| Date |
Text |
| 2021-04-09 13:47:42 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) AN INSUFFICIENT NUMBER OF HARDCOPY SETS HAD BEEN |
| | PROVIDED WITH THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. PLEASE BE SURE TO |
| | PROVIDE THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF SETS REQUIRED FOR |
| | RESUBMITTAL (SEE INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL). |
| | |
| | 2.) THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THE PRINTING OF THE HARD |
| | COPY SET THAT WAS SUBMITTED. PLEASE CHECK TO MAKE SURE |
| | THE PLANS ARE LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | 3.) THE APPROVED AND THE PROPOSED BUILDING CALCULATIONS |
| | DO NOT ADD UP. IT WAS THE UNDERSTANDING OF STAFF THAT |
| | THE BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | BUILDING WOULD NOT BE CHANGING IN THE ZOOM CALL FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED AMENDMENT BACK IN FEBRUARY. THERE SEEMS TO BE |
| | ADDITIONAL BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE FROM THE APPROVED |
| | PLAN. PLEASE CLARIFY. ALSO NOTE THAT AS DISCUSSED IN |
| | THE ZOOM CALL FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT BACK IN |
| | FEBRUARY, THAT ANY BUILDING ADDITION GREATER THAN 5% |
| | WOULD REQUIRE A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE PD. |
| | |
| | 4.) AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET |
| | MDP-1) AND THE OVERALL SITE PLAN (SHEET OSP-1) IS |
| | REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS AMENDMENT SINCE THE DATA |
| | CALCULATIONS HAVE CHANGED. |
| | |
| | 5.) ALL PROPOSED CHANGES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED IN THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. CHANGES NOT PROVIDED IN THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INCLUDE PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS |
| | SURFACE AREA, RELOCATION OF 8 FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL, |
| | ADJUSTMENTS MADE TO THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, ETC. (JUST |
| | TO NAME A FEW.). |
| | |
| | 6.) ALL REVISION DATES SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | MODIFIED SHEETS FROM THE APPROVED PLANS FOR TRACKING |
| | PURPOSES. FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE REVISION DATE WILL |
| | RESULT IN A "FAIL" IN THE SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE DATA/AREAS EXHIBITS (SHEET SD-1): |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE OVERALL |
| | DEVELOPMENT SITE DATA TABULAR: A) EXISTING FLU IS NO |
| | LONGER COMMERCIAL (C). PLEASE CORRECT TO COMMERCIAL |
| | EAST (CE). B) EXISTING ZONING IS NO LONGER GENERAL |
| | COMMERCIAL (GC). PLEASE CORRECT TO COMMERCIAL PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT (CPD) WITH UNDERLYING GC. C) THE |
| | CALCULATIONS PROVIDED FOR POD 3 IN THE CONCURRENCY |
| | SUMMARY TABLE DOES NOT ADD UP. PLEASE ADDRESS OR |
| | CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE LAND USE AND |
| | ZONING INFORMATION AND NOTES FOR POD 3 (LOT 2 PER PLAT) |
| | TABLE: CHECK CALCULATIONS FOR FAR, LOT AREA, BUILDING, |
| | IMPERVIOUS AND PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA. THE NUMBERS DON?T |
| | SEEM TO ADD UP AND MUST BE ADDRESSED FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS (SHEET SP-1): |
| | |
| | 1.) THE DATA CALCULATIONS ARE MISSING FROM THE "CLEAN" |
| | SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PARCEL (SHEET |
| | SP-1). PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | 2.) IN ORDER TO PROVIDE AN 8 FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL |
| | ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE (FRONT), THE WALL SHALL BE |
| | SETBACK MORE THAN 5 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE; |
| | OTHERWISE, THE HEIGHT OF THE WALL CANNOT EXCEED 4 FT. |
| | IN HEIGHT (WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK). ACCORDING TO THE |
| | PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROJECT, THE WALL HAS |
| | BEEN MOVED AND NOW DOES NOT MEET THE WALL HEIGHT |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZLDRS WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 3.) THE WIDTH OF THE INGRESS/EGRESS TO THE STRUCTURED |
| | PARKING GARAGE SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN REDUCED FROM 24 FT. |
| | TO 20 FT. WRITTEN CONFIRMATION FROM THE CITY?S TRAFFIC |
| | ENGINEERING SHALL BE PROVIDED STATING THAT THERE ARE NO |
| | ISSUES WITH THE WIDTH OF THE INGRESS/EGRESS. |
| | |
| | 4.) ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS AS IT RELATES TO THE |
| | NOTES AND LABELS FOR SHEET SP-1: A) SURFACE PARKING |
| | CALCULATIONS HAVE CHANGED; 86 PARKING SPACES SEEMS TO |
| | BE THE INCORRECT NUMBER OF SURFACES PARKING SPACES |
| | PROVIDED. B) SHOW THE SETBACK DIMENSION OF THE PROPOSED |
| | MONUMENT SIGN TO THE PROPERTY LINE FOR CONSISTENCY WITH |
| | THE APPROVED PLANS AND TO VERIFY THAT NO CHANGES HAVE |
| | BEEN MADE TO THE SETBACK OF THE MONUMENT SIGN. C) |
| | DIMENSIONS REQUIRED FOR THE LOADING ZONE FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. D) FLOATING NOTES FOR: |
| | PRIVATE PATIOS, 12' FPL EASEMENT, 16'-6" VERT. |
| | CLEARANCE UNDER ENTRY CANOPY. E) REAR (EAST) SETBACK |
| | SEEMS TO BE MISLABELED AT 23'-10". A DIMENSION HAS BEEN |
| | PROVIDED THAT SHOWS THE EAST SETBACK AT 23'-9". PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS: |
| | |
| | 1.) FULL ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS SHALL BE REQUIRED |
| | FOR EACH LEVEL TO COMPLETE THE ARCHITECTURAL SET AS |
| | PART OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE APPROVED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2.) SIGNAGE HAS BEEN DETECTED ON THE ELEVATIONAL |
| | DRAWINGS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTES IN THE |
| | PLAN: ALL WALL SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH ARTICLE XIII, |
| | SIGN REGULATIONS OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. THE COMPLIANCE NOTE HAS REMOVED IN THE |
| | PROPOSED PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X |
| | 17 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($60.00). |
| |
Print |
