Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z21050010
Project Number Z21050010
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2021-07-20 09:16:05PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 PROJECT NO.: Z21050010
 CASE NO.: PB 1887
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. APPROVED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION
 (SCAD) SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 SCHOOL DISTRICT. THE SCAD SHALL INCLUDE APPROVAL FOR
 THE REZONING, AS WELL AS THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ACTUAL
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT). AN UNSIGNED ELECTRONIC FORM WAS
 INCLUDED IN YOUR SUBMITTAL, BUT IT WAS NOT SIGNED BY
 THE OWNER/AGENT. IF THIS IS THE VERSION THAT YOU ARE
 REQUESTING THE CITY TO SIGN BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE
 SCHOOL DISTRICT, IT NEEDS TO FIRST BE SIGNED BY THE
 OWNER/AGENT.
  
 2. THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS WITH
 REGARD TO:
  
 2.1. THE SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF WAIVER REQUESTS WITH
 LITTLE TO NO INDICATION OF HOW THE IMPACTS OF THOSE
 WAIVERS ARE BEING MITIGATED.
  
 2.2. NO INDICATION ON HOW THE PUBLIC IS TO BENEFIT FROM
 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND THE
 ASSOCIATED WAIVERS. PURSUANT TO THE CITY'S ZLDRS,
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS ARE PERMITTED TO ENCOURAGE "THE
 USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE
 DEVELOPMENT". WHAT INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES ARE BEING
 UTILIZED? HOW ARE THE BENEFITS MENTIONED IN YOUR
 JUSTIFICATION ANY DIFFERENT (OR BETTER) THAN WHAT WOULD
 RESULT FROM A PROJECT THAT CONFORMS TO THE CURRENT
 ZONING DISTRICT?
  
 2.3. THE CONFIGURATION OF THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY,
 INCLUDING CIRCULATION PATTERN AND OPERATION WITH THE
 GATE/VALET/ETC. AND AMOUNT OF SPACE DEDICATED TO
 VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS.
  
 2.4. LACK OF "ACTIVE" USE ALONG THE FLAGLER DRIVE
 STREET FRONTAGE, INCLUDING THE AMOUNT OF AREA DEDICATED
 TO VEHICULAR USE ON THE GROUND FLOOR, THE PARKING
 GARAGE ON THE UPPER FLOORS, ETC.
  
 3. IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS (JUSTIFICATION, SITE PLAN,
 ETC.) THERE IS REFERENCE TO A WAIVING THE LOT WIDTH
 REQUIREMENT IN TABLE XIII-1; TABLE XIII-1 PERTAINS TO
 SIGN REGULATIONS. I BELIEVE YOU ARE INTENDING TO
 REFERENCE TABLE VIII-1. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL CODE
 CITATIONS, ETC. ARE REFERENCED CORRECTLY.
  
 4. PAGE 3 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT
 THREE (3) WAIVERS ARE BEING REQUESTED, BUT THE PLANS
 INDICATED SEVEN (7). PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DOCUMENTS
 AND PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND ACCURATE.
  
 5. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT CONTAINS MULTIPLE
 SPELLING AND GRAMMATICAL ERRORS. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 6. PAGE 4 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT
 THE MARINA PROJECT IS APPROVED FOR 1,050 UNITS; PLEASE
 NOTE THAT 1,059 UNITS ARE APPROVED.
  
 7. PAGE 4 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT
 THE PROPOSED DOCK HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE FDEP AND THE
 ARMY CORPS; COPIES OF THOSE APPROVALS ARE REQUESTED.
  
 8. PAGES 4 AND 9 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MAKE
 REFERENCE TO SEC. 94-243, TABLE VIII-3 OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS; THIS SECTION OF THE CODE IS THE SCHEDULE OF
 DISTRICT REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS. PLEASE
 ENSURE THAT ALL CODE CITATIONS, ETC. ARE REFERENCED
 CORRECTLY.
  
 9. PAGE 5 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MAKES
 REFERENCE TO THE REQUIRED BUILDING COVERAGE, OPEN
 SPACE, PERVIOUS AREA, ETC.; PLEASE NOTE THAT
 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DO NOT HAVE THESE
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 10. THE FRONT SETBACKS (BOTH REQUIRED AND PROPOSED)
 SHOWN ON PAGE 5 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS
 INCORRECT. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL DATA IS CORRECT.
  
 11. THE CODE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE TABLE "SCUBA
 CLUB PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS" ON SHEET SP-1
 ARE INCORRECT.
  
 12. PAGE 10 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES
 THAT SEC. 94-207(C)(4) REQUIRES THE 2:1 RATIO FOR
 SETBACKS VS. BUILDING HEIGHT; THIS IS INCORRECT.
  
 13. PAGE 11 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MAKES
 REFERENCE TO SEC. 94-243(D)(2)(A) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS;
 THIS CODE SECTION DOES NOT EXIST. PLEASE ENSURE THAT
 ALL CODE CITATIONS, ETC. ARE REFERENCED CORRECTLY.
  
 14. AS REQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, THE
 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PROVIDED IN
 MICROSOFT WORK, OR COMPATIBLE, FORMAT.
  
 15. THE OWNER'S CONSENT FORM LISTS THE OWNER AS "SCUBA
 CLUB MANAGER, LLC", BUT THE WARRANTY DEED PROVIDED
 INDICATES THAT THE OWNER IS "SCUBA CLUB WPB, LLC".
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE CORRECT OWNER IS LISTED.
  
 16. ALL OF THE REQUIRED PUBLIC UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 17. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-312(1)(A) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS,
 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITH 75 UNITS OR LESS ARE ONLY
 PERMITTED ONE (1) ACCESS POINT. ADDITIONALLY, IF
 MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS WERE PROVIDED, SEC. 94-312(2)(A)
 OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS REQUIRES THAT ACCESS POINTS HAVE A
 MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 125 FEET ON A
 NON-THOROUGHFARE ROADWAY.
  
 18. THE LANDSCAPING SHOWN ON SHEET R7 DOES NOT
 ACCURATELY REFLECT WHAT IS PROPOSED IN THE SUBMITTED
 LANDSCAPE PLANS. ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ACCURATELY MATCH
 WHAT IS PROPOSED.
  
 19. THE LABELING OF THE "GUARD HOUSE" ON SHEET R7 IS
 PLACED INCORRECTLY.
  
 20. THE SETBACK LINE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS APPEAR
 TO BE IN THE WRONG LOCATION, SPECIFICALLY THE FRONT
 SETBACK.
  
 21. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-71(D)(2)(A) OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS, LOT WIDTHS ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH FLAGLER
 DRIVE ARE TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 94-77(A)(1)(L), WHICH
 REQUIRES A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF 75 FEET. MANY OF YOUR
 PLANS/DOCUMENTS REFERENCE A REQUIRED LOT WIDTH OF 50
 FEET; PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 22. IT WAS INDICATED THAT BIKE PARKING IS BEING
 PROVIDED FOR EIGHT (8) BICYCLES. THE ONLY INFORMATION
 ON THE PLANS INDICATING ANY BICYCLE FACILITIES HAS BEEN
 THE BIKE STORAGE ROOM:
  
 22.1. PLEASE INDICATE THE LAYOUT OF THE FACILITIES IN
 THIS ROOM TO ENSURE THAT A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF
 FACILITIES ARE BEING PROVIDED.
  
 22.2. ADDITIONAL FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT ARE
 ACCESSIBLE TO GUESTS, ETC. THAT MAY NOT HAVE ACCESS TO
 THE BIKE STORAGE ROOM.
  
 22.3. THE SITE PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW STEPS FROM THE
 ADJACENT WALKWAY INTO BOTH THE BIKE STORAGE AS WELL AS
 STAIR 3, ETC. THESE ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS. IF STEPS ARE BEING PROVIDED, PLEASE ENSURE THAT
 THIS IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE ADA ACCESSIBLE.
  
 23. THE WAIVER REGARDING THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING
 RELATIVE TO THE SETBACKS SHOULD BE EXPRESSED AS A
 WAIVER TO THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PERMITTED. THE
 REFERENCE TO THE SETBACK CAN ALSO BE PROVIDED, BUT THE
 WAIVER TO THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL BE EXPRESSLY
 INDICATED.
  
 24. THE SETBACK SHALL BE INDICATED FOR THE MONUMENT
 SIGN. PER SEC. 94-407(2) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, THE SIGN
 SHALL BE 20 FEET FROM AN ADJACENT PROPERTY, AND 20 FEET
 FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IF PLACED PERPENDICULAR TO THE
 STREET.
  
 25. THE HEIGHT OF THE FREESTANDING SIGN SHALL BE
 INDICATED. PER SEC. 94-207(2) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, THE
 SIGN SHALL NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT.
  
 26. PLEASE PROVIDE CROSS SECTION (WITH CORRECT
 ELEVATIONS) SHOWING THE AREA FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY
 LINE TO THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE RELATIONSHIP
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, THE PROPERTY LINE,
 THE EXISTING CONCRETE WALL, ETC.
  
 27. ALL SETBACKS NEED TO BE MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY
 LINE TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE STRUCTURE. IT APPEARS
 THAT THAT AT LEASE THE REAR SETBACK IS NOT MEASURED TO
 THE CLOSEST POINT AS THERE ARE STRUCTURAL WALLS,
 COLUMNS, ETC. THAT ARE CLOSER TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 ARE NOT BEING ACCOUNTED FOR.
  
 28. DATA TABLE NEEDS TO INDICATE THE NUMBER OF COMPACT
 PARKING SPACES AND INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH SEC.
 94-485(N)(1) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS.
  
 29. TURNAROUND SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT EACH
 DEAD-END PARKING AREA.
  
 30. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED SHOWING THE PROPOSED
 SCREENING METHODS FOR THE PARKING GARAGE, INCLUDING HOW
 VEHICLE LIGHTS WILL BE BLOCKED FROM IMPACTING THE
 ADJACENT PROPERTIES, ETC.
  
 31. ADDITIONAL DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ON THE ROOF
 PLAN/ELEVATIONS TO INDICATE WHY THE HEIGHT OF THE
 BUILDING IS MEASURED AT 235' 2" AND NOT 244' 2". IS THE
 AREA ABOVE 235? 2? ENCLOSED, OR IS IT A SCREEN
 WALL/PARAPET?
  
 32. THE SITE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO INDICATE THE AREA
 ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBMERGED LANDS AND INDICATE HOW
 THE DENSITY COMPLIES WITH SEC. 94-309(F)(3) OF THE
 CITY'S ZLDRS. NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-309(F)(2)
 OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, "A STATEMENT CONCURRENT WITH LAND
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION OR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION,
 IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY, THAT AN
 APPLICATION TO FILL AND UTILIZE SUBMERGED LANDS WILL
 NOT BE FILLED FOLLOWING APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT OR ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT."
  
 33. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-313(A) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS, THE
 FOLLOWING INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE DOCK IF
 IT IS TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION:
  
 33.1. A CROSS SECTION SHOWING ALL ELEMENTS OF THE
 PROPOSED DOCK, BOTTOM OF THE WATERWAY, MEAN HIGH WATER,
 BULKHEAD, ETC. SHALL BE PROVIDED. NO PORTION OF THE
 DOCK SHALL EXTEND ABOVE THE HEIGHT OF THE BULKHEAD WITH
 THE EXCEPTION OF SECURITY FENCES, BOAT LIFTS, AND
 MOORING DEVICES.
  
 33.2. A STUDY SHOWING THAT MARINE GRASSES, ETC. ARE NOT
 BEING IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED DOCK CONSTRUCTION.
  
 33.3. THE DISTANCE FROM THE END OF THE PROPOSED DOCK TO
 THE NAVIGABLE CHANNEL.
  
 33.4. A NOTATION SHALL BE MADE INDICATING THAT ALL
 SLIPS WITH BE PROVIDED WITH APPROPRIATE WATER AND
 ELECTRICAL SERVICE.
  
 33.5. AT LEAST ONE LADDER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH
 DOCK, EXTENDING FROM THE DOCK SURFACE TO 2 FEET BELOW
 MEAN LOW WATER.
  
 33.6. WATER-RESISTANT REFLECTIVE NUMBER SHALL E
 PROVIDED ON THE END OF THE DOCK, VISIBLE FROM THE
 WATERWAY, CORRESPONDING TO THE STREET ADDRESS.
  
 34. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT APPEAR TO BE PILINGS LOCATED
 OUTSIDE THE MIDDLE 1/3 OF THE LOT. ALL PILINGS, MOORING
 RELATED FACILITIES, ETC. SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN
 THE MIDDLE 1/3 OF THE LOT, AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 94-313(A)(3)(H) OF THE CITY'S ZLDRS.
  
 35. THE DOCK PLATFORM ADJACENT TO THE SEAWALL APPEARS
 TO BE ENCROACHING OUTSIDE THE MIDDLE 1/3 OF THE LOT.
 ADDITIONALLY, THE PLATFORM SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOES
 NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
 ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT AND ACCURATE.
  
 36. PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-313(A)(3)(G)(II) OF THE CITY'S
 ZLDRS, DOCKS CONTAINING FOUR OR MORE MOORING SLIPS
 SHALL PROVIDE SANITARY SEWER PUMP OUT FACILITIES ON THE
 FOLLOWING BASIS: ONE SANITARY SEWER PUMP OUT RECEPTACLE
 FOR EVERY EIGHT MOORING SLIPS OR FRACTION THEREOF, OR
 APPROPRIATE CONNECTIONS TO EACH MOORING SLIP.
  
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE SEPTEMBER 21,
 2021, PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN MONDAY, AUGUST 2, 2021.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2021, PLANNING
 BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO
 LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 6, 2021. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM,
 AND BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH
 REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE.
  
 H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved