| Date |
Text |
| 2021-12-22 09:25:04 | COMMENTS PER RICK ROSSANO, PROJ. COORD. WPB ENG. |
| | SERVICES, [email protected], 561-494-1098: |
| | 1. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY |
| | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. |
| | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS OF REVISED PERVIOUS AND |
| | IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPACTED |
| | AREAS. |
| | 3. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL , PLANS SHALL SHOW |
| | PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, |
| | STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND SEWER LINES, INCLUDING |
| | STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY |
| | SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, METERS, AND |
| | OTHERS DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH |
| | BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES |
| | SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, |
| | CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND |
| | MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. ALL |
| | AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE VIEW. |
| | DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON PLAN |
| | VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, |
| | ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION |
| | FACILITIES LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | 4. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, CUT AND CAP |
| | UTILITIES NOT IN USE, AND REMOVE ANY ABANDONED UTILITY |
| | LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM CITY RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | 5. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND |
| | NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED. |
| | - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT: |
| | - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS |
| | THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF |
| | DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; AND |
| | - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE |
| | STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A |
| | MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4). |
| | - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF |
| | CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION |
| | THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL |
| | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
| | OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. IF THE ENGINEERING PLANS DO |
| | NOT INCLUDE AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THEN THE |
| | CONTRACTOR SHOULD SUBMIT ONE PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT. |
| | 6. PROVIDE PROFILES OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING WATER AND |
| | SEWER WITHIN RIGHT OF WAY AND SHOW ANY |
| | CROSSINGS/CONFLICTS. |
| | 7. CLEARLY LABEL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | 8. PLEASE SHOW REPLACEMENT OF SANITARY LATERALS AND |
| | SHOW ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT PARCELS. |
| | 9. PLEASE SHOW WATER SERVICES/METERS ETC. AND ADJACENT |
| | PARCEL ADDRESSES. |
| | 10. WHEN TRENCHING IN IN CITY-MAINTAINED ROADWAY AREAS |
| | ADD NOTE TO PROVIDE 50 FT. PAVEMENT RESTORATION |
| | TRANSITION ON EACH SIDE OF PROPOSED TRENCH PER CURRENT |
| | CITY OF WPB STANDARD DETAIL GC-8. |
| | 11. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND |
| | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER |
| | (Z-XXXXXXXX). |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE SUPV. |
| | WPB PUB. UTIL. 561-494-2262 OR [email protected]: |
| | |
| | DID NOT RECEIVE RESPONSE TO PRIOR REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE: |
| | |
| | -WATER MAIN TEES AT INTERSECTIONS NEED ADDITIONAL GATE |
| | VALVES FOR THE BRANCHES. |
| | |
| | -SOME WATER SERVICES AND METER BOXES APPEAR TO BE |
| | MISSING FROM CIVIL PLANS SUCH AS 1147 N RAILROAD AND |
| | 1021 N RAILROAD. |
| | |
| | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SHOW AND DETAIL MORE |
| | CLEARLY THE WATER MAIN CONNECTIONS FROM NEW 12 INCH |
| | WATER MAIN TO THE EXISTING WATER MAINS. INCLUDE INFO ON |
| | ANY PARTS, REDUCERS, VALVES, ETC. |
| | |
| | -MANY SECTIONS OF SEWER MAIN SAY 0.42% BUT ONE NEAR |
| | 10TH AND RAILROAD SAYS 4.42%. IS THAT ACCURATE? |
| | |
| | -THERE ARE TRAFFIC SIGNS ATTACHED TO WOOD UTILITY POLE |
| | AT 11TH AND N RAILROAD. WILL THE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING |
| | AFFECT THIS? |
| | |
| | -THERE ARE MANY GARAGES WITH DRIVEWAYS. HOW WILL THIS |
| | BE HANDLED? WILL THEY ALL STILL BE USABLE AT PROJECT |
| | COMPLETION, AND HAS THE PROJECT DESIGN MADE SURE |
| | PROPOSED TREES WILL NOT IMPEDE USE? |
| | |
| | -SEVERAL UTILITIES SUCH AS S113, S111, AND S107 |
| | ENCROACH SLIGHTLY INTO PLANTERS. WILL THIS CAUSE |
| | PROBLEM? |
| | |
| | -S113 AND S110 ARE IN A CROSSWALK. WILL THESE CREATE |
| | ANY TRIP AND FALL HAZARDS OR PROBLEMS WITH USE OF |
| | CROSSWALK? |
| | |
| | -CANNOT TELL FROM PLANS IF SEWER MAIN ALONG THE WEST |
| | SIDE OF RAILROAD AVENUE UNDER THE SIDEWALK IS EXISTING |
| | OR PROPOSED AND WHAT IS HAPPENING TO IT. PLEASE MAKE |
| | MORE CLEAR. |
| | |
| | -ARE THERE ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED SEWER LATERAL |
| | CLEANOUTS IN PROJECT AREA? IF SO, PLEASE SHOW AND |
| | LABEL. |
| | |
| | -THERE IS AN EXISTING LIGHT POLE AT PROPOSED NORTH |
| | DRIVEWAY OF PARKING LOT ON 9TH ST. WHAT IS HAPPENING TO |
| | IT? |
| | |
| | -ON IRRIGATION PLAN, REPLACE PVB TYPE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY |
| | WITH RP TYPE. |
| | |
| | -THERE ARE EXISTING UTILITY POLES AND GUY WIRES IN |
| | ALLEY BETWEEN 8TH AND 9TH ST. ARE THOSE BEING |
| | UNDERGROUNDED? |
| | |
| | -FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL: LABEL SEWER LATERALS |
| | WITH PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL TYPE, SHOW ALL FRANCHISE |
| | UTILITIES INCLUDING GAS AND FIBER OPTIC, CALLOUT ALL |
| | UTILITY CROSSINGS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY WITH ELEVATION |
| | INFO. |
| | |
| | -AT 10TH ST INTERSECTION, ONE WATER MAIN VALVE IS IN A |
| | CROSSWALK AND ONE FIRE HYDRANT SERVICE GATE VALVE IS IN |
| | A CROSSWALK. CAN BOTH BE RELOCATED OUTSIDE OF SIDEWALK? |
| | |
| | -WILL A FORCE MAIN OR SEWER MAIN RUN THROUGH PROPOSED |
| | PARKING LOTS? IF SO, PLEASE SHOW ON CIVIL PLANS. |
| | |
| | -WHAT ARE THE LARGE STRIPED AREAS JUST NORTH OF 10TH ST |
| | INTERSECTION? ARE THEY RAISED AND CURBED, OR LEVEL WITH |
| | THE STREET? |
| | |
| | -ARE THERE ANY PROPOSED GREASE TRAPS? IF SO, SHOW ON |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | -IS THE ENTIRETY OF NORTH RAILROAD AVENUE STREET FROM |
| | 7TH ST TO 11TH ST BEING REPAVED WITH ASPHALT? CANNOT |
| | TELL FROM PLANS. PLEASE SHOW AND LABEL THE GENERAL |
| | OUTSKIRT BOUNDARIES OF THE PAVEMENT RESTORATION. ALSO |
| | INCLUDE ANY SIDESTREETS AND ALLEYS. |
| | |
| | -SOME BUILDING DOORS SUCH AS 917 AND 861 N RAILROAD |
| | LOOK TO OPEN OUTWARD INTO SIDEWALK. PLEASE SHOW ALL THE |
| | BUILDING DOORS AND MAKE SURE STREETSCAPE PLAN DESIGN |
| | WORKS IN UNISON WITH ANY DOORS. |
| | |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM MIKE TECHNOW, PUB. UTIL. ENGINEER, |
| | 561-494-1047, [email protected] : |
| | |
| | -RECOMMEND TO GROUT THE EXISTING 8? SANITARY MAIN (ON |
| | THE EAST SIDE). |
| | -REPLACE STORMWATER PIPE ON 10TH ST/NORTH RAILROAD AS |
| | PART OF THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | -REPLACE EXISTING SANITARY SERVICES, CALL OUT/SHOW |
| | CLEAN OUTS, WYES, SHOW CONNECTION TO NEW MAIN. |
| | -REDUCE WM TO 4? AT CONNECTION POINT. |
| | -SHOW DRY UTILITY CROSSING. |
| | -REPLACE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS. |
| | -CALL OUT NEW WATER SERVICES AND REPLACEMENTS. |
| | -CALL OUT SIZE OF WATER SERVICE. |
| | -SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED DRY UTILITIES (FPL |
| | UNDERGROUND). |
| | -SHOW WM PROFILE. |
| | -PROVIDE LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCS FOR PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT. |
| | -ARE THERE ANY LANDSCAPE PLANS? |
| | |
| | |
| | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | CONCERNS, THANKS. |
| | RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| | DEPARTMENT |
| | DIRECT: (561) 494-1098 [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
