFSET THE REDUCED
 DEPTH DIMENSION.
  
 12) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 PROJECTIONS AND ENCROACHMENTS (EX. BALCONIES AND OTHER
 ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES) ON THE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS SO
 THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE NMUD
 REGULATIONS. THIS HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR ALL THE
 FACADES ON ALL THE BUILDINGS. **** THE FOLLOWING ARE
 FEATURES THAT DID NOT HAVE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED. ANY
 FEATURES THAT DO NOT MEET MINIMUM OR MAXIMUM
 ENCROACHMENT ALLOWANCE WILL REQUIRE A VARIANCE.
  
 A. THE NORTH AND EAST ELEVATION DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING A
 CALL OUT AN ALUMINUM CANOPY ON THE UPPER PORTION OF THE
 GROUND LEVEL; HOWEVER, NO DETAILS OF THIS CANOPY, TO
 INCLUDE DIMENSIONS, ARE PROVIDED SO THAT STAFF CAN
 VERIFY CODE COMPLIANCE. ADDITIONALLY, THE CANOPY IS NOT
 SHOWN ON THE SIDES OF THESE ELEVATION DRAWINGS
 EXTENDING FROM THE BUILDING.
 B. THE BALCONY THAT WRAPS BUILDING B.
 C. THE CANOPY ON BUILDING C. NOTE: THE CANOPY IS SHOWN
 ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS, BUT NOT THE SITE/FLOOR
 PLANS. ADDITIONALLY, IT IS SHOWN ENCROACHING INTO THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 13) THE AREA WITH THE UNITS SUPPORTED OVER THE
 ABANDONED PORTION OF NORTHWOOD ROAD IS LABELED AS A
 COLONNADE. PLEASE REMOVE THIS NOMENCLATURE AS BY THE
 NMUD REGULATIONS THIS DOES NOT MEET THE COLONNADE
 ALLOWANCES, SPECIFICALLY, THE DEPTH EXCEEDS THE HEIGHT
 AND COLONNADES ARE NOT PERMITTED TO HAVE ENCLOSED USED
 ABOVE.
  
 14) SECTION 94-209.2.J.1.H REQUIRES ARCHITECTURAL
 FEATURES OR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON ALL FACADE
 ELEVATIONS. THE BLANK WALL SHOWN ON THE EAST ELEVATION
 OF BUILDING C IS NOT PERMITTED.
  
 15) AS PART OF THE REALIGNMENT OF PINEWOOD AS A PRIVATE
 DRIVE, STAFF WILL BE ADDING THE FOLLOWING PROVISION TO
 THE NMUD REGULATIONS TO ENSURE THAT ACTIVE USES AND
 TRANSPARENCY ARE MAINTAINED ALONG THE DRIVE. PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF NEW
 PINEWOOD TO VERIFY THAT THE LANGUAGE MATCHES THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING DESIGN.
  
 "THE REALIGNED PORTION OF PINEWOOD AVENUE SHALL HAVE A
 MINIMUM OF 60 FEET BETWEEN BUILDING FACADES AND THE
 TRAVEL LANES SHALL NOT TOTAL MORE THAN 20 FEET IN
 WIDTH. SIDEWALKS AND ON-STREET PARKING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. A MINIMUM OF 50 PERCENT OF THE BUILDING
 FRONTAGES ALONG EACH SIDE THE REALIGNED PORTION OF
 PINEWOOD AVENUE SHALL CONFORM TO THE GROUND FLOOR
 ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENTS."
  
 16) ACCESS EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR ANY PORTIONS OF
 SIDEWALKS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE ROADWAYS
 TRAVERSING THE SITE AND THE PARKING SPACES ON PRIVATE
 PROPERTY.
  
 17) SHEET A400 CUTS OFF THE ELEVATION HEIGHT DIMENSIONS
 UNDER THE TITLE BLOCK. PLEASE REVISE.
  
 18) THE BUILDING A ELEVATION DRAWINGS FAIL TO SHOW THE
 COLUMNS/BALCONY SEPARATORS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE FLOOR
 PLANS RUNNING THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING. NOTE:
 THE RENDERINGS AND THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING
 A SHOW A NUMBER OF DIFFERENCES.
  
 STREETSCAPE
  
 19) UPDATED COMMENT: THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW THE
 ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND SITE FEATURES SUCH AS THE
 FIRE HYDRANTS, LIGHT POLES, VERIZON POLE, BOLLARDS,
 ETC. TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE SITE CONDITIONS.
  
 20) REPEAT COMMENT: NO DETAILS WERE PROVIDED ON THE
 SITE LIGHTING TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE NMUD
 REGULATIONS. *** THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A
 PLANNING BOARD HEARING SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT
 THERE IS NO INCONSISTENCY WITH THE CODE REQUIREMENTS.
 THE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT
 STREETLIGHTS BE PROVIDED ALONG PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY
 ADJACENT TO THE SITE. CLEARLY SHOW THE PEDESTRIAN
 ORIENTED LIGHTING FOR THE SIDEWALKS ALONG THE SITE AND
 WITHIN THE PASEO ON THE PLANS. THE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL
 PLANS INDICATE THAT SOME EXISTING LIGHTS WILL REMAIN,
 BUT NOT ALL OF THE SITE IS COVERED.
  
 21) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR INCLUDING A NOTE
 STATING WHERE THE SIDEWALKS OR WALKWAYS CROSS THE
 DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES TO THE PARKING FACILITIES, LOADING
 AREAS, OR STREETS (BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC), THE
 SIDEWALK OR WALKWAY IS CONTINUOUS AND REMAINS AT A
 CONSTANT LEVEL; HOWEVER, THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN IN
 CROSS-SECTION (OR OTHER GRAPHIC METHOD) ON THE PLANS,
 PREFERABLY THE CIVIL PLANS. **** STAFF IS UNABLE TO
 LOCATE THE CROSS-SECTION DEMONSTRATING THE CONTINUOUS
 SIDEWALK AT A CONSTANT LEVEL ON SHEET C2.05 AS STATED
 IN THE KIMLEY HORN RESPONSE LETTER.
  
 22) UPDATED COMMENT: THE LANE WIDTH DIMENSIONS ON
 EITHER SIDE OF THE MEDIANS IN BROADWAY NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED. NEITHER THE CIVIL PLANS NOR THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS INCLUDE THIS DIMENSION. NOTE: THE LINE WEIGHT ON
 SOME OF THE LAYERS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE SO
 FAINT THAT THEY ARE UNREADABLE ? AN EXAMPLE IS THE
 CURBS ALONG BROADWAY.
  
 23) UPDATED COMMENT: ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS.
  
 A. SECTION A-A ON SHEET C2.05 SHOWS 9.5-FOOT WIDE
 SIDEWALKS, WHILE THE SAME LOCATION ON SHEET A-301 SHOWS
 10-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME,
 ACCURATE CONDITIONS.
 B. SECTION E-E ON SHEET A2.05 SHOWS A 16.5-FOOT SETBACK
 FOR BUILDING A, WHILE SHEET A301 SHOWS A 16-FOOT
 SETBACK. A 5.2-FOOT SETBACK IS SHOWN TO BUILDING B IN
 SECTION E-E, WHILE SHEET A200 SHOWS THE BUILDING AT THE
 5-FOOT SETBACK LINE. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME,
 ACCURATE CONDITIONS.
 C. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FROM THE EDGE OF THE PARKING
 SPACES TO BUILDING B THAT IS SHOWN ON SECTION F-F ON
 SHEET A2.05 ON A301. NOTE: SOME OF THE DIMENSION LINES
 THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY SHOWN ON SHEET A301 ARE NO LONGER
 INCLUDED.
 D. SECTION E-E ON SHEET A2.05 SHOWS A 16.6-FOOT SETBACK
 FOR BUILDING A, WHILE SHEET A301 SHOWS A 16-FOOT
 SETBACK. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME, ACCURATE
 CONDITIONS.
  
 24) REPEAT COMMENT: THE EXTENSION OF BROADWAY AND
 CONCURRENT CLOSING OF THE VEHICULAR CONNECTIONS BETWEEN
 BROADWAY AND PINEWOOD RESULTS IN MORE TRAFFIC BEING
 ROUTED TO 23RD STREET SOUTH OF THE PROJECT. CURRENTLY
 23RD STREET WEST OF THE BROADWAY EXTENSION IS ONE-WAY
 WEST WITH A BULB OUT TO RESTRICT THE EASTWARD FLOW OF
 TRAFFIC. THIS WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED AND THIS SECTION
 OF 23RD STREET REOPENED TO TWO-WAY TRAFFIC, WITH
 APPROPRIATE TRAFFIC MARKINGS. **** THE COMMENT RESPONSE
 STATES THAT THIS IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS, YET IT IS
 NOT DEFINED IN THIS AREA. THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT
 LISTS THIS A REQUIREMENT.
  
 25) CHECK THE CLEARANCES BETWEEN THE BOLLARDS AND PASEO
 COLUMNS WHERE THE PASEO CROSSES PINEWOOD. YOU MAY WANT
 TO ADJUST THE SPACING TO ALLOW A MORE COMFORTABLE
 PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE WALKING NORTH/SOUTH.
  
 PARKING/LOADING
  
 26) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VEHICLE TURNING RADIUS
 DRAWING FOR MOVING TRUCKS INTO/OUT OF THE LOADING
 AREAS. **** SHEET C4.01 IS THE GARBAGE TRUCK PLAN, NOT
 THE MOVING TRUCK PLAN.
  
 27) THERE ARE A FEW PARKING SPACES THAT ARE ADJACENT TO
 WALLS THAT DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL ONE FOOT
 TO ALLOW FOR THE OPENING OF DOORS. EITHER PROVIDE THAT
 THESE SPACES HAVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE, OR THEY WILL NEED
 TO BE DESIGNATED AS COMPACT PARKING SPACES. THE PARKING
 TABLE WILL NEED TO BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 28) UPDATED COMMENT: THERE ARE TWO SPACE LABELS IN THE
 NORTHEAST CORNER OF LEVEL 2 THAT ARE SHOWN IN CONFLICT
 WITH THE ELEVATOR/STAIRS. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTLY
 SHOWN.
  
 29) UPDATED COMMENT: DEAD END PARKING ROWS FOR CRA
 PARKING IS NOT PERMITTED WITHOUT A TURNAROUND SPACE.
 THE DEAD-END PARKING ROW ON LEVEL 1.5 THAT IS LABELED
 AS CRA MUST CONTAIN A TURNAROUND SPACE, DUE TO THE
 GATE. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE OPEN AREA ADJACENT TO
 THE GATE OPPOSITE THE LAST PARKING SPACE HAS SUFFICIENT
 AREA TO ACT AS A TURN AROUND.
  
 30) THE NEWLY SHOWN CRA PARKING AREA ON LEVEL 1.5 IS
 GATED AND DOES NOT HAVE AN ADA COMPLIANT PARKING SPACE
 AND ACCESSIBLE ACCESS TO THE GROUND LEVEL. PROVIDE AN
 ADA SPACE AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE ELEVATOR THAT
 DOES NOT REQUIRE THE USER TO TRAVEL BEHIND PARKED CARS.
 THIS WILL REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF TWO PARKING SPACES
 (ONE CRA AND ONE DP). NOTE: THE ADA PARKING SPACE AND
 AISLE BETWEEN THE CRA AND PP ON THE NORTH HALF OF THE
 GARAGE MAY BE REPLACED WITH THE OTHER REMOVED CRA
 SPACES.
  
 31) THE RETAIL REQUIRES 132 PARKING SPACES. THE PLAN
 DOES NOT SHOW SUFFICIENT PP SPACES (CRA SPACES MAY NOT
 BE USED) TO ACCOMMODATE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. NOTE:
 THIS WOULD BE FURTHER REDUCED IF FDOT DOES NOT APPROVE
 THE DESIGN FOR BROADWAY.
  
 REGULAR PP SPACES LEVEL 1.5: 89
 ADA PP SPACES LEVEL 1.5: 5
 ON-STREET PP SPACES: 34
 TOTAL PP SPACES: 128
  
 32) WHERE ARE THE 19 GUEST SPACES LOCATED WITHIN THE
 GARAGE AND HOW ARE THEY ACCESSED BY GUESTS? THERE IS NO
 CALL BOX SHOWN ON THE PLANS THAT WOULD ALLOW THE GUESTS
 TO CONTACT A UNIT OWNER TO BE GRANTED ACCESS TO THE
 GATE-CONTROLLED AREA. ANY CALL BOX NEEDS TO BE LOCATED
 SUCH THAT TRAFFIC FLOW AND PARKING IS NOT INHIBITED
 WHILE GUESTS ARE AWAITING ENTRANCE.
  
 33) THE PARKING TABLE ON SHEET A103.3 DOES NOT MATCH
 THE PARKING TABLE ON SHEET A103.1, WHICH SEEMS TO
 CORRECTLY DEPICT WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ALL PAGES
 MUST SHOW CONSISTENT, ACCURATE, CODE COMPLIANT
 INFORMATION.
  
 34) UPDATED COMMENT: THE PARKING REQUIREMENT MULTIPLIER
 FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE PROJECT IS
 INCORRECTLY SHOWN AS 1 PER 20 INSTEAD OF 1 PER 10 ON
 THE PARKING REQUIRED TABLE. THE PROJECT REQUIRES 14
 BICYCLE SPACES FOR THE COMMERCIAL PORTION (ROUND UP
 PARTIAL SPACES).
  
 35) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE
 BICYCLE RACK MODEL DETAIL AND DIMENSIONS THAT WILL BE
 USED IN THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOMS. THIS MODEL NEEDS TO
 BE SHOWN IN THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOMS TO INCLUDE THE
 DIMENSIONS OF THE ROOM AND THE RACKS IN THE ROOM.
  
 36) UPDATED COMMENT: ON-STREET BICYCLE FACILITIES ARE
 REQUIRED. THE DEVELOPMENT COVERS A LARGE AREA AND WHILE
 EMPLOYEES AND RESIDENTIAL VISITORS CAN BE EXPECTED TO
 USE THE BICYCLE PARKING ROOM AT THE NORTHWEST PORTION
 OF THE SIDE, STORE CUSTOMERS ARRIVING VIA BICYCLE WILL
 LOOK FOR BICYCLE PARKING CLOSE TO THE ENTRANCE OF THE
 STORE THEY ARE VISITING. IF NOT BICYCLE FACILITY IS
 IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE, THE USER WILL CHAIN THEIR
 BICYCLE TO LIGHT POLES, TREES, ETC., AND OFTEN BLOCK
 THE PEDESTRIAN NETWORK. ON-STREET BICYCLE PAD
 DIMENSIONS MUST BE CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS SO THAT
 STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM AND THAT
 SIDEWALKS ARE NOT BLOCKED. THE PADS MUST INCLUDE THE
 RACK(S) AND THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE RACKS TO THE EDGE
 OF THE PAD. FOR CLARITY THIS DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED
 AT A BIGGER SCALE. NOTE: THE HARDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS
 ON-STREET BICYCLE RACKS; HOWEVER, NO DIMENSIONS ARE
 PROVIDED TO VERIFY THE COMMENTS ABOVE.
  
 37) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE
 MICRO MOBILITY STATIONS TO THE PROPOSED PLAZA LANDSCAPE
 AREAS SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THE PEDESTRIAN CLEARANCES.
 **** THE DIMENSIONS WERE NOT PROVIDED SO STAFF IS
 UNABLE TO VERIFY THE PEDESTRIAN CLEARANCE.
  
 LANDSCAPE
  
 38) UPDATED COMMENT: THE ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND
 CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE SAME BASE PLANTING
 CONDITIONS FOR THE COLUMNS ALONG PINEWOOD. ALL OF THE
 COLUMNS NEED TO HAVE THE BASE PLANTINGS.
  
 39) PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CALCULATION ON SHEET A102.0
 COUNTS MORE AREA THAN IS DEFINED AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.
 THE BREAKDOWN ON SHEET L1.02 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ON
 SHEET A102.0 SO THAT IT IS CLEAR THAT THERE IS 10,000+
 SF OF COMPLIANT PUBLIC OPEN SPACE.
  
 WAIVERS/VARIANCES
  
 40) THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL DIMENSION OF A BUILDING
 WITHIN THE MIXED USE DISTRICTS IS 250 FEET. BUILDING A
 EXCEEDS THIS ON ALL FRONTAGES. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FULL
 DIMENSION OF LEVEL 2 ON ALL ELEVATIONS AS THIS IS THE
 LARGEST FLOORPLATE. **** VARIANCE REQUIRED.
  
 41) THE MAXIMUM LOT WIDTH FOR FLEX BUILDINGS IS 200
 FEET AND TOWER BUILDINGS IS 250 FEET. THE LOT
 CONTAINING BUILDINGS A AND B EXCEEDS THIS BASED ON THE
 ABANDONMENT OF PINEWOOD AND NORTHWOOD ROAD AND THE
 BLOCK NO LONGER BOUNDED ON ALL SIDES BY STREETS OR RR.
 **** VARIANCE REQUIRED.
  
 42) THE ADDITIONAL ABANDONMENT OF PINEWOOD AND
 NORTHWOOD ROAD RESULTS IN EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM BLOCK
 LENGTH AND PERIMETER DIMENSION. PROVIDE THE PERIMETER
 DIMENSION OF THE PARCEL THAT CONTAINS BUILDINGS A AND
 B. **** VARIANCE REQUIRED.
  
 43) THE NMUD REGULATIONS LIMIT THE TOWER FLOOR PLATE TO
 30,000 SQUARE FEET FOR ANY SINGLE FLOORPLATE WITH AND
 AVERAGE FLOORPLATE OF UP TO 20,000 SQUARE FEET. THE
 MAXIMUM TOWER FLOORPLATES ARE SHOWN AT 45,450 SQUARE
 FEET. THE NMUD FLOOR PLATE AVERAGE ONLY APPLIES TO THE
 TOWER PORTION OF BUILDINGS WITHIN THE CORE SUBDISTRICT.
 **** VARIANCE REQUIRED.
  
 44)THE ACTIVE USE LINER REQUIRED BY SECTION
 94-209.J.1.G.II. REQUIRED FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE
 GROUND FLOOR IS NOT ACHIEVED FOR THE AREAS LISTED
 BELOW. **** VARIANCES REQUIRED.
  
 A. BUILDING A ALONG 25TH STREET AT THE FIRE COMMAND
 ROOM. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THIS AREA ALONG 25TH
 STREET.
 B. BUILDING A ALONG THE GARDEN PLAZA AT THE STAIRS.
 PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THIS AREA ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE
 OF THE STAIRS AS WELL AS THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ADJACENT
 RETAIL AREA.
 C. BUILDING B ALONG 23RD STREET AT THE BOH AND TRASH
 ROOM. PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THIS AREA ALONG 23RD
 STREET.
  
 45) UPDATED COMMENT: SECTION 94-209.E.2.B.I. REQUIRES
 THAT ALL LEVELS OF THE PARKING GARAGE MUST BE SCREENED
 BY A LINER BUILDING CONTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20
 FEET OF HABITABLE SPACE. THIS IS NOT MET ALONG THE FULL
 LENGTH OF 25TH STREET. **** A VARIANCE FROM THIS CODE
 REQUIREMENT IS NEEDED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FOR
 PARKING LEVELS 1.5 AND 2, MEASURED FROM THE WEST SIDE
 OF THE CORRIDOR TO THE WESTERN BUILDING WALL. ALSO
 PROVIDE THE DIMENSION FORM THE WEST SIDE OF THE
 CORRIDOR TO THE WEST WALL OF UNIT 18. THE REMAINDER IS
 THE UNSCREENED PORTION OF THE GARAGE AND WILL BE THE
 WAIVER THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING FROM THE 100% SCREENING
 REQUIREMENT. PLEASE ALSO PROVIDE THE DEPTH OF UNIT 18
 FROM 25TH STREET SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT YOU ARE
 MEETING THE 20 FOOT OF HABITABLE SPACE AND THAT ANOTHER
 WAIVER IS NOT REQUIRED.
  
 46) UPDATED COMMENT: SECTION 94-209.2.A.IV. REQUIRES
 THAT ALL PARKING GARAGES MUST HAVE DIRECT PEDESTRIAN
 ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY. NONE OF THE PARKING SPACES
 APPEAR TO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WALKWAY. THE
 PP AND CRA SPACES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE GARAGE LEVEL
 1.5 USE AN ELEVATOR THAT THE FUTURE PUBLIC ACCESS
 EASEMENT ALONG THE NEW PINEWOOD. THE CRA SPACE ON THE
 SOUTH SIDE OF THE GARAGE LEVEL 1.5 HAVE EMERGENCY
 ACCESS TO THE RAILROAD, WHICH IS NOT A PUBLIC WALKWAY.
 EVEN UPON MODIFICATION TO ACCOMMODATE ADA, THESE USERS
 WILL GO THROUGH THE LOBBY PRIOR TO GETTING TO A PUBLIC
 ACCESS EASEMENT AREA (PASEO OR PINEWOOD). WHILE THE
 RESIDENTS THAT HAVE ACCESS TO THE LINER UNIT CORRIDOR
 WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THE JUMP LOBBIES, WHICH ARE
 DIRECTLY ON A PUBLIC WALKWAY, IT IS UNCLEAR IF THE
 RESIDENTS OF THE TOWER WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THESE AREAS
 AS WELL. THE RESIDENT ONLY, LIMITED ACCESS TO THE JUMP
 LOBBIES DOES NOT QUALIFY AS THE GARAGES HAVING DIRECT
 ACCESS. **** A WAIVER OF THIS CODE PROVISION IS
 REQUIRED. AS PART OF THE WAIVER, ALL UNIT OWNERS WOULD
 NEED TO BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THE ELEVATORS AND STAIRS
 THAT ACCESS THE JUMP LOBBIES.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved