| Date |
Text |
| 2021-09-01 17:06:05 | CASE NO. PB 1857B - 3RD RESUBMITTAL REVIEW 9/1/21 |
| | FLAGLER TOWERS |
| | 1315 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE |
| | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF ISSUANCE (BY NOVEMBER 1, 2021), THE |
| | PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ON ADDITIONAL |
| | SUBMITTAL. IF COMMENTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED YOU WILL BE |
| | ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE |
| | ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE FAA |
| | APPLICATION NUMBERS. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE FAA |
| | APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED TOWER PRIOR TO SCHEDULING |
| | THIS CASE FOR PLANNING BOARD. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT THE BUILDING |
| | IN EXCESS OF 300 FEET IN HEIGHT. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU |
| | ARE WELCOME TO PROCEED THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING |
| | PROCESS TO CITY COMMISSION; HOWEVER, STAFF WILL BE |
| | RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE REQUEST AS CURRENTLY |
| | PROPOSED. THE LATEST ROUND OF RESPONSES INCLUDES ITEMS |
| | WHICH MUST BE PROVIDED AND CORRECTED PRIOR TO BEING |
| | SCHEDULED FOR PLANNING BOARD, REGARDLESS OF THE |
| | BUILDING DESIGN (EXAMPLE: PARKING LOT CORRECTIONS). |
| | |
| | BUILDING PLACEMENT |
| | |
| | 3) UPDATED COMMENT: SHEET G-201 WAS UPDATED TO SHOW THE |
| | BUILDING 15 FEET FROM THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. THE |
| | CIVIL PLAN CROSS SECTIONS H (14.6 FEET) AND I (14.8) |
| | SHOW THE BUILDING CLOSER THAN 15 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE. ALL PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE SAME CONDITION WITH A |
| | MINIMUM 15-FOOT SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 4) CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE LATEST SIDEWALK AND |
| | LANDSCAPE CONFIGURATION ALONG DIANA PLACE. |
| | |
| | A. UPDATED COMMENT: THE WESTERNMOST TOWNHOUSES, WITH AN |
| | FFE OF 9 FEET ARE BELOW THE ROADWAY ELEVATION, WHICH IS |
| | A PROBLEM. THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION ON HOW |
| | YOU PLAN TO ACCOMPLISH THE DRAINAGE FOR THESE UNITS. |
| | THIS NEEDS TO BE APPROVED BY ROBERT BROWN, CHIEF |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL. PLEASE NOTE THAT IT HAS COME TO THE |
| | PLANNING STAFF'S ATTENTION THAT THE FIMA FLOOD ZONE |
| | MAPS SHOW THAT YOUR FFE NEEDS TO BE SET AT 10, NOT 9 |
| | FEET. WHILE THE CITY IS CURRENTLY APPEALING THIS |
| | DESIGNATION; IF THE APPEAL IS NOT GRANTED, YOU WILL |
| | NEED TO REVISE YOUR FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL. |
| | |
| | B. UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR RELOCATING THE |
| | SIDEWALK CLOSER TO THE TOWNHOUSES AND FLATTENING OUT |
| | THE EXTREME GRADE ISSUES THAT PREVIOUSLY OCCURRED. THE |
| | STAIRS THAT YOU HAVE USED TO OFFSET THIS GRADE |
| | DIFFERENTIAL FOR THE WALKWAYS FROM THE SIDEWALK TO THE |
| | UNITS MAY NOT OCCUR ON THE CITY PROPERTY BUT MUST |
| | RATHER OCCUR ON YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY. AS DISCUSSED ON |
| | THE CALL, FOR WALK-UP UNITS, THIS TYPICALLY OCCURS AT |
| | THE ENTRY TO THE BUILDING. PLEASE NOTE THAT PRELIMINARY |
| | DISCUSSIONS THAT PLANNING STAFF HAD WITH BUILDING STAFF |
| | VERIFIED THAT SHOULD THESE STAIRS BE WITHIN THE CITY |
| | PROPERTY THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE HANDRAILS, |
| | WHICH IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SITUATION. |
| | |
| | C. THE PROPOSED EAST/WEST SIDEWALK NOW SHOWS STEPS AT |
| | THE WESTERN END TO OFFSET THE GRADE DIFFERENTIAL, WHICH |
| | IS NOT ADA COMPLIANT. NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED TO |
| | VERIFY THAT THE NEW CONNECTION TO THE DIANA PLACE |
| | CROSSWALK PROVIDES AN ADA COMPLIANT ROUTE TO AVOID THE |
| | STEPS. THIS NEW CONFIGURATION REQUIRES APPROVAL BY |
| | ROBERT BROWN, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | PARKING |
| | |
| | 5) UPDATED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BICYCLE |
| | PARKING CLOSER TO A GUEST ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE TO THE |
| | BUILDING. THE LOCATION APPEARS TO REQUIRE THAT USERS |
| | WOULD NEED TO WALK THEIR BICYCLES THROUGH THE CAFE |
| | SEATING AREA, WHICH IS NOT IDEAL FOR EITHER THE CAFE |
| | OPERATION OR THE BICYCLE PARKER. PROVIDE A DIRECT PAVED |
| | CONNECTION FROM THE FRONT OF THE RACKS TO THE PUBLIC |
| | SIDEWALK SO THAT THE CONFLICT IS MINIMIZE (SEE E-MAILED |
| | ADDENDUM). THIS WILL ALSO ALLOW GUESTS A ROUTE TO THE |
| | BUILDING ENTRANCE THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE THEM TO WALK |
| | THROUGH THE CAFE SEATING AREA. |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE |
| | |
| | 6) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ONLY |
| | PERMIT HEDGES WITHIN A SETBACK TO BE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT |
| | OF 10 FEET. THE RESUBMITTED PLANS CALL OUT THE |
| | PODOCARPUS ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO BE GROWN TO |
| | A HEIGHT OF 12 FEET TO ARCH OVER THE GATES. IS THIS |
| | PROPOSED TO BE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE ARCH OR THE |
| | UNDERSIDE OF THE ARCH? YOU HAVE STATED THAT THERE WILL |
| | BE COLUMNS FOR THE GATES. THIS WOULD FORCE THE HEDGES |
| | WIDER FROM THE ENTRYWAY AND THUS CREATE A LARGE VISUAL |
| | OBSTRUCTION FOR PEDESTRIANS ALONG THE NEW DIANA PLACE |
| | WALKWAY. IF YOU CHOOSE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS |
| | CONFIGURATION, AN ADDITIONAL WAIVER MUST BE REQUESTED, |
| | BUT STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT IT. |
| | |
| | 7) UPDATED COMMENT: THE TWO NEW TREES PROVIDED ADJACENT |
| | TO THE CANOPY AT THE SOUTH ENTRANCE ARE SHOWN PLANTED |
| | IN PAVEMENT, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. THE PLANTING AREA |
| | NEEDS TO BE SHOWN AS APPROPRIATE FOR A 200-GALLON ROOT |
| | BALL. WHILE ALL SHOWING THAT THE TREES WILL BE PLANTED |
| | IN PAVEMENT, THE CIVIL, SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT |
| | SHOW THE SAME PAVEMENT CONDITIONS IN THIS AREA. |
| | |
| | 8) SOME OF THE TREES ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING ARE SHOWN PLANTED IN PAVEMENT, WHICH IS NOT |
| | PERMITTED. THE CIVIL, LANDSCAPE AND SITE PLANS ALL SHOW |
| | THE CONSISTENT PAVEMENT CONDITION. |
| | |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: FPL EASEMENT WHICH BISECTS THE |
| | PROPOSED BUILDING LOCATION WILL NEED TO BE RELEASED BY |
| | FPL AND ALL OVERHEAD LINES MUST BE REMOVED. ANY NEW |
| | UTILITY LINES MUST BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND. |
| | |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY |
| | OWNED PARCEL SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING THE |
| | SIDEWALK, WALKWAYS AND LANDSCAPE, WILL BE THE |
| | MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FLAGLER TOWERS |
| | PROJECT. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS AND EASEMENTS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATION: EVERY UNIT OWNER SHALL HAVE AT |
| | LEAST ONE EV EQUIPPED PARKING SPACE. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
