| Date |
Text |
| 2022-01-19 12:58:54 | -TWO MANHOLES IN ALLEY APPEAR TO BE OVERLAPPING ON |
| | CIVIL PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE MANHOLES HAVE ADEQUATE |
| | CLEARANCE DISTANCE. |
| | |
| | -WATER SERVICE SHOWN AT NORTH SIDE OF 300 BANYAN |
| | PROPERTY HAS NO EXISTING WATER METER INSTALLED. IF IT |
| | REMAINS AFTER BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT WOULD HAVE TO |
| | COORDINATE METER INSTALLATION AND ACCOUNT SETUP WITH |
| | CITY WPB, AND PAY ALL APPLICABLE FEES, DEPOSITS, AND |
| | CHARGES. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE AT NORTH |
| | SIDE OF PROPERTY DOES NOT SHOW PROPOSED BACKFLOW |
| | ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY WOULD HAVE TO |
| | BE INSTALLED FOR THE WATER SERVICE TO BE USED, AND MUST |
| | BE AT LOCATION APPROVED BY WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | -VERTICAL MOUNT DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS |
| | NONSTANDARD. WOULD REQUIRE ENGINEER DESIGN AND |
| | EVALUATION. PROPOSED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MAKE/MODEL WOULD |
| | HAVE TO BE USC-APPROVED FOR VERTICAL ORIENTATION. |
| | |
| | -SITE PLAN SAYS FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS LOCATED |
| | IN AN OUTDOOR STORAGE ROOM AND APPEARS TO HAVE OPEN |
| | ENTRY. RECOMMEND VERIFYING LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE TO |
| | FIRE DEPARTMENT AND MEETS NFPA STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | -SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLANS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW |
| | RELOCATION OF BIKE RACK NEAR THE WATER METER FOR 300 |
| | BANYAN AT SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY. CIVIL PLANS SHOW IT |
| | REMOVED ALRIGHT. (NOT SURE IF THEY SHOW THE NEW |
| | LOCATION) |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 3 INCH BFP AND METER FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. IS |
| | LOCATED SUBSTANTIALLY CLOSE TO EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | CONCERN WAS BROUGHT UP ABOUT BUILDING FOOTERS AND |
| | EXCAVATION ADJACENT BUILDING. EOR SUGGESTED DIMENSIONS |
| | OF BUILDING FOOTER AND SAFETY OF EXCAVATION COULD BE |
| | CONFIRMED. PLEASE SUBMIT THOSE VERIFICATIONS AT FORMAL |
| | ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 3 INCH METER FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. MUST BE |
| | INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND IN CONFORMANCE TO WPB SD WS-3 |
| | SEP2019. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 3 INCH METERED WATER SERVICE FOR 301 CLEMATIS |
| | ST. IS NONSTANDARD DESIGN. MAY NEED REVISION AT FORMAL |
| | ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 3 INCH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. |
| | APPEARS TO BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. RECOMMEND VERIFYING |
| | LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. |
| | |
| | -PLANS DO NOT SHOW EXISTING LARGE DIAMETER FIRELINE |
| | WATER SERVICE OR DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW INSTALLATION AT |
| | 301 CLEMATIS ST. SHOW BOTH AT FORMAL ENGINEERING |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 4 INCH PARALLEL RPZ MAY HAVE BIGGER FOOTPRINT |
| | THAN SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS. |
| | |
| | -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW CROSSING INFORMATION OR |
| | PROFILES FOR UTILITY WORK IN ALLEY. WHEN REVIEWED AT |
| | FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF THERE ARE ANY |
| | CONFLICTS, ADDITIONAL WORK OR PLAN REVISION MAY BE |
| | NEEDED. |
| | |
| | -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT COMMUNICATE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR 2 |
| | INCH BFP AT EAST SIDE OF 301 CLEMATIS AND WHAT IS |
| | HAPPENING TO THE ASSOCIATED WATER METER. ANY PROPOSED |
| | LOCATION MUST BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES AND |
| | RETEST/REINSPECTION WOULD BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | -CIVIL PLANS SHOW EXSS AND EXDN FLOWING TO ONE MANHOLE |
| | IN OLIVE. EOR NEEDS TO VERIFY IF THIS IS ACCURATE AND |
| | UPDATE PLANS AS NEEDED. |
| | |
| | -EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES TO 301 CLEMATIS ST. |
| | BUILDING ARE NOT SHOWN AND LABELED ON WATER PLAN WITH |
| | WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. UPDATE AT FORMAL ENGINEERING |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PLANS ARE MISSING SEVERAL STANDARD DETAILS INCLUDING |
| | SMALL METERED WATER SERVICE, LARGE METERED WATER |
| | SERVICE, AND FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. ADD AT FORMAL |
| | ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PLANS FOR EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND UTILITY |
| | POLES ALONG THE ALLEYWAY WERE PREVIOUSLY UNCERTAIN. |
| | NEWEST REVISION PLANS STILL DO NOT SEEM TO ACCOUNT FOR |
| | THEM, OR DETAIL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. |
| | |
| 2022-01-19 12:56:20 | ENGINEERING |
| | -TWO MANHOLES IN ALLEY APPEAR TO BE OVERLAPPING ON |
| | CIVIL PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE MANHOLES HAVE ADEQUATE |
| | CLEARANCE DISTANCE. |
| | |
| | -WATER SERVICE SHOWN AT NORTH SIDE OF 300 BANYAN |
| | PROPERTY HAS NO EXISTING WATER METER INSTALLED. IF IT |
| | REMAINS AFTER BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT WOULD HAVE TO |
| | COORDINATE METER INSTALLATION AND ACCOUNT SETUP WITH |
| | CITY WPB, AND PAY ALL APPLICABLE FEES, DEPOSITS, AND |
| | CHARGES. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED METERED IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE AT NORTH |
| | SIDE OF PROPERTY DOES NOT SHOW PROPOSED BACKFLOW |
| | ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY WOULD HAVE TO |
| | BE INSTALLED FOR THE WATER SERVICE TO BE USED, AND MUST |
| | BE AT LOCATION APPROVED BY WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | -VERTICAL MOUNT DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS |
| | NONSTANDARD. WOULD REQUIRE ENGINEER DESIGN AND |
| | EVALUATION. PROPOSED BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MAKE/MODEL WOULD |
| | HAVE TO BE USC-APPROVED FOR VERTICAL ORIENTATION. |
| | |
| | -SITE PLAN SAYS FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS LOCATED |
| | IN AN OUTDOOR STORAGE ROOM AND APPEARS TO HAVE OPEN |
| | ENTRY. RECOMMEND VERIFYING LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE TO |
| | FIRE DEPARTMENT AND MEETS NFPA STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | -SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLANS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW |
| | RELOCATION OF BIKE RACK NEAR THE WATER METER FOR 300 |
| | BANYAN AT SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY. CIVIL PLANS SHOW IT |
| | REMOVED ALRIGHT. (NOT SURE IF THEY SHOW THE NEW |
| | LOCATION) |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 3 INCH BFP AND METER FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. IS |
| | LOCATED SUBSTANTIALLY CLOSE TO EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | CONCERN WAS BROUGHT UP ABOUT BUILDING FOOTERS AND |
| | EXCAVATION ADJACENT BUILDING. EOR SUGGESTED DIMENSIONS |
| | OF BUILDING FOOTER AND SAFETY OF EXCAVATION COULD BE |
| | CONFIRMED. PLEASE SUBMIT THOSE VERIFICATIONS AT FORMAL |
| | ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 3 INCH METER FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. MUST BE |
| | INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND IN CONFORMANCE TO WPB SD WS-3 |
| | SEP2019. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 3 INCH METERED WATER SERVICE FOR 301 CLEMATIS |
| | ST. IS NONSTANDARD DESIGN. MAY NEED REVISION AT FORMAL |
| | ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 3 INCH BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY FOR 301 CLEMATIS ST. |
| | APPEARS TO BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. RECOMMEND VERIFYING |
| | LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. |
| | |
| | -PLANS DO NOT SHOW EXISTING LARGE DIAMETER FIRELINE |
| | WATER SERVICE OR DCDA FIRELINE BACKFLOW INSTALLATION AT |
| | 301 CLEMATIS ST. SHOW BOTH AT FORMAL ENGINEERING |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED 4 INCH PARALLEL RPZ MAY HAVE BIGGER FOOTPRINT |
| | THAN SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS. |
| | |
| | -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT SHOW CROSSING INFORMATION OR |
| | PROFILES FOR UTILITY WORK IN ALLEY. WHEN REVIEWED AT |
| | FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF THERE ARE ANY |
| | CONFLICTS, ADDITIONAL WORK OR PLAN REVISION MAY BE |
| | NEEDED. |
| | |
| | -CIVIL PLANS DO NOT COMMUNICATE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR 2 |
| | INCH BFP AT EAST SIDE OF 301 CLEMATIS AND WHAT IS |
| | HAPPENING TO THE ASSOCIATED WATER METER. ANY PROPOSED |
| | LOCATION MUST BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES AND |
| | RETEST/REINSPECTION WOULD BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | -CIVIL PLANS SHOW EXSS AND EXDN FLOWING TO ONE MANHOLE |
| | IN OLIVE. EOR NEEDS TO VERIFY IF THIS IS ACCURATE AND |
| | UPDATE PLANS AS NEEDED. |
| | |
| | -EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICES TO 301 CLEMATIS ST. |
| | BUILDING ARE NOT SHOWN AND LABELED ON WATER PLAN WITH |
| | WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. UPDATE AT FORMAL ENGINEERING |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PLANS ARE MISSING SEVERAL STANDARD DETAILS INCLUDING |
| | SMALL METERED WATER SERVICE, LARGE METERED WATER |
| | SERVICE, AND FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. ADD AT FORMAL |
| | ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -PLANS FOR EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND UTILITY |
| | POLES ALONG THE ALLEYWAY WERE PREVIOUSLY UNCERTAIN. |
| | NEWEST REVISION PLANS STILL DO NOT SEEM TO ACCOUNT FOR |
| | THEM, OR DETAIL WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THEM. |
| | |
| 2021-11-10 15:56:25 | PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT: |
| | TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE OVER |
| | $500,000 IT IS SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT AS |
| | PER CITY ORDINANCE. |
| | SECTION 78-129: ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, |
| | INCLUDING NEW CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR |
| | IMPROVEMENT OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE TOTAL |
| | CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN |
| | $500,000 ARE SUBJECT TO THE PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT. |
| | OPTION 1: INSTALL ARTWORK ON THE DEVELOPMENT SITE |
| | VALUED IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN ONE PERCENT OF THE |
| | TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS; OR |
| | OPTION 2: CONTRIBUTE AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO 75 PERCENT OF |
| | ONE PERCENT OF THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR DEPOSIT |
| | TO THE PUBLIC ART ACCOUNT. |
| | A COMPLETED PUBLIC ART ASSESSMENT APPLICATION IS |
| | REQUIRED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC ART & |
| | CULTURE AT [email protected] TO OBTAIN AN ART ASSESSMENT |
| | APPLICATION AND REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
