| Date |
Text |
| 2021-10-15 12:00:05 | PB 1799B - REVIEW OF SEPTAMBER RESUBMITTAL |
| | 1309 S. FLAGLER RPD BUILDING PERMIT BASED MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT |
| | 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO |
| | (2) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF ISSUE (BY DECEMBER 15, 2021), THE |
| | PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN |
| | THE SITE, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AS TO THE PLACEMENT |
| | OF THE SCULPTURE PADS NEAR THE VALET ONLY STAGING |
| | SPACES. ALL THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE SAME CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 2) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BICYCLE ROOM DETAIL. IT |
| | SHOWS 12 RACKS THAT WILL HOLD ONE BICYCLE EACH, NOT THE |
| | 13 LISTED ON THE SITE DATA SHEET. THE 12 SPACES EXCEED |
| | CODE MINIMUM; HOWEVER, THE SITE DATA SHEET NEEDS TO |
| | SHOW CORRECT INFORMATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE EMPLOYEE |
| | RACK HOLDS TWO BICYCLES, SO YOU MAY WISH TO ADD CLARITY |
| | TO THE TABLE. |
| | |
| | 3) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE SETBACK FROM THE BASE OF |
| | THE ANGLED AMENITY SUPPORT COLUMNS TO THE NORTH AND |
| | SOUTH PROPERTY LINES. HOWEVER, SINCE THE COLUMNS ANGLE |
| | TOWARD THE PROPERTY LINE, THE MEASURE NEEDS TO BE |
| | PROVIDED TO THE PORTION OF THE COLUMN THAT IS CLOSEST |
| | TO THE PROPERTY LINE. STAFF SCALED THE PLANS AND IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THE REQUIRES SETBACK DIMENSION IS MET; |
| | HOWEVER, IT MUST BE SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 4) THE ELEVATION OR SECTION DRAWINGS MUST SHOW A |
| | DIMENSION TAG TO THE ROOF DECK THAT IS BASED ON THE |
| | MEAN AVERAGE EXISTING GRADE THAT VERIFIES THAT THE |
| | BUILDING HEIGHT IS NO TALLER THAN 300 FEET. |
| | |
| | 5) THE ROOF PLAN SHOWS SAUNAS IN THE BATHROOMS. THIS IS |
| | NOT PERMITTED. STAFF PERMITS REQUIRED BATHROOMS ONLY AS |
| | ENCLOSED SPACE FOR ROOFTOP POOLS WHICH EXCEED THE |
| | BUILDING HEIGHT. THE SAUNA IS AN AMENITY AND THUS MUST |
| | STAY BELOW THE 300-FOOT BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWANCE. |
| | NOTE: THE ORIGINAL ROOF PLAN JUST SHOWED ONE BATHROOM |
| | WITH A SHOWER. WHY ARE THERE NOW TWO BATHROOMS SHOWN? |
| | |
| | 6) THE NUBMER OF SPACES ON SHEET G0.01 FOR THE BASEMENT |
| | 1 PARKING LINE IS INCORRECT. THERE ARE 31 PARKING |
| | SPACES. PLEASE CORRECT THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | CONDITION: DUE TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE NEW COLUMN THAT |
| | RESTRICTS THE WIDTH OF THE DRIVE AISLE TO 13 FEET, |
| | TANDEM VALET SPACES B2-04/05 THROUGH B2-12/13 MUST |
| | ALWAYS REMAIN VALET ONLY (THIS MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | CONDOMINIUM DOCUMENTS) AND MAY NOT BE UTILIZED FOR |
| | SELF-PARKING. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
