Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z21050010
Project Number Z21050010
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2021-10-14 14:27:01PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 PROJECT NO.: Z21050010
 CASE NO.: PB 1887
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. [ SATISFIED ] - APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY
 AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD) SHALL BE PROVIDED
 FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. THE SCAD
 SHALL INCLUDE APPROVAL FOR THE REZONING, AS WELL AS THE
 DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ACTUAL PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT). AN
 UNSIGNED ELECTRONIC FORM WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR
 SUBMITTAL, BUT IT WAS NOT SIGNED BY THE OWNER/AGENT. IF
 THIS IS THE VERSION THAT YOU ARE REQUESTING THE CITY TO
 SIGN BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, IT NEEDS
 TO FIRST BE SIGNED BY THE OWNER/AGENT.
  
 2. [ STAFF ACKNOWLEDGES THE EFFORTS THAT WERE MADE TO
 ADDRESS THE CONCERNS LISTED BELOW ? 2.1 THROUGH 2.4 -
 AND HAS NO COMMENTS AT THIS TIME BUT IS CONTINUING TO
 REVIEW THE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL THAT WAS
 PROVIDED ] - THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS SIGNIFICANT
 CONCERNS WITH REGARD TO:
  
 2.1. THE SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF WAIVER REQUESTS WITH
 LITTLE TO NO INDICATION OF HOW THE IMPACTS OF THOSE
 WAIVERS ARE BEING MITIGATED.
  
 2.2. NO INDICATION ON HOW THE PUBLIC IS TO BENEFIT FROM
 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND THE
 ASSOCIATED WAIVERS. PURSUANT TO THE CITY'S ZLDRS,
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ARE PERMITTED TO ENCOURAGE "THE
 USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE
 DEVELOPMENT". WHAT INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES ARE BEING
 UTILIZED? HOW ARE THE BENEFITS MENTIONED IN YOUR
 JUSTIFICATION ANY DIFFERENT (OR BETTER) THAN WHAT WOULD
 RESULT FROM A PROJECT THAT CONFORMS TO THE CURRENT
 ZONING DISTRICT?
  
 2.3. THE CONFIGURATION OF THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING CIRCULATION PATTERN AND OPERATION WITH THE
 GATE/VALET/ETC. AND AMOUNT OF SPACE DEDICATED TO
 VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS.
  
 2.4. LACK OF "ACTIVE" USE ALONG THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 STREET FRONTAGE, INCLUDING THE AMOUNT OF AREA DEDICATED
 TO VEHICULAR USE ON THE GROUND FLOOR, THE PARKING
 GARAGE ON THE UPPER FLOORS, ETC.
  
 3. [ SATISFIED ] - IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS
 (JUSTIFICATION, SITE PLAN, ETC.) THERE IS REFERENCE TO
 A WAIVING THE LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT IN TABLE XIII-1;
 TABLE XIII-1 PERTAINS TO SIGN REGULATIONS. I BELIEVE
 YOU ARE INTENDING TO REFERENCE TABLE VIII-1. PLEASE
 ENSURE THAT ALL CODE CITATIONS, ETC. ARE REFERENCED
 CORRECTLY.
  
 4. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PAGE 3 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THREE (3) WAIVERS ARE BEING
 REQUESTED, BUT THE PLANS INDICATED SEVEN (7). PLEASE
 ENSURE THAT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND
 ACCURATE.
  
 4.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - THROUGHOUT THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT IT INDICATES THAT SIX (6) WAIVERS ARE BEING
 REQUESTED, BUT THE PLANS CONTINUE TO INDICATE SEVEN (7)
 WAIVERS. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DOCUMENTS AND PLANS ARE
 CONSISTENT AND ACCURATE.
  
 5. [ SATISFIED ] - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT CONTAINS
 MULTIPLE SPELLING AND GRAMMATICAL ERRORS. PLEASE
 CORRECT.
  
 6. [ SATISFIED ] - PAGE 4 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THE MARINA PROJECT IS APPROVED
 FOR 1,050 UNITS; PLEASE NOTE THAT 1,059 UNITS ARE
 APPROVED.
  
 7. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - PAGE 4 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THE PROPOSED DOCK HAS BEEN
 APPROVED BY THE FDEP AND THE ARMY CORPS; COPIES OF
 THOSE APPROVALS ARE REQUESTED.
  
 7.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - ON PAGE 2 OF 10 OF THE FDEP
 APPROVAL, IT INDICATES THAT FEDERAL AUTHORIZATION
 EXPIRED ON 7/25/2016.
  
 7.2 [ NEW COMMENT ] - EXHIBIT A OF THE FDEP APPROVAL
 INDICATES THAT THE TIME LIMIT FOR COMPLETING THE WORK
 AUTHORIZED ENDS ON 7/25/2016.
  
 8. [ SATISFIED ] - PAGES 4 AND 9 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT MAKE REFERENCE TO SEC. 94-243, TABLE VIII-3
 OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS; THIS SECTION OF THE CODE IS THE
 SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL
 DISTRICTS. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL CODE CITATIONS, ETC.
 ARE REFERENCED CORRECTLY.
  
 9. [ SATISFIED ] - PAGE 5 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT MAKES REFERENCE TO THE REQUIRED BUILDING
 COVERAGE, OPEN SPACE, PERVIOUS AREA, ETC.; PLEASE NOTE
 THAT RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DO NOT HAVE THESE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 10. [ SATISFIED ] - THE FRONT SETBACKS (BOTH REQUIRED
 AND PROPOSED) SHOWN ON PAGE 5 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT IS INCORRECT. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DATA IS
 CORRECT.
  
 11. [ SATISFIED ] - THE CODE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE
 TABLE "SCUBA CLUB PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS" ON
 SHEET SP-1 ARE INCORRECT.
  
 12. [ SATISFIED ] - PAGE 10 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT INDICATES THAT SEC. 94-207(C)(4) REQUIRES THE
 2:1 RATIO FOR SETBACKS VS. BUILDING HEIGHT; THIS IS
 INCORRECT.
  
 13. [ SATISIFED ] - PAGE 11 OF THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT MAKES REFERENCE TO SEC. 94-243(D)(2)(A) OF
 THE CITY'S ZLDRS; THIS CODE SECTION DOES NOT EXIST.
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL CODE CITATIONS, ETC. ARE
 REFERENCED CORRECTLY.
  
 14. [ SATISFIED ] - AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION, THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
 SHALL BE PROVIDED IN MICROSOFT WORK, OR COMPATIBLE,
 FORMAT.
  
 15. [ SATISFIED ] - THE OWNER'S CONSENT FORM LISTS THE
 OWNER AS "SCUBA CLUB MANAGER, LLC", BUT THE WARRANTY
 DEED PROVIDED INDICATES THAT THE OWNER IS "SCUBA CLUB
 WPB, LLC". PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE CORRECT OWNER IS
 LISTED.
  
 16. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - ALL OF THE REQUIRED
 PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 16.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - COMCAST LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 17. [ SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-312(1)(A) OF
 THE CITY'S ZLDRS, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH 75
 UNITS OR LESS ARE ONLY PERMITTED ONE (1) ACCESS POINT.
 ADDITIONALLY, IF MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS WERE PROVIDED,
 SEC. 94-312(2)(A) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS REQUIRES THAT
 ACCESS POINTS HAVE A MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE OF AT
 LEAST 125 FEET ON A NON-THOROUGHFARE ROADWAY.
  
 18. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LANDSCAPING SHOWN ON SHEET R7
 DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT IS PROPOSED IN THE
 SUBMITTED LANDSCAPE PLANS. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS
 ACCURATELY MATCH WHAT IS PROPOSED.
  
 19. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LABELING OF THE "GUARD HOUSE"
 ON SHEET R7 IS PLACED INCORRECTLY.
  
 20. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SETBACK LINE ON THE
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS APPEAR TO BE IN THE WRONG LOCATION,
 SPECIFICALLY THE FRONT SETBACK.
  
 21. [ SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-71(D)(2)(A) OF
 THE CITY'S ZLDRS, LOT WIDTHS ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH
 FLAGLER DRIVE ARE TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 94-77(A)(1)(L),
 WHICH REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 75 FEET. MANY OF
 YOUR PLANS/DOCUMENTS REFERENCE A REQUIRED LOT WIDTH OF
 50 FEET; PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 22. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - IT WAS INDICATED THAT
 BIKE PARKING IS BEING PROVIDED FOR EIGHT (8) BICYCLES.
 THE ONLY INFORMATION ON THE PLANS INDICATING ANY
 BICYCLE FACILITIES HAS BEEN THE BIKE STORAGE ROOM:
  
 22.1. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE INDICATE THE LAYOUT OF THE
 FACILITIES IN THIS ROOM TO ENSURE THAT A SUFFICIENT
 NUMBER OF FACILITIES ARE BEING PROVIDED.
  
 22.2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES
 SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT ARE ACCESSIBLE TO GUESTS, ETC.
 THAT MAY NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE BIKE STORAGE ROOM.
  
 22.2.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? A DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 THE BIKE RACKS LOCATED BEHIND THE VALET STATION AND
 SUCH RACKS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY?S DESIGN
 REQUIREMENTS, SPACING, ETC.
  
 22.3. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW
 STEPS FROM THE ADJACENT WALKWAY INTO BOTH THE BIKE
 STORAGE AS WELL AS STAIR 3, ETC. THESE ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. IF STEPS ARE BEING PROVIDED,
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT THIS IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE ADA
 ACCESSIBLE.
  
 23. [ SATISFIED ] - THE WAIVER REGARDING THE HEIGHT OF
 THE BUILDING RELATIVE TO THE SETBACKS SHOULD BE
 EXPRESSED AS A WAIVER TO THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT
 PERMITTED. THE REFERENCE TO THE SETBACK CAN ALSO BE
 PROVIDED, BUT THE WAIVER TO THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL BE
 EXPRESSLY INDICATED.
  
 24. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SETBACK SHALL BE INDICATED FOR
 THE MONUMENT SIGN. PER SEC. 94-407(2) OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS, THE SIGN SHALL BE 20 FEET FROM AN ADJACENT
 PROPERTY, AND 20 FEET FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IF PLACED
 PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREET.
  
 25. [ SATISFIED ] - THE HEIGHT OF THE FREESTANDING SIGN
 SHALL BE INDICATED. PER SEC. 94-207(2) OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS, THE SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN
 HEIGHT.
  
 26. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE CROSS
 SECTION (WITH CORRECT ELEVATIONS) SHOWING THE AREA FROM
 THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE
 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, THE
 PROPERTY LINE, THE EXISTING CONCRETE WALL, ETC.
  
 26.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? IN THE CROSS SECTIONS, PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE ELEVATION POINTS FOR THE TOP OF THE
 RETAINING WALL.
  
 26.2 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING THE CROSS SECTION IN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
 SHOW THE SITE SLOPING TOWARD THE ADJACENT PROPERTY,
 WITH ALL RUNOFF LEAVING THE SITE ONTO THE ADJACENT
 PROPERTY; THE CIVIL PLANS INDICATE WHAT APPEARS TO BE A
 SWALE BEFORE THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL
 PLANS ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 27. [ SATISFIED ] - ALL SETBACKS NEED TO BE MEASURED
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE
 STRUCTURE. IT APPEARS THAT THAT AT LEASE THE REAR
 SETBACK IS NOT MEASURED TO THE CLOSEST POINT AS THERE
 ARE STRUCTURAL WALLS, COLUMNS, ETC. THAT ARE CLOSER TO
 THE PROPERTY LINE AND ARE NOT BEING ACCOUNTED FOR.
  
 28. [ SATISFIED ] - DATA TABLE NEEDS TO INDICATE THE
 NUMBER OF COMPACT PARKING SPACES AND INDICATE
 COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(N)(1) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS.
  
 29. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - TURNAROUND SPACES SHALL
 BE PROVIDED AT EACH DEAD-END PARKING AREA.
  
 29.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] ? THE TURNAROUND AREA AT THE TOP
 OF THE 5TH FLOOR NEEDS TO BE STRIPED OUT AS NO PARKING.
  
 30. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED SHOWING THE PROPOSED
 SCREENING METHODS FOR THE PARKING GARAGE, INCLUDING HOW
 VEHICLE LIGHTS WILL BE BLOCKED FROM IMPACTING THE
 ADJACENT PROPERTIES, ETC.
  
 31. [ SATISFIED ] - ADDITIONAL DETAIL NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED ON THE ROOF PLAN/ELEVATIONS TO INDICATE WHY
 THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING IS MEASURED AT 235' 2" AND
 NOT 244' 2". IS THE AREA ABOVE 235? 2? ENCLOSED, OR IS
 IT A SCREEN WALL/PARAPET?
  
 32. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE SITE DATA TABLE NEEDS
 TO INDICATE THE AREA ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBMERGED
 LANDS AND INDICATE HOW THE DENSITY COMPLIES WITH SEC.
 94-309(F)(3) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS. NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO
 SEC. 94-309(F)(2) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, "A STATEMENT
 CONCURRENT WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION OR
 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO
 THE CITY ATTORNEY, THAT AN APPLICATION TO FILL AND
 UTILIZE SUBMERGED LANDS WILL NOT BE FILLED FOLLOWING
 APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OR
 ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT."
  
 32.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED
 REGARDING THE DENSITY CALCULATION AND AN ADDITIONAL
 WAIVER HAS BEEN ADDED TO INCREASE THE DENSITY
 ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBMERGED LANDS. PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-309(F)(4) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, PROPOERTIES MUST HAVE
 AN "AGGREGATE OF UPLAND AND SUBMERGED ACREAGE OF TWO
 ACRES OR MORE" TO APPLY FOR A PD IN ORDER TO INCREASE
 THE UTILIZATION OF SUBMERGED LAND.
  
 33. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-313(A) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, THE FOLLOWING
 INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE DOCK IF IT IS TO
 BE INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION:
  
 33.1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - A CROSS SECTION SHOWING
 ALL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED DOCK, BOTTOM OF THE
 WATERWAY, MEAN HIGH WATER, BULKHEAD, ETC. SHALL BE
 PROVIDED. NO PORTION OF THE DOCK SHALL EXTEND ABOVE THE
 HEIGHT OF THE BULKHEAD WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SECURITY
 FENCES, BOAT LIFTS, AND MOORING DEVICES.
  
 33.1.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - ARE THE 2015 PLANS PREPARED BY
 ISIMINGER & STUBBS BEING UTILIZED TO PROVIDE DETAIL
 REGARDING THE DOCK? THESE PLANS DO NOT COMPLETELY MATCH
 WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED CURRENTLY. ALL 2015 PLANS NEEDS
 TO BE UPDATED AND ALL PLANS NEED TO BE CONSISTENT.
  
 33.2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - A STUDY SHOWING THAT
 MARINE GRASSES, ETC. ARE NOT BEING IMPACTED BY THE
 PROPOSED DOCK CONSTRUCTION.
  
 33.2.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - ARE THE 2015 PLAN PREPARED BY
 ISIMINGER & STUBBS BEING UTILIZED TO PROVIDE DETAIL
 REGARDING THE DOCK CONSTRUCTION? ALL 2015 PLANS NEEDS
 TO BE UPDATED AND ALL PLANS NEED TO BE CONSISTENT.
  
 33.3. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE DISTANCE FROM THE END OF
 THE PROPOSED DOCK TO THE NAVIGABLE CHANNEL.
  
 33.4. [ SATISFIED ] - A NOTATION SHALL BE MADE
 INDICATING THAT ALL SLIPS WITH BE PROVIDED WITH
 APPROPRIATE WATER AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
  
 33.5. [ SATISFIED ] - AT LEAST ONE LADDER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FOR EACH DOCK, EXTENDING FROM THE DOCK SURFACE
 TO 2 FEET BELOW MEAN LOW WATER.
  
 33.6. [ SATISFIED ] - WATER-RESISTANT REFLECTIVE NUMBER
 SHALL E PROVIDED ON THE END OF THE DOCK, VISIBLE FROM
 THE WATERWAY, CORRESPONDING TO THE STREET ADDRESS.
  
 34. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT
 APPEAR TO BE PILINGS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE MIDDLE 1/3 OF
 THE LOT. ALL PILINGS, MOORING RELATED FACILITIES, ETC.
 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE MIDDLE 1/3 OF THE LOT,
 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 94-313(A)(3)(H) OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS.
  
 34.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - ARE THE 2015 PLANS PREPARED BY
 ISIMINGER & STUBBS BEING UTILIZED TO PROVIDE DETAIL
 REGARDING THE DOCK CONSTRUCTION? THESE PLANS DO NOT
 COMPLETELY MATCH WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED CURRENTLY. THE
 DOCK PLAN ON SHEET SP-1 DOES NOT SHOW ANY MOORING
 PILINGS. LOCATIONS OF ALL MOORING FACILITIES, BOAT
 LIFTS, ETC. NEED TO BE SHOWN TO ENSURE PLACEMENT WITHIN
 THE REQUIRED SETBACKS. ALL 2015 PLANS NEEDS TO BE
 UPDATED AND ALL PLANS NEED TO BE CONSISTENT.
  
 35. [ SATISFIED ] - THE DOCK PLATFORM ADJACENT TO THE
 SEAWALL APPEARS TO BE ENCROACHING OUTSIDE THE MIDDLE
 1/3 OF THE LOT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PLATFORM SHOWN ON THE
 SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE
 CIVIL PLANS. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND
 ACCURATE.
  
 36. [ SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO SEC.
 94-313(A)(3)(G)(II) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, DOCKS
 CONTAINING FOUR OR MORE MOORING SLIPS SHALL PROVIDE
 SANITARY SEWER PUMP OUT FACILITIES ON THE FOLLOWING
 BASIS: ONE SANITARY SEWER PUMP OUT RECEPTACLE FOR EVERY
 EIGHT MOORING SLIPS OR FRACTION THEREOF, OR APPROPRIATE
 CONNECTIONS TO EACH MOORING SLIP.
  
 37. [ NEW COMMENT [ - PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING
 THE GREEN WALL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY
 (HEIGHT OF THE WALL, ETC.) AS WELL AS THE HEIGHT OF THE
 KNEE WALL THAT IS PROPOSED ALONG THE FRONT OF THE
 PROPERTY.
  
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE NOVEMBER 16, 2021,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2021.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER 16, 2021, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1, 2021. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND
 BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved