| Date |
Text |
| 2021-09-02 14:30:48 | *** THE PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED IN 2018 |
| | (REFERENCE: ISPR CASE NO. 18-08). DUE TO INACTIVITY |
| | OVER A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME WITH THE ORIGINAL |
| | SUBMITTAL, ISPR CASE NO. 18-08 WAS WITHDRAWN BY STAFF. |
| | THE SAME PROJECT IS NOW SUBMITTED UNDER A NEW |
| | APPLICATION NUMBER (REFERENCE: ISPR CASE NO. 21-11). |
| | ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR THIS NEW SUBMITTAL MUST BE |
| | UPDATED. *** |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO THE APPLICANT TO SCHEDULE |
| | A MEETING WITH STAFF TO DISCUSS ALTERNATIVES WITH THE |
| | SITE DESIGN TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 2.) CIVIL PLANS ARE MISSING FROM THE SUBMITTAL PACKET. |
| | THE CIVIL DRAWINGS ARE A REQUIRED COMPONENT OF THE |
| | APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. PLEASE REFER TO PAGE 18 OF THE |
| | 2021 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR THE ENGINEERING PLANS |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | |
| | 3.) AN UPDATED, ABSTRACTED ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | SURVEY IS REQUIRED. THE SURVEY MUST BE LESS THAN A YEAR |
| | OLD. THE SURVEY PROVIDED IS OUTDATED (FROM 2018) AND IS |
| | NOT ABSTRACTED. A DIGITAL SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY IS |
| | ALSO REQUIRED AS PART OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 4.) THE SIGNED OWNER'S CONSENT FORM PROVIDED WITH THE |
| | APPLICATION IS NO LONGER VALID. PLEASE EXECUTE A NEW |
| | OWNER'S CONSENT FORM. |
| | |
| | 5.) PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATED WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT |
| | THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE |
| | PROPOSAL FOR WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE |
| | AND GARBAGE COLLECTION SERVICES. |
| | |
| | 6.) PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATED LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING |
| | PUBLIC FACILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT |
| | DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE |
| | INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, |
| | FPU, FPL AND COMCAST. |
| | |
| | 7.) THE TRAFFIC STUDY, PREPARED BY JFO GROUP, INC., IS |
| | OUTDATED (FROM 2018). A NEW STUDY IS REQUIRED FOR STAFF |
| | REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 8.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER |
| | FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY, INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | PROJECT HAS MET THE TPS STANDARDS FOR THE COUNTY IS |
| | REQUIRED. THIS LETTER IS MISSING FROM THE APPLICATION |
| | PACKET. |
| | |
| | 9.) THE PROPERTY IS ZONED INDUSTRIAL (I); HOWEVER, |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE APPLICATION (PLANS |
| | AND DOCUMENTS, I.E. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, PROJECT |
| | FACT SHEET, SITE PLAN, ETC.) INDICATE THAT THE SITE IS |
| | ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI), WHICH IS INCORRECT. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 10.) A RESPONSE TO EACH STANDARD IN SECTION 94-3(C), |
| | SITE DESIGN AND QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, OF |
| | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE APPLICANT MUST EXPLAIN HOW EACH |
| | STANDARD IS MET THROUGH THE SITE DESIGN. |
| | |
| | 11.) IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE PARKING |
| | REQUIREMENT FOR A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY (WAREHOUSING |
| | FOR FAMILIES AND SMALL BUSINESSES) IS DIFFERENT FROM A |
| | BUSINESS OPERATION WITHIN A WAREHOUSE BUILDING/UNIT. |
| | ANY CHANGE IN USE FROM WAREHOUSING FOR FAMILIES AND |
| | SMALL BUSINESSES (SELF-STORAGE) WILL REQUIRE THE NEW |
| | USE TO MEET THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-481(D)] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) CONSIDER JOINING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITH THE |
| | ADJACENT PARCEL TO THE NORTH (SAME PROPERTY OWNER). |
| | JOINING THE PARCELS WOULD ALLOW FOR GREATER FLEXIBILITY |
| | IN DESIGN (PARKING, LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, |
| | INGRESS/EGRESS) AND INCREASE THE OVERALL FUNCTIONALITY |
| | OF THE SITE. |
| | |
| | 2.) PER THE SUBMITTED OUTDATED SURVEY, THERE SEEMS TO |
| | BE AN EXISTING WATER METER AND VALVE IN CONFLICT WITH |
| | THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 3.) PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON HOW THE |
| | PROPOSED "LOCKING SWING GATE" WILL FUNCTION (I.E. |
| | MANUAL OR MECHANICAL ACCESSIBILITY; ACCESS FOR |
| | EMERGENCY AND/OR SERVICE VEHICLES, ETC.). IS THE GATE |
| | ALSO CHAIN LINK? ADDITIONAL COMMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | BY THE CITY?S FIRE AND SANITATION DEPARTMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4.) DETAIL OF THE PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL IS |
| | INCONSISTENT WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE CITY. PLEASE |
| | REVISE TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-485(J)] |
| | |
| | 5.) ALL BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES (I.E. FENCES, ETC.) WITHIN |
| | THE PROPOSED PROJECT MUST BE LABELED WITH SETBACK |
| | DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S). |
| | |
| | 6.) THE AREA IDENTIFIED TO MANAGE TRASH GENERATED FROM |
| | THE PROJECT SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS |
| | DEPARTMENT. SCREENING OF TRASH/GARBAGE RECEPTACLES |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR S.94-315. |
| | |
| | 7.) SHOW LOCATION FOR ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PROVIDED |
| | FOR THE PROPERTY (INCLUDING A/C IF APPLICABLE). SETBACK |
| | AND SCREENING MEASURES APPLY. [ZLDR S.94-305(4)] |
| | |
| | 8.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA |
| | TABULAR, AS REQUIRED IN THE SITE DATA CHECKLIST OF THE |
| | 2021 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: A) ZONING DESIGNATION IS |
| | NOT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI); B) PARCEL SIZE IS |
| | INCONSISTENT WITH THE PARCEL SIZE INFORMATION PROVIDED |
| | IN THE SURVEY; C) MAXIMUM AND PROPOSED CALCULATIONS |
| | REQUIRED FOR: LOT COVERAGE BY BUILDING, LOT COVERAGE BY |
| | IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, BUILDING HEIGHT, OPEN SPACE, |
| | LANDSCAPED AREA AND FLOOR AREA RATIO. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) CONSIDER ADDITION FENESTRATION/ARCHITECTURAL |
| | TREATMENT TO THE BUILDING FACADES (ESPECIALLY ON THE |
| | FACADES VISIBLE FROM THE STREET (I.E. ABUTTING THE |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY). |
| | |
| | 2.) BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN |
| | THE FLOOR PLAN(S) OF BOTH BUILDINGS DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) IS ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT |
| | SITE? IF SO, LOCATION AND HEIGHT OF ANY POLE FIXTURES |
| | AND A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ILLUSTRATING INTENSITY SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8 ? INCHES X |
| | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND |
| | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458. |
| |
Print |
