| Date |
Text |
| 2021-09-27 21:37:42 | NO FURTHER COMMENTS |
| | |
| | SATISFIED. APPROVED WITH THE CONDITION OF REVISING |
| | FREIGHT MANAGEMENT PLAN. |
| | |
| | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER ONCE RECEIVED. |
| | 2) SATISFIED. SECOND PARAGRAPH OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | SEEMS INCOMPLETE OR MISSING TEXT AT THE END |
| | 3) SATISFIED. DRIVEWAY DIAGRAM SHOWCASES AN ACCESS |
| | POINT ON DIANA, DUE TO THAT, THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS |
| | INVALID IN ITS ASSUMPTIONS AND FINDINGS. PLEASE CORRECT |
| | AND REVISE ACCORDING TO THE LATEST SITE PLAN. |
| | 4) SATISFIED. PROPERLY DEPICT INBOUND/OUTBOUND VOLUMES |
| | THROUGH EACH OF THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAYS OR ENTRY POINTS. |
| | AGGREGATE AND SHOWCASE VOLUMES ENTERING/EXITING THE S |
| | FLAGLER AND CURRIE CRESCENT MAIN DRIVEWAYS IN FIGURE 4. |
| | 5) SATISFIED. SPECIFY THE FUNCTIONALITY OF EACH |
| | DRIVEWAY (I.E. SERVICE, PUBLIC AND RESIDENTIAL) |
| | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A SEPARATE TRAFFIC STUDY FROM THE |
| | ONE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY, WHERE ALL VEHICULAR |
| | VOLUMES (I.E. RESIDENTIAL) ARE CONSIDERED |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS |
| | 7) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC |
| | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY, PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND |
| | PARKING STALLS) OF THE PROPERTIES ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE |
| | OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES |
| | CLEARLY DEFINED. VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS SHALL BE DEPICTED |
| | FROM OLIVE AVENUE AND THROUGH ALL POTENTIALLY |
| | SERVICEABLE AREAS |
| | 9) SATISFIED. PROVIDE SITE PLAN, OR INDICATE THE |
| | SPECIFIC SHEET SHOWCASING: ROAD, SIDEWALK, AND DRIVEWAY |
| | DIMENSIONS. SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING. |
| | 10) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET WIDE |
| | SIDEWALK ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE ON OLIVE AVE AND |
| | CURRIE CRESCENT. |
| | 11) SATISFIED. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET SIDEWALK |
| | ALONG FLAGLER DR |
| | 12) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE BY WAY OF |
| | PAVEMENT MARKINGS AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY |
| | STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC |
| | ELECTRIFICATION READINESS (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC |
| | CONDUIT) |
| | 13) SATISFIED. MAXIMUM ALLOWED DRIVEWAY WIDTH IS 25 |
| | FEET. THE RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY ON CURRIE CRESCENT DOES |
| | NOT MEET SUCH CRITERIA. |
| | 14) SATISFIED. MISSING DETAILS FOR THE SIDEWALK ON THE |
| | SOUTH-WEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
