| Date |
Text |
| 2021-09-01 16:49:51 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER |
| | 561-822-1462 |
| | PROJECT: FLAGLER TOWER Z21050015 |
| | AUGUST 31, 2021 |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | REVIEW: FLAGLER TOWERS 7/20/21 |
| | 1. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED |
| | 2. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED |
| | 3. PREVIOUSLY SATISFIED |
| | 4. SATISFIED. DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION IMPACT ON THE |
| | EXISTING MATURE TREES ON CITY PROPERTY ALONG DIANA PL. |
| | REMOVE FICUS TREES AND REPLACE WITH 1 TO 1 CATEGORY |
| | SHADE TREE. (SEE #5) |
| | 7/27/21 RC: PLAN IS ALREADY IN PLACE BETWEEN PLANNING |
| | AND PARKS AND REC. TO REPLACE FICUS WITH GREEN BUTTON |
| | WOOD IN AGREEMENT WITH THE NORTON PARK PLACE CONDO. |
| | APPLICANTS MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TREES ON |
| | NORTH SIDE OF DIANA PLACE. |
| | 7/20/2021 |
| | 6. 7/27/21 RC. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE |
| | TREE DISPOSITION LIST: |
| | ? SATISFIED. SHOW THE DISPOSITION OF TREES #1479 ? |
| | #1530. |
| | ? SATISFIED. IDENTIFY TREE #1504 |
| | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE DUE FOR |
| | TREES AND PALMS LISTED TO BE REMOVED. ON EXISTING TREES |
| | ON SITE LIST AND EXISTING TREES ON ADJACENT SITE LIST. |
| | 7. SATISFIED. SEE COMMENT #6 TREE #1479 ON TREE LIST |
| | WILL NEED TO BE LISTED AS REMOVE TO REFLECT DEPICTION |
| | ON THE MAP. PAGE D-1 |
| | 8. SATISFIED. APPLICANT NEEDS PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANS |
| | FOR POOL TERRACE PAGE LA 3-1. THE LANDSCAPING ON THE |
| | AMENITIES LEVEL WILL BE APPROVED WITH PROJECT AND NEEDS |
| | TO BE SUBMITTED. |
| | 9. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK TREES ON FLAGLER APPEAR TO BE IN |
| | CONFLICT WITH MAN HOLE COVERS AND STORM WATER LINE. |
| | ADJUST LINE OR TREE LOCATIONS TO BE RESOLVE. |
| | 10. SATISFIED. LIVE OAK ON SOUTH SIDE BUFFER APPEARS TO |
| | BE TOO CLOSE TO BUILDING AND ENTRY CANOPY AND WILL |
| | OUTGROW ITS SPACE CREATING A CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING |
| | AND SHADE CANOPY. |
| | THE TREES DO NOT APPEAR ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET |
| | LG-3.1. IF THIS IS IN ERROR, PROVIDE A MANAGEMENT PLAN |
| | FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE TREES. |
| | 11. SATISFIED. IN EAST SIDE COURTYARD THERE IS A STRAY |
| | UNMARKED DIAGONAL LINE GOING ACROSS. IDENTIFY LINE OR |
| | REMOVE IF IT?S NOT INTENTIONAL. |
| | SENIOR LANDSCAPE PLANNER WILL RETURN ON 7/22 PLAN IS |
| | SUBJECT TO HIS REVIEW |
| | 7/27/21 RC. |
| | 13. SATISFIED. ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BE ON AT |
| | LEAST 1-20 SCALE PLAN AS THE CURRENT SCALE IS NOT |
| | READABLE |
| | 14. SATISFIED. SHOW OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE |
| | NON-BUILDING AREA OF THE LOT. ADJUST OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM |
| | ON SHEET LR-2. LANDSCAPING OVER BUILDING STRUCTURE IS |
| | NOT COUNTED FOR OPEN SPACE. PROVIDE A DIAGRAM SHOWING |
| | LANDSCAPED AREAS. |
| | 15. SATISFIED. USING THE OPEN SPACE SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED SHADE TREES, FLOWERING |
| | TREES AND SHRUBS PER SECTION 94-442 (C) (2) B. ADD THE |
| | TOTAL TREES REQUIRED FOR OPEN SPACE AND FOR MULTIFAMILY |
| | REQUIREMENT AND SHOW THE TOTAL REQUIRED TREES. |
| | 16. SATISFIED. SHOW THE PROVIDED LINEAR FEET OF |
| | LANDSCAPING FOR THE BUILDING PERIMETER. |
| | ABOVE GROUND POTS AND PLANTERS MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS |
| | PERIMETER LANDSCAPE. THERE ARE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE |
| | BUILDING ON THE OLIVE SIDE AND SHOWN AS PLANTINGS THAT |
| | DO NOT APPEAR AS OPENINGS IN THE PAVED AREAS. CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFY THESE AREAS AND RECALCULATE THE PERIMETER |
| | LANDSCAPE. |
| | 17. SATISFIED. ADD A NATIVE COLUMN TO THE PLANT |
| | SCHEDULE SO STAFF CAN VERIFY REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 18. SATISFIED. MAGNOLIA MAY BE COUNTED AS NATIVE. |
| | 19. SATISFIED. FLORIDA FRIENDLY REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE |
| | AN AREA PLAN SHOWING THE SOD AREAS AS PART OF THE TOTAL |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA AND PROVIDE THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE. ITEM |
| | 6B DOES NOT APPLY. |
| | ITEM 6B STILL DOES NOT APPLY. |
| | 20. SATISFIED. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON SEA |
| | PLUM TREE IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY IF IT IS A CULTIVAR OF |
| | SEA GRAPE. |
| | 21. SATISFIED. TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED NEEDS TO |
| | BE SHOWN FROM THE PLANT LIST. CURRENT COUNT IS 92 TREES |
| | PLUS 11 CABBAGE PALMS AT 3:1 FOR A TOTAL OF 95. SHOW |
| | RELOCATED TREES ON THE PLANT LIST. SHOW OFFSITE TREES |
| | ON THE PLANT LIST. IF REQUIRED TREES ARE NOT TO BE |
| | PROVIDED ON SITE A WAVER MUST BE REQUESTED. |
| | 22. SATISFIED. THE TREES PROVIDED ON THE AMENITY AREA |
| | ON FLAGLER NEED TO BE SPREAD OUT TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR |
| | PEDESTRIANS. |
| | THE INTENT FOR THE OVERALL PEDESTRIAN PLAN FOR THE CITY |
| | IS TO PROVIDE TREE CANOPY SHADE OVER PUBLIC AREAS AND |
| | PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS. THE LARGE GAP ADJACENT TO THE |
| | PLAZA DOES NOT MEET THIS INTENT. STAFF DOES NOT |
| | RECOGNIZE HAVING THE TREES IN FRONT OF THE PLAZA AS A |
| | SAFETY ISSUE, AS THE TREES WOULD MEET CPTED (CRIME |
| | PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN) |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE TREE BRANCHING TO BE ABOVE 7 |
| | FEET. PEDESTRIAN ENJOYMENT OF THE PUBLIC WALKWAY ALSO |
| | OUTWEIGHS THE NEEDS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO EXPOSE THE |
| | ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | 23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TRANSPLANTED OAK TREE #1538 |
| | APPEARS TO BE PROBLEMATIC IN THE SPECIFIED LOCATION |
| | THAT IT WILL CONFLICT WITH THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. |
| | TRANSPLANTED TREES MAY BE RELOCATED OFF SITE. THIS |
| | APPEARS THIS COULD ALSO BE AN ISSUE WITH THE OTHER |
| | RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS. |
| | THE APPLICANT HAS A NOTE PLACED ON THE PLANS FOR |
| | TEMPORARY STORAGE OF THE RELOCATED TREES. PROVIDE A |
| | MORE DETAILED PLAN ON HOW THIS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED. THE |
| | RELOCATED LIVE OAK IS SHOWN WITH PAVING PROPOSED OVER |
| | THE ROOT SYSTEM AT ITS NEW LOCATION THAT WILL NOT BE |
| | PRACTICAL OR HEALTHY FOR THE TREE. THE RENDERINGS SHOW |
| | GRASS AREA. A SUSPENDED PAVING SYSTEM OR SOIL CELLS |
| | MUST BE PROVIDED IF THE TREE IS TO BE SUSTAINABLE. |
| | PROVIDE THE RELOCATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE |
| | TREES BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER RELOCATION AND INCLUDE |
| | IT ON THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/18/21: |
| | 24. SATISFIED. TREE COUNT ON THE PLANT LIST OF 29 LIVE |
| | OAK TREES DOES NOT MATCH THE PLAN SHOWING 30 TREES. |
| | 25. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE SIDEWALK PROPOSED ALONG |
| | OLIVE AVE. APPEARS TO BE TOO CLOSE TO EXISTING TREES |
| | AND PALMS. PROVIDE MORE DETAIL ON HOW THIS WILL BE |
| | ADDRESSED. |
| | SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH ADJUSTED SIDEWALK ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | 26. SATISFIED. PROVIDE SCREENING HEDGES FOR ALL GROUND |
| | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING WATER AND FIRE BACKFLOWS ON |
| | THE CURRIE CRESCENT SIDE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | 27. SATISFIED. VINES ARE SHOWN ON THE RENDERINGS ON THE |
| | WALL OF THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, BUT NO PLANTS |
| | ARE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. CORRECT TO SHOW THE |
| | PLANTINGS. |
| | 28. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL MITIGATION |
| | DUE FOR THE ON SITE TREES AND PALMS TO BE REMOVED. |
| | ADONIDIA PALMS ARE CATEGORY 4 AND REQUIRE 50 SQ FT |
| | CANOPY MITIGATION PER TRUNK, SPANISH CHERRY IS LISTED |
| | UNDER CATEGORY 1 AND REQUIRES 300 SQ FT CANOPY |
| | MITIGATION. PROVIDE THE LIST OF TREES ADDED TO THE SITE |
| | AND ASSIGN THE CANOPY CREDITS BASED ON THE CATEGORY AND |
| | PROVIDE THE TOTAL. |
| | THERE ARE CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE ONSITE AND |
| | OFFSITE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS. |
| | 29. THE PLANTING PLANS FOR THE OFF SITE TREES NEED TO |
| | BE REVISED TO SHOW THE FOLLOWING: |
| | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE ROYAL PALMS BETWEEN THE |
| | GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREES ARE NOT APPROPRIATE TO DUPLICATE |
| | THE CURRENT LOOK OF THE TREE CANOPY AND THEY WOULD |
| | PRESENT A SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE ISSUE OVER THE |
| | PAVEMENT AND PARKING SPACES. REMOVE THE ROW OF PALMS |
| | ADJACENT TO THE CURB. |
| | THERE IS A GAP IN THE TREE CANOPY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF |
| | ACTION PL. ADJACENT TO THE ANGLED PARKING SPACES. GREEN |
| | BUTTONWOOD TREES MUST BE PLACED ALONG THIS AREA |
| | REPLACING THE ROYAL PALMS. |
| | |
| | ? SATISFIED. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM PROVIDED FOR THE |
| | ROOT ZONE OF THE TREES. THE SIDEWALK NEEDS TO BE PUSHED |
| | FARTHER AWAY FROM THE CURB (10 TO 12 FEET) ALLOWING |
| | ENOUGH ROOT SPACE FOR THE TREES AND THE NARROWER |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE BACK OF SIDEWALK. ROYAL PALMS |
| | COULD BE PLACED IN THIS STRIP, BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO |
| | BE FAR ENOUGH AWAY FROM THE SIDEWALK TO AVOID FRONDS |
| | DROPPING ON THE SIDEWALK. |
| | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL TREE CANOPY |
| | MITIGATION DUE FOR THE REMOVED TREES AND PROVIDE THE |
| | MITIGATION SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR THE NEW TREES |
| | AND PALMS PROPOSED. IF THERE IS MITIGATION DUE, STAFF |
| | WILL DISCUSS OPTIONS TO ADDRESS IT. |
| | THERE ARE CORRECTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE ONSITE AND |
| | OFFSITE MITIGATION CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | ? SATISFIED. INCREASING THE NUMBER OF GREEN BUTTONWOOD |
| | TREES AND ROYAL PALMS WOULD INCREASE THE PUBLIC |
| | BENEFITS AND THE AESTHETICS. |
| | ? SATISFIED. EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS A GAP ON THE CORNER |
| | OF OLIVE AND DIANA WITH NO TREE CANOPY PROVIDED. THIS |
| | WAS A LOCATION SUGGESTED BY STAFF FOR THE RELOCATED |
| | LIVE OAK TREE. |
| | |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE STREET TREES AND |
| | RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH |
| | THIS PETITION. |
| | |
| | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| | THE MAINTENANCE OF THE, ROAD RIGHT OF WAY |
| | LANDSCAPING/TREES AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH |
| | A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. |
| | |
| |
Print |
