| Date |
Text |
| 2021-06-28 14:41:49 | CASE NO. PB1060MM - JUNE 28, 2021 REVIEW |
| | BJS @ BRANDSMART |
| | 751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE |
| | SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING BOARD |
| | MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY AUGUST 28, 2021), THE |
| | PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT REMOVED REFERENCE TO |
| | SEATING AT THE BIOSWALE OVERLOOKS. SEATING NEEDS TO BE |
| | PROVIDED AT THESE LOCATIONS (THIS CAN BE USED BY NOT |
| | ONLY THE PUBLIC, BUT ALSO EMPLOYEES EATING LUNCH). |
| | |
| | WAIVERS |
| | |
| | 2) STAFF HAS IDENTIFIED ADDITIONAL WAIVERS THAT ARE |
| | REQUIRED: |
| | |
| | A. THE AREA WHERE THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS DOES NOT |
| | PROVIDE THE BUFFER TREES AT THE REQUIRED 30-FOOT ON |
| | CENTER. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST. |
| | |
| | B. THE SITE EXCEEDS THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS |
| | PERMITTED ONTO A RIGHT-OF-WAY. SECTION 94-312.1.A |
| | PERMITS ONLY TWO ACCESS POINTS ONTO EXECUTIVE CENTER |
| | DRIVE. BASED ON THE SITE DESIGN, STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT |
| | TO A WAIVER REQUEST FOR THREE ACCESS POINTS. |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET C102.0 HAS MISALIGNED DIMENSION TAGS ALONG THE |
| | PARKING ROWS ADJACENT TO I-95. THESE NEED TO BE |
| | CORRECTLY PLACED. |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | |
| | 4) THE EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE FROM BEST BUY TO |
| | EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEET L-200 BUT |
| | NOT ON ENLARGED SHEET L-201. THE PROPOSED REPLACEMENT |
| | 12-FOOT WIDE STORMWATER EASEMENT, CENTERED ON THE |
| | STORMWATER PIPE, IS NOT SHOWN ON EITHER SHEET. THESE |
| | MUST BE SHOWN ON BOTH SHEETS SO THAT PLANNING CAN |
| | VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO TREES PLACED WITHIN THE |
| | STORMWATER EASEMENT AND THAT TREES IN PROXIMITY TO THE |
| | EASEMENT HAVE THE PROPER ROOT BARRIER. A WAIVER IS |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE TREES THAT WILL NOT BE INSTALLED AND |
| | WITHOUT THE EASEMENT ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, |
| | STAFF CANNOT ENUMERATE THE SPECIFIC WAIVER REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5) THERE ARE NUMEROUS CONFLICTS WHERE REQUIRED TREES |
| | ARE EITHER CLOSE TO OR ON TOP OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY |
| | INFRASTRUCTURE ON THE SITE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| | STAFF WILL BE PROVIDING A MARKED-UP PLAN WITH THESE |
| | LOCATIONS UNDER SEPARATE COVER. |
| | |
| | 6) THE PARKING ROWS IN THE PARKING FIELD ON THE SOUTH |
| | PORTION OF THE SITE DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE DIVIDER |
| | MEDIAN REQUIREMENTS. THIS COMMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY |
| | INCLUDED AND DISCUSSED WITH RAY CARANCI, SENIOR |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND NOT ADDRESSED. STAFF WILL BE |
| | PROVIDING A MARKED-UP PLAN WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | UNDER SEPARATE COVER. THIS MAY REQUIRE AN UPDATE TO THE |
| | PARKING TABLE. |
| | |
| | 7) THERE ARE TERMINAL ISLANDS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE |
| | REQUIRED TREES. STAFF WILL BE PROVIDING A MARKED-UP |
| | PLAN WITH THESE LOCATIONS UNDER SEPARATE COVER. |
| | |
| | 8) THE REQUIRED AND PROVIDED TREE COUNTS ON THE WPB |
| | LANDSCAPE LEGEND CONTAIN ERRORS. THE CITY REQUIRES THAT |
| | ANY PARTIAL TREE IS ROUNDED UP. THIS REQUIRED TREES ON |
| | THE EAST, WEST AND EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE FRONTAGES |
| | EACH REQUIRE ONE ADDITIONAL TREE. STAFF HAS COUNTED THE |
| | TREES ALONG EACH OF THESE BUFFERS AND THERE ARE AN |
| | ADEQUATE NUMBER OF TREES (NOT TRESS AS MISSPELLED ON |
| | THE TABLE) PROVIDED, AND ON AT LEAST TWO OF THE BUFFERS |
| | THE NUMBER PROVIDED IS UNDER COUNTED COMPARED WITH WHAT |
| | IS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | CONDITION - PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE FPL MUST |
| | PROVIDE A RELEASE OF THE EASEMENTS WHICH CONFLICT WITH |
| | THE PROPOSED BJS BUILDING. |
| | |
| | CONDITION - ALL TRANSFORMERS MUST BE SCREENED. |
| | |
| | CONDITION - ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE |
| | SCREENED TO THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT. |
| | |
| | CONDITION - CROSS UTILITY AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | CONDITION - PRIOR TO CO THE PLAT NEEDS TO BE RECORDED. |
| | |
| | SITE CIRCULATION |
| | |
| | PLANNING STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE EASEMENT WITH COVENANTS |
| | AND RESTRICTIONS COVERING THE CROSS-ACCESS AREA WITH |
| | THE CITY SURVEYOR AND ATTORNEY'S OFFICE IN RELATION TO |
| | THE LATEST SUBMITTED SITE PLAN AND VERIFIED THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED NORTHERN ACCESS DRIVE FALLS WITHIN THE ACCESS |
| | EASEMENT LIMITS. THEREFORE, THERE IS NO CONFLICT |
| | BETWEEN THIS PROJECT AND THE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF BEST |
| | BUY. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT YOU STILL PURSUE ABANDONING |
| | THE EASEMENT WITH BEST BUY AS IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO NO |
| | LONGER BE NEEDED. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
