| Date |
Text |
| 2021-03-10 10:45:47 | CASE NO. PB 1060NN |
| | FLAMINGO CAR WASH II |
| | 879 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | MARCH 26, 2021, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | MAY 18, 2021 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY MAY 11, 2021), |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) THE CHINESE RESTAURANT SITE IS PART OF WHAT WAS |
| | PARCEL 3 OF THE PALM BEACH LAKES INN AND GOLF COURSE |
| | CPD AND COVERED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2622-93. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE A RESPONSE/STATUS UPDATE TO THE CONDITIONS |
| | LISTED IN SECTION 5, SUBSECTIONS 3, 7, 8 AND 9 OF |
| | ORDINANCE NO. 2622-93. |
| | |
| | 2) EVEN THOUGH THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT FOR THE |
| | REDEVELOPMENT SHOWS A REDUCTION IN TRIPS FOR THE |
| | MAJORITY OF THE TESTED TIME FRAMES, YOU ARE STILL |
| | REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AN APPROVED TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE |
| | STANDARDS LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY ENGINEERING. AN |
| | APPROVAL LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING FOR |
| | PLANNING BOARD. |
| | |
| | 3) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING A COPY OF THE EASEMENT WITH |
| | COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS. IT INDICATES THAT BEST BUY |
| | HAS AN INTEREST IN THE CROSS ACCESS, SPECIFICALLY A |
| | DRIVE TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | VERIFICATION THAT BEST BUY HAS RELEASED THEIR INTEREST |
| | IN THE EASEMENT. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE DUMPSTER AND |
| | LANDSCAPING OBSTRUCTING BEST BUY FROM UTILIZING THE |
| | EASEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT REGARDLESS OF WHAT IS STATED |
| | IN THE EASEMENT, BEST BUY HAS NO RIGHTS TO THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF AN OFF PREMISE SIGN, WHICH WOULD BE IN |
| | VIOLATION OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 4) THANK YOU FOR SHOWING THE CROSS ACCESS DRIVEWAY WITH |
| | THE BRANDSMART/BJS SITE CONSTRUCTED TO THE PROPERTY |
| | LINE. NOTE: THE RECENT BRANDSMART/BJS RESUBMITTAL DID |
| | NOT SHOW THEIR SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY LINED UP WITH THE |
| | FLAMINGO PROPOSED LOCATION. STAFF WILL BE MAKING THAT |
| | COMMENT ON THEIR REVIEW; HOWEVER, YOU WILL NEED TO SHOW |
| | THE CORRECT TRAFFIC MARKINGS ON THE SITE PLAN (EXAMPLE |
| | STOP BAR AND SIGN FOR VEHICLES EXITING THE |
| | BRANDSMART/BJS SITE), EVEN THOUGH THEY WILL NOT NEED TO |
| | BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE CONNECTION IS COMPLETED. |
| | |
| | 5) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE WARRANTY DEED AND THE FPU, FPL |
| | AND COMCAST LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION. |
| | |
| | 6) PROVIDE COPIES OF ALL THE EASEMENTS/RESTRICTIONS |
| | AFFECTING THE SITE. A QUICK REVIEW OF THE TWO 30 FOOT |
| | I.E.E. LISTED ON THE SURVEY DO NOT SHOW THE EASEMENT |
| | EXTENDING TO THE PROPOSED NEW ACCESS CONNECTION TO THE |
| | DRIVEWAY BETWEEN THE GAS STATION AND THE RESTAURANT |
| | PARCEL. PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT YOU HAVE |
| | ACCESS RIGHTS TO THE PARCEL AS SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 7) PLEASE CONSIDER MAKING THE EMPLOYEE/ADA PARKING |
| | SPACES ONLY NINE (9) FEET WIDE AND 18 FEET DEEP |
| | INCLUDING THE TWO (2) FOOT OVERHANG TO REDUCE THE |
| | AMOUNT OF PAVEMENT WITHIN THE PARKING AREA. THESE |
| | SPACES DO NOT NEED THE EXTRA SIZE THAT THE VACUUM |
| | SPACES REQUIRE. |
| | |
| | 8) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT THE SIDEWALK |
| | ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE WILL BE WIDENED TO AN 8-10 |
| | FOOT MULTIPURPOSE PATH; HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN CALLS |
| | OUT A 7-9 FOOT WIDTH THAT MATCHES THE EXISTING |
| | CONDITION SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. PLEASE EXPLAIN OR AMEND |
| | THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. |
| | |
| | 9) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE |
| | THAT ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A |
| | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT SHALL NOT |
| | EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF |
| | SUCH DEVELOPMENT. THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWS THIS |
| | MAXIMUM BEING EXCEEDED ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. |
| | THE BOUNDARY WITH BEST BUY DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE |
| | PLAN, BUT STILL APPEARS TO EXCEED THE PERMITTED LIGHT |
| | LEVELS. |
| | |
| | 10) PROVIDE THE DETAILS OF THE PAY LANE STRUCTURE. THE |
| | POSTS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE ARE LOCATED |
| | WITHIN THE REQUIRED FIVE (5) FOOT SIDE SETBACK, WHICH |
| | IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 11) THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK NEEDS TO HAVE A SUPPORT |
| | POST DIMENSION BETWEEN 22 AND 24 INCHES AS OPPOSED TO |
| | THE 14.375 INCHES SPECIFIED ON THE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL. |
| | THE NARROW DIMENSION IS NOT ADEQUATE TO APPROPRIATELY |
| | SECURE A BICYCLE. |
| | |
| | 12) PROVIDE THE BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS ON THE OVERALL |
| | SITE OR CIVIL PLAN AS WELL AS THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 13) THE FLAG POLE MAY NOT EXCEED 50 FEET IN HEIGHT AND |
| | MAY NOT FLY A FLAG WITH THE NAME OR LOGO OF THE |
| | BUSINESS. |
| | |
| | 14) NONE OF THE PLANT MATERIALS ARE LABELED ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. STAFF CANNOT VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 15) THE EAST AND SOUTH BUFFERS DO NOT APPEAR TO MEET |
| | THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED TREES NOR DO THEY MEET |
| | THE REQUIRED SPACING OF THE TREES DUE TO THE DRAINAGE |
| | EASEMENTS. YOU HAVE NOT DEMONSTRATED COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 16) FREESTANDING SIGNS ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF |
| | 24 FEET FROM ADJOINING LOT LINES. THE MONUMENT SIGN |
| | LOCATION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS SETBACK REQUIREMENT. |
| | WHAT IS THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE SIGN? |
| | |
| | 17) DIRECTIONAL SIGNS ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF |
| | 20 FEET FROM ANOTHER LOT LINE. THE PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL |
| | SIGNS DO NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. NO DETAILS ON THE |
| | DIRECTIONAL SIGNS WERE PROVIDED TO VERIFY CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE. NOTE: DEPENDING ON WHAT THE SIGNS ARE FOR, |
| | THEY MAY ACTUALLY BE PARKING AREA INSTRUCTIONAL SIGNS, |
| | WHICH HAVE DIFFERENT SETBACK PROVISIONS. |
| | |
| | 18) THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM |
| | CITY STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 19) THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN SHOWS THE PROPOSED |
| | CONTROL STRUCTURE AND OUTFALL PIPE WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER ON THE BRANDSMART/BJS SITE. THIS NEEDS TO BE |
| | RELOCATED TO UNDERNEATH A PAVED AREA SO AS NOT TO |
| | IMPACT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. |
| | |
| | 20) WHAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS? WHAT |
| | IS THE OPPORTUNITY TO ABANDON, REVISE OR RELOCATE THEM? |
| | THE NON-EXCLUSIVE OUTFALL DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED IN |
| | ORB 11870 PG 300 INCLUDES PROVISIONS FOR TERMINATION OF |
| | THE EASEMENTS OF PORTIONS OF EASEMENTS THAT ARE NO |
| | LONGER NEEDED. |
| | |
| | 21) TURN OFF THE TREE DISPOSITION LAYER ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN. THIS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON A SEPARATE PLAN AS IT |
| | IMPEDES THE READABILITY OF THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 22) PLEASE CONSIDER USING A PERVIOUS PAVEMENT |
| | UNDERNEATH THE VACUUM AREA PARKING SPOTS. |
| | |
| | 23) STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THERE IS NO INTERNAL |
| | PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION BETWEEN THE MARATHON GAS |
| | STATION, THE PROPOSED FLAMINGO CAR WASH SITE AND THE |
| | BEST BUY. IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE PEDESTRIAN |
| | CIRCULATION SITE DESIGN QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT |
| | STANDARDS, YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A FIVE (5) FOOT |
| | WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF THE SITE |
| | FROM EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE TO THE BEST BUY PROPERTY |
| | LINE. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WOULD BE SHIFTED TO THE |
| | SIDEWALK AND YOUR EXISTING CURB LINE. |
| | |
| | 24) THE BENCHES ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE NEED TO |
| | MEET CPTED STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 25) PLEASE CLARIFY THE INTENT OF THE USE CHART THAT IS |
| | INCLUDED WITH THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 26) IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR A UNIFORM STREETSCAPE ON |
| | THIS SIDE OF EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE AND PROVIDE SHADE, |
| | THE NORTHERN BUFFER TREES NEED TO BE GUMBO LIMBO TREES. |
| | |
| |
Print |
