| Date |
Text |
| 2022-07-05 10:02:09 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 05-06-2022: |
| | |
| | 1. [SATISFIED] ON THE CIVIL DRAWINGS, INDICATE BY |
| | HATCHING AND CALLOUTS, PROPOSED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 2. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? SLOPE OF THE SOUTH END |
| | SIDEWALK APPEARS TO BE GREATER THAN 5% (STAFF |
| | CALCULATES 8.8%) AND WOULD BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND |
| | WOULD NEED HANDRAILS, WHICH SHOULD NOT ENCROACH INTO |
| | THE RIGHT OF WAY. SLOPE OF NORTH SIDEWALK APPEARS TO BE |
| | 4.9%. CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT |
| | SUBMITTAL] AT THE SOUTH END OF THE MIDDLE PARKING LOT, |
| | THE SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK BETWEEN HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE |
| | AND SIDEWALK ALONG RAILROAD AVE MAY NOT MEET ADA |
| | CRITERIA. CHECK THE SLOPE OF THE SIDEWALK FROM 9TH |
| | STREET TO THE NORTH PARKING LOT ALSO. |
| | |
| | 3. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE SPOT GRADES FOR THE ALLEY NORTH |
| | OF 9TH STREET. WILL THERE BE A BERM ALONG THE NORTH |
| | PROPERTY LINE? |
| | |
| | 4. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER SLOPING THE WEST EDGES OF THE |
| | PARKING LOTS SO THAT THE WHEEL STOPS DO NOT TRAP WATER. |
| | |
| | 5. [PARTIALLY SATISFIED ? VIEW PORT ON SHEET C1.1 ISN?T |
| | AT THE SHEET SCALE; CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH THE |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.] CHECK THE NORTH-SOUTH |
| | DIMENSIONS OF ALL THE PARKING AREAS. FOR EXAMPLE, THE |
| | SOUTH HALF OF THE PARKING LOT BETWEEN THE ALLEY AND 9TH |
| | STREET MEASURES 50.5 FT BETWEEN THE CURBS OF THE |
| | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. IF THE SIX PARKING SPACES ARE EACH |
| | 8.5 FEET WIDE, THEN THE DISTANCE SHOULD BE 51 FEET. THE |
| | NORTH HALF OF THE PARKING LOT SOUTH OF THE ALLEY |
| | MEASURES 42 FEET BUT FOR FIVE 8.5 FEET WIDE PARKING |
| | SPACES, THE DISTANCE SHOULD BE 42.5 FEET. |
| | |
| | 6. [SATISFIED] HOW WAS THE BERM ELEVATIONS DETERMINED |
| | FOR THE RIGHT SIDE OF SECTIONS A, B, AND C? |
| | |
| | 7. [SATISFIED] CIVIL PLAN PARKING LAYOUT DOES NOT MATCH |
| | THE LAYOUT SHOWN ON SHEET SP1 OF 1. FOR EXAMPLE, SHEET |
| | SP1 OF 1 SHOWS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE 4.5 WIDE STRIP TO |
| | THE WEST OF THE CENTER PARKING SPACES IN THE NORTH |
| | PARKING LOT AND THE CIVIL PLANS DOES NOT SHOW THE |
| | CURBING. EXAMPLE 2, IN THE SAME PARKING LOT, SP1 OF 1 |
| | DOES NOT SHOW CURBING ALONG THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT |
| | BETWEEN THE HANDICAP PARKING SPACES AND THE DRIVEWAY |
| | ENTRANCE (AND ALONG THE OTHER OUTER EDGES OF THE |
| | PARKING AREAS OF THE LOT) AND THE CIVIL PLANS DO. |
| | |
| | 8. [SATISFIED] PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW THE PARALLEL |
| | HANDICAP PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE STRIPED. |
| | |
| | 9. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST ADDING CENTERLINE STRIPING AT |
| | STOP BARS SINCE THE ENTRANCES ARE ONLY 20 FEET WIDE. |
| | |
| | 10. [NOT SATISFIED ? RESPONSE TO COMMENT INDICATED |
| | SIGNAGE IS FOR WESTBOUND TURNS ONLY. SIGNAGE AND |
| | STRIPING PLAN DOES NOT SHOW ANY SIGNS RESTRICTING TURNS |
| | FROM THE PARKING LOT ONTO THE ALLEY; PAVEMENT STRIPING |
| | SHOWS EASTBOUND TURN ARROWS AT THE PARKING LOT DRIVEWAY |
| | EXITS TO THE ALLEY. CITY'S ] WILL EASTBOUND TURNS ONTO |
| | THE ALLEY BE ALLOWED FROM THE PARKING LOTS ON EITHER |
| | SIDE OF THE ALLEY? |
| | |
| | 11. [SATISFIED] REPLACE DETAIL SHOWING HAY BALE |
| | PROTECTION OF INLETS WITH ALTERNATIVE METHOD/MATERIALS. |
| | |
| | 12. [SATISFIED] THE SITE DEMOLITION PLAN SHOWS THE |
| | CLOSING OF THE ALLEY. |
| | |
| | 13. [SATISFIED ? THE VIEWPORT ON SHEET C1.1 MAY NOT BE |
| | TO THE SHEET SCALE.] THE NORTH EDGE OF THE NORTH |
| | PARKING LOT IS CUTOFF IN THE PLAN VIEW. |
| | |
| | 14. [SATISFIED] LOCATE THE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OUTSIDE |
| | OF THE RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | |
| | 15. [SATISFIED] DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AT THE EAST END OF |
| | THE STREETS MAY REQUIRE INLET PROTECTION. |
| | |
| | 16. [SATISFIED] SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 17. [SATISFIED] SUGGEST LOCATING LIGHT POLES OPPOSITE |
| | THE STRIPING BETWEEN PARKING SPACES INSTEAD OF OPPOSITE |
| | THE WHEEL STOPS TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE LIGHT |
| | POLE GETTING HIT WHEN ADJACENT TO THE 2-FOOT OVERHANG |
| | AREA. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL: |
| | A. RE-DESIGN THE GRADING PLAN TO REDUCE LONGITUDINAL |
| | SLOPES OF SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE PARKING LOTS |
| | AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY TO LESS THAN 5% SO THAT THEY ARE NOT |
| | CONSIDERED RAMPS ACCORDING TO THE A.D.A. BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | B. CORRECT LAYOUT OF SHEET C1.1 SO THAT IT MEETS THE |
| | SHEET SCALE. |
| | |
| | C. STRIPING/SIGNAGE FOR DRIVEWAY EXITS TO THE ALLEY TO |
| | BE CLARIFIED AND APPROVED BY CITY TRANSPORTATION |
| | ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, PE |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | 561-351-0510 (M) |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |
