| Date |
Text |
| 2021-08-11 10:25:03 | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO THE STANDARDS: |
| | -PLEASE SHOW EXISTING VALVES. |
| | -PLEASE SHOW EXISTING DRY UTILITIES. |
| | -SHOW EXISTING UTILITIES ON OLIVE. |
| | -PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR SELECTED METER SIZE |
| | -CALL OUT POINT OF SERVICE |
| | -CALL OUT EASEMENTS POINT OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS. |
| | -PROVIDE PROFILE OF EXISTING UTILITIES (WATER, SEWER, |
| | STORM) WITHIN CITY R/W. |
| | -PROVIDE PROFILE FOR POINT OF SERVICE. |
| | -INCLUDE UTILITY CONFLICT/CROSSING INFO INCLUDING SOFT |
| | DIG/TEST HOLE REPORTS |
| | -ADD NOTE ON PLANS THAT THIS IS WITHIN THE LIFT STATION |
| | #40 SERVICE BOUNDARY. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CONTACT MIKE TECHNOW 561-494-1047 OR |
| | [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS PER MARK HURLEY: |
| | |
| | -SITE PLAN TALKS ABOUT A CONCRETE LIGHT POLE TO BE |
| | LOCATED ON EAST SIDE. WHO OWNS THE LIGHT POLE AND IS |
| | THERE A TENTATIVE DATE FOR THE RELOCATE? APPLICANT MAY |
| | NEED TO RELOCATE THE LIGHT POLE SO DRIVEWAY WILL BE |
| | FUNCTIONAL IF TIMETABLES NOT LINE UP. |
| | |
| | -THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING IS SHOWING IN A |
| | VISIBILITY TRIANGLE ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | -DO THE NORTH BALCONIES EXTEND INTO THE ROW? ARE THEY |
| | ALSO ALLOWED TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT SETBACK? |
| | |
| | -THERE APPEARS TO BE A UTILITY POLE CONFLICT WITH THE |
| | USABILITY OF A PARKING SPOT ON THE WEST SIDE. |
| | |
| | -PLEASE SUBMIT DEMO PLAN AND PAVING PLAN SHOWING THE |
| | REMOVAL OF THE THREE DRIVEWAY APPROACHES AND |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW ONE. |
| | |
| | -LANDSCAPING PLANS AND SITE PLAN DO NOT SEEM TO MATCH. |
| | ONE EXAMPLE IS THE PARKING LOT DESIGN ON THE WEST SIDE. |
| | PLEASE MAKE SURE THE PLANS MATCH EACH OTHER WITH THE |
| | GENERAL LAYOUT. |
| | |
| | -ARE THERE ANY EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR THE |
| | OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ON THE WEST SIDE OF PROPERTY? |
| | |
| | -THERE APPEARS TO BE MULTIPLE EXISTING SMALL WATER |
| | SERVICES BUT THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW THEM. THOSE MAY |
| | CONFLICT WITH PLANS AND MAY NEED REMOVAL. |
| | |
| | -PROPOSED TREES NEAR NORTH ROW MAY CONFLICT WITH |
| | EXISTING WATER MAIN. |
| | |
| | -DID NOT SEE UTILITY PLAN WITH PROPOSED WATER METERS, |
| | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, OR FIRELINE. REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | UTILITIES MAY BE HARD TO ACHIEVE WITHOUT PRIOR PLANNING |
| | AND MAY NECESSITATE SITE PLAN CHANGES. |
| | |
| | -ALLEY WATER MAIN WOULD LIKELY NOT ACCEPT NEW WATER |
| | SERVICES. OTHER NEARBY WATER MAINS ARE SMALL DIAMETER |
| | WITH LIMITED ACCESS. |
| | |
| | -PAVEMENT RESTORATION MAY BE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION |
| | ACTIVITIES IN ROW. |
| | |
| | RESPECTFULLY, |
| | |
| | MARK HURLEY |
| | FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPERVISOR |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | 561-822-2262 |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
