| Date |
Text |
| 2021-07-29 10:44:29 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 07.29.2021 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z21030022 |
| | CASE NO.: FSPR 21-02 |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. [ SATISFIED ] - ARE THERE ANY HISTORIC ELEMENTS FROM |
| | THE PREVIOUS GOLF COURSE/CLUBHOUSE THAT COULD BE |
| | INCORPORATED INTO THE NEW FACILITIES? |
| | |
| | 1.1 [ SATISFIED ] - NUMEROUS ITEMS FROM THE OLD |
| | CLUBHOUSE/COURSE HAVE BEEN LOCATED. TOM FRANKEL HAS |
| | BEEN MADE AWARE AND IS TO BE COORDINATING A REVIEW, |
| | EVALUATION, ETC. NO COORDINATION HAS OCCURRED TO DATE. |
| | |
| | 2. [ SATISFIED ] - THE NETTING, IF LOCATED WITHIN A |
| | SETBACK, SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT |
| | PROVIDED IN SEC. 94-302.C.1. IF LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE |
| | SETBACK, THE NETTING/POLES SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM |
| | HEIGHT PERMITTED WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT, AS |
| | PROVIDED IN SEC. 94-204.5. |
| | |
| | 2.1 [ SATISFIED ] - VARIANCE IN-PROCESS (ZBA CASE NO. |
| | 3394). |
| | |
| | 3. [ SATISFIED ] - PHOTOMETRIC PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | AND SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 94-309.A., AS |
| | ALSO REQUIRED BY SEC. 94-273.D.60.B.4. ALL OUTDOOR |
| | LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE |
| | ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL |
| | ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR |
| | PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. |
| | |
| | 3.1 [ SATISFIED ] - ON THE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR THE |
| | DRIVING RANGE / PAR 3 COURSE, PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | PHOTOMETRIC LEVELS AT THE PROPERTY LINE TO SHOW THE |
| | IMPACT OF THE SHIELDING, ETC. LEVELS SHOULD NOT EXCEED |
| | 0.5 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED ON THE PROPERTY ADJACENT |
| | TO A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. |
| | |
| | 3.1.1 [ SATISFIED ] - THERE IS ONE AREA WHERE THE |
| | LEVELS ARE 0.6 FOOTCANDLES. |
| | |
| | 4. [ SATISFIED ] - FENCES/WALLS PROPOSED WITHIN THE |
| | FRONT SETBACK SHALL NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. |
| | FENCES/WALL LOCATED WITHIN OTHER SETBACKS SHALL NOT |
| | EXCEED SIX (6) FEET IN HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 4.1 [ SATISFIED ] - VARIANCE IN-PROCESS (ZBA CASE NO. |
| | 3394). |
| | |
| | 5. [ SATISFIED ] - ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS |
| | BETWEEN THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND FENCING WITH THE |
| | EXISTING 60 INCH DRAINAGE PIPE IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER |
| | OF THE SITE. ANY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED WITHIN THE |
| | REQUIRED EASEMENT WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY THE |
| | EASEMENT HOLDER. |
| | |
| | 5.1 [ SATISFIED ] - NEW FENCING IS BEING PROPOSED TO BE |
| | INSTALLED AT THE SOUTHEAST END OF THE EASEMENT |
| | (ADJACENT TO GEORGIA AVENUE). CONSENT FROM THE CITY'S |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6. [ SATISFIED ] - THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW CURBING |
| | GOING ACROSS THE FRONT OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | 7. [ SATISFIED ] - WHAT IS THE REASONING FOR EXTENDING |
| | THE ASPHALT PARKING LOT ALL THE WAY TO THE NORTHEAST |
| | CORNER OF THE OFFICE BUILDING? IS THIS A |
| | LOADING/UNLOADING AREA? IS THERE GOING TO BE STORAGE? |
| | DEPENDING UPON THE RESPONSE, SCREENING MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, A TURNAROUND PARKING SPACE NEEDS TO BE |
| | PROVIDED AS THIS IS A DEAD-END ROW OF PARKING. |
| | |
| | 8. [ SATISFIED ] - WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE CITY ON |
| | PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY ALONG GEORGIA AVENUE ] - A |
| | SIDEWALK SHALL BE PROVIDED ON GEORGIA AVENUE CONNECTING |
| | THE SITE TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK NETWORK. |
| | |
| | 9. [ SATISFIED ] - AN INCREASED AND ENHANCED BUFFER |
| | NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ALONG MADDOCK STREET AND GEORGIA |
| | AVENUE (INCREASE LANDSCAPING, NEW FENCING, ETC.). THIS |
| | WILL BE A PART OF FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH STAFF. |
| | |
| | 10. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL |
| | SCREEN WALLS AND GATES AROUND THE LOADING/TRASH SERVICE |
| | AREA, ETC. ARE THESE SCREEN WALLS ABOVE GRADE? ARE THEY |
| | RETAINING WALLS? BOTH? |
| | |
| | 10.1 [ SATISFIED ] - WHILE YOUR NARRATIVE DESCRIBES |
| | THIS AREA, A DETAIL OR CROSS-SECTION SHOULD BE |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 11. [ SATISFIED ] - IT IS SUGGESTED THAT PARKING SPACES |
| | ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPING BE MADE 16 FEET IN LENGTH WITH |
| | THE USE OF A CURB (NO WHEEL STOP) AND THAT THE |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA BE INCREASED IN SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE THE |
| | OVERHANG. |
| | |
| | 11.1 [ SATISFIED ] - THERE APPEAR TO BE A FEW |
| | ADDITIONAL SPACES WHERE THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND CAN BE |
| | ENLARGED TO ALLOW THE OVERHANG. PLEASE CONTACT ME FOR |
| | SPECIFIC LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 12. [ SATISFIED ] - NEED TO SHOW LOCATIONS FOR BIKE |
| | RACKS AND THE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE QUANTITY OF BIKE RACKS. BIKE RACKS |
| | SHOULD BE DISTRIBUTED AMONGST THE VARIOUS BUILDINGS |
| | (OFFICE, CLUBHOUSE, MAINTENANCE, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 12.1 [ SATISFIED ] - THE NUMBER OF SPACES IN THE TABLE |
| | DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT IS DRAWN ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THERE ARE FOUR (4) SPACES |
| | AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY, NOT TWO (2), THEREBY |
| | RESULTING IN 16 TOTAL BICYCLE SPACES. THE TABLE AND THE |
| | LABEL ON THE BICYCLE SPACES AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY |
| | NEED TO BE CORRECTED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 13. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE |
| | LOCATIONS FOR ALL STOP BARS, CROSSWALKS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 13.1 [ NOT SATISFIED ] - A STOP BAR IS MISSING |
| | SOUTHEAST OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. ADDITIONALLY, A |
| | STOP BAR WOULD EITHER NEED TO BE PROVIDED AT THE DRIVE |
| | AISLE TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE DUMPSTER, OR THE ONE |
| | IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF THE DUMPSTER. |
| | |
| | 13.1.1 [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON THE |
| | SITE PLAN DO NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | 14. [ SATISFIED ] - IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A PARKING |
| | SPACE IN FRONT OF THE OFFICE BUILDING DUMPSTER THAT |
| | WOULD CONFLICT WITH THE GATES ON THE ENCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | 15. [ SATISFIED ] - IS PUBLIC WORKS GOING TO BE |
| | ACCEPTABLE OF THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER BY THE |
| | OFFICE BUILDING? THIS SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF BACK-OUT |
| | REQUIRED. PLEASE OBTAIN CONFIRMATION. |
| | |
| | 16. [ SATISFIED - SUBJECT TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL ] - |
| | IMPROVEMENTS AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ARE SHOWN IN |
| | THE ACCESS EASEMENT. EITHER THE IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO BE |
| | MOVED TO OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT, OR CONSENT FROM THE |
| | EASEMENT HOLDER SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 17. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS FOR CHAIN LINK FENCING |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED (HEIGHT, ETC.) AND SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 18. [ SATISFIED ] - WITH UNDERSTANDING THAT BUILDING |
| | DIVISION HAS INDICATED NO ROUTE IS REQUIRED ] - DOES |
| | THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY NEED AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM |
| | THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY? PLEASE CONFIRM. |
| | |
| | 19. [ SATISFIED ] - SYMBOLOGY APPEARS TO BE MISSING |
| | FROM THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AT THE MAINTENANCE |
| | FACILITY. |
| | |
| | 20. [ SATISFIED ] - WHAT IS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM |
| | THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE TO THE ACCESSIBLE BUILDING |
| | ENTRANCE? |
| | |
| | 21. [ SATISFIED ] - DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE |
| | SCREENING PROPOSED AROUND THE STORAGE BINS. |
| | |
| | 22. [ SATISFIED ] - THE DIMENSIONS OF THE DUMPSTER AT |
| | THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY DO NOT SEEM TO MATCH THAT |
| | SHOWN FOR THE DUMPSTER DETAIL. A SEPARATE DETAIL MAY |
| | NEED TO BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 22.1 [ SATISFIED ] - IS THE MAINTENACE FACILITY |
| | DUMPSTER TO BE PICKED UP BY A PRIVATE PROVIDER? PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 23. [ SATISFIED ] - COVERED OUTDOOR STORAGE AT THE |
| | MAINTENANCE FACILITY NEEDS TO BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH SEC. 94-315.B.1. WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE STORED IN |
| | THIS AREA? |
| | |
| | 24. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DEDICATION OF |
| | ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL CHANGE THE PROPERTY LINE AND |
| | THEREBY CHANGE THE MEASUREMENT OF ANY SETBACKS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 24.1 [ SATISIFIED ] - YOUR NARRATIVE INDICATES THAT NO |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY IS BEING DEDICATED AS PART OF THIS |
| | PROJECT...HAS IT BEEN CONFIRMED THAT NO RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| | WILL BE DEDICATED TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXISTING |
| | ROUNDABOUT AT THE SOUTHER TERMINUS OF PARKER AVENUE? |
| | |
| | 25. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SIDEWALK THAT LEAVES THE |
| | TERRACE ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE CLUBHOUSE, WHERE |
| | IS IT GOING TO? WHAT IS IS CONNECTING TO? |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
