| Date |
Text |
| 2021-11-08 17:20:56 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 10-22-2021 SUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | 1. [SATISFIED] THE CITY'S OFFICIAL VERTICAL DATUM PER |
| | CITY CODE IS NGVD1929. THE CITY IS ALLOWING SURVEYS AND |
| | PLANS TO USE NAVD1988 PROVIDED THE CONVERSION EQUATION |
| | BETWEEN NAVD1988 AND NGVD1929 IS ALSO PROVIDED. PROVIDE |
| | THE CONVERSION EQUATION ON THE SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - SEE NEW COMMENT #20 BELOW] |
| | ADD VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO SHEETS |
| | C-200 (FOR BENCHMARK ELEVATION) AND C-204. LABEL THE |
| | VERTICAL DATUM ON SHEETS C-203 AND C-206. [[PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENTS: LABEL THE VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION |
| | EQUATION TO NGVD1929 ON ALL CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS |
| | WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION.] |
| | |
| | 3. [SATISFIED] MINIMUM 15 INCH DIAMETER RCP DRAINAGE |
| | PIPE TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| | 4. [SATISFIED - CALCULATIONS TO BE PROVIDED WITH |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO BE |
| | DESIGNED TO MEET SFWMD ERP CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 5. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A PRB DETAIL AND LABEL THE |
| | STRUCTURES WHERE A PRB WILL BE INSTALLED. [PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT: PRBS SHOULD BE USED IN STRUCTURES CONNECTED TO |
| | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AND ON THE OUTFALL PIPE. THE CITY |
| | DOES NOT ALLOW THE USE OF BLEEDERS WITH EXFILTRATION |
| | TRENCHES.] |
| | |
| | 6. [SATISFIED] THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE EXISTING CATCH |
| | BASIN ON DATURA STREET WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY. THE CIVIL |
| | PLANS SHOW THE CATCH BASIN AT THE WEST SIDE OF THE |
| | DRIVEWAY. IF THE SITE PLAN IS CORRECT, THEN SHOW THE |
| | DRIVEWAY FLARE CONNECTING INTO THE EXISTING CURB |
| | TRANSITION. IF THE CATCH BASIN IS WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY |
| | THEN IT SHOULD BE CONVERTED TO A VALLEY GUTTER TOP AND |
| | VALLEY GUTTER CONSTRUCTED ACROSS THE DRIVEWAY. |
| | |
| | 7. [SATISFIED] VALLEY GUTTER MAY NOT BE NEEDED AT THE |
| | ALLEY DRIVEWAY. COORDINATE DESIGN WITH THE CITY'S |
| | PROPOSED UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE ALLEY. |
| | |
| | 8. [SATISFIED] MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT TO BE NEEDED FOR |
| | THE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF |
| | QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE. |
| | |
| | 9. [SATISFIED] SITE SHOULD BE GRADED TO DRAIN |
| | INTERNALLY TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND NOT FLOW ACROSS |
| | THE SIDEWALKS. |
| | |
| | 10. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 11. [SATISFIED] SHOW AND LABEL THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FROM BACK OF CURB TO |
| | THE PROPERTY LINE. [PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROVIDE CROSS |
| | SECTIONS FOR EACH DRIVEWAY AND FOR THE EAST PROPERTY |
| | LINE FROM CENTER OF RIGHT OF WAY TO 10 FEET WITHIN THE |
| | PROJECT.] |
| | |
| | 12. [SATISFIED] INDICATE IF A PERIMETER BERM WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED TO CONTAIN STORMWATER RUNOFF UP TO THE 25-YEAR |
| | 3-DAY STORM EVENT. |
| | |
| | 13. [SATISFIED - SUGGESTION CONSIDERED BUT CANNOT BE |
| | IMPLEMENTED. SEE NEW COMMENT #21 BELOW.] SUGGEST |
| | NARROWING THE WIDTH OF THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY IN ORDER TO |
| | KEEP THE EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AND CONVERT THE |
| | STRUCTURE TO MANHOLE TOP. THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL DUCT |
| | BANK MAY PREVENT THE INSTALLATION OF 15? RCP BETWEEN |
| | THE NEW CATCH BASIN AND THE NEW MANHOLE IN THE RIGHT OF |
| | WAY. |
| | |
| | 14. [SATISFIED - SEE NEW COMMENT #22 BELOW] LABEL |
| | EXISTING PIPE SIZES AND MATERIAL FOR STORMWATER, |
| | SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAINS. |
| | |
| | 15. [SATISFIED] THE SITE PLAN (SHEET PSP-1) SHOWS AND |
| | EXISTING STORM PIPE ON DATURA STREET AS CURVING BETWEEN |
| | A CATCH BASIN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ROAD AND A |
| | MANHOLE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ROAD. FURTHER WEST ON |
| | DATURA STREET, A STORM PIPE IS SHOWN BENDING AROUND THE |
| | POWER POLE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE STREET. HOW WERE |
| | THESE PIPE ALIGNMENTS DETERMINED? |
| | |
| | 16. [NOT SATISFIED - CAN BE CORRECTED FOR ENGINEERING |
| | PERMIT SUBMITTAL] SHEET C-203 SHOWS THE ELEVATION OF |
| | THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE SIDEWALK CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY |
| | TO BE THE SAME. THERE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM CROSS SLOPE |
| | OF 0.5% FOR DRAINAGE AND MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2% FOR |
| | ADA. THE CROSS SLOPE NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON SECTION A-A |
| | ON SHEET C-205. |
| | |
| | 17. [SATISFIED] INCREASE THE DEPTH OF THE SWALE EAST OF |
| | THE PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 18. [SATISFIED] COMMENT REVISED 9/13/2021 TO MATCH WHAT |
| | WAS DISCUSSED WITH J. SCHMIDT ON 9/10/21) MOVE THE |
| | PROPOSED CURBING OUT OF THE ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY. LABEL |
| | THE CURBS ON SHEET C-200. |
| | |
| | 19. [NOT SATISFIED - CAN BE ADDRESSED FOR ENGINEERING |
| | PERMIT SUBMITTAL] THE VALLEY GUTTER WILL NOT BE |
| | PERPENDICULAR TO THE CURBING ON EITHER SIDE OF THE |
| | DRIVEWAY. THE SOUTH EDGE OF THE VALLEY GUTTER SHOULD BE |
| | TANGENT TO THE EP BETWEEN THE NEW MANHOLE (MH 1) AND |
| | THE TYPE 'F' C&G. [PREVIOUS COMMENT: CAN THE VALLEY |
| | GUTTER (DROP CURB) ACROSS THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY BE TANGENT |
| | TO THE BULBOUT WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY? DRIVERS TURNING |
| | FROM QUADRILLE PLAZA DRIVE AND FOLLOWING THE EDGE OF |
| | PAVEMENT WILL HIT THE BULBOUT OR HAVE TO QUICKLY SHIFT |
| | TO THE LEFT TO AVOID THE BULBOUT. MORE OF THE CURB AND |
| | GUTTER EAST OF THE DRIVEWAY MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED (IF |
| | THE ROAD IS WIDE ENOUGH) TO BE TANGENT ON THE EAST SIDE |
| | ALSO.] |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS (CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING ENGINEERING |
| | PERMIT SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | 20. ADD VERTICAL DATUM AND CONVERSION EQUATION TO SHEET |
| | C-304. |
| | |
| | 21. THE TWO EXISTING PIPES BETWEEN THE CURB INLET TO BE |
| | REMOVED AND THE STRUCTURE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF DATURA |
| | STREET ARE LESS THAN 15 INCHES IN DIAMETER BECAUSE THE |
| | ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK PREVENTED THE INSTALLATION OF 15 |
| | INCH RCP. PROVIDE POTHOLE INFORMATION ON THE DUCT BANK |
| | WHERE THE STORM PIPE WILL BE CROSSING. SHOW THE CORRECT |
| | SIZE PIPES ON SHEET C-100, C-200 AND C-203. |
| | |
| | 22. LABEL THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED PIPE SIZES AND |
| | MATERIAL ON SHEET C-203. |
| | |
| | 23. THE SCALE BAR APPEARS TO BE MISLABELED ON SEVERAL |
| | ENGINEERING SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 24. IS THE CONCRETE COLLAR (PLAN KEYNOTE #70 ON SHEET |
| | C-200) AROUND STRUCTURE CB1 NECESSARY? THE SURROUNDING |
| | PAVEMENT IS SHOWN TO BE CONCRETE. IF COLLAR IS NEEDED, |
| | STAFF SUGGESTS THE COLLAR BE A MINIMUM 6 INCHES THICK |
| | INSTEAD OF THE 3 INCHES SHOWN ON THE DETAIL ON SHEET |
| | C-308. |
| | |
| | 25. SHOW OUTLINE OF EXFILTRATION TRENCH ON SHEETS C-200 |
| | AND C-203. |
| | |
| | 26. IS YARD DRAIN YD1 NEEDED? CAN THE AREA BE GRADED TO |
| | DRAIN TO CB2? |
| | |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | 561-351-0510 (M) |
| | |
| |
Print |
