Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z21050015
Project Number Z21050015
Review Stop STORM
Sequence Number 6
Notes
Date Text
2021-11-05 13:50:10THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE
 OCTOBER 29, 2021 PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 1. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL - COORDINATE THE
 GRADING OF CURRIE CRESCENT WITH THE FORTE RESIDENCES
 DEVELOPMENT.] PROPOSED GRADES AT EAST CURB OF CURRIE
 CRESCENT AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN THE 9/8/21 FORTE
 RESIDENCES GRADING PLAN AND THE 9/13/21 FLAGLER TOWERS
 GRADING PLAN APPEAR TO MATCH. [SEE NEW COMMENT 31
 BELOW]
  
 2. [SATISFIED] FLAGLER TOWERS GRADING PLAN SHOWS A SPOT
 GRADE OF 11.07 AT THE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE.
 THIS GRADE WILL CAUSE WATER TO POND IN THE DRIVEWAY
 GUTTER TO THE NORTH (WHICH HAS SPOT GRADES OF 10.93 ON
 THE SOUTH SIDE AND 11.18 ME ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 DRIVEWAY APRON.
  
 3. [SATISFIED] MAINTAIN CROWN CROSS SECTION OF CURRIE
 CRESCENT.
  
 4. [SATISFIED] REQUESTED DIMENSIONS WERE ONLY PROVIDE
 FOR SECTIONS B-B, C-C, D-D, H-H, AND J-J. PREVIOUS
 COMMENT: FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET C-501, PROVIDE
 DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO
 VALLEY GUTTER OR BACK OF SIDEWALK.
  
 5. [SATISFIED] SIDEWALK ACROSS WEST DRIVEWAY TO CURRIE
 CRESCENT SHALL SLOPE TOWARD THE STREET. THE HIGH POINT
 OF THE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT
 STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY FROM FLOWING
 DOWN THE DRIVEWAY TOWARD THE BUILDING AND AT THE SAME
 TIME MINIMIZE THE AREA OF THE DRIVEWAY SLOPING TOWARD
 THE ROAD (I.E. MAXIMIZE THE DRIVEWAY SLOPE BETWEEN THE
 HIGH POINT AND THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK.)] SUGGEST
 SLOPING THE SIDEWALK PORTION OF THE DRIVEWAY SHOWN IN
 SECTION B-B TOWARD THE VALLEY GUTTER. THE GRADES SHOWN
 ON SHEET C-500 FOR THE DRIVEWAY WITH SECTION B-B (10.72
 AT EP AND 10.70/10.84 AT BOW ACROSS DRIVEWAY) DO NOT
 MATCH THE GRADES SHOWN ON SECTION B-B ON SHEET C-501
 (11.00 AT EP AND 11.04 AT BACK OF CROSSWALK [HIGH POINT
 OF DRIVEWAY]). SECTION B-B SHOWS LESS THAN 1/2 INCH
 DROP (0.04 FT) BETWEEN BACK OF WALK AND EP. THIS SHORT
 RISE WILL NOT STOP MUCH ROADWAY STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM
 FLOWING DOWN THE DRIVEWAY. THE GRADING PLAN DOESN?T
 APPEAR TO SUPPORT ALL OF THE CROSSWALK/SIDEWALK SLOPING
 TOWARD THE ROAD.
  
 6. [SATISFIED - SLOPES REMOVED FROM SHEET G-203.]
 PREVIOUS COMMENT: SECTION D-D SHOWS 13.5% SLOPE EAST OF
 THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEET G-203 SHOWS 7.5% RAMP UP.
 PREVIOUS COMMENT: COORDINATE THE SLOPES SHOWN FOR THE
 DRIVEWAYS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE,
 SECTION C-C SHOWS 3.4% SLOPE BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND
 VALLEY GUTTER. SHEET A-101 SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY AT 7.5%
 SLOPE.
  
 7. [SATISFIED] SECTION D-D: PROVIDE SIDEWALK AREA WITH
 SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 2%.
  
 8. [SATISFIED] SECTION E-E: CORRECT LABELS FOR ROAD
 CENTERLINE AND PROPERTY LINE.
  
 9. [SATISFIED] [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL -
 PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON DIANA PLACE SHALL SLOPE TO
 THE PROPOSED NORTH TYPE 'D' CURB AT MINIMUM 2% CROSS
 SLOPE. LANDSCAPE AREA BETWEEN BACK CURB AND 10 FT
 SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE 4:1 OR FLATTER SLOPE. THE 6.8 FT
 LONG SIDEWALK CONNECTORS BETWEEN 10 FT WIDE SIDEWALK
 AND THE PROPERTY LINE CAN SLOPE UP TO 7.2% (EQUATES TO
 LESS THAN 0.5 FT DROP) WITHOUT NEEDING HANDRAILS.
 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AND STORM PIPE WILL BE NEEDED AT
 EAST END OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES TO COLLECT
 STORMWATER RUNOFF AND CONVEY TO EXISTING DRAINAGE
 STRUCTURE.] (PREVIOUS COMMENT- GRADING OF THE AREA
 BETWEEN THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND THE CENTER LINE OF
 DIANA PLACE CAN BE A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO
 BE WORKED OUT DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.]
 REVISED COMMENT: THE GRADING BETWEEN THE ROAD
 CENTERLINE AND R/W, AS SHOWN ON SECTIONS H-H THROUGH
 J-J NEEDS FURTHER REFINEMENT. SINCE STEPS ARE BEING
 PROPOSED TO MAKE UP THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE
 FINISHED FLOORS OF THE HOUSING UNITS AND THE DIANA
 PLACE PARCEL, MAINTAIN NORMAL CROWN FOR DIANA PLACE AND
 SLOPE THE PARKING TOWARD THE PROPOSED CURB LINE. FOR
 SECTION J-J, THE LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD MEET THE TOP OF
 CURB. FOR SECTION J-J, SLOPE THE SIDEWALK TOWARD THE
 ROAD AND INSTALL A CATCH BASIN IN THE SMALL LANDSCAPE
 AREA AND CONNECT INTO THE CURB INLET ON THE STREET.
 PROVIDE SECTION(S) ON EITHER SIDE OF THE STEPS TO SHOW
 HOW THE AREA BETWEEN THE STEPS WILL SLOPE.
  
 10. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END
 OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE
 SIDEWALK.
  
 11. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING INCLUDING
 DIMENSIONS TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE UNDERGROUND PARKING
 GARAGE.
  
 12. [SATISFIED - CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT
 APPROVAL - FOR THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE, THE SFWMD TRENCH EQUATION WILL HAVE TO
 BE MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RETAINING WALL ON ONE
 SIDE AND POSSIBLE GARAGE WALL ON THE OTHER THAT WILL
 LIMIT THE FLOW OUT OF THE TRENCH.]
  
 13. [SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH
 ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WILL BE MAINTAINED,
 INCLUDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT, WHEN IT HAS LOST ITS
 DISPOSAL CAPACITY IN A FEW YEARS.
  
 14. [NOT SATISFIED. CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT
 APPROVAL - PROVIDE AN EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL,
 LABELING THE TRENCH WIDTH AND THE ELEVATIONS FOR THE
 TOP OF TRENCH, THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH, AND THE PIPE
 INVERT.]
  
 15. [NOT SATISFIED. CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT
 APPROVAL - PROVIDE DETAIL OF CONTROL STRUCTURE(S). NOTE
 BLEEDERS CANNOT BE USED AS PART OF THE CONTROL TO
 SURCHARGE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH.]
  
 16. [SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS ON
 CURRIE CRESCENT (BECAUSE OF THE TRENCH CUTS AND THE
 CHANGE IN PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR THE PARKING SPACES).
 PREVIOUS COMMENT: SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING LIMITS FOR
 TRENCH CUTS IN THE ROADWAY PER CITY'S STANDARD DETAIL
 GC-8.
  
 17. [SATISFIED] CONVERT EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IN
 THE EXISTING SOUTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE TO A
 CATCH BASIN WITH A HOODED FRAME AND GRATE. THE
 STRUCTURE MAY NEED TO BE ENLARGED IN ORDER TO CONNECT
 THE PROPOSED 15-INCH RCP FROM THE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 18. [SATISFIED - CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT
 APPROVAL - DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN TO CONSIDER SEA LEVEL
 RISE.]
  
 19. [SATISFIED - PIPE WAS REMOVED] WHAT IS THE PURPOSE
 OF THE 6-INCH HDPE PIPE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND EAST
 PROPERTY LINE?
  
 20. [SATISFIED. CONDITION OF ENGINEERING PERMIT
 APPROVAL - THE ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM WILL NEED TO BE
 DESIGNED SO THAT MANHOLE LIDS ARE NOT DISPLACED BY THE
 PRESSURE OF THE WATER OR TRAPPED AIR IN THE ROOF
 DOWNSPOUTS.]
  
 21. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END
 OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE
 SIDEWALK.
  
 22. [SATISFIED - WATER QUALITY TREATMENT PER SFWMD ERP
 SHALL BE DESIGNED AND PROVIDED FOR THE ADDITIONAL
 IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THE DIANA PLACE PARCEL.] NEW COMMENT
 ? FINAL LAYOUT AND DESIGN OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ON DIANA
 PLACE TO BE WORKED OUT DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL.
  
 23. [SATISFIED - DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOWN ON THE RECENTLY
 SUBMITTED FORTE RESIDENCES PLANS.] SHEET C-500 SHOWS
 PROPOSED STORM PIPE ALONG THE NORTH CURB OF CURRIE
 CRESCENT AND CATCH BASINS NEAR THE EAST END OF THE
 STREET BUT NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR THESE. THE
 SIDEWALK AND CURB SHOULD BE SHOWN TO BE REPLACED AND
 PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT IN THE WESTBOUND LANE OF
 CURRIE CRESCENT FOR THE STORM PIPE AND ON S. OLIVE AVE
 FOR THE DRAINAGE MANHOLE. THE CURB RAMP ON THE NE
 CORNER OF S. OLIVE AND CURRIE CRESCENT WILL NEED TO BE
 CONSTRUCTED TO CURRENT ADA CRITERIA.
  
 24. SATISFIED - GRADES MODIFIED] FOR THE NORTH DRIVEWAY
 TO CURRIE CRESCENT, SHEET C-500 SHOWS SPOT GRADES OF
 10.92 AND 10.60+/-ME FOR THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT NEXT TO
 THE DROP CURB/VALLEY GUTTER. CROSS SECTION D-D PROVIDES
 A SPOT GRADE OF 11.07 FOR THE EP NEXT TO THE DROP
 CURB/VALLEY GUTTER.
  
 25. [SATISFIED - SPOT GRADES REMOVED FROM ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS] SECTION D-D ON SHEET C-500 SHOWS A SPOT GRADE OF
 11.86 AT THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEETS G-201 AND G-203 SHOW
 A SPOT GRADE OF 11FT 3IN AT THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 26. [SATISFIED - SPOT GRADES REMOVED FROM ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS] AT THE NORTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE, SHEET
 C-500 SHOWS THE PROPERTY LINE AT AN ELEVATION LESS THAN
 3.98 FT NAVD. SHEET G-203 SHOWS AN ELEVATION OF 4FT 3IN
 AT THE PROPERTY LINE CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY.
  
 27. [SATISFIED] - GRADES FOR CROSS SECTIONS SHOWN ON
 SHEET C-501 SHALL AGREE WITH THE GRADING PLAN ON SHEET
 C-500.
 A. SECTION B-B SHOWS EP GRADE OF 11.00; GRADING PLAN
 SHOWS SPOT GRADE OF 10.72.
 B. SECTION C-C SHOWS BACK OF GUTTER ELEVATION OF 11.18;
 GRADING PLAN SHOWS EP SPOT GRADE OF 10.72.
 C. SECTION D-D SHOWS SPOT GRADE OF 11.83 AT THE
 PROPERTY LINE/FRONT OF TRENCH DRAIN; GRADING PLAN CALLS
 OUT TRENCH DRAIN RIM ELEVATION OF 12.90.
 D. SECTIONS H-H, I-I AND J-J TO BE MODIFIED PER COMMENT
 NO. 9.
  
 28. CONSIDER MOVING THE CONTROL STRUCTURE OUT OF THE
 SIDEWALK BETWEEN S. OLIVE AVE AND THE RESTAURANT/CAFE.
  
 29. FORTE RESIDENCES DEVELOPMENT WAS INSTRUCTED TO MOVE
 THE 5 FT WIDE SIDEWALK ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CURRIE
 CRESCENT TO THE NORTH R/W LINE. THIS WILL REDUCE THE
 WIDTH OF THE ROAD AND MAY IMPACT THE AUTOTURN ANALYSES
 FOR FLAGLER TOWERS.
  
 30. [SATISFIED] THE FRAME AND COVER OF THE PROPOSED
 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WHERE CURRIE CRESCENT TURNS
 NORTH SHALL NOT BE WITHIN THE CURB AND GUTTER. THE RIM
 ELEVATION FOR THIS STRUCTURE (10.43) DOES NOT MATCH THE
 GRADING PLAN (11.07).
  
 NEW COMMENTS:
 31. FORTE RESIDENCES? EOR TO JUSTIFY THE PROPOSED CROSS
 SLOPES OF CURRIE CRESCENT OR FLATTEN THEM TO MEET THE
 FLORIDA GREEN BOOK.
  
 32. TYPE 'C' DETAIL HAS NOTE THAT WEIRS OR PRBS ARE NOT
 TO BE USED IN THIS TYPE OF STRUCTURE. THERE IS A
 PROPOSED TYPE 'C' INLET WITH PRB CALLED OUT IN THE
 NORTH FRONTAGE ALONG S. OLIVE AVE. [CAN BE ADDRESSED
 WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]
  
 33. SHOW SWALE WHERE THE TOP OF CURB ELEVATION IS
 HIGHER THAN THE FRONT OF WALK ELEVATION ALONG DIANA
 PLACE (NEAR WEST END OF THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES).
 [CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL]
  
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120 (O)
 561-351-0510 (M)
 [email protected]
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved