| Date |
Text |
| 2021-08-16 14:11:01 | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW 21-05 - JULY 20, 2021 |
| | RESUBMITTAL |
| | PUBLIX @ SOUTHDALE |
| | 804 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE |
| | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY OCTOBER 16, 2021), |
| | THE PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($200). |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT |
| | VERIFYING THAT THE NEW DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT INCREASE |
| | VEHICLE TRIPS. IF THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT SHOWS |
| | THAT THERE IS AN INCREASE IN TRAFFIC TRIPS, THEN YOU |
| | MUST PROVIDE A TPS APPROVAL LETTER FROM PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY. **** THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES THAT A |
| | CERTIFIED TRAFFIC ENGINEER STATED THAT A TRAFFIC STUDY |
| | WAS IS NOT NEEDED. YOU NEED TO SUBMIT |
| | |
| | 2) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE FPL, FPU, COMCAST, AND |
| | WEST PALM BEACH UTILITY LETTER APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 3) BASED ON THE ENTIRE SITE BEING ONE PARCEL, YOU MUST |
| | USE THE TOTAL SITE ACREAGE IN YOUR SITE DATA |
| | CALCULATIONS ON THE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS - 380,133 |
| | SF (8.727 ACRES). NOTE: THE LANDSCAPE PLANS MUST REMOVE |
| | THE ERRONEOUS REFERENCE TO THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 4) THE PLANS SHOW THAT THE PARKING LOT IS BEING MILLED |
| | AND RESURFACED. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THIS REQUIRES THE PARKING LOT, |
| | INCLUDING THE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, TO BE |
| | BROUGHT INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER |
| | LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE. THESE BUFFERS |
| | MUST BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH AND CONTAIN THE |
| | REQUIRED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. **** THIS WAS NOT |
| | PROVIDED. SEE LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 5) A ROUGH CALCULATION OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION VALUE |
| | BASED ON THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL (ICC), BUILDING |
| | VALUATION DATA (BVD) TABLE SHOWS THAT THE NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION WILL EXCEED 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE |
| | EXISTING STRUCTURE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE ENTIRE SITE NEEDS BE |
| | BROUGHT INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE |
| | REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING FOUNDATION PLANTING AND, |
| | MINIMUM SITE LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE. **** THIS WAS NOT |
| | PROVIDED. SEE LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) UPDATED COMMENT: PLEASE VERIFY THAT ALL PARKING ROWS |
| | ARE PROVIDING A 45-DEGREE ANGLE. THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON |
| | EACH ROW AT THE MAIN PARKING FIELD NOR FOR THE PARKING |
| | ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. PARKING DETAILS ARE |
| | REQUIRED FOR ALL CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 7) THE DIMENSION LINE ON THE PLAN FOR THE STALL DEPTHS |
| | IS NOT USING THE CORRECT MEASURE POINTS. STAFF IS |
| | UNABLE TO VERIFY THAT THE STALL DEPTHS COMPLY WITH THE |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS REQUIRE |
| | THAT PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE ISLANDS BE THE FULL LENGTH |
| | OF THE PARKING SPACE. THE PLANS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | 9) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW |
| | WHERE THE STOREFRONT BOLLARDS AND GUARD RAILS ARE |
| | LOCATED. **** THESE NEED TO BE LABELED ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 10) THANK YOU FOR SHOWING THE SCREEN WALLS FOR THE |
| | COMPACTOR AND THE GENERATOR ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS ON THE ELEVATIONS |
| | AND THE SCREEN WALL LOCATIONS ON THE CIVIL AND |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 11) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES |
| | ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 12) ALL THE COLUMNS FOR THE BUILDING OVERHANG NEED TO |
| | BE REFLECTED ON THE CIVIL PLAN AS THE COLUMN LOCATIONS |
| | IMPACT BOTH CAR AND BICYCLE PARKING. |
| | |
| | 13) THANK YOU FOR SHOWING BICYCLE RACKS ALONG THE FRONT |
| | OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | A. THE PLANS MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE REQUIRED PAD DEPTH |
| | OF SIX (6) FEET AND 24 INCHES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE |
| | RACK (30 INCHES IS RACKS ARE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO |
| | EACH OTHER INSTEAD OF SPREAD OUT). |
| | |
| | B. HOW WILL THE CARS PARKING IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING |
| | BE PREVENTED FROM OVERHANGING THE CURB (EX. WILL WHEEL |
| | STOPS BE PROVIDED)? THE CURRENT PLANS SHOW THAT AN |
| | OVERHANG IS POSSIBLE; HOWEVER, THIS OVERHANG DIRECTLY |
| | CONFLICTS WITH ANY BICYCLES THAT ARE PARKED IN THE |
| | BICYCLE RACKS AS SHOWN. |
| | |
| | C. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE WEATHER PROTECTION FOR PARKED |
| | BICYCLES, THE RACKS SHOULD BE MOVED UNDER THE ROOF |
| | OVERHANG. |
| | |
| | D. THE PUBLIX IS THE ANCHOR OF THIS SHOPPING PLAZA AND |
| | AS SUCH NEEDS TO HAVE A SOME OF THE BICYCLE RACKS |
| | CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE, BOTH FOR CUSTOMERS AND |
| | EMPLOYEES. |
| | |
| | 14) PLEASE DESCRIBE THE MICRO-MOBILITY STATION THAT IS |
| | NOW SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 15) PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE COMPACTOR SCREENING. IT |
| | IS NOT PERMITTED TO SIT ON A PAD UNSCREENED AS SHOWN IN |
| | PERSPECTIVE #2. |
| | |
| | 16) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY |
| | BETWEEN THE PERSPECTIVE DRAWINGS AND THE COLOR |
| | ELEVATIONS ON THE REAR PARAPET WALL. THE PERSPECTIVES |
| | CLEARLY SHOW A PARAPET THAT WILL HIDE THE ROOFTOP |
| | EQUIPMENT; HOWEVER, THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW A REAR |
| | PARAPET. **** THE PERSPECTIVE DRAWINGS CLEARLY SHOW THE |
| | SIDE AND REAR PARAPET WALLS AT THE SAME HEIGHT. THE |
| | REAR OF THE SIDE PARAPET WALLS IS VISIBLE AND EXTENDING |
| | HIGHER THAN WHAT IS SHOWN AS THE HIGH POINT OF THE REAR |
| | OF THE BUILDING. THE REAR PARAPET NEEDS TO BE |
| | ACCURATELY DEPICTED SO STAFF CAN BE CONFIDENT THAT THE |
| | ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED (AS SHOWN |
| | ON THE PERSPECTIVE DRAWINGS). PROVIDE THE HEIGHT TO THE |
| | ROOF AND THE TOP OF THE REAR PARAPET ON THE ELEVATIONS |
| | (COLOR ELEVATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED). |
| | |
| | 17) IS NEW LIGHTING BEING PROPOSED ON THE SITE? |
| | LIGHTING NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE CIVIL AND |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
