Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z20090017
Project Number Z20090017
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2020-10-05 16:54:20PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 10.05.2020
 PROJECT NO.: Z20090017
 CASE NO.: PB 791KK
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. SHEET SP-1 - THE DIMENSION LINE FOR THE SIDE
 INTERIOR SETBACK AND THE POOL PAVILION OUTLINE ARE
 UNCLEAR AND CONFUSING. IT IS HARD TO DISTINGUISH THE
 OUTLINE OF THE PAVILION.
  
 2. SHEET SP-1 - THE GENERATOR SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A
 SOLID/OPAQUE FENCE OR WALL SURROUNDED BY LANDSCAPING.
  
 3. SHEET SP-1 - PROVIDE THE ELEVATION POINTS FOR THE
 SIDEWALKS/STAIRS THAT ARE ENCROACHING INTO THE SETBACK
 (AS WAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN PREVIOUSLY).
  
 4. SHEET SP-1 - COMPACT PARKING CALCULATIONS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN THE DATA TABLE AND SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
  
 5. SHEET A-2.1 - THE SPACE TO THE RIGHT OF THE GARAGE
 ENTRANCE (AS YOU ENTER THE GARAGE) IS DIMENSIONED
 INCORRECTLY. IT SHOULD BE MEASURED TO THE CENTER OF THE
 DOUBLE-STRIPE.
  
 6. SHEET A-2.1 - THERE ARE TWO (2) SPACES NEXT TO THE
 EXISTING COMPACT SPACES THAT SHOULD ALSO BE LABELED AS
 COMPACT (SHOULD BE FOUR (4) COMPACT SPACES IN A ROW).
  
 7. SHEET A-2.1 - THE TURNAROUND FOR THE PROPOSED GATES
 ON THE GROUND FLOOR DOES NOT FUNCTION.
  
 8. SHEET A-2.1 - WHY IS THE SIDEWALK/STAIR LEADING FROM
 THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK INTO THE MAILROOM WHEN THERE IS NO
 DOOR? THIS SHEET APPEARS TO SHOW A WINDOW, ALTHOUGH THE
 ELEVATION DOES SHOW A DOOR. PLEASE ENSURE CONSISTENCY
 ACROSS ALL PLANS.
  
 9. SHEET A-2.1 - THE FENCING AND POOL DECK ON THIS PLAN
 DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 10. SHEET A-3.1 - THE COLOR LEGEND STILL INDICATES THAT
 THE STONE IS BEING USED ON THE GARAGE ENTRY.
 ________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) PDFS OF ALL REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 TTY: 800.955.8771
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved