| Date |
Text |
| 2021-09-01 15:15:04 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | AUGUST 25, 2021 PLAN SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 1. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] THERE IS 0.42 FT |
| | DIFFERENCE IN GRADES OF EP SHOWN ON THE FLAGLER FORTE |
| | (11.02' NAVD) AND ON THE FLAGLER TOWER (10.60' NAVD +/- |
| | ME) PLANS. (PREVIOUS COMMENT: COORDINATE THE GRADING OF |
| | CURRIE CRESCENT WITH THE FLAGLER FORTE DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 2. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] CURRIE CRESCENT |
| | CURB AND GUTTER TO HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO THE STREET |
| | DRAINAGE SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 3. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] MAINTAIN CROWN |
| | CROSS SECTION OF CURRIE CRESCENT. |
| | |
| | 4. [SATISFIED] REQUESTED DIMENSIONS WERE ONLY PROVIDE |
| | FOR SECTIONS B-B, C-C, D-D, H-H, AND J-J. PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT: FOR THE CROSS SECTIONS ON SHEET C-501, PROVIDE |
| | DIMENSIONS FROM PROPERTY LINE/RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO |
| | VALLEY GUTTER OR BACK OF SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 5. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST SLOPING THE SIDEWALK PORTION OF |
| | THE DRIVEWAY SHOWN IN SECTION B-B TOWARD THE VALLEY |
| | GUTTER. |
| | |
| | 6. [NOT SATISFIED] PREVIOUS COMMENT: SECTION D-D SHOWS |
| | 13.5% SLOPE EAST OF THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEET G-203 |
| | SHOWS 7.5% RAMP UP. PREVIOUS COMMENT: COORDINATE THE |
| | SLOPES SHOWN FOR THE DRIVEWAYS WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL |
| | PLANS. FOR EXAMPLE, SECTION C-C SHOWS 3.4% SLOPE |
| | BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND VALLEY GUTTER. SHEET A-101 |
| | SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY AT 7.5% SLOPE. |
| | |
| | 7. {SATISFIED] SECTION D-D: PROVIDE SIDEWALK AREA WITH |
| | SLOPE NO STEEPER THAN 2%. |
| | |
| | 8. [SATISFIED] SECTION E-E: CORRECT LABELS FOR ROAD |
| | CENTERLINE AND PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 9. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED - GRADING OF THE AREA BETWEEN |
| | THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AND THE CENTER LINE OF DIANA |
| | PLACE CAN BE A CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO BE |
| | WORKED OUT DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] |
| | REVISED COMMENT: THE GRADING BETWEEN THE ROAD |
| | CENTERLINE AND R/W, AS SHOWN ON SECTIONS H-H THROUGH |
| | J-J NEEDS FURTHER REFINEMENT. SINCE STEPS ARE BEING |
| | PROPOSED TO MAKE UP THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE |
| | FINISHED FLOORS OF THE HOUSING UNITS AND THE DIANA |
| | PLACE PARCEL, MAINTAIN NORMAL CROWN FOR DIANA PLACE AND |
| | SLOPE THE PARKING TOWARD THE PROPOSED CURB LINE. FOR |
| | SECTION J-J, THE LANDSCAPE AREA SHOULD MEET THE TOP OF |
| | CURB. FOR SECTION J-J, SLOPE THE SIDEWALK TOWARD THE |
| | ROAD AND INSTALL A CATCH BASIN IN THE SMALL LANDSCAPE |
| | AREA AND CONNECT INTO THE CURB INLET ON THE STREET. |
| | PROVIDE SECTION(S) ON EITHER SIDE OF THE STEPS TO SHOW |
| | HOW THE AREA BETWEEN THE STEPS WILL SLOPE. |
| | |
| | 10. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END |
| | OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE |
| | SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 11. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION FROM THE NORTH |
| | PROPERTY LINE TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING INCLUDING |
| | DIMENSIONS TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE UNDERGROUND PARKING |
| | GARAGE. |
| | |
| | 12. [SATISFIED - TO BE WORKED OUT AT ENGINEERING PERMIT |
| | SUBMITTAL] FOR THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH ALONG THE NORTH |
| | PROPERTY LINE, THE SFWMD TRENCH EQUATION WILL HAVE TO |
| | BE MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RETAINING WALL ON ONE |
| | SIDE AND POSSIBLE GARAGE WALL ON THE OTHER THAT WILL |
| | LIMIT THE FLOW OUT OF THE TRENCH. |
| | |
| | 13. [SATISFIED] EXPLAIN HOW THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH |
| | ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WILL BE MAINTAINED, |
| | INCLUDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT, WHEN IT HAS LOST ITS |
| | DISPOSAL CAPACITY IN A FEW YEARS. |
| | |
| | 14. [NOT SATISFIED. INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED WITH |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE AN EXFILTRATION |
| | TRENCH DETAIL, LABELING THE TRENCH WIDTH AND THE |
| | ELEVATIONS FOR THE TOP OF TRENCH, THE BOTTOM OF THE |
| | TRENCH, AND THE PIPE INVERT. |
| | |
| | 15. [NOT SATISFIED. INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED WITH |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL] PROVIDE DETAIL OF CONTROL |
| | STRUCTURE(S). NOTE BLEEDERS CANNOT BE USED AS PART OF |
| | THE CONTROL TO SURCHARGE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH. |
| | |
| | 16. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED] SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING |
| | LIMITS ON CURRIE CRESCENT (BECAUSE OF THE TRENCH CUTS |
| | AND THE CHANGE IN PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR THE PARKING |
| | SPACES). PREVIOUS COMMENT: SHOW MILL AND RESURFACING |
| | LIMITS FOR TRENCH CUTS IN THE ROADWAY PER CITY'S |
| | STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. |
| | |
| | 17. [SATISFIED] CONVERT EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE IN |
| | THE EXISTING SOUTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE TO A |
| | CATCH BASIN WITH A HOODED FRAME AND GRATE. THE |
| | STRUCTURE MAY NEED TO BE ENLARGED IN ORDER TO CONNECT |
| | THE PROPOSED 15-INCH RCP FROM THE DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 18. [SATISFIED - TO BE WORKED OUT AT ENGINEERING PERMIT |
| | SUBMITTAL] DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESIGN TO CONSIDER SEA LEVEL |
| | RISE. |
| | |
| | 19. [SATISFIED - PIPE WAS REMOVED] WHAT IS THE PURPOSE |
| | OF THE 6-INCH HDPE PIPE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND EAST |
| | PROPERTY LINE? |
| | |
| | 20. [SATISFIED - TO BE ADDRESSED DURING FINAL |
| | ENGINEERING DESIGN] THE ROOF DRAIN SYSTEM WILL NEED TO |
| | BE DESIGNED SO THAT MANHOLE LIDS ARE NOT DISPLACED BY |
| | THE PRESSURE OF THE WATER OR TRAPPED AIR IN THE ROOF |
| | DOWNSPOUTS. |
| | |
| | 21. [SATISFIED] IT APPEARS THE TOWNHOME AT THE WEST END |
| | OF THE PROJECT WILL HOLD WATER BEHIND THE DIANA PLACE |
| | SIDEWALK. |
| | |
| | 22. [CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL] WHAT DRAINAGE |
| | MITIGATION (WATER QUALITY AND PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION) IS |
| | PROPOSED FOR THE ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS AREA IN THE |
| | DIANA PLACE PARCEL. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | 23. SHEET C-500 SHOWS PROPOSED STORM PIPE ALONG THE |
| | NORTH CURB OF CURRIE CRESCENT AND CATCH BASINS NEAR THE |
| | EAST END OF THE STREET BUT NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED |
| | FOR THESE. THE SIDEWALK AND CURB SHOULD BE SHOWN TO BE |
| | REPLACED AND PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT IN THE WESTBOUND |
| | LANE OF CURRIE CRESCENT FOR THE STORM PIPE AND ON S. |
| | OLIVE AVE FOR THE DRAINAGE MANHOLE. THE CURB RAMP ON |
| | THE NE CORNER OF S. OLIVE AND CURRIE CRESCENT WILL NEED |
| | TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO CURRENT ADA CRITERIA. |
| | |
| | 24. FOR THE NORTH DRIVEWAY TO CURRIE CRESCENT, SHEET |
| | C-500 SHOWS SPOT GRADES OF 10.92 AND 10.60+/-ME FOR THE |
| | EDGE OF PAVEMENT NEXT TO THE DROP CURB/VALLEY GUTTER. |
| | CROSS SECTION D-D PROVIDES A SPOT GRADE OF 11.07 FOR |
| | THE EP NEXT TO THE DROP CURB/VALLEY GUTTER. |
| | |
| | 25. SECTION D-D ON SHEET C-500 SHOWS A SPOT GRADE OF |
| | 11.86 AT THE PROPERTY LINE. SHEETS G-201 AND G-203 SHOW |
| | A SPOT GRADE OF 11FT 3IN AT THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 26. AT THE NORTH DRIVEWAY TO S. FLAGLER DRIVE, SHEET |
| | C-500 SHOWS THE PROPERTY LINE AT AN ELEVATION LESS THAN |
| | 3.98 FT NAVD. SHEET G-203 SHOWS AN ELEVATION OF 4FT 3IN |
| | AT THE PROPERTY LINE CROSSING THE DRIVEWAY. |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | 561-351-0510 (M) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
