| Date |
Text |
| 2021-03-02 15:44:14 | GENERAL: |
| | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH CITY |
| | ENGINEERING ON THE DESIGN OF TAMARIND AVENUE AS THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF FLAGLER STATION AND THE LINEAR PARK |
| | PROGRESSES |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE TAMARIND AVENUE PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN |
| | FINALIZED BY CITY ENGINEERING DEPT. |
| | 2. SATISFIED. |
| | 3. NOTED, SATISFIED. |
| | 4. SATISFIED. STAFF RECOMMENDS HAVING A DISCUSSION WITH |
| | CRA, ZONING STAFF AND THE CITY LANDSCAPE PLANNER TO |
| | DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING DESIGN ITEMS: |
| | A. SATISFIED. |
| | B. SATISFIED. |
| | C. SATISFIED. |
| | D. SATISFIED. |
| | E. SATISFIED. |
| | F. SATISFIED. |
| | G. SATISFIED. |
| | H. SATISFIED. |
| | 5. ONGOING. THE PROPOSED GHOST TRAIN MAY BE IN CONFLICT |
| | WITH AN EXISTING FORCE MAIN. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPOSED |
| | DIMENSIONS OF STRUCTURE IF KNOWN OR ESTIMATED |
| | DIMENSIONS. CAN THIS BE SHIFTED FURTHER WEST TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS? |
| | THE LATEST ITERATIONS OF THE AIPP CONCEPT THAT PLANNING |
| | STAFF HAS SEEN DID NOT INCLUDE ANY OPTION FOR MOBILE |
| | RELOCATION. THIS SHALL BE AN ONGOING DISCUSSION BETWEEN |
| | PLANNING, ENGINEERING, CRA AND PUBLIC WORKS AS THE AIPP |
| | CONCEPT IS REVISED |
| | 6. SATISFIED. |
| | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF PRESERVED |
| | RAIL TRANSFER PIECE (FOUND ON SITE SEPARATE FROM |
| | TRACKS) |
| | HISTORIC AND PLANNING STAFF WOULD LIKE TO KEEP THIS |
| | RAIL TRANSFER PIECE AS PART OF THE PRESERVATION OF THE |
| | LINEAR PARK. THIS PIECE COULD BE INCLUDED IN THE AIPP |
| | (SUGGESTION ONLY, NEED TO WORK WITH AIPP) OR STOOD UP |
| | INTO PLANTER BED OR LAID INTO GROUND WITHIN PARK. THESE |
| | ARE ONLY SUGGESTIONS. PLEASE HAVE DISCUSSIONS WITH |
| | AIPP, CRA AND PLANNING |
| | LANDSCAPE: |
| | 1. SATISFIED. |
| | 2. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE RETAIN LANDSCAPE |
| | SCREENING AROUND FLAGLER STATION?S UTILITIES AS |
| | PROPOSED WITH THE PARENT SITE (TO BEST EXTENT |
| | POSSIBLE). IS A BENCH PROPOSED IN FRONT OF THIS AREA? |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY, THIS WOULD NOT BE A GOOD LOCATION FOR A |
| | BENCH DUE TO THE UTILITIES |
| | 3. PLEASE DISTINGUISH BETWEEN PROPOSED BENCHES FROM |
| | EDGE OF PAVERS THROUGH LABELING OR OTHER MEANS |
| | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE CONFIRM WITH RAY CARANCI |
| | IF SABAL PALMS NUMBER 53, 54, 62, 67 AND 68 SHOULD BE |
| | PRESERVED ON SITE OR BETTER TO BE RELOCATED (OR |
| | MITIGATED) |
| | PLEASE SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS |
| | |
| | |
| | CIVIL: |
| | 1. SATISFIED. |
| | 2. SATISFIED. |
| | |
| | |
| | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
| | 561 822 1426 |
| | [email protected] |
| |
Print |
