| Date |
Text |
| 2020-10-30 12:32:24 | |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | 1. SATISFIED |
| | 2. ONGOING DISCUSSION WITH APPLICANT LEGAL TEAM AND |
| | CITY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NECESSARY TO MAKE FINAL |
| | DETERMINATION OF SITE CALCULATIONS. |
| | A. WHAT ARE THE LEGAL PARAMETERS THAT REGULATE THE |
| | MASTER ASSOCIATION? |
| | B. IS DRAINAGE FOR PHASE II ALLOWED WITHIN THE MASTER |
| | ASSOCIATION AREA? CAN IT BE LOCATION OUTSIDE PHASE II |
| | PARCEL? |
| | C. IS EDGE ASSOCIATION CONSENTING FOR OPEN SPACE TO BE |
| | OPEN TO THE PUBLIC? ARE THEY AWARE OPEN SPACE PERMITS |
| | THE PUBLIC TO ENTER? |
| | D. EXTENSION OF BALCONIES INTO EDGE ASSOCIATION |
| | PROPERTY ? NEED TO CONFIRM IF PERMITTED |
| | E. MEASUREMENT OF SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK AND REAR |
| | SETBACK DETERMINED BASED ON HOW PROPERTY LINES WILL BE |
| | MODIFIED WITH PROJECT |
| | F. HOW WILL INTERNAL DRIVE BE MAINTAINED AND OPERATED? |
| | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED |
| | REMOVE ACTIVE USE, TRANSPARENCY DATA FOR THE EDGE. ONLY |
| | DATA FOR THE ENTIRE SITE TO REMAIN IS THE PUBLIC OPEN |
| | SPACE. PLEASE UPDATE FAR DATA LABEL FOR SUBJECT PARCEL |
| | TO ?350? (CURRENTLY READS ?305?) |
| | 4. ONGOING. CAN EXISTING DRAINAGE BE DISENGAGED? |
| | STORMWATER DRAINAGE UNDER REVIEW BY CITY ENGINEERING |
| | DEPARTMENT. |
| | 5. SATISFIED |
| | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SHEET A ? 0.01 |
| | A. SATISFIED. LABEL STREET NAMES ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR |
| | DESIGNATIONS UNDER MIN. ACTIVE USE TABLE |
| | B. SATISFIED. INCLUDE ACTUAL PROVIDED SETBACK FOR SIDE |
| | INTERIOR SOUTH |
| | C. SEE NEW COMMENT #70 INCLUDE VARIANCE TABLE FOR |
| | PROPOSED VARIANCES. PLEASE NOTE, SETBACK FOR GROUND |
| | FLOOR, PODIUM AND TOWER ARE THREE SEPARATE VARIANCE |
| | REQUESTS |
| | D. SATISFIED. MINIMUM GUEST PARKING FOR MICROUNITS IS |
| | 1/20 NOT 0, PLEASE UPDATE IN TABLE |
| | 7. SATISFIED. |
| | 8. SATISIFED. THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF CAR-SHARE STATIONS |
| | MAY BE REDUCED BY ONE CAR-SHARE STATION PER EVERY 13 |
| | ON-SITE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. CAR SHARE STATIONS CAN |
| | BE REDUCED BY NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE |
| | MICROUNITS. DEDUCTION BASED ON CURRENT NUMBERS WOULD BE |
| | 9 SPACES, RESULTING IN A NEED FOR 9 CAR SHARE SPACES. |
| | EXACT AMOUNT OF CAR SHARE SPACES OR NEED FOR ANY TO BE |
| | DETERMINED THROUGHOUT BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS |
| | 9. SATISFIED |
| | 10. SATISFIED |
| | 11. SATISFIED |
| | 12. SATISFIED |
| | 13. SATISFIED |
| | 14. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. REDUCE NUMBER OF DRIVEWAY AND |
| | CURB CUTS FROM PROJECT. ELIMINATE FROM CLEARWATER DRIVE |
| | IF POSSIBLE. NO MORE THAN ONE ON CLEARWATER IF ALL |
| | CANNOT BE ELIMINATED. REDUCE INTERNAL TO TWO LANES ONLY |
| | CAN THE APRON WIDTH BE REDUCED? PLEASE CHECK ? SEEM |
| | WIDER THAN NECESSARY |
| | 15. SATISFIED |
| | 16. SATISFIED |
| | 17. SATISFIED |
| | 18. SATISFIED |
| | 19. SATISFIED |
| | 20. SATISFIED |
| | 21. SATISFIED |
| | 22. SATISFIED |
| | 23. SATISFIED |
| | 24. PARTIALLY SATISFIED: SHOW ADJACENT PROPERTY CURB |
| | LINES, PARKING LOTS, STRUCTURES ETC. ON SITE PLAN AND |
| | CIVIL PLANS |
| | NOT SHOWN ON CIVIL PLANS |
| | 25. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. HOW WILL TRASH PICKUP WORK FOR |
| | NEW BUILDING? WHERE WILL EXISTING TRASH FOR EDGE |
| | BUILDING BE RELOCATED? |
| | NEED TO HAVE DISCUSSION WITH EDGE BUILDING FOR THEIR |
| | CURRENT STORAGE TO CONFIRM. NEED CONVERSATION WITH MATT |
| | HEJAZI OF PUBLIC WORKS TO CONFIRM TRUCK ENTRY ON PAVED |
| | CIRCULAR DRIVE |
| | 26. SATISFIED. |
| | 27. SATISFIED |
| | 28. SATISFIED |
| | 29. SATISFIED |
| | 30. SATISFIED |
| | 31. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT COLOR RENDERINGS FROM |
| | GROUND VIEW PERSPECTIVE. INCLUDE LANDSCAPE AS PROPOSED, |
| | AT PLANTING HEIGHT FOR ACCURATE CONSTRUCTION |
| | REPRESENTATION. |
| | 32. SATISFIED |
| | 33. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT CONTEXTUAL |
| | ELEVATIONS |
| | NEED MORE DETAILED CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS |
| | 34. SATISFIED |
| | 35. SATISFIED |
| | 36. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. WHERE IS THE ACCESS TO THE DOG |
| | PARK PROPOSED? WILL IT CONNECT TO CLEARWATER DRIVE? |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAIL |
| | LOCATION IS FINE, HOWEVER NEED TO CONFIRM THAT EDGE |
| | BUILDING HAS ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO TRANSPORT TRASH BINS |
| | TO STAGING AREA. NEED TO CONFIRM THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL |
| | WORK FOR ALL PARTIES INVOLVED |
| | 37. SATISFIED |
| | 38. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PROVIDE PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS |
| | PLANS ? TO INCLUDE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, ALL BUILDING |
| | ENTRANCES AND PATHWAYS ? INCLUDING DOG PARK ENTRANCE |
| | COORDINATED DURING BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS |
| | LANDSCAPE: |
| | 39. SATISFIED |
| | 40. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. EXISTING OAK TREES ALONG |
| | CLEARWATER DRIVE MAY BE ABLE TO BE RELOCATED TO |
| | PLANTING BED CLOSER TO CURB- SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS. |
| | NEED TO COORDINATE WITH ENGINEERING FOR UTILITY LINE |
| | PLACEMENT |
| | PROPOSED TREES SHALL BE ALONG CURB LINE AS SEWER LINE |
| | IS BEING RELOCATED |
| | 41. SATISFIED |
| | 42. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. SPECIFIC TYPE OF PUBLIC OPEN |
| | SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IS REQUIRED. PLEASE |
| | INCLUDE SPECIFIC TYPE AND TABLES ILLUSTRATING HOW |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC OPEN SPACE TYPES HAVE BEEN |
| | MET. NEED ADDITIONAL DETAIL TO DETERMINE IF OPEN SPACE |
| | IS AN IMPROVEMENT ON SITE. THE INITIAL DESIGN DOES NOT |
| | SEEM TO BE A BIG IMPROVEMENT TO PUBLIC SPACE. NEED TO |
| | COORDINATE |
| | PASSAGEWAY OPEN SPACE DOES NOT WORK FOR THIS SITE. THIS |
| | LOCATION OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DOES NOT MEET THE |
| | DEFINITION OF PASSAGEWAY FROM SECTION 94-109. |
| | 43. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PRESERVE THE TWO |
| | TREES THAT EXIST ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DRY RETENTION |
| | AREA (NEW PROPOSED OPEN SPACE) BY MEANS OF ISLANDS OR |
| | SHIFTING/REMOVING SOME PARKING SPACES |
| | SATISFIED AS LONG AS RAY CARANCI HAS DETERMINED THAT |
| | THE TREES ARE NOT WORTH PRESERVING. |
| | 44. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE HARDSCAPE PLAN |
| | ILLUSTRATING PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PAVERS, FOUNTAIN |
| | (INCLUDING DEPTH OF FOUNTAIN AND PROTECTIVE BARRIER), |
| | PAVER BANDING/CONCRETE BANDING, SEATING OPEN SPACE, |
| | ETC. |
| | NEED TO SEE MATERIAL EXAMPLES AND DETAILS FOR PAVERS, |
| | BANDING, ETC. REQUIRED PRIOR TO DAC (STAFF UNDERSTANDS |
| | EXACT COLOR AND MATERIAL CHOICES MAY BE MODIFIED |
| | THROUGHOUT BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS, BUT A CONCEPT IS |
| | NEEDED) |
| | 45. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET PL-1 DOES |
| | NOT SEEM TO ACCOUNT FOR FIRE, IRRIGATION AND WATER |
| | ASSEMBLY ADJACENT TO PROPOSED OPEN SPACE ? PLEASE |
| | COORDINATE WITH CIVIL PLAN |
| | LOW SHRUBS CAN BE PLANTED IN FRONT OF FIRE BACKFLOW, |
| | IRRIGATION METER. FROM PAST CASES, THEY CANNOT BE |
| | PLANTED IN FRONT OF DOMESTIC BACKFLOW BUT PLEASE |
| | CONFIRM WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES. THE SIDEWALK BETWEEN |
| | THESE UTILITIES AND THE BACK OF CURB IS APPROXIMATELY |
| | 12 FEET ? CAN BE REDUCED TO 8 FEET TO ACCOMMODATE |
| | ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE IN FRONT OF UTILITIES. PLEASE |
| | EXAMINE POSSIBILITY AND SEE HOW IT INTERACTS WITH THE |
| | REST OF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND SIDEWALK |
| | ALONG CLEARWATER |
| | 46. SATISFIED |
| | 47. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ARE TREES PROPOSED ALONG |
| | CLEARWATER DRIVE IN A LANDSCAPE BED? THIS IS PREFERRED |
| | IF 8-FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE CAN BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN |
| | BUILDING FA?ADE AND BED (APPEARS IT CAN) |
| | TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG CURB LINE IN PLANTER BED |
| | RATHER THAN FA?ADE PLANTING. CONTINUOUS PLANTER BED CAN |
| | BE LOCATED ALONG ENTIRE FA?ADE WHERE THERE IS NO |
| | CROSSWALK OR CURB CUT |
| | 48. SATISFIED |
| | 49. PARTIALLLY SATISFIED. CANNOT DETERMINE IF TREES ON |
| | NORTH SIDE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ARE EXISTING. STAFF |
| | DOES NOT WANT THE EXISTING MATURE TREES AT THIS |
| | LOCATION REMOVED |
| | CAN TREES K AND L BE PRESERVED? THEY DON?T SEEM TO NEED |
| | TO BE REMOVED |
| | 50. NOT SATISFIED. ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES ALONG |
| | BUILDINGS SOUTH FA?ADE SHALL BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE |
| | HEDGE TO BEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. PLEASE INCLUDE IN |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | COORDINATE LANDSCAPE SCREENING AROUND THESE UTILITIES |
| | WHEN THEY ARE IN THEIR FINAL APPROVED LOCATION. FOR THE |
| | SAKE OF SITE PLAN REVIEW, PLEASE PLACE LOW LANDSCAPE ON |
| | ALL SIDES OF THE FDC, FIRE BACKFLOW, IRRIGATION METER, |
| | AND ON THREE SIDES OF THE WATER METER AND DOMESTIC |
| | BACKFLOW (CANNOT BE PLANTED ON THE ACCESSED SIDE OF |
| | WATER METER AND DOMESTIC BACKFLOW). IN THE CASE THAT |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES REQUIRES ANY OF THESE UTILITIES TO BE |
| | LOCATED ON THE ROW (NOT WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY), |
| | PLEASE PLACE UP AGAINST BUILDING WITH FA?ADE PLANTING, |
| | OR ALONG CURB LINE SURROUNDING BY PLANTING. CONTINUE |
| | COORDINATION WITH ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | 51. SATISFIED |
| | 52. SATISFIED. |
| | 53. ONGOING. DUE TO THE SITE?S SIZE AND THE REQUEST FOR |
| | VARIANCES, THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO DAC REVIEW PRIOR |
| | TO COMPLETING PPRC PROCESS |
| | 54. ONGOING. APPLICANT SHALL MEET AIPP REQUIREMENTS ? |
| | CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, AIPP COORDINATOR AT |
| | [email protected] |
| | CIVIL: |
| | 55. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MAINTAIN AND ENHANCE |
| | CONNECTION FROM PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MULTI |
| | MODAL CENTER THROUGH ADA RAMP AND CROSSWALK |
| | PLEASE INDICATE EXISTING CROSSWALK AND MAINTAINED |
| | CONNECTION ON PLANS |
| | 56. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. DO NOT SEE DETAIL FOR WS-8 |
| | WATER METER OR WS-11 IRRIGATION METER AS LABELED ON |
| | SHEET C-03 |
| | SHEET C-12 NOT INCLUDED WITH SUBMITTAL PACKAGE |
| | 57. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND |
| | UTILITIES, INCLUDING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES, WATER METERS, |
| | FDC, FIRE BACKFLOWS, GENERATORS, IRRIGATION METERS, |
| | ETC. REQUIRE ZONING APPROVAL IN COORDINATION WITH |
| | PUBLIC WORKS AND CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT |
| | IRRIGATION METER ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. LOCATE GATE |
| | VALVES OFF OF PUBLIC SIDEWALK AREA. CAN DCDA BE LOCATED |
| | FURTHER WEST TO PROVIDE FOR LANDSCAPE SCREENING BETWEEN |
| | SIDEWALK AND DCDA? SAME FOR IRRIGATION RPZ? IN THE CASE |
| | THAT PUBLIC UTILITIES REQUIRE ANY OF THESE UTILITIES TO |
| | BE LOCATED ON THE ROW (NOT WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY), |
| | PLEASE PLACE UP AGAINST BUILDING WITH FA?ADE PLANTING, |
| | OR ALONG CURB LINE SURROUNDING BY PLANTING. CONTINUE |
| | COORDINATION WITH ZONING DEPARTMENT |
| | |
| | 58. SATISFIED |
| | 59. SATISFIED |
| | 60. SATISFIED |
| | 61. SATISFIED |
| | 62. SATISFIED |
| | 63. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FOR |
| | SIDEWALKS, PARALLEL PARKING SPACES, OPEN SPACE AREAS, |
| | ETC. PLEASE PROVIDE A PARALLEL CUB CUT ACROSS ALL |
| | PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCES, SHOWING SLOPE OF SIDEWALK |
| | STAFF WAS NOT CLEAR ? MEANT TO ASK FOR A CROSS SECTION |
| | ACROSS THE PARKING GARAGE THAT IS PARALLEL TO |
| | CLEARWATER, NOT PARALLEL TO THE GARAGE ENTRANCE DRIVE |
| | 64. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. SHOW ALL DOORWAYS ON CIVIL |
| | PLANS AND INDICATE HOW GRADE CHANGES ARE BEING |
| | ACCOMMODATED. ALL GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR INTERIOR |
| | TO THE BUILDING, NOT ON THE SIDEWALK/ROW |
| | TO ENSURE THAT THIS IS MAINTAINED, WILL BE A CONDITION |
| | OF APPROVAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW |
| | NEW COMMENTS OCTOBER 30, 2020: |
| | 65. SCAD SHALL BE APPROVED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL. |
| | ARCHITECTURE: |
| | 66. IS A GATE PROPOSED AT THE SOUTH EGRESS ONLY DRIVE |
| | ONTO CLEARWATER? PLEASE INDICATE ON SITE PLAN AND ON |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE INCLUDE MATERIAL DETAIL |
| | 67. IS A GATE PROPOSED FOR THE ACCESS TO THE PARKING |
| | GARAGE? THE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL PARKING SPACES WILL NEED |
| | TO BE ACCESSIBLE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC. PLEASE EXPLAIN |
| | HOW THIS WILL WORK |
| | 68. PLEASE INCLUDE RENDERINGS SHOWING INTERACTION OF |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WITH PROPOSED BUILDING, AND VIEW FROM |
| | NORTHWEST LOOKING SOUTHEAST, AND VIEW FROM SOUTH EAST |
| | CORNER LOOKING NORTH WEST. |
| | 69. PLEASE NOTE, WINDOW MATERIAL TINTING SHALL MAINTAIN |
| | TRANSPARENCY BETWEEN GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACES AND |
| | EXTERIOR. PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL SPEC (UNDERSTANDING |
| | THIS MAY CHANGE DURING PERMIT PROCESS, BUT TRANSPARENCY |
| | MUST BE MAINTAINED) |
| | 70. PLEASE UPDATE VARIANCE TABLE TO REFLECT TWO |
| | VARIANCES ? NOT THREE (ONE FOR GROUND FLOOR AND PODIUM, |
| | ONE FOR PARKING ABOVE 7TH FLOOR) |
| | 71. DOG PARK STILL LABELED ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ON |
| | SIDE INTERIOR LOT LINE |
| | 72. WHAT IS THE FUNCTION OF THE 16?6? SPACE ON NORTH |
| | SIDE OF NORTH DRIVEWAY ON CLEARWATER? CAN RETAIL SPACE |
| | BE EXTENDED HERE |
| | 73. SOME OF THE CONCRETE FINS COULD BE REMOVED IN ORDER |
| | TO BETTER REFLECT PLANAR BREAKS AS THEY ARE PROPOSED IN |
| | THE EXHIBIT. PLEASE SCHEDULE A CALL WITH URBAN DESIGN |
| | TEAM TO DISCUSS |
| | 74. PLEASE INCLUDE AN OPAQUE GATE SOMEWHERE APPROPRIATE |
| | WITHIN THE SPACE BETWEEN THE EDGE AND PROPOSED 350 |
| | PROJECT TO SCREEN THE BACK OF HOUSE/DUMPSTER STAGING |
| | AREA FROM THOSE WITHIN THE CIRCULAR DRIVE AND THE |
| | PUBLIC VIEW FROM THE ACCESS EASEMENT ROADWAY |
| | 75. STAFF RECOMMENDS ANALYZING PROPOSED ENTRANCE TO DOG |
| | PARK. LOOKS LIKE THE ONLY WAY TO GET THERE IS THROUGH |
| | THE CORRIDOR THAT GOES IN FRONT OF THE GENERATOR ROOMS |
| | OR HAVING TO WALK THROUGH THE ASPHALT DUMPSTER STAGING |
| | AREA. NOT A ZONING REQUIREMENT BUT A RECOMMENDATION FOR |
| | THE TENANT?S ENJOYMENT |
| | TRAFFIC: |
| | 76. PLEASE UPDATE TRAFFIC STUDY ? NO LONGER LEFT TURN |
| | IN TO SOUTH EGRESS DRIVE AND UPDATE IF ONLY FOR LOADING |
| | EGRESS (NO LONGER FOR OTHER VEHICULAR EGRESS) |
| | LANDSCAPE: |
| | 77. OAK TREE PROPOSED VERY CLOSE TO FIRE HYDRANT AT |
| | CIRCULAR PARKING ROW LANDSCAPE ISLAND. IS THIS TOO |
| | CLOSE? |
| | 78. STREET TREES ALONG CURB LINE SHALL BE 20-FOOT |
| | PLANTING HEIGHT |
| | 79. OVERALL, STAFF FEELS THAT THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE |
| | NEEDS TO BE ENHANCED AND BETTER DESIGNED TO INTERACT |
| | WITH THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDING. A DIFFERENT |
| | TYPE OF OPEN SPACE WILL NEED TO BE PICKED AND THE |
| | CRITERIA MET. STAFF RECOMMENDS A CONFERENCE CALL WITH |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLANNER AND URBAN DESIGN TO DISCUSS |
| | FURTHER |
| | CIVIL/SITE: |
| | 80. PUBLIC BICYCLE RACK ON CLEARWATER OUTSIDE |
| | COMMERCIAL SPACE, PLEASE REORIENT TO BE PARALLEL WITH |
| | BUILDING TO FIT 6-FOOT-LONG BICYCLES (LEAVE 24? FROM |
| | BUILDING FA?ADE) |
| | 81. RE-LABEL GROUND FLOOR UNITS FROM RESIDENTIAL TO |
| | LIVE/WORK TO MATCH SITE PLAN |
| | 82. PROPOSED CURBING OUTSIDE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCES |
| | ON CLEARWATER DRIVE PREVENT CLEAR SIDEWALK PATH (IF |
| | THIS IS A SIDEWALK ALONG THE BUILDING FA?ADE) LEADING |
| | TO DOG PARK. SUGGEST PROVIDING FLUSH SIDEWALK WITH |
| | GARAGE ENTRANCES |
| | 83. ADD LABEL TO PROPOSED STAGING AREA FOR TRASH ? |
| | CURRENTLY READS AS ONLY STAGING FOR THE EDGE TRASH. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY THAT THIS IS ALSO PROPOSED STAGING FOR |
| | PROPOSED 350 BUILDING. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE NUMBER OF |
| | COMPACTORS AND RECYCLING BINS THAT CAN FIT WITHIN THIS |
| | STAGING AREA SAFELY ? USE ACTUAL DIMENSIONS OF EDGE |
| | COMPACTORS AND PROPOSED 350 COMPACTORS. THIS WILL NEED |
| | TO BE REVIEWED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES (MATT HEJAZI) |
| | 84. CIVIL PLANS APPEAR TO SHOW WALL AROUND DUMPSTER |
| | STAGING AREA BUT DOES NOT APPEAR ON OTHER PLANS. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY |
| | 85. CIVIL SHEET C-08 ILLUSTRATES VAULT THOUGH LABELED |
| | TO REMOVE ON SHEET C-03. PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | 86. PLEASE REMOVE PUMP HOUSE OUTLINE ON SHEET C-08 AND |
| | LIGHT POLE THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED AT EXISTING OPEN |
| | SPACE?S ENTRANCE FROM CLEARWATER DRIVE (IF BEING |
| | REMOVED) |
| | 87. CAN PROPOSED SSMH #2 BE LOCATED OFF OF THE PUBLIC |
| | SIDEWALK? ARE TWO MANHOLES SO CLOSE TO EACH OTHER (SSMH |
| | #2 AND SSMH #1 NECESSARY OR CAN ONE BE REMOVED OR |
| | RELOCATED? |
| | 88. PLEASE REMOVE TRUNCATED DOMES AT PARKING GARAGE |
| | ENTRANCES ON CLEARWATER. ONLY INCLUDE AT ROADWAY |
| | INTERSECTIONS (PER CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPT.) |
| | 89. PLEASE AMEND THE CROSS SECTION A-A TO ACCURATELY |
| | REFLECT PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND WALL SEATING |
| | 90. PLEASE MATCH WIDTH OF CURB CUTS AND APRONS WITH |
| | SITE PLAN |
| | 91. CONTINUE 8 FOOT SIDEWALK ENTIRE LENGTH OF PROPERTY |
| | AND TRANSITION OUTSIDE PROPERTY (AT PROJECTS SOUTHEAST |
| | SIDE) |
| | |
| | PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: |
| | 92. ALL PORTIONS OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE PAINTED |
| | (CEILING AND WALLS INCLUDING ANY UTILITIES AND PIPING) |
| | TO A DEPTH OF 20 FEET. ALL PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING |
| | SHALL BE SHIELDED |
| | 93. PLEASE NOTE, ALL PROJECTS WITH MICROUNITS SHALL |
| | CONTRIBUTE TO THE CITY TROLLEY FUND AT A RATE OF $10 |
| | PER MICROUNIT PER MONTH |
| | 94. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE |
| | HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT. ALL WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT |
| | SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH |
| | BUILDING FA?ADE |
| | 95. ALL GRADE CHANGES SHOULD OCCUR INTERIOR TO THE |
| | BUILDING, NOT ON THE SIDEWALK/ROW |
| | 96. TRANSPARENCY MUST BE MAINTAINED THROUGH CHOICE OF |
| | GLASS FOR WINDOWS ALONG GROUND FLOOR |
| | SEE OTHER DEPARTMENT COMMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL STANDARD |
| | PROPOSED PROVISOS |
| | |
| | |
| | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
| | 561 822 1426 |
| | [email protected] |
| |
Print |
