| Date |
Text |
| 2021-08-26 12:26:30 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS TO OCCUR ON A HEAVY UTILITY |
| | SITE WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN CORE. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO |
| | CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT ON IMPROVEMENTS TO |
| | THE ENTIRE SITE THAT WOULD REDUCE THE NEGATIVE VISUAL |
| | IMPACT OF THE UTILITY FACILITY ON THE PUBLIC REALM. SEE |
| | STAFF'S COMMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | BELOW. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE FPL SERVICE LETTER (DATED JULY 23, 2021) STATES |
| | " FACILITIES HAVE POTENTIAL TO BE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | RE-LOCATED AND EASEMENTS ADJUSTED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF |
| | THE PROJECT." HAVE THE PLANS BEEN MODIFIED TO ADDRESS |
| | FPL'S COMMENT? ALL POTENTIAL UTILITY ISSUES MUST BE |
| | RESOLVED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 3.) SERVICE LETTERS FROM COMCAST AND FPU ARE STILL |
| | OUTSTANDING. |
| | |
| | 4.) RENDERINGS MUST BE ACCURATE AND MATCH ALL EXISTING |
| | AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS FOR THE PROJECT. REVIEW OF THE |
| | LATEST SET OF RENDERINGS WITH THE PLANS DO NOT MATCH. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) BARBED WIRED IS NOT PERMITTED ABOVE THE FENCE AND |
| | SHALL BE REMOVED. THIS IS DEPICTED IN THE RENDERINGS |
| | AND IN THE ENGINEERING PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING VS. |
| | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING ON DATURA STREET. THE FEE IS |
| | $16,900/REMOVED SPACE. |
| | |
| | 3.) SKETCH AND LEGAL HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE ROW |
| | DEDICATION ALONG DATURA (8/4/2021 RESUBMITTAL); |
| | HOWEVER, THE ROW DEDICATION SHALL ALSO BE |
| | ILLUSTRATED/CROSSHATCHED AND NOTATED IN THE SITE PLAN |
| | AND ROW DEDICATION CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN |
| | THE SITE DATA TABULAR (SHEET SP-1) FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 4.) A NEW FENCE IS DEPICTED ALONG QUADRILLE PLAZA ROAD |
| | (NOT PERMITTED OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE) AND |
| | CONTINUING ALONG DATURA STREET AND THE ALLEY FOR THE |
| | PROJECT. THERE IS NO INFORMATION/DETAIL/NOTE PROVIDED |
| | ON THIS FENCE. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF OPPOSES THIS |
| | FENCE AS IT INHIBITS ACCESS AND INTEGRATION TO THE |
| | PUBLIC PLAZA. |
| | |
| | 5.) THERE ARE SAFETY CONCERNS WITH THE ACCESSIBLE SPACE |
| | BETWEEN THE ENCLOSURE AND THE DC CONVERTER. IT IS |
| | HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT ONE SCREEN ENCLOSURE IS USED TO |
| | SCREEN ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND/OR GATES ARE |
| | PROVIDED TO ELIMINATE THE ACCESSIBLE SPACE BETWEEN THE |
| | EQUIPMENT. |
| | |
| | 6.) SETBACK DISTANCE FOR THE SOLAR PANEL TABLE CLOSEST |
| | TO THE PROPERTY LINE IS STILL MISSING. SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | ZLDR S.94-122; A MINIMUM OF 16 FT. FROM THE BACK OF |
| | CURB IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7.) ALTHOUGH THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSE LETTER (DATED |
| | 8/2/2021) STATES THAT "TELECOMMUNICATION AND POWERLINES |
| | WILL BE RELOCATED IN COORDINATION WITH ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES," A NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN |
| | IDENTIFYING WHICH POLES WILL BE RELOCATED (AS THE |
| | UTILITY POLES ARE STILL REFLECTED AS INCUMBRANCES IN |
| | THE SITE PLAN] |
| | |
| | 8.) THE RENDERINGS DEPICT AN ARTISTIC SURFACE FOR THE |
| | PARKING LOT; HOWEVER, DETAILS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED ON |
| | THE ARTWORK. IF ART IS NOT PROVIDED ON THE PAVEMENT, |
| | THE PARKING AREA SHALL BE PAVED WITH A LIGHTLY |
| | REFLECTIVE SURFACE TO REDUCE THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT ON |
| | UNCOVERED SURFACE. |
| | |
| | 9.) THE RENDERINGS ILLUSTRATE AN AIR PUMP THAT IS NOT |
| | NOTED IN THE SITE PLAN. THE LOCATION OF THE AIR PUMP IN |
| | THE MIDDLE OF THE ONE-WAY DRIVE AISLE IS NOT IDEAL AND |
| | SHOULD BE EITHER ELIMINATED OR RELOCATED TO A MORE |
| | APPROPRIATE LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 10.) CAN THE TWO ELECTRICAL POLES BE COMBINED TO ONE ON |
| | DATURA STREET? |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) MONUMENT SIGNS ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN |
| | MASTER PLAN (DMP) AREA. THE PROJECT PROPOSES A MONUMENT |
| | SIGN AT THE DATURA STREET ENTRANCE, WHICH IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE IS PERMITTED [ZLDR |
| | S.94-110(B)(3)]. [NOTE: STAFF IS CURRENTLY REVIEWING A |
| | SEPARATE SIGN PACKAGE SUBMITTED AND WILL ADVISE ON |
| | COMPLIANCE ISSUES.] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) GROUND LIGHTING, AS DEPICTED IN THE RENDERINGS, DO |
| | NOT SEEM TO BE DEPICTED IN THE PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X |
| | 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($300.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| |
Print |
