| Date |
Text |
| 2021-07-01 12:00:14 | COMMENTS TO 6/2/21 SET |
| | 1. NOT SATISFIED. APPLICANT NEEDS TO SUBMIT A REPORT |
| | WITH THE REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONVERSION OF |
| | USES NECESSARY TO ACCOUNT FOR THE OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | ABOVE THE AVAILABLE POOL. PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE PROJECT |
| | EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE CURRENTLY ALLOCATED |
| | FOR OFFICE IN THE DRI CAPACITY TABLE. BASED ON THE |
| | LATEST NUMBERS, A CONVERSION FROM OTHER CATEGORY WOULD |
| | BE NEEDED TO ALLOW 62,833 SF OF ADDITIONAL OFFICE |
| | SPACE. PLEASE SUBMIT CONVERSION ANALYSIS ACCORDING TO |
| | ORDINANCE 4412-12.-PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATION FOR EACH USE TO |
| | DETERMINE THE NEED FOR CONVERSION CAPACITY FROM THE |
| | CITYPLACE DRI. CURRENTLY THERE IS ONLY 383,429 SF OF |
| | OFFICE SPACE, AND 32,337 SF OR RETAIL AVAILABLE IN THE |
| | POOL. IT SEEMS THE GBA OF PROPOSED OFFICE MAY EXCEED |
| | THE AVAILABLE SF NECESSITATING A SF CONVERSION. |
| | 2. SATISFIED.- PLEASE REVIEW ORDINANCE NO. 4412-12 AND |
| | PROVIDE CONFIRMATION OF COMPLIANCE FOR ALL APPLICABLE |
| | ITEMS. |
| | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PASSAGEWAY SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DESIGN STANDARDS IN ORDER TO BE |
| | COUNTED AS ACTIVE USES, SEATING, VEGETATION AND TREE |
| | CANOPY SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PASSAGE WAY. PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENTS: STAFF UNDERSTAND WAIVERS ARE REQUESTED. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEMATIC DRAWING INDICATING THE |
| | COMPLIANCE AT GROUND FLOOR AND THE WAIVERS REQUESTED |
| | FOR FLOORS 2ND-5TH. IF THE AREA OF THE PASEO MEETS THE |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, IT CAN BE COUNTED AS |
| | ACTIVE USE AS IT IS ADJACENT TO ACTIVE USES ON BOTH |
| | SIDES.- PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE GRAPHIC |
| | INFORMATION TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVE |
| | USE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 4. NOT SATISFIED. SOME SUGGESTIONS TO REDUCE THE NUMBER |
| | OF WAIVERS REQUESTED: |
| | A. AS IT SEEMS THE PROPOSED VALET PARKING SPACES ON THE |
| | GROUND FLOOR ARE NOT USABLE (DUE TO CIRCULATION |
| | PATTERNS) THE GROUND FLOOR ACTIVE USE ALONG DIXIE HWAY |
| | COULD BE MODIFIED TO MEET THE MINIMUM DEPTH REQUIRED. |
| | B. SATISFIED WITH HORIZONTAL VARIATION PROVIDED IN THE |
| | GARAGE. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLANAR BREAKS COULD BE |
| | MEASURED HORIZONTALLY WITH THE VARIATION ON THE |
| | BUILDING PLANE OF EACH PARKING LEVEL. |
| | C. NOT SATISFIED: PLEASE PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE LOCATION |
| | FOR THE REQUIRED TREES. PREVIOUS COMMENT: CONSIDERING |
| | THE CANOPY AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE IS AT 33? IN HEIGHT, |
| | TREES MAY BE INSTALLED ALONG THE CURB TO COMPLY WITH |
| | TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENT. |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROJECT IS REQUESTING 22 DIFFERENT |
| | WAIVERS FROM REGULATIONS. PLEASE FURTHER STUDY OPTIONS |
| | TO COMPLY WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS OR REDUCE THE WAIVER |
| | REQUEST. SOME OF THE WAIVERS THAT CAN BE REDUCED |
| | INCLUDE: |
| | A. SATISFIED-PORTE COCHERE. CONSIDERING THE DROP-OFF |
| | AREA ON QUADRILLE CANNOT MEET THE PORTE COCHERE |
| | REQUIREMENTS STAFF RECOMMENDS UTILIZING A REGULAR |
| | ON-STREET DROP-OFF. |
| | B. SATISFIED-TOWER AND GARAGE SEPARATION ARE NOT |
| | APPLICABLE TO THIS DISTRICT. |
| | 5. SATISFIED. WAIVER REQUESTED. PLEASE PROVIDE SOME |
| | SECTIONS TO INDICATE THE RELATION BETWEEN THE OFFICE |
| | TOWER LEVELS AND THE GARAGE LEVELS. IF THE OFFICE |
| | LEVELS ARE USED, GARAGE LEVELS 8,9 AND 10 SEEM TO |
| | EXCEED TO MAXIMUM FOOTPRINT (TOWER LEVELS 6 AND 7).THE |
| | WAIVER REQUEST SHOULD BE FOR THOSE TWO FLOORS TO EXCEED |
| | THE MAXIMUM 55% BUILDING FOOTPRINT ALLOWED? PREVIOUS |
| | COMMENT: PROJECT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT |
| | ALLOWED AT THE 6TH AND 7TH STORY (55%) AND ABOVE 8TH |
| | STORY (50%) DUE TO THE PARKING GOING UP 10 STORIES. |
| | JUSTIFICATION LIST THE WAIVER REQUEST TO EXCEED THE |
| | MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT FROM 6TH TO 24TH FLOOR. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROVIDED |
| | ABOVE THE 10TH LEVEL. THE PROJECT IS ALLOWED TO EXCEED |
| | MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ABOVE THE 5TH FLOOR, BUT IN |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK, WHICH IS NOT |
| | PROVIDED AT THIS POINT. |
| | 6. SATISFIED- PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF 20 |
| | CARPOOL/VANPOOL AND 10 CAR SHARE STATION PROPOSED AS |
| | PART OF THE TDM STRATEGIES TO REACH MAXIMUM PARKING |
| | ALLOWED. PROPOSED PARKING EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED. |
| | MAXIMUM PARKING ALLOWED FOR THE PROJECT IS: |
| | SOFT MAXIMUM = 398,590 SF AT1.5/1,000 = 598 SPACES |
| | ADDITIONAL .75/1,000 WITH CONTRIBUTION TO TRANSIT = 299 |
| | SPACES |
| | ADDITIONAL WITH TDM STRATEGIES = 299 SPACES |
| | TOTAL ALLOWED = 1,196 SPACES ? PARKING PROPOSED ON |
| | 6/2/21 SUBMITTAL IS 1,195 |
| | PARKING PROPOSES ON APRIL 23, 21 VERSION = 1,213 SPACES |
| | TO INCREASE FROM THE SOFT MAXIMUM THE PROJECT CAN: |
| | A. CONTRIBUTE TO THE TRANSIT OPERATION FUND (EXACT |
| | AMOUNT TO BE CALCULATED). THAT WILL ALLOW 299 |
| | ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES. |
| | B. THE ADDITIONAL SPACES REQUESTED UP TO THE HARD |
| | MAXIMUM WOULD REQUIRE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TDM |
| | STRATEGIES. PLEASE IDENTIFY WHICH TDM STRATEGIES THE |
| | PROJECT IS GOING TO IMPLEMENT. |
| | |
| | 7. NOT SATISFIED . AT LEAST CURB CUT ON LAKEVIEW CAN BE |
| | REDUCED TO 12? WIDE TRAVEL LANES. WAIVER REQUESTED. |
| | REFUGE AREA MENTIONED IN THE RESPONSE LETTER IS NOT |
| | SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PROPOSED CURB |
| | CUT EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM 25 FEET ALLOWED. FURTHER |
| | DISCUSSION NECESSARY TO DETERMINE IF THE SERVICE DRIVE |
| | CAN BE REDUCED, OR IF THERE ARE ANY MEASURES TO |
| | MITIGATE THE IMPACT ON PEDESTRIANS. |
| | 8. SATISFIED. CONDITION TO BE INCLUDED IN APPROVAL- |
| | SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS THE |
| | DRIVEWAY. |
| | 9. SATISFIED- FDOT REQUIRES A PUBLIC PURPOSE LEASE |
| | REQUEST FOR THE DROP-OFF AREA INITIATED BY CITY OR CRA. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE PRE-APPROVAL LETTER FROM FDOT TO CONFIRM |
| | THEY WILL ACCEPT THE DROP OFF AREA ON QUADRILLE BLVD |
| | AND THE LOCATION OF THE CURB CUTS.-PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | TPS LETTER FROM COUNTY MENTIONS THE POSSIBLE NEED FOR |
| | DECELERATION LANES TO ACCESS GARAGE. PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | PRE-DETERMINATION LETTER FROM FDOT CONFIRMING THE |
| | AGENCY APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED SIDE PLAN (DRIVEWAYS, |
| | TREES ETC.) |
| | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE NARRATIVE ON THE CURB |
| | SIDE MANAGEMENT OF ON-STREET DROP OFF/PICK UP AREA |
| | PROPOSED ON QUADRILLE BLVD.- PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE FOR A CURB SIDE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND A FREIGHT |
| | DELIVERY MANAGEMENT PLAN. |
| | 11. SATISFIED. PROPOSED VALET LOCATION IS NOT |
| | FUNCTIONAL, THE VALET OPERATION IS BLOCKING THE TRAVEL |
| | LANES. A SEPARATE AREA FOR STACKING IS NEEDED. PLEASE |
| | INDICATE THE TRAVEL PATHS FOR CARS RECEIVED AT THE 2ND |
| | FLOOR VALET TO THE GROUND FLOOR VALET PARKING AREA. |
| | VALET CARS SHOULD NOT CIRCULATE IN THE PUBLIC ROW. ? |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING |
| | THE OPERATION OF THE VALET SERVICE FOR THE BUILDING. |
| | PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE VALET PARKING |
| | DROP-OFF /PICK UP AREA INSIDE THE GARAGE. |
| | 12. TO BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITON OF APPROVAL- DUE TO |
| | THE PROPOSAL TO INCLUDE TANDEM PARKING SPACES, VALET |
| | SERVICE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. A RESTRICTIVE |
| | COVENANT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 13. STAFF STILL RECOMMENDS MORE REALISTIC RENDERINGS BE |
| | PROVIDED FOR STAFF EVALUATION AND PUBLIC MEETINGS. |
| | STAFF RECOMMENDS MORE REALISTIC RENDERINGS FOR THE PB |
| | AND CITY COMMISSION MEETING. CAN THE CONCRETE PARAPET |
| | THAT CREATES THE ILLUSION OF SLAB THICKNESS BE TALLER |
| | TO FURTHER SCREEN THE CARS FROM VIEW? WHAT ABOUT SOME |
| | VEGETATION IN SOME OF THE SLAB PROJECTIONS THAT |
| | COMPLEMENT THE ART INSTALLATION AND HELP SCREEN THE |
| | CARS?? PREVIOUS COMMENT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED REGARDING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE |
| | PARKING GARAGE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPLICANT TO PROVIDE |
| | DETAILED SECTIONS TO FULLY EXPLAIN THE SPECIAL DESIGN |
| | OF THE GARAGE SLABS THAT WILL JUSTIFY THE LACK OF |
| | ACTIVE USES. REALISTIC RENDERING IMAGES ARE ALSO |
| | RECOMMENDED TO FULLY DEPICT THE IMAGE OF THE GARAGE AND |
| | ALLOW A COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE GARAGE IMPACT ON |
| | THE SURROUNDING. RENDERINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ALL |
| | THE DIFFERENT VIEW POINTS OF THE GARAGE (DIXIE, |
| | LAKEVIEW, OKEECHOBEE) AND FROM STREET LEVEL PERSPECTIVE |
| | AS WELL AS FROM UPPER LEVELS FROM SURROUNDING |
| | BUILDINGS. |
| | PLANS INDICATE SOME OF THE PARKING SPACES AT THE EDGE |
| | OF THE SLAB, ARE THE CARS VISIBLE FROM OUTSIDE? |
| | 14. NOT SATISFIED. SOME OF THE GARAGE SLABS ENCROACH |
| | INTO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACKS. SECTION IN A513 |
| | DOES NOT SEEM TO MATCH FLOOR PLANS BUT SEEMS TO |
| | INDICATE SOME ADDITIONAL SETBACK ABOVE FLOOR 6TH BEYOND |
| | THE MINIMUM REQUIRED. PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM |
| | SETBACK LINE AND THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK FOR PARKING |
| | USES TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE WAIVER IN EACH |
| | PARKING LEVEL. PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| | MINIMUM SETBACK IN THE GARAGE SECTIONS TO IDENTIFY THE |
| | EXTEND OF THE ENCROACHMENTS INDICATED IN THE FLOOR |
| | PLANS. ARE THE ENCROACHMENTS PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL |
| | FEATURES? |
| | 15. NOT SATISFIED. IF THE PROJECT INTENDS TO ASK FOR A |
| | WAIVER, THE REQUIRED TREES SHALL BE LOCATED ON OTHER |
| | PARTS OF THE PROJECT OR A MITIGATION FEE PAID INTO THE |
| | TREE FUND. SOME ADDITIONAL TREES CAN BE INSTALLED NORTH |
| | AND SOUTH OF THE CANOPY TO BRING THE PROJECT CLOSER |
| | INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT. PLEASE SUGGEST |
| | WHERE THE REMAINING TREES CAN BE LOCATION AROUND THE |
| | PROJECT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED |
| | ALONG THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD FRONTAGE EVERY 30 FEET. |
| | 16. SATISFIED. SIDEWALK ALONG THE QUADRILLE FRONTAGE IS |
| | 10 FEET AT ITS NARROWEST POINT. PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | SIDEWALK ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD BY THE BUILDING |
| | ENTRANCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET IN WIDTH. |
| | 17. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A FA?ADE DETAIL DEPICTING |
| | THE TREATMENT OF THE FA?ADE TO ACCOMMODATE THE UTILITY |
| | ELEMENTS. ALSO PLEASE CLARIFY HOW IS THE ACCESS TO THE |
| | FIRE BACKFLOW. - PREVIOUS COMMENT: ALL BACKFLOW |
| | PREVENTORS AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITY CONNECTIONS AT THE |
| | GROUND LEVEL NEED TO BE SCREENED FROM VIEW. FURTHER |
| | DISCUSSION IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE MOST |
| | APPROPRIATE LOCATION. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS AND SITE PLAN |
| | DRAWINGS SHALL REFLECT THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF SUCH |
| | EQUIPMENT. |
| | 18. SATISFIED. SIGNAGE TO BE SUBMITTED - A COMPLETE |
| | SIGNAGE PACKET SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL AS PART |
| | OF THE LEVEL III SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS BY THE CITY |
| | COMMISSION. |
| | 19. SATISFIED. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE DESIGNATED 798 |
| | SF ROOM IS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE 120 BIKE |
| | PARKING SPACES. PREVIOUS COMMENT. BIKE PARKING REQUIRED |
| | IS 120 SPACES. - PREVIOUS COMMENT: THE BIKE STORAGE |
| | INDICATED ON THE GROUND FLOOR ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD |
| | DOES NOT SEEM ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE 120 BIKE SPACES |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT (1/10 PARKING SPACES) |
| | 20. NOT SATISFIED. TO BE INCLUDED AS A CONDITION OF |
| | APPROVAL. SHOWERS MAY BE DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE |
| | BUILDING, BUT IT SHALL BE ENSURED THAT ALL TENANTS HAVE |
| | ACCESS TO A SHOWER FACILITY (13 SHOWERS REQUIRED). |
| | SHEET A112 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN SUBMITTED SET. BASED ON |
| | THE 382,211 SF OF NET OFFICE SPACE, THE PROJECT IS |
| | REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 13 SHOWERS AND CHANGING FACILITIES. |
| | SHOWERS SHALL BE IN AREAS ACCESSIBLE TO ALL TENANTS. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE PRELIMINARY LOCATION FOR SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVAL PROCESS- PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE SHOWER AND CHANGING ROOMS REQUIRED FOR |
| | THE PROJECT (1 SHOWER AND CHANGING /30,000 SF OF |
| | OFFICE). |
| | 21. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE CALLING OUT THE |
| | NON-REFLECTIVE NATURE OF THE GLASS IN THE FA?ADE. - |
| | PLEASE CONFIRM THE PROPOSED GLASS IS NOT A REFLECTIVE |
| | GLASS TO CAUSE IMPACT OF DRIVERS. |
| | 22. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE LAY OUT THE LINE OF SIGHT |
| | MEETING THE FDOT REQUIREMENTS TO CONFIRM THE LOCATION |
| | OF THE TREES INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS MEET FDOT |
| | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE OBTAIN A PRE-APPROVAL LETTER FROM |
| | FDOT TO CONFIRM THEY WILL ALLOW THE PROPOSED PLACEMENT |
| | OF TREES ALONG THE CURB LINE. - PLEASE CONFIRM FDOT HAS |
| | APPROVED THE LOCATIONS OF THE PROPOSED TREES ALONG THE |
| | CURB. |
| | 23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. WHAT ARE THE FDOT STANDARDS |
| | FOR A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING? PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS SHOULD |
| | HAVE THERMOPLASTIC ZEBRA PATTERN AND ADA RAMPS. ? |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISION OF PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS |
| | AT ALL INTERSECTIONS. |
| | 24. NOT SATISFIED. 12 BIKE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT, CLOSE TO BUILDING |
| | ENTRANCE AND RETAIL ENTRANCES. BIKE PARKING FOR THE |
| | GENERAL PUBLIC SHALL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE PROJECT |
| | WITHIN THE PUBLIC REALM. PLEASE PROVIDE 1 BIKE SPACE |
| | PER EVERY 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THE PROVIDED |
| | BIKE PARKING INSIDE THE BUILDING IS FOR THE BUILDING |
| | TENANTS. - PREVIOUS COMMENT: PUBLIC BIKE RACKS ARE |
| | REQUIRED ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE AT A RATIO OF ONE |
| | PARKING SPACE/100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE. |
| | 25. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TO BE CONFIRMED DURING |
| | BUILDING PERMIT. ANY CHANGES IN GRADE ELEVATION BETWEEN |
| | THE SIDEWALK AND THE FINISHED FLOOR SHALL BE ABSORBED |
| | INSIDE THE BUILDING. ? PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | STREET SECTIONS INCLUDING GROUND FLOOR ELEVATIONS TO |
| | CONFIRM EXISTING STREET AND SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS CAN BE |
| | MET WITH THE NEW PROJECT. |
| | 26. SATISFIED. A MAXIMUM OF 30 % OF THE PARKING SPACES |
| | CAN BE COMPACT SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO |
| | CONFIRM COMPLIANCE. ? PREVIOUS COMMENT: PLEASE CONFIRM |
| | YOU DO NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE COMPACT PARKING |
| | SPACES FOR THE PROJECT. |
| | 27. THE PARKING PROJECTIONS IN SOME OF THE UPPER FLOORS |
| | ENCROACH INTO THE MINIMUM SETBACK. PLEASE ADJUST. A |
| | MAXIMUM 2 FEET FOR ARCHITECTURAL ENCROACHMENT IS |
| | ALLOWED. |
| | FOR RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF ALL |
| | DRAWINGS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND ONE CD WITH |
| | ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS. PLEASE |
| | INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH OF THE |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | 28. IF THE GROUDN FLOOR PARKING IS GOING TO BE USED BY |
| | EMPLOYEES, PLEASE INDICATE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE |
| | PARKING AREA. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
