| Date |
Text |
| 2022-01-28 19:56:52 | TRAFFIC COMMENTS |
| | 1) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE TRAFFIC STUDY. THIS |
| | ITEM IS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN THE TPS LETTER. PLEASE |
| | EXPAND THE STUDY BY PROVIDING AN INTERSECTION ANALYSIS |
| | OF THE SOUTHERN/PARKER AND SOUTHERN/LAKE INTERSECTIONS, |
| | PROVIDE FUTURE CONDITION SCENARIO ASSUMING ROAD |
| | CONFIGURATION ACCORDING TO FDOT I-95/SOUTHERN BLVD |
| | INTERCHANGE AND FDOT SOUTHERN BLVD INTERCOASTAL BRIDGE |
| | PROJECTS, AS THEY MAY IMPACT VEHICULAR MOVEMENTS AT THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DRIVEWAYS; ALSO INCLUDE REFERENCES |
| | TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH BICYCLE MASTERPLAN. |
| | PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTHERN BLVD DRIVEWAY, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF A DIAGRAM SHOWCASING EXISTING/FUTURE |
| | DAILY/PEAK HOUR TURNING VOLUMES |
| | 2) SATISFIED. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. INDEPENDENTLY |
| | FROM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCREASE/DECREASE OF |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE. A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY IN ORDER TO UPDATE THE TRAFFIC |
| | GENERATORS? DATABASE AND IDENTIFY POTENTIAL IMPACT TO |
| | THE ROAD SYSTEM. |
| | 3) SATISFIED. EXPLAIN THE CHANGE IN DRIVEWAY |
| | DIRECTIONALITY ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT. |
| | OTHERWISE REVERT TO ORIGINAL CONFIGURATION |
| | 4) SATISFIED. ALIGN PARKING AISLES? CENTERLINES WITH |
| | THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY LANE ONES |
| | 5) SATISFIED. ON THE SITE PLAN, PLEASE SHOWCASE BASIC |
| | CURB DETAILS (I.E. DRIVEWAY AND PARKING STALLS) ON THE |
| | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROADS SURROUNDING THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT |
| | 6) SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE |
| | TRUCK AND SERVICE VEHICLES DRIVING IN AND OUT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WITH VEHICLE DYNAMIC ENVELOPES |
| | CLEARLY DEFINED. ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN A |
| | SEPARATE FILE/DRAWING |
| | 7) SATISFIED. IDENTIFY AND DESIGNATE AN EASILY |
| | ACCESSIBLE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION AREA (MINIMUM 8 X 20 |
| | FEET) AND PROVIDE BASIC ELECTRIFICATION READINESS |
| | (CIRCUIT BOX AND ELECTRIC CONDUIT) |
| | 8) SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING TABLE SHOWCASING THE |
| | NUMBER OF REQUIRED AND PROVIDED PARKING SPACES, |
| | INCLUSIVE OF ADA AND BICYCLE ONES |
| | 9) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CROSSWALK BY ADA STALLS IS |
| | MIS-ALIGNED WITH THE PARKING ISLE PATHWAY. SHEET C-302 |
| | DEPICTS A SLANTED CROSSWALK |
| | 10) PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE OR INDICATE DOCUMENT |
| | SHEET DEPICTING ROAD, DRIVING ISLE, SIDEWALK AND |
| | DRIVEWAY DIMENSIONS. SHEET C-302 DOES NOT SHOW ROADWAYS |
| | NOR DRIVEWAYS DIMENSION |
| | 11) NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS FOR |
| | EACH MISSING ELEMENT DEPICTED IN CITY CODE CHAPTER 94 |
| | ARTICLE XV FIGURE XV-2. SPECIFICALLY: (C) STALL DEPTH, |
| | (E) CURB LENGTH, (F) HALF-BAY, (G) FULL BAY. IF ALREADY |
| | PROVIDED, PLEASE INDICATE SHEET NUMBER |
| | 12) NOT SATISFIED. VERIFY THAT SIDEWALK WIDTH ALONG |
| | NOTTINGHAM BLVD FULFILLS MINIMUM ADA STANDARDS |
| | REQUIREMENT OF 36 INCHES UN-OBSTRUCTED (I.E. NO LIGHT |
| | POLES WITHIN SUCH WIDTH) |
| | 13) NOT SATISFIED. THE ADOPTED CITY BICYCLE MASTERPLAN |
| | REQUIRES PROTECTED SEPARATED BICYCLE LANES ALONG |
| | NOTTINGHAM BLVD. PLEASE REVISE PROPOSED ROADWAY DESIGN |
| | ALONG SITE FRONTAGE ACCORDINGLY |
| | |
| |
Print |
