| Date |
Text |
| 2021-07-14 19:22:42 | APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: |
| | PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CO, THE APPLICANT WILL USE BEST |
| | EFFORTS TO WORK WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TO IMPLEMENT |
| | RESTRIPING ON THE NORTHBOUND APPROACH (SOUTH LEG) OF |
| | THE INTERSECTION OF PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD & |
| | EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE TO ALLOW FOR: 2 LEFT TURN LANES |
| | + 1 SHARED THROUGH/RIGHT LANE AND THE ASSOCIATED SIGNAL |
| | MODIFICATIONS THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE |
| | THIS RESTRIPING. IF, HOWEVER, THE COUNTY ULTIMATELY |
| | DETERMINES THAT THE ASSOCIATED SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS |
| | CANNOT BE IMPLEMENTED WHILE UTILIZING THE EXISTING |
| | CONCRETE STRAIN POLES AT THE INTERSECTION, THIS |
| | IMPROVEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. INSTEAD, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE STRIPING TO MAXIMIZE THE |
| | NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN STORAGE LENGTH TO THE EXTENT |
| | PRACTICAL AND CONTRIBUTE $150,000 TOWARDSA CITY |
| | DESIGNATED TRANSPORTATION FUND. |
| | |
| | TRAFFIC COMMENTS: |
| | 1. SATISFIED. PER TPS RECOMMENDATION, IMPROVE NB |
| | LEFT-TURN QUEUE CAPACITY ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DR AT |
| | THE PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD INTERSECTION. UPDATED TRAFFIC |
| | ANALYSIS WAS NOT PROVIDED IN THE LATEST RESUBMISSION. |
| | THE PARKING ANALYSIS DOES NOT ADDRESS THIS COMMENT. |
| | 2. SATISFIED. UNLESS THE COUNTY APPROVES AND AGREES TO |
| | IMPLEMENT THE OPTIMIZED SIGNAL TIMING AT THE EXECUTIVE |
| | DR AND PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD INTERSECTION AS PRESENTED |
| | IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY, A LANE RECONFIGURATION OF THE NB |
| | APPROACH IS NECESSARY. SPECIFICALLY: CONVERT THE |
| | EXISTING 1 LEFT-TURN LANE, 1 THROUGH LANE, 1 RIGHT-TURN |
| | LANE TO 2 LEFT-TURN LANES AND 1 THROUGH/RIGHT LANE. |
| | 3. SATISFIED. PER TPS RECOMMENDATION, CONSTRUCT |
| | RIGHT-TURN DECELERATION LANES AT DRIVEWAY #2 AND #3. |
| | PROVIDE PROPER LEFT-TURN CHANNELIZATION TO DRIVEWAY #2 |
| | AND #3 BY MEANS OF EITHER STRIPING OR MID-BLOCK |
| | ISLANDS. UPDATED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WAS NOT PROVIDED IN |
| | THE LATEST RESUBMISSION. THE PARKING ANALYSIS DOES NOT |
| | ADDRESS THIS COMMENT. |
| | 4. SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN ANALYSIS FOR GARBAGE AND |
| | LARGE DELIVERY TRUCK OPERATIONS WITHIN THE FACILITY |
| | A. THE WB-67 ANALYSIS SHOWS AN ENCROACHMENT WITH THE |
| | LEFT SIDE CURB IN THE SOUTH-EAST PORTION OF THE LOT |
| | WHILE TURNING LEFT TOWARDS THE EXIT DRIVEWAY |
| | B. GARBAGE TRUCK ANALYSIS SEEMS MISSING |
| | 5. SATISFIED. PERTAINING THE PARKING STUDY. PROVIDE |
| | PARKING DEMAND VALUES BASED ON ITE PARKING GENERATION |
| | MANUAL 5TH EDITION AND COMPARE THEM WITH THE STUDY |
| | ESTIMATE. PLEASE ELABORATE AND JUSTIFY THE RESULTS. |
| | |
| | SITE COMMENTS: |
| | 6. SATISFIED. EXTEND THE WIDER SIDEWALK CONFIGURATION |
| | ALONG THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE NORTH OF DRIVEWAY #2. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SET NAME/NUMBER SHOWCASING SIDEWALK |
| | DIMENSIONS |
| | 7. SATISFIED. CONSIDER IMPLEMENTING A MULTIMODAL PATH |
| | ALONG SITE FRONTAGE OR CONFIGURE EXECUTIVE CENTER DR |
| | ROAD GEOMETRY TO MIMIC THE PORTION SOUTH OF CONGRESS |
| | AVE. PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SET NAME/NUMBER SHOWCASING |
| | SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS ALONG PROPERTY FRONTAGE. PROVIDE |
| | PROPOSED SIDEWALK EXACT WIDTH DIMENSIONS IN THE COMMENT |
| | RESPONSE. |
| | |
| | VALERIO ORICCHIO |
| | CITY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER |
| | 561-494-1092 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| |
Print |