Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z20100013
Project Number Z20100013
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2020-11-12 11:17:34PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 11.12.2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z20100012 & Z20100013
 CASE NO.: PB 1868 & 1869
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION
 (REPLAT) ? IT APPEARS THAT MATERIALS SUBMITTED WERE
 THOSE REQUIRED FOR A LOT SPLIT ALONG EXISTING PLATTED
 LOT LINES. AS THE SUBDIVISION IS CREATING NEW LOT
 LINES, A REPLAT IT REQUIRED.
  
 2. IT LOOKS LIKE A REPLAT WAS PREPARED (IN ADDITION TO
 THE LOT SPLIT DOCUMENTS) BUT ONLY PAGE 2 OF THE PLAT
 WAS PROVIDED. THE LOT SPLIT DOCUMENTS ARE NOT NEEDED,
 AND A FULL PLAT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA
 STATUTES NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 3. THERE?S INCONSISTENCY IN THE LOT DIMENSIONS BETWEEN
 THE SITE PLAN APPROVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
 BOARD AND THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. ENSURE THAT THE
 SITE PLAN, PROPOSED PLAT, ETC. ARE ALL ACCURATE AND
 CONSISTENT?AND ENSURE THAT ALL ZONING AND HPB
 REQUIREMENTS CONTINUE TO BE MET.
  
 4. THE PROPOSED PLAT SHALL NOT CREATE ANY NEW
 NONCONFORMITIES. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT, IT APPEARS THAT
 THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 2 WOULD RESULT IN
 THE NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED POOL SETBACK
 ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING POOL ON LOT 1. THE SITE
 PLAN, HOWEVER, SHOWS THE EXISTING POOL MEETING THIS
 SETBACK REQUIREMENT.
  
 5. NOTE THAT FOR LOT 3, IF TWO (2) CURB-CUTS ARE
 PROPOSED, EACH OF THEM SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN (10) FEET
 IN WIDTH. ADDITIONALLY, A MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT, OR
 1,000 SQUARE FEET (WHICHEVER IS LESS) OF THE FRONT YARD
 SHALL CONSIST OF LANDSCAPING.
  
 6. IT IS THE CITY?S POLICY THAT ABANDONMENT OF ALLEYS
 REQUIRE THE APPRAISAL OF THE LAND, THE VALUE OF WHICH
 IS TO BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY IN EXCHANGE FOR THE ALLEY
 NO LONGER BEING AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC. PLEASE
 COORDINATE WITH VINCE NOEL, ENGINEERING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT MANAGER.
  
 7. THE LETTER FROM FPL INDICATES THAT EASEMENTS WILL BE
 REQUIRED TO COVER EXISTING FACILITIES. PLEASE INDICATE
 THE LOCATION OF THE FACILITIES AND WHAT EASEMENTS WILL
 BE DEDICATED. DEPENDING UPON THE LOCATION OF THE FUTURE
 EASEMENTS, SOME OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS MAY NEED
 TO BE RELOCATED.
  
 8. A LETTER OF NO OBJECTION STILL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED
 FROM THE CITY?S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 REGARDING THE ABANDONMENT OF THE ALLEY.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) PDFS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT
 DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE
 COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved