| Date |
Text |
| 2021-03-05 15:12:48 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE SITE PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PLAT APPLICATION |
| | (REFERENCE: PB CASE NO. 1875) HAS BEEN REVIEWED AT THE |
| | 2/11/2021 PPRC MEETING. ANY CHANGES TO THE SITE PLAN |
| | THAT WILL TRIGGER CHANGES IN THE PLAT DOCUMENT WILL |
| | NEED TO BE ADDRESSED FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 2.) SIGNED AND NOTARIZED MAILING LIST AFFIDAVIT IS |
| | MISSING FROM THE SUBMITTAL PACKET. |
| | |
| | 3.) A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD) |
| | LETTER IS REQUIRED SINCE THE PROJECT CONTAINS |
| | RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THE SCAD LETTER IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | THE APPLICATION MOVING FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING. |
| | |
| | 4.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: COMCAST AND FPU. |
| | |
| | 5.) A WORD DOCUMENT, CONTAINING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION |
| | OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY (NOT THE PROPOSED REPLAT, AS IT |
| | HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED) SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE FILE. |
| | |
| | 6.) PLEASE CLARIFY/ADDRESS IN THE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT THE FOLLOWING: A) THE STATEMENT REFERENCES |
| | "ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY" ; HOWEVER, THE BUILDING FORM |
| | DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF "ATTACHED |
| | SINGLE-FAMILY" AND APPEARS TO BE A TOWNHOUSE FORM. B) |
| | FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS NORTH OF THE |
| | SUBJECT PROPERTY IS INCORRECT. |
| | |
| | 7.) FURTHER DISCUSSION WITH CITY STAFF ON HOW TO |
| | IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF DESIGN TO PROVIDE GREATER |
| | BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE |
| | SURROUNDING COMMUNITY SHALL BE REQUIRED. DISCUSSION MAY |
| | INCLUDE PROVISION FOR COMMON OPEN SPACE, PEDESTRIAN |
| | CONNECTION TO SURROUNDING COMMUNITY AMENITIES (I.E. |
| | WAREHOUSE DISTRICT; HOWARD PARK), ETC. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLAT COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE USE OF TRACT "A" SHALL BE CLEARLY DEFINED IN |
| | THE DEDICATIONS AND RESERVATIONS. ALSO, HOW BIG IS |
| | TRACT A? AS NOTED IN THE PPRC COMMENTS FOR THE SITE |
| | PLAN (PB CASE NO. 1875: GENERAL COMMENTS #2), THE |
| | INTENT OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS TO ENCOURAGE THROUGH |
| | INCENTIVES, THE USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND |
| | DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND |
| | ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY. IT IS ENCOURAGED |
| | THAT TRACT "A" BE DEDICATED AND DESIGNED AS OPEN SPACE |
| | FOR USE BY THE RESIDENTS/COMMUNITY(SEMI-PUBLIC). |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X |
| | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND |
| | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($600.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458. |
| | |
| |
Print |
