| Date |
Text |
| 2022-08-11 10:52:29 | ZONING COMMENTS 8.10.22 |
| | |
| | 1. AS PER THE CHANGE IN PROJECT SCOPE, STAFF RECOGNIZES |
| | THE DOWNGRADE |
| | FROM A MAJOR PD AMENDMENT TO THAT OF A MINOR PD |
| | AMENDMENT, AS THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO TOTAL SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE OF ANY BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES ONSITE, NO |
| | CHANGES TO PD BOUNDARIES, OR CHANGES IN PD CONDITIONS. |
| | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 2. STAFF HAS CONCERNS WITH THE ADDITIONAL DROP-OFF |
| | LOCATION ALONG TRINITY PL. WITHIN PUBLIC LAND. THE |
| | PROPOSED DROP-OFF REQUIRES AND ENCROACHES SIGNIFICANTLY |
| | INTO CITY-OWNED LAND. IT WILL SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT |
| | GREENSPACE ALONG FLAGLER DR. FOR THE USE OF AN EXTRA |
| | VEHICULAR DROP-OFF.CONVEYANCE OR USE OF THE CITY-OWNED |
| | LAND FOR THE DROP-OFF WILL REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT |
| | IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SURROUNDING GREENSPACE AND PUBLIC |
| | REALM ALONG BOTH THE ROW OF TRINITY PL. AND FLAGLER DR. |
| | TO COMPENSATE FOR THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF THE ADDITIONAL |
| | DROP-OFF AREA. THESE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL INCLUDE |
| | ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING (STREET TREES, PLANTINGS, ETC.) |
| | SEATING, AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: COORDINATION WITH CITY STAFF HAS BEEN DONE TO |
| | PROVIDE THE REQUESTED IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | [NOT SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | WILL REQUIRE AN APPROVED MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE |
| | CITY, WHICH ASSIGNS THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSOR, AND |
| | ASSIGNS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THE PD SITE, |
| | ROW, AND TRINITY PARK. |
| | |
| | CITY TO ISSUE A LICENSE OF NONEXCLUSIVE USE FOR PORTION |
| | OF CITY PARK PROPERTY GIVES PERMISSION TO USE THE LAND |
| | AND MAKE IMPROVEMENTS BUT CAN BE REVOKED AT ANY TIME BY |
| | THE CITY. FURTHER DISCUSSIONS NECESSARY WITH LEGAL |
| | DEPT., PARKS & REC., AND PLANNING. |
| | |
| | THE ADDITION OF THE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION ALONG |
| | TRINITY PARK NEEDS RELOCATION. LOCATION CONFLICTS WITH |
| | THE CITY?S BRIGHTLINE/BRIGHTBIKE SHARING STATION ALONG |
| | THE CHASE ST. AND PARK FRONTAGE. APPROVED PLANS FOR |
| | BIKESHARE LOCATION ATTACHED TO COMMENTS, AND EMAILED TO |
| | APPLICANT. ADDITIONALLY, THE MEETING WITH STAFF AND |
| | APPLICANT DETERMINED A LOCATION CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE |
| | OF THE RESTAURANT OR ALONG THE S. FLAGLER FRONTAGE |
| | (ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK AT THE INTERSECTION OF |
| | TRINITY PL. & S. FLAGLER, ON OR CLOSER TO PD PROPERTY) |
| | AS A MORE APPROPRIATE LOCATION. NO CONCRETE PAD OR |
| | FACILITY HOOKUPS NEED TO BE INSTALLED AT THIS TIME, |
| | STAFF ONLY REQUESTS THAT AN APPROPRIATE SPACE IS |
| | RESERVED FOR WHEN A CITY MICRO-MOBILITY PROGRAM COMES |
| | ONLINE. |
| | |
| | 3. WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE BUILDING ENTRANCE ON CORNER |
| | OF TRINITY PL. AND CHASE ST., STAFF IS CONCERNED WITH |
| | THE REDUCED CHANCE FOR ACTIVITY ON THE GROUND LEVEL OF |
| | TRINITY PL. WHAT IS GOING ON WITHIN THIS SPACE? A. |
| | SHEET C4.02 SHOWS ENTRANCES ON THE SIDEWALK AND CORNER |
| | SIDE, THESE CANNOT BE ACCESSED FROM THE TRINITY PL. |
| | SIDEWALK. |
| | RESPONSE: PLEASE SEE SHEET C4.00, THE DOORS HAVE BEEN |
| | REVISED. |
| | [SATISFIED] DOORS REMOVED FROM PLANS. DISCUSSIONS WITH |
| | STAFF CLARIFIED USE OF SPACE FOR FUTURE TENANT OR |
| | RESTAURANT. |
| | |
| | 4. "WATER WELL FOR COOLING SYSTEM" VAULT SHOWN IN |
| | SIDEWALK/ROW. NOTE CLAIMS TO PUT THIS VAULT AT GRADE, |
| | PLANS ALSO SHOW 3'-7" OF CLEARANCE ON THE SIDEWALK. |
| | WILL VAULT IMPEDE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ON THE SIDEWALK, |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY? |
| | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C5.00, THE EXISTING LID |
| | WILL BE RELOCATED AND ADJUSTED TO GRADE. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 5. END OF DROP-OFF WHERE TRINITY PL. MEETS FLAGLER DR |
| | WILL REQUIRE AN ALTERATION TO THE EGRESS TO |
| | DISCOURAGE/PREVENT ENTRANCE FROM SOUTHBOUND CARS ALONG |
| | FLAGLER DR. THE TRINITY PL. EXIT REQUIRES SIGNAGE FOR |
| | STRAIGHT AND RIGHT TURN ONLY, WITH THE ADDITION OF A NO |
| | ENTRY SIGN ON FLAGLER DR. |
| | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C4.00, SIGNAGE AND CURB |
| | MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 6. MINIMUM WIDTH OF TWO-WAY SHALL BE 18'. PLEASE |
| | INCREASE AREA AROUND DROP-OFF TO BE 18' IN WIDTH AT A |
| | MINIMUM PLUS THE SIDE GUTTERS. |
| | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C4.00, THE MINIMUM |
| | WIDTH FOR A TWO-WAY IS PROVIDED. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 7. WHAT IS HAPPENING THE WITH FDC CONNECTION WITHIN THE |
| | TRIANGULAR SECTION OF GREENSPACE BETWEEN TRINITY PL. |
| | AND FLAGLER DR.? IS THIS BEING RELOCATED? PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY. |
| | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C6.00, EXISTING FDC TO |
| | REMAIN. |
| | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ANY GROUND-MOUNTED MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH LANDSCAPE |
| | HEDGES. |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE MODIFY OR REALIGN THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN |
| | PATH FROM TRINITY PARK, ADJUST IT TO BE PERPENDICULAR |
| | TO THE SOUTHERN SIDEWALK ALONGTRINITY PL (MAKING A MORE |
| | DIRECT/SHORTER PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OVER THE |
| | TRAVEL/DROP-OFF LANES). |
| | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C4.00, THE PEDESTRIAN |
| | PATH HAS BEEN REVISED. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 9. ADDITION OF A SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TRINITY |
| | PLACE WITH ADDITIONAL STREET TREES. |
| | RESPONSE: PLEASE REFER TO SHEET C4.00, AN 8? SIDEWALK |
| | AND LANDSCAPE AREA HAS BEEN ADDED. |
| | [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SIDEWALK LOCATION CONFLICTS WITH |
| | THE CITY?S BRIGHTLINE/BRIGHTBIKE SHARING STATION ALONG |
| | THE CHASE ST. AND PARK FRONTAGE. APPROVED PLANS FOR |
| | BIKESHARE LOCATION ATTACHED TO COMMENTS, AND EMAILED TO |
| | APPLICANT. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 10. PLEASE CONFIRM ALL RESTAURANT SEATING IS OUTDOORS, |
| | NOT ENCLOSED, AND NOT UNDER AC. |
| | RESPONSE: CONFIRMED. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 11. IS THE BUILDING COLOR PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED FROM |
| | THE EXISTING PINK? RENDERS SEEM TO SUGGEST CHANGE. |
| | RESPONSE: NO COLOR CHANGE IS PROPOSED AT THIS TIME. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE FDOT APPROVAL FOR THE STREETSCAPE |
| | CHANGES ALONG LAKEVIEW AVE. |
| | RESPONSE: LAKEVIEW AVENUE IS NO LONGER PART OF THIS |
| | PROJECT?S SCOPE OF WORK. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: THE PHILLIPS POINT MINOR AMENDMENT AND THE |
| | ESPERANTE & PHILLIPS POINT STREETSCAPE PROJECTS HAVE |
| | BEEN SEPARATED INTO TWO SEPARATE PROJECTS UNDER |
| | SEPARATE COVERS AND THE LIMITS OF SCOPE OF WORK BETWEEN |
| | EACH PROJECT IS SHOWN IN THE EXHIBIT ENCLOSED. THE |
| | TRANSITION POINTS BETWEEN THE TWO PROJECTS OCCURS AT |
| | THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE TRINITY PLACE AND CHASE AVENUE |
| | INTERSECTION AND ALSO MID-WAY ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE AS |
| | SHOWN IN THE EXHIBIT WITH A RED DASHED LINE. THE REASON |
| | FOR THE SEPARATION, IS BECAUSE THE ESPERANTE & PHILLIPS |
| | POINT STREETSCAPE PROJECT DOES NOT PROPOSE ANY BUILDING |
| | MODIFICATIONS, WHILE THE PHILLIPS POINT MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | DOES INCLUDE BUILDING MODIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | [NOTE.] COMMENT FROM Z22070013 (FSPR 22-12) STREETSCAPE |
| | CANNOT BE SUBMITTED UNDER ONE UMBRELLA AMENDMENT OR |
| | APPLICATION, AS THIS IS IMPACTING TWO SEPARATE PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENTS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE LANDSCAPE/STREETSCAPE |
| | PLANS. WILL HAVE TO PARTITION INTO THREE SEPARATE |
| | APPLICATIONS/AMENDMENTS: A PHILLIPS POINT MINOR FOR |
| | STREETSCAPE/LANDSCAPE, ESPERANTE MINOR FOR |
| | STREETSCAPE/LANDSCAPE, AND THE CHASE ST. FACE OF CITY. |
| | |
| | 13. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY SHALL BE |
| | APPROVED ASSIGNING THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS, AND |
| | ASSIGNS THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE |
| | ENTIRE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE AND THE SUBSEQUENT |
| | PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY, LANDSCAPING, AND IRRIGATION AS |
| | PART OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES. |
| | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. |
| | [SATISFIED] WILL INCLUDE AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 14. THE PLANTERS SCREENING THE GARAGE FACADE SHALL BE |
| | RESTORED WITH PLANT MATERIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED AT THE GROUND LEVEL. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | 15. WILL HAVE TO COORDINATE IN THE FUTURE WITH SPECIAL |
| | EVENTS IN REGARDS TO TRINITY PL. ACCESS AND |
| | CIRCULATION, ESPECIALLY DURING THE PB BOAT SHOW AND |
| | SUNFEST. |
| | RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED. |
| | [SATISFIED] |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT 8.11.22 |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE |
| | TRIANGULAR SECTION OF GREENSPACE BETWEEN TRINITY PL. |
| | AND FLAGLER DR., (THE AREA WITHIN LP-2, ADJACENT TO |
| | SIDEWALK AND BIKE RACK AREA). ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING |
| | PROVIDES A CONTINUOUS/SEAMLESS TRANSITION FROM PARK |
| | LANDSCAPING TO THE OUTDOOR DINING AREAS LANDSCAPING, |
| | AND ENHANCES PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT WITH SHADE OR |
| | AESTHETIC IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | |
| |
Print |