| Date |
Text |
| 2020-10-14 10:56:31 | CASE NO. PB 1223K |
| | JFK NORTH CAMPUS TREE REPLACEMENT AND DIRECTIONAL SIGN |
| | MINOR |
| | 2201 45TH STREET |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE |
| | (3) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY DECEMBER 14, 2020), THE |
| | PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) THE UPDATED SIGN LOCATION PLAN NEEDS TO BE IN THE |
| | FORM OF EXHIBIT G OF RES. NO. 297-19. THE SIGN |
| | LOCATIONS, WITH THEIR ORIENTATION, NEED TO BE OVERLAID |
| | ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW THAT THE PROPOSED SIGNS |
| | DO NOT CONFLICT WITH, OR A BLOCKED BY, THE REQUIRED |
| | TREES. |
| | |
| | 2) THE SIGNS THAT ARE PART OF THIS APPLICATION ARE |
| | DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS SUCH ON |
| | THE PLANS. THE JFK SIGN PLAN HAS DIFFERING ALLOWANCES |
| | FOR MONUMENT AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET C300: |
| | |
| | A. THE DIRECTIONAL SIGN FOR CLIENTS ENTERING FROM NORTH |
| | CONGRESS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN. THE ORIGINAL SIGN WAS IN AN |
| | ISLAND THAT WAS RECONFIGURED. IT NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED |
| | WHERE IT DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH THE TERMINAL ISLAND |
| | TREES. |
| | |
| | B. A DIRECTIONAL SIGN NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED TO DIRECT |
| | AMBULANCES TO THEIR EMERGENCY ROOM ENTRANCE ON THE |
| | NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND THE NON-AMBULANCE |
| | CLIENTS TO THEIR ENTRANCE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING VIA THE SOUTHBOUND ONE-WAY DRIVE. THIS SIGN |
| | MAY BE WHAT IS INTENDED AS SIGN #2. |
| | |
| | C. THE "LOCATION OF MONUMENT SIGN #2" WAS INSTALLED ON |
| | THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY WITHOUT A PERMIT AND MUST BE |
| | REMOVED. |
| | |
| | D. THE "PROPOSED RELOCATION OF MONUMENT SIGN #2 WITH NO |
| | REVISIONS" IS SHOWN ON THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY WHICH |
| | IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET C301: |
| | |
| | A. WHERE IS "MONUMENT SIGN #2" CURRENTLY LOCATED THAT |
| | IS PROPOSED TO BE MOVED? IS THIS THE SIGN THAT IS |
| | ADJACENT TO THE DRIVE TO THE MAIN HOSPITAL ENTRANCE? |
| | YOU MAY WANT TO ADD A SIGN AND NOT RELOCATE THE |
| | EXISTING ONE. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PLANS DO NOT INCLUDE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS TO GET |
| | CLIENTS (AND AMBULANCES) WHO ENTER VIA THE SOUTHERN |
| | DRIVEWAY TO ENTRANCES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE |
| | BUILDING. THIS IS THE SIGNAGE THAT IS REQUIRED BY THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATION. STAFF WILL BE SENDING A MARK-UP |
| | AS PART OF AN E-MAIL DIRECTLY TO THE APPLICANT TO |
| | CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 6) PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE ENTRY DRIVE TO THE MAIN |
| | HOSPITAL WILL BE RECONFIGURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| | SUBMITTED PLANS. THE LATEST PICTOMETRY PHOTOS DO NOT |
| | SHOW THIS WORK HAVING COMMENCED. NOT PERFORMING THE |
| | APPROVED WORK IN THIS AREA WOULD CREATE NUMEROUS SITE |
| | AND LANDSCAPE ISSUES WITH THE OVERALL MASTER PLAN. |
| | |
| | 7) THE LANDSCAPE PLANS WERE NOT SUBMITTED IN ELECTRONIC |
| | FORMAT. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
