| Date |
Text |
| 2021-09-29 17:28:10 | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENG. |
| | SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 [email protected] : |
| | |
| | 1. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY |
| | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. |
| | 2. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON PLANS OF EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED DEMANDS FOR WATER & SEWER (AVERAGE, MAXIMUM |
| | AND PEAK) AND FIRE FLOW DEMANDS. CALCULATIONS SHALL BE |
| | PER FAC 64E-8 FOR WATER AND PER FAC 64-E.008 FOR SEWER. |
| | 3. PROVIDE CCTV VIDEO OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND |
| | STORMWATER PIPES ALONG ENTIRE PROJECT FRONTAGE. CCTV IS |
| | A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. |
| | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND |
| | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED AREAS |
| | ON PAVING PLANS. |
| | 5. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE |
| | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING |
| | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT |
| | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] |
| | 6. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW |
| | PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, |
| | STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING |
| | STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY |
| | SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND |
| | OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH |
| | BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES |
| | SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, |
| | CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND |
| | MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL |
| | AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW. |
| | DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN |
| | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, |
| | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION |
| | FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | 7. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , CUT AND CAP |
| | UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY |
| | LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | 8. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PROVIDE DEDICATED |
| | UTILITY EASEMENTS TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY PERSONNEL TO |
| | PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. |
| | 9. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED LOCATION OF WATER |
| | METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION. |
| | 10. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PLEASE CALLOUT |
| | DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA AND FIRE BACKFLOW |
| | PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE DESIGN ON ALL |
| | BACKFLOWS. |
| | 11. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND |
| | NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED. |
| | - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT: |
| | - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS |
| | THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF |
| | DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND |
| | - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE |
| | STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A |
| | MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4). |
| | - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF |
| | CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION |
| | THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL |
| | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
| | OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO |
| | NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE |
| | CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT. |
| | 12. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, PROVIDE PROFILES |
| | OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND SEWER WITHIN RIGHT |
| | OF WAY AND SHOW ANY CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. |
| | 13. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN SUBMITTING |
| | APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT |
| | SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW DEVICES SHOWING |
| | SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING USC APPROVED |
| | LEAD-FREE DESIGN. |
| | 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL CLEARLY SHOW ROAD |
| | RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | 15. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL PROVIDE SANITARY |
| | ELEVATIONS AT MANHOLE TIE-IN. |
| | 16. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF SANITARY LINES |
| | ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW ADJACENT SANITARY |
| | LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT |
| | PARCELS. |
| | 17. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, IF WATER LINES |
| | ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW ADJACENT PARCEL |
| | ADDRESSES. |
| | 18. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, WHEN TRENCHING IN |
| | IN CITY MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50 |
| | FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF |
| | PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL |
| | GC-8. |
| | 19. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND |
| | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER |
| | (Z-XXXXXXXX). |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE |
| | SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-2262 OR |
| | [email protected]: |
| | |
| | 1. VERIFY WITH WPB FIRE MARSHAL THAT PROPOSED DCDA |
| | LOCATION IS ACCEPTABLE. |
| | RESPONSE: WE HAVE COORDINATED WITH MARK HURLEY TO |
| | DETERMINE THE PROPER LOCATION FOR DCDA. |
| | NOT SATISFIED. CANNOT RECALL COORDINATING WITH |
| | APPLICANT ON DCDA LOCATION AND NO VERIFICATION FROM WPB |
| | FIRE MARSHAL. PLEASE ALSO REFERENCE REVIEW COMMENTS AND |
| | RESPONSES FROM FIRE MARSHAL 7C AND ANA MARIA 19. |
| | |
| | 12. WILL ALL OF THE METERED PARKING SPOTS ON DATURA |
| | REMAIN AFTER PROJECT COMPLETED? |
| | RESPONSE: A PORTION OF THE METERED PARKING WILL BE |
| | REMOVED DUE TO REDESIGN OF DATURA STREET LAYOUT. |
| | EMAIL SEAN SAMUELS [email protected] AND COPY DANIEL |
| | GIUST [email protected] AND ANA MARIA APONTE |
| | [email protected] REGARDING THIS ISSUE. |
| | |
| | 20. LANDSCAPING PLAN ONLY SHOWS TREES BEING REMOVED. |
| | PLEASE UPDATE LANDSCAPING PLAN TO SHOW ANY OTHER |
| | PROPOSED OR EXISTING LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES, BUSHES, |
| | PLANTS, AND GRASS. VERIFY TREES WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH |
| | UTILITIES. ALSO ADD SEPARATE SHEET SHOWING UTILITIES |
| | OVERLAID WITH LANDSCAPING. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT A CIVIL COMMENT, HAVE LANDSCAPE RESPOND. |
| | NOT SATISIFIED. DID NOT SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN WITH |
| | PROPOSED LANDSCAPING IN RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | -CIVIL, SITE, AND LANDSCAPING PLANS DO NOT APPEAR TO |
| | MATCH EACH OTHER WITH RESPECT TO THE WATER SERVICES AND |
| | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. SITE PLANS ONLY SHOW BACKFLOW |
| | ASSEMBLIES, BUT SHOW THEM IN THE NORTHWEST AREA OF |
| | PROPERTY CONTRARY TO THE OTHER PLAN SETS. PLEASE MAKE |
| | SURE ALL PLANS MATCH, AND ALSO SHOW THE LARGE ABOVE |
| | GROUND METER ON THE SITE PLANS. |
| | |
| | -UTILITY EASEMENT IS NOT NEEDED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| | -RELOCATE IRRIGATION METER ADJACENT THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | -ADD UTILITY EASEMENT FOR IRRIGATION METER AND UPSTREAM |
| | PIPING IF SOUTH OF PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | -BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES MAY NOT BE IN UTILITY EASEMENTS. |
| | MAY NEED TO MAKE SEPARATE SYMBOL OR ICON FOR THE |
| | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES TO DISTINGUISH THAT. |
| | |
| | -LABEL IRRIGATION BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AS RP TYPE. |
| | |
| | -SEWER LATERAL CONNECTION AT SEWER MAIN IS CLOSE TO |
| | FIBER OPTIC BOX AND MAY NEED TO BE RELOCATED UPON |
| | FURTHER REVIEW AT ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | -UTILITY PLAN SHOWS EXISTING POLE CONFLICT WITH |
| | PROPOSED ALLEY BAY DRIVE ENTRANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL TECHNOW, PROJECT ENGINEER, WPB |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-494-1047, [email protected] : |
| | -ADD LOS TO PLAN SHEET. |
| | -PROVIDE NAVD CONVERSION. |
| | -PLEASE ADD NOTE THAT THIS IS WITHIN LS 21 SERVICE |
| | AREA. |
| | -PLEASE SHOW ALL VALVES, SHOW PIPE TYPE AND SIZE. |
| | -SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW. |
| | -CALL OUT SIZE OF METER. |
| | -WHAT IS UGU? PLEASE SHOW ON LEGEND. |
| | -PROVIDE POST CCTV OF SERVICE LATERALS. |
| | -NOTE TO CUT AND CAP UNUSED SERVICES AT THE MAIN. |
| | -CALL OUT SIZE/MATERIAL OF GAS MAIN. |
| | -CALL OUT SIZE/MATERIAL OF SERVICE. |
| | -WHAT SIZE IS THE CONNECTION TO GREASE TRAP? |
| | -CITY WOULD LIKE THE CLEANOUT IN THE ROW. |
| | -SHOW ALL EXISTING DRY UTILITIES. |
| | -METER SHOULD BE WITHIN ROW. |
| | -PLANS APPEAR TO BE CONCEPTUAL. A MORE THOROUGH REVIEW |
| | WILL BE DONE WITH FINALIZED PLANS. |
| | |
| | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | CONCERNS, THANKS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
