| Date |
Text |
| 2022-02-07 14:46:37 | *** THE PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED IN 2018 |
| | (REFERENCE: ISPR CASE NO. 18-08). DUE TO INACTIVITY |
| | OVER A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME WITH THE ORIGINAL |
| | SUBMITTAL, ISPR CASE N. 18-08 WAS WITHDRAWN BY STAFF. |
| | THE SAME PROJECT IS NOW SUBMITTED UNDER A NEW |
| | APPLICATION NUMBER (REFERENCE: ISPR CASE NO. 21-11). |
| | ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR THIS NEW SUBMITTAL MUST BE |
| | UPDATED. *** |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A RESPONSE TO EACH STANDARD IN SEC. 94-35(C), SITE |
| | DESIGN AND QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, OF THE |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED. THE APPLICANT MUST EXPLAIN HOW EACH |
| | STANDARD (IN WORDS) IS MET THROUGH IN SITE DESIGN. |
| | [9/2/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NO DOCUMENT ADDRESSING THE |
| | STANDARDS WAS FOUND IN THE RESUBMITTAL PACKET. |
| | APPLICANT'S 1/26/22 RESPONSE TO STAFF'S COMMENT IS THAT |
| | THE STANDARDS ARE ADDRESSED IN THE PLANS. THIS IS |
| | INSUFFICIENT, AS A WRITE-UP OF THE STANDARDS IS A |
| | REQUIRED COMPONENT OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS AND IT IS |
| | NECESSARY TO ASSIST STAFF WITH UNDERSTANDING THE SITE |
| | DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE REFER TO PAGE 28 OF THE |
| | 2022 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.] |
| | |
| | 2.) THE PROPERTY IS ZONED INDUSTRIAL (I); HOWEVER, |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE APPLICATION (PLANS |
| | AND DOCUMENTS, I.E. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, PROJECT |
| | FACT SHEET, SITE PLAN, ETC.) INDICATE THAT THE SITE IS |
| | ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI), WHICH IS INCORRECT. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. [9/2/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. NO REVISED/CORRECTED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT |
| | AND PROJECT FACT SHEET PROVIDED WITH THE 1/28/22 |
| | RESUBMITTAL PACKET. ALSO, THE PROJECT DATA TABULAR ON |
| | SHEET A1.0 HAS NOT BEEN CORRECTED.] |
| | |
| | 3.) THE UPDATED PUBLIC FACILITIES LETTER FROM AT&T WAS |
| | NOT PROVIDED IN THE 1/28/22 RESUBMITTAL PACKET. |
| | |
| | 4.) THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT |
| | IS A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY; HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT'S |
| | 1/28/22 RESPONSE TO STAFF'S COMMENTS STATES THAT "A USE |
| | IS NOT PROPOSED OR ANTICIPATED AT THIS TIME." A USE |
| | MUST BE DETERMINED AT THE SITE PLAN STAGE. IF THIS |
| | PROJECT IS A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY IT MUST BE CLEARLY |
| | STATED AS SUCH IN THE PLANS, JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE GENERAL NOTES |
| | ON SHEET A1.0: A) #8 (NEW SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION) IS |
| | NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE SITE PLAN. REMOVE THE NOTE IF NOT |
| | APPLICABLE; OTHERWISE PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF |
| | THE NEW SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION IN THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE PROJECT DATA |
| | TABULAR ON SHEET A1.0: A) ZONING IS INDUSTRIAL (I). B) |
| | THE INFORMATION ON THE FLOOR AREA RATIO IS |
| | CUT-OFF/INCOMPLETE. C) PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT |
| | INFORMATION IS MISSING AND MUST BE PROVIDED IN THE |
| | PROJECT DATA. |
| | |
| | 3.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA |
| | TABULAR ON SHEET A1.0: A) THE GROSS SITE AREA IS NOT |
| | 1,475 ACRES. B) GROSS FLOOR AREA AND BUILDING COVERAGE |
| | IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE |
| | PROJECT DATA TABULAR AND IN THE SITE PLAN. NEEDS TO BE |
| | CORRECTED FOR CONSISTENCY. C) PERCENTAGE PROVIDED FOR |
| | THE BUILDING COVERAGE SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT. D) THE |
| | PARKING CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT AND NEEDS TO BE |
| | REFERENCED AS "WAREHOUSING FACILITIES FOR FAMILIES AND |
| | SMALL BUSINESSES" (I.E. THE PARKING CALCULATION FOR |
| | WAREHOUSING FACILITIES FOR FAMILIES AND SMLL BUSINESSES |
| | IS NOT 1 PARKING SPACE/1,000 SQ. FT.). |
| | |
| | 4.) PLEASE ADD THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL NOTES TO THE |
| | SITE PLAN (AS NOTED IN THE APPLICANT'S 1/26/22 RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND SITE |
| | LIGHTING): A) THESE BUILDINGS ARE INTENDED FOR |
| | UNOCCUPIED STORAGE AND WILL NOT BE EQUIPPED WITH AIR |
| | CONDITIONING OR HEATING. B) BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTS |
| | ONLY. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE |
| | GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE |
| | AWAY FROM ALL PUBLIC THROUGHFARES. |
| | |
| | 5.) ALL BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES (I.E. FENCES, TRASH |
| | ENCLOSURE, ETC.) WITHIN THE PROPOSED PROJECT MUST BE |
| | LABELED WITH SETBACK DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE(S). [9/2/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | FROM THE TRASH ENCLOSURE TO THE FRONT (WEST/CLARE |
| | AVENUE) PROPERTY LINE (A CRITICAL DIMENSION) HAS NOT |
| | BEEN PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN.] |
| | |
| | 6.) HOW TALL IS THE LOCKING SWING GATE AND THE ADA WALK |
| | GATE? THE HEIGHT OF THE GATE/FENCE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN |
| | THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 7.) ACCORDING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS, AWNINGS |
| | WILL BE PROVIDED ABOVE THE DOORS OF EACH UNIT. THE |
| | AWNINGS AND DIMENSIONS SHALL BE OUTLINED IN THE SITE |
| | PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 8.) THE PARKING STRIPING DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET C-2 |
| | IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S STANDARDS. PARKING |
| | STRIPING STANDARDS MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ZLDR |
| | S.94-485. |
| | |
| | 9.) THE AREA IDENTIFIED TO MANAGE TRASH GENERATED FROM |
| | THE PROJECT SHALL BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC WORKS |
| | DEPARTMENT. SCREENING OF TRASH/RECEPTACLE ENCLOSURE |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR S.94-315. |
| | [9/2/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: SCREENING REQUIREMENT NOT |
| | ADDRESSED. THE ENCLOSURE MUST BE LINED WITH LANDSCAPING |
| | ON ALL THREE SIDES PER ZLDR S.94-315. PLACEMENT AND |
| | ADEQUACY OF THE ENCLOSURE MUST ALSO BE APPROVED BY THE |
| | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.] |
| | |
| | 10.) LANDSCAPE AREA AND PLANT MATERIAL ON THE SOUTH |
| | SIDE OF THE PROPERTY (I.E. THE 5 FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER) SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT |
| | WITH A NON-MOUNTABLE CURB. [ZLDR S.94-443(C)(5)] |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN |
| | THE FLOOR PLAN(S) OF BOTH BUILDINGS DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY. [9/2/2021 MODIFIED/REPEAT COMMENT: |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING #2 IS STILL NOT CONSISTENT ON |
| | BOTH THE SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN. THERE IS A |
| | DISCREPANCY OF 71 SQ. FT. IF THE 71 SQ. FT. IS THE |
| | FLOOR AREA CALCULATION OF THE ADA RESTROOM IN UNIT #5, |
| | IT MUST BE ALSO INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL BUILDING SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE CALCULATION. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.] |
| | |
| | 2.) WEST ELEVATION NOTES/INFORMATION SEEMS TO BE |
| | CUT-OFF/INCOMPLETE. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, |
| | AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL ($200.00 DUE AT THE TIME OF |
| | THE NEXT RESUBMITTAL ? FOR CYCLE 3). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| |
Print |
