| Date |
Text |
| 2021-11-18 16:45:49 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE SURVEYS FOR 510 SUNSET ROAD AND 519 AVON ROAD |
| | HAVE NOW BEEN PROVIDED. AS DISCUSSED WITH STAFF, YOU |
| | WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE LEVEL-OF-SERVICE |
| | (LOS) ANALYSIS FOR THESE PARCELS. LOS ANALYSIS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR TRAFFIC, WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SOLID |
| | WASTE AND SCHOOLS. |
| | |
| | 2.) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL |
| | PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE PROVIDED IN DIGITAL FORMAT. ONE |
| | FLASH DRIVE WAS EMPTY IN THE LAST RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION (PB 1883): |
| | |
| | 1.) IN YOUR APPLICATION FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE (FLU) |
| | MAP AMENDMENT, THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MUST STATE |
| | THAT THE REQUEST IS TO CHANGE TO FLU DESIGNATION OF THE |
| | SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SINGLE FAMILY (SF) TO MULTIFAMILY |
| | MEDIUM DENSITY (MFMD) RESIDENTIAL. THE LANGUAGE IN THE |
| | STATEMENT MUST INCLUDE INFORMATION ON THE EXISTING AND |
| | PROPOSED MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DENSITY. AS A |
| | PRIVATELY-INITIATED APPLICATION FOR 2420 FLORIDA |
| | AVENUE, THE APPLICANT MUST CLEARLY STATE THE INTENT OF |
| | THE APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE APPLICATION MUST INCLUDE A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO |
| | HOW THE PROPOSED FLU AMENDMENT MEETS AT LEAST ONE OF |
| | THE STANDARDS PROVIDED IN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT |
| | POLICY 1.1.5 OF THE CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (I.E. |
| | WRITTEN PARAGRAPHS TO HOW THE PROPOSED FLU AMENDMENT |
| | SPECIALLY ADDRESSES THE STANDARD(S). |
| | |
| | 3.) THERE IS AN INCONSISTENCY WITH THE SUBMITTED LOS |
| | ANALYSIS. THE LOS ANALYSIS IS MIXED WITH SOME OF THE |
| | ANALYSIS CONSISTING OF JUST 2420 FLORIDA AVENUE AND |
| | SOME OF THE ANALYSIS FOR ALL PARCELS INVOLVED IN THE |
| | AMENDMENT (2420 FLORIDA AVENUE, 510 SUNSET ROAD AND 519 |
| | AVON ROAD). NOW THAT THE SURVEYS FOR 510 SUNSET AND 519 |
| | AVON ROAD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED, THE SURVEY CAN BE USED TO |
| | ACCURATELY COMPLETE THE LOS ANALYSIS AND COMBINED |
| | TOGETHER. THE LOS ANALYSIS MUST BE ACCURATE AND |
| | CONSISTENT AND MUST INCLUDE ALL PARCELS INVOLVED IN THE |
| | FLU AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 4.) THERE IS AN INCONSISTENCY WITH THE SUBMITTED |
| | CERTIFICATION LETTERS. SOME LETTERS ARE JUST FOR 2420 |
| | FLORIDA AVENUE (I.E. SCHOOL BOARD AND DRAINAGE); AND |
| | OTHERS SEEM TO INCLUDE 510 SUNSET ROAD AND 519 AVON |
| | ROAD. NOW THAT THE SURVEYS FOR 510 SUNSET ROAD AND 519 |
| | AVON ROAD HAVE BEEN PROVIDED, THE CERTIFICATION LETTER |
| | FOR ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC FACILITIES LETTERS CAN BE |
| | COMBINED AS ONE. |
| | |
| | |
| | REZONING: |
| | |
| | 1.) FOR THE PRIVATELY-INITIATED APPLICATION, THE |
| | APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE A RESPONSE TO EACH OF THE |
| | REZONING STANDARDS IN SEC. 94-32 OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AS HOW IT RELATES TO THE |
| | APPLICATION. A BRIEF UMBRELLA STATEMENT (AS PROVIDED IN |
| | THE 7/30/21 RESUBMITTAL) DOES NOT SUFFICE NOR DOES IT |
| | DEMONSTRATE HOW THE PROPOSED REZONING MEETS EACH |
| | STANDARD. THIS IS A REQUIRED COMPONENT TO COMPLETING |
| | THE APPLICATION. |
| | |
| |
Print |
