Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z21030022
Project Number Z21030022
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2021-04-14 14:15:02PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 04.14.2021
 PROJECT NO.: Z21030022
 CASE NO.: FSPR 21-02
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. ARE THERE ANY HISTORIC ELEMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS
 GOLF COURSE/CLUBHOUSE THAT COULD BE INCORPORATED INTO
 THE NEW FACILITIES?
  
 2. THE NETTING, IF LOCATED WITHIN A SETBACK, SHALL NOT
 EXCEED THE MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGHT PROVIDED IN SEC.
 94-302.C.1. IF LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE SETBACK, THE
 NETTING/POLES SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT
 PERMITTED WITHIN THE ZONING DISTRICT, AS PROVIDED IN
 SEC. 94-204.5.
  
 3. PHOTOMETRIC PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND SHALL
 INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. 94-309.A., AS ALSO
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 94-273.D.60.B.4. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING
 SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED
 TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT
 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC
 THOROUGHFARES.
  
 4. FENCES/WALLS PROPOSED WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL
 NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. FENCES/WALL LOCATED
 WITHIN OTHER SETBACKS SHALL NOT EXCEED SIX (6) FEET IN
 HEIGHT.
  
 5. ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPING AND FENCING WITH THE EXISTING 60
 INCH DRAINAGE PIPE IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE.
 ANY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED WITHIN THE REQUIRED EASEMENT
 WILL NEED TO BE APPROVED BY THE EASEMENT HOLDER.
  
 6. THE ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW CURBING GOING ACROSS THE
 FRONT OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 7. WHAT IS THE REASONING FOR EXTENDING THE ASPHALT
 PARKING LOT ALL THE WAY TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE
 OFFICE BUILDING? IS THIS A LOADING/UNLOADING AREA? IS
 THERE GOING TO BE STORAGE? DEPENDING UPON THE RESPONSE,
 SCREENING MAY BE REQUIRED. ADDITIONALLY, A TURNAROUND
 PARKING SPACE NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AS THIS IS A
 DEAD-END ROW OF PARKING.
  
 8. A SIDEWALK SHALL BE PROVIDED ON GEORGIA AVENUE
 CONNECTING THE SITE TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK NETWORK.
  
 9. AN INCREASED AND ENHANCED BUFFER NEEDS TO BE
 PROVIDED ALONG MADDOCK STREET AND GEORGIA AVENUE
 (INCREASE LANDSCAPING, NEW FENCING, ETC.). THIS WILL BE
 A PART OF FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH STAFF.
  
 10. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL SCREEN WALLS AND
 GATES AROUND THE LOADING/TRASH SERVICE AREA, ETC. ARE
 THESE SCREEN WALLS ABOVE GRADE? ARE THEY RETAINING
 WALLS? BOTH?
  
 11. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO
 LANDSCAPING BE MADE 16 FEET IN LENGTH WITH THE USE OF A
 CURB (NO WHEEL STOP) AND THAT THE LANDSCAPE AREA BE
 INCREASED IN SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE THE OVERHANG.
  
 12. NEED TO SHOW LOCATIONS FOR BIKE RACKS AND THE DATA
 TABLE NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 QUANTITY OF BIKE RACKS. BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE
 DISTRIBUTED AMONGST THE VARIOUS BUILDINGS (OFFICE,
 CLUBHOUSE, MAINTENANCE, ETC.).
  
 13. PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE LOCATIONS FOR ALL STOP BARS,
 CROSSWALKS, ETC.
  
 14. IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A PARKING SPACE IN FRONT
 OF THE OFFICE BUILDING DUMPSTER THAT WOULD CONFLICT
 WITH THE GATES ON THE ENCLOSURE.
  
 15. IS PUBLIC WORKS GOING TO BE ACCEPTABLE OF THE
 LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER BY THE OFFICE BUILDING? THIS
 SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF BACK-OUT REQUIRED. PLEASE OBTAIN
 CONFIRMATION.
  
 16. IMPROVEMENTS AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ARE SHOWN
 IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT. EITHER THE IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO
 BE MOVED TO OUTSIDE THE EASEMENT, OR CONSENT FROM THE
 EASEMENT HOLDER SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 17. DETAILS FOR CHAIN LINK FENCING SHALL BE PROVIDED
 (HEIGHT, ETC.) AND SHALL COMPLY WITH MAXIMUM FENCE
 HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS.
  
 18. DOES THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY NEED AN ACCESSIBLE
 ROUTE FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY? PLEASE CONFIRM.
  
 19. SYMBOLOGY APPEARS TO BE MISSING FROM THE ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACE AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY.
  
 20. WHAT IS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACE TO THE ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCE?
  
 21. DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE SCREENING
 PROPOSED AROUND THE STORAGE BINS.
  
 22. THE DIMENSIONS OF THE DUMPSTER AT THE MAINTENANCE
 FACILITY DO NOT SEEM TO MATCH THAT SHOWN FOR THE
 DUMPSTER DETAIL. A SEPARATE DETAIL MAY NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 23. COVERED OUTDOOR STORAGE AT THE MAINTENANCE FACILITY
 NEEDS TO BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC.
 94-315.B.1. WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE STORED IN THIS AREA?
  
 24. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DEDICATION OF ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY
 WILL CHANGE THE PROPERTY LINE AND THEREBY CHANGE THE
 MEASUREMENT OF ANY SETBACKS, ETC.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved