| Date |
Text |
| 2021-03-22 10:34:50 | |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | 1. SATISFIED |
| | 2. SATISFIED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NECESSARY TO |
| | MAKE FINAL DETERMINATION OF SITE CALCULATIONS. |
| | A. SATISFIED. WHAT ARE THE LEGAL PARAMETERS THAT |
| | REGULATE THE MASTER ASSOCIATION? |
| | B. SATISFIED. IS DRAINAGE FOR PHASE II ALLOWED WITHIN |
| | THE MASTER ASSOCIATION AREA? CAN IT BE LOCATION OUTSIDE |
| | PHASE II PARCEL? |
| | C. SATISFIED. IS EDGE ASSOCIATION CONSENTING FOR OPEN |
| | SPACE TO BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC? ARE THEY AWARE OPEN |
| | SPACE PERMITS THE PUBLIC TO ENTER? |
| | D. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: EXTENSION OF BALCONIES INTO |
| | EDGE ASSOCIATION PROPERTY ? NEED TO CONFIRM IF |
| | PERMITTED ? EASEMENT SHALL BE REQUIRED |
| | E. SATISFIED. MEASUREMENT OF SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK AND |
| | REAR SETBACK DETERMINED BASED ON HOW PROPERTY LINES |
| | WILL BE MODIFIED WITH PROJECT |
| | F. SATISFIED. HOW WILL INTERNAL DRIVE BE MAINTAINED AND |
| | OPERATED? |
| | 3. SATISFIED |
| | 4. ONGOING. CAN EXISTING DRAINAGE BE DISENGAGED? |
| | STORMWATER DRAINAGE UNDER REVIEW BY CITY ENGINEERING |
| | DEPARTMENT. |
| | 5. SATISFIED |
| | 6. SATISFIED. |
| | 7. SATISFIED. |
| | 8. SATISIFED. |
| | 9. SATISFIED |
| | 10. SATISFIED |
| | 11. SATISFIED |
| | 12. SATISFIED |
| | 13. SATISFIED |
| | 14. SATISFIED. |
| | 15. SATISFIED |
| | 16. SATISFIED |
| | 17. SATISFIED |
| | 18. SATISFIED |
| | 19. SATISFIED |
| | 20. SATISFIED |
| | 21. SATISFIED |
| | 22. SATISFIED |
| | 23. SATISFIED |
| | 24. SATISFIED |
| | 25. ONGOING ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. HOW WILL TRASH |
| | PICKUP WORK FOR NEW BUILDING? WHERE WILL EXISTING TRASH |
| | FOR EDGE BUILDING BE RELOCATED? |
| | NEED CONFIRMATION FROM MATT HEJAZI. MAY WANT TO HAVE |
| | FULL DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. ONGOING DISCUSSION WITH PUBLIC |
| | WORKS |
| | 26. SATISFIED. |
| | 27. SATISFIED |
| | 28. SATISFIED |
| | 29. SATISFIED |
| | 30. SATISFIED |
| | 31. SATISFIED. |
| | 32. SATISFIED |
| | 33. SATISFIED. |
| | 34. SATISFIED |
| | 35. SATISFIED |
| | 36. SATISFIED. |
| | 37. SATISFIED |
| | 38. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS |
| | PLANS ? TO INCLUDE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, ALL BUILDING |
| | ENTRANCES AND PATHWAYS ? INCLUDING DOG PARK ENTRANCE |
| | COORDINATED DURING BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS |
| | LANDSCAPE: |
| | 39. SATISFIED |
| | 40. SATISFIED. |
| | 41. SATISFIED |
| | 42. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. SPECIFIC TYPE OF PUBLIC OPEN |
| | SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED. PLEASE |
| | INCLUDE SPECIFIC TYPE AND TABLES ILLUSTRATING HOW |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OPEN SPACE TYPES HAVE BEEN |
| | MET. NEED ADDITIONAL DETAIL TO DETERMINE IF OPEN SPACE |
| | IS AN IMPROVEMENT ON SITE. THE INITIAL DESIGN DOES NOT |
| | SEEM TO BE A BIG IMPROVEMENT TO PUBLIC SPACE. NEED TO |
| | COORDINATE |
| | DESIGN OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED, AND |
| | BROUGHT BACK TO DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE AT FUTURE |
| | DATE WITH INCORPORATION OF AIPP REQUIREMENT |
| | 43. SATISFIED. |
| | 44. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PROVIDE HARDSCAPE PLAN |
| | ILLUSTRATING PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PAVERS, FOUNTAIN |
| | (INCLUDING DEPTH OF FOUNTAIN AND PROTECTIVE BARRIER), |
| | PAVER BANDING/CONCRETE BANDING, SEATING OPEN SPACE, |
| | ETC. |
| | DESIGN OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED, AND |
| | BROUGHT BACK TO DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE AT FUTURE |
| | DATE WITH INCORPORATION OF AIPP REQUIREMENT |
| | 45. NOT SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET PL-1 DOES NOT |
| | SEEM TO ACCOUNT FOR FIRE, IRRIGATION AND WATER ASSEMBLY |
| | ADJACENT TO PROPOSED OPEN SPACE ? PLEASE COORDINATE |
| | WITH CIVIL PLAN |
| | REPEAT COMMENT ? NOT SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLANS: LOW |
| | SHRUBS CAN BE PLANTED IN FRONT OF FIRE BACKFLOW, |
| | IRRIGATION METER. FROM PAST CASES, THEY CANNOT BE |
| | PLANTED IN FRONT OF DOMESTIC BACKFLOW BUT PLEASE |
| | CONFIRM WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES. THE SIDEWALK BETWEEN |
| | THESE UTILITIES AND THE BACK OF CURB IS APPROXIMATELY |
| | 12 FEET ? CAN BE REDUCED TO 8 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE |
| | ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE IN FRONT OF UTILITIES. PLEASE |
| | EXAMINE POSSIBILITY AND SEE HOW IT INTERACTS WITH THE |
| | REST OF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND SIDEWALK |
| | ALONG CLEARWATER |
| | 46. SATISFIED |
| | 47. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ARE TREES PROPOSED ALONG |
| | CLEARWATER DRIVE IN A LANDSCAPE BED? THIS IS PREFERRED |
| | IF 8-FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE CAN BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN |
| | BUILDING FA?ADE AND BED (APPEARS IT CAN) |
| | TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG CURB LINE IN PLANTER BED |
| | RATHER THAN FA?ADE PLANTING. CONTINUOUS PLANTER BED CAN |
| | BE LOCATED ALONG ENTIRE FA?ADE WHERE THERE IS NO |
| | CROSSWALK OR CURB CUT |
| | 48. SATISFIED |
| | 49. SATISFIED. |
| | 50. NOT SATISFIED. ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES ALONG |
| | BUILDINGS SOUTH FA?ADE SHALL BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE |
| | HEDGE TO BEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. PLEASE INCLUDE IN |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | COORDINATE LANDSCAPE SCREENING AROUND THESE UTILITIES |
| | WHEN THEY ARE IN THEIR FINAL APPROVED LOCATION. FOR THE |
| | SAKE OF SITE PLAN REVIEW, PLEASE PLACE LOW LANDSCAPE ON |
| | ALL SIDES OF THE FDC, FIRE BACKFLOW, IRRIGATION METER, |
| | AND ON THREE SIDES OF THE WATER METER AND DOMESTIC |
| | BACKFLOW (CANNOT BE PLANTED ON THE ACCESSED SIDE OF |
| | WATER METER AND DOMESTIC BACKFLOW). IN THE CASE THAT |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES REQUIRES ANY OF THESE UTILITIES TO BE |
| | LOCATED ON THE ROW (NOT WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY), |
| | PLEASE PLACE UP AGAINST BUILDING WITH FA?ADE PLANTING, |
| | OR ALONG CURB LINE SURROUNDING BY PLANTING. CONTINUE |
| | COORDINATION WITH ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | 51. SATISFIED |
| | 52. SATISFIED. |
| | 53. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. DUE TO THE SITE?S SIZE AND |
| | THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCES, THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO |
| | DAC REVIEW PRIOR TO COMPLETING PPRC PROCESS |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SUBJECT TO FURTHER DAC REVIEW WITH |
| | INCORPORATION OF AIPP |
| | 54. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. APPLICANT SHALL MEET AIPP |
| | REQUIREMENTS ? CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, AIPP COORDINATOR |
| | AT [email protected] |
| | CIVIL: |
| | 55. SATISFIED |
| | 56. SATISFIED. |
| | 57. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF ALL |
| | ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES, INCLUDING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, |
| | WATER METERS, FDC, FIRE BACKFLOWS, GENERATORS, |
| | IRRIGATION METERS, ETC. REQUIRE ZONING APPROVAL IN |
| | COORDINATION WITH PUBLIC WORKS AND CITY ENGINEERING |
| | DEPARTMENT |
| | COORDINATION BETWEEN UTILITIES, FIRE, AND ZONING SHALL |
| | CONTINUE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. ZONING SHALL |
| | BE INCLUDED IN FINAL LOCATION PLACEMENT |
| | 58. SATISFIED |
| | 59. SATISFIED |
| | 60. SATISFIED |
| | 61. SATISFIED |
| | 62. SATISFIED |
| | 63. NOT SATISFIED. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR |
| | SIDEWALKS, PARALLEL PARKING SPACES, OPEN SPACE AREAS, |
| | ETC. PLEASE PROVIDE A PARALLEL CUB CUT ACROSS ALL |
| | PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCES, SHOWING SLOPE OF SIDEWALK |
| | PROVIDE CROSS SECTION PARALLEL TO CLEARWATER DRIVE, |
| | ACROSS PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE THAT SHOWS THE SLOPE OF |
| | THE SIDEWALK FROM NORTH TO SOUTH AS IT CROSSES THE |
| | ENTRANCE. SIDEWALK SHALL BE KEPT LEVEL ACROSS ENTRANCE |
| | 64. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. SHOW ALL DOORWAYS ON CIVIL |
| | PLANS AND INDICATE HOW GRADE CHANGES ARE BEING |
| | ACCOMMODATED. ALL GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR INTERIOR |
| | TO THE BUILDING, NOT ON THE SIDEWALK/ROW |
| | NEW COMMENTS OCTOBER 30, 2020: |
| | 65. SATISFIED |
| | ARCHITECTURE: |
| | 66. NOT SATISFIED. IS A GATE PROPOSED AT THE SOUTH |
| | EGRESS ONLY DRIVE ONTO CLEARWATER? PLEASE INDICATE ON |
| | SITE PLAN AND ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE INCLUDE |
| | MATERIAL DETAIL |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL SCREENING GATE NOT JUST |
| | GATE ARM TO SCREEN LOADING AREA FROM ROW |
| | 67. SATISFIED |
| | 68. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PLEASE INCLUDE RENDERINGS |
| | SHOWING INTERACTION OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WITH PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING, AND VIEW FROM NORTHWEST LOOKING SOUTHEAST, |
| | AND VIEW FROM SOUTH EAST CORNER LOOKING NORTH WEST. |
| | 69. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE NOTE, WINDOW MATERIAL |
| | TINTING SHALL MAINTAIN TRANSPARENCY BETWEEN GROUND |
| | FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACES AND EXTERIOR. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | MATERIAL SPEC (UNDERSTANDING THIS MAY CHANGE DURING |
| | PERMIT PROCESS, BUT TRANSPARENCY MUST BE MAINTAINED) |
| | 70. SATISFIED |
| | 71. SATISFIED |
| | 72. SATISFIED |
| | 73. SATISFIED |
| | 74. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PLEASE INCLUDE AN OPAQUE |
| | GATE SOMEWHERE APPROPRIATE WITHIN THE SPACE BETWEEN THE |
| | EDGE AND PROPOSED 350 PROJECT TO SCREEN THE BACK OF |
| | HOUSE/DUMPSTER STAGING AREA FROM THOSE WITHIN THE |
| | CIRCULAR DRIVE AND THE PUBLIC VIEW FROM THE ACCESS |
| | EASEMENT ROADWAY |
| | 75. SATISFIED. |
| | TRAFFIC: |
| | 76. SATISIFED |
| | 77. SATISFIED. |
| | LANDSCAPE: |
| | 78. SATISFIED |
| | 79. SATISFIED |
| | 80. CONDITON OF APPROVAL: OVERALL, STAFF FEELS THAT THE |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE NEEDS TO BE ENHANCED AND BETTER |
| | DESIGNED TO INTERACT WITH THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING. A DIFFERENT TYPE OF OPEN SPACE WILL NEED TO |
| | BE PICKED AND THE CRITERIA MET. STAFF RECOMMENDS A |
| | CONFERENCE CALL WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER AND URBAN |
| | DESIGN TO DISCUSS FURTHER |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED BY DAC WITH |
| | INCORPORATION OF AIPP REQUIREMENT |
| | CIVIL/SITE: |
| | 81. SATISFIED |
| | 82. SATISFIED |
| | 83. SATISFIED |
| | 84. ONGOING. ADD LABEL TO PROPOSED STAGING AREA FOR |
| | TRASH ? CURRENTLY READS AS ONLY STAGING FOR THE EDGE |
| | TRASH. PLEASE CLARIFY THAT THIS IS ALSO PROPOSED |
| | STAGING FOR PROPOSED 350 BUILDING. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE |
| | NUMBER OF COMPACTORS AND RECYCLING BINS THAT CAN FIT |
| | WITHIN THIS STAGING AREA SAFELY ? USE ACTUAL DIMENSIONS |
| | OF EDGE COMPACTORS AND PROPOSED 350 COMPACTORS. THIS |
| | WILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC WORKS (MATT HEJAZI) |
| | WAITING FOR REVIEW BY PUBLIC WORKS |
| | 85. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CIVIL PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW |
| | WALL AROUND DUMPSTER STAGING AREA BUT DOES NOT APPEAR |
| | ON OTHER PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | MIGHT WANT A FULL ENCLOSURE NOT JUST CURB ? CHECK WITH |
| | MATT HEJAZI |
| | 86. SATISFIED |
| | 87. SATISFIED |
| | 88. SATISFIED |
| | 89. SATISFIED |
| | 90. COA: PLEASE AMEND THE CROSS SECTION A-A TO |
| | ACCURATELY REFLECT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND WALL SEATING |
| | TO BE REVISED FOR BUILDING PERMIT AFTER PUBLIC OPEN |
| | SPACE IS APPROVED |
| | 91. SATISFIED |
| | 92. SATISFIED |
| | 93. SATISFIED |
| | 94. SATISIFIED |
| | |
| | PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: |
| | 1. ALL PORTIONS OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE PAINTED |
| | (CEILING AND WALLS INCLUDING ANY UTILITIES AND PIPING) |
| | TO A DEPTH OF 20 FEET. ALL PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING |
| | SHALL BE SHIELDED |
| | 2. PLEASE NOTE, ALL PROJECTS WITH MICROUNITS SHALL |
| | CONTRIBUTE TO THE CITY TROLLEY FUND AT A RATE OF $10 |
| | PER MICROUNIT PER MONTH |
| | 3. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE |
| | HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT. ALL WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT |
| | SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH |
| | BUILDING FA?ADE |
| | 4. ALL GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR INTERIOR TO THE |
| | BUILDING, NOT ON THE SIDEWALK/ROW |
| | 5. EXACT AMOUNT OF CAR SHARE SPACES OR NEED FOR ANY TO |
| | BE DETERMINED THROUGHOUT BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS |
| | 6. EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR EXTENSION OF BALCONIES INTO |
| | EDGE MASTER ASSOCIATION PROPERTY |
| | 7. DETAILS OF PROPOSED DOG PARK TO BE COORDINATED |
| | DURING BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS. STAFF RECOMMENDS |
| | ANALYZING PROPOSED ENTRANCE TO DOG PARK. LOOKS LIKE THE |
| | ONLY WAY TO GET THERE IS THROUGH THE CORRIDOR THAT GOES |
| | IN FRONT OF THE GENERATOR ROOMS OR HAVING TO WALK |
| | THROUGH THE ASPHALT DUMPSTER STAGING AREA. NOT A ZONING |
| | REQUIREMENT BUT A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE TENANT?S |
| | ENJOYMENT |
| | 8. PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS PLANS ? TO INCLUDE |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND PATHWAYS |
| | ? INCLUDING DOG PARK ENTRANCE |
| | 9. DESIGN OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO BE FURTHER REVIEWED, |
| | AND BROUGHT BACK TO DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE AT FUTURE |
| | DATE WITH INCORPORATION OF AIPP REQUIREMENT |
| | A. PLEASE INCLUDE RENDERINGS SHOWING INTERACTION OF |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WITH PROPOSED BUILDING, AND VIEW FROM |
| | NORTHWEST LOOKING SOUTHEAST, AND VIEW FROM SOUTH EAST |
| | CORNER LOOKING NORTH WEST. |
| | B. PLEASE AMEND THE CROSS SECTION A-A TO ACCURATELY |
| | REFLECT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND WALL SEATING |
| | 10. PLEASE NOTE, WINDOW MATERIAL TINTING SHALL MAINTAIN |
| | TRANSPARENCY BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACES AND |
| | EXTERIOR. PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL SPEC WITH BUILDING |
| | PERMIT |
| | 11. PLEASE INCLUDE AN OPAQUE GATE SOMEWHERE APPROPRIATE |
| | WITHIN THE SPACE BETWEEN THE EDGE AND PROPOSED 350 |
| | PROJECT TO SCREEN THE BACK OF HOUSE/DUMPSTER STAGING |
| | AREA FROM THOSE WITHIN THE CIRCULAR DRIVE AND THE |
| | PUBLIC VIEW FROM THE ACCESS EASEMENT ROADWAY |
| | SEE OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL STANDARD |
| | PROPOSED PROVISOS |
| | |
| | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
| | 561 822 1426 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | ANA MARIA APONTE, CITY URBAN DESIGNER |
| | 561 822 1439 |
| | [email protected] |
| |
Print |
