| Date |
Text |
| 2021-06-01 12:12:24 | CASE NO. PB1060MM - MAY 31, 2021 REVIEW |
| | BJS @ BRANDSMART |
| | 751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE |
| | SCHEDULED A PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY AUGUST 1, 2021), THE |
| | PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE |
| | CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | INNOVATIVE FEATURES LISTED IN JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT |
| | |
| | 1) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT LISTS THAT THE |
| | DECORATIVE CONCRETE PATH AND PAVER PLAZA AROUND THE |
| | BIOSWALE INCLUDES A SEAT WALL, BENCHES, LIGHTED |
| | BOLLARDS. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PAVER OVERLOOKS |
| | AND THE WALKWAY MEETING THIS STATEMENT. THE PLANS DO |
| | NOT SHOW ANY SEAT WALL OR BENCHES AT THE OVERLOOKS. |
| | SOME SEATING NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AT THESE LOCATIONS |
| | (CAN BE USED BY EMPLOYEES TO EAT LUNCH). ADDITIONALLY, |
| | THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWS NO DETAILS OF BOLLARD |
| | LIGHTING OR BOLLARD LIGHTING LOCATIONS ALONG THE PATH. |
| | PLEASE UPDATE THE PLANS ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 2) PLEASE PROVIDE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IN WORD. |
| | |
| | WAIVERS |
| | |
| | 3) STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE WAIVERS LISTED IN THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AS WELL AS WHAT STAFF HAS |
| | IDENTIFIED BASED ON THE PLANS AND HAS PROVIDED THEM |
| | BELOW WITH COMMENTARY. |
| | |
| | A. WAIVER REQUESTED FOR NUMBER OF ON-SITE PARKING |
| | SPACES REQUIRED - THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| | COMMENTS POSTED ON MARCH 29, 2021, REQUIRED THE |
| | SUBMITTAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL ITE INFORMATION FOR THE |
| | PARKING STUDY. PLANNING STAFF IS AWAITING THE TRAFFIC |
| | ENGINEERING REVIEW TO FINALIZE IF THE PARKING STUDY |
| | REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE |
| | PARKING WAIVER. |
| | |
| | B. INTERIOR LOT LINE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS - THE |
| | PERIMETER BUFFER APPEARS TO MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, AND IN SOME AREA EXCEEDS THE |
| | MINIMUM WIDTH. THE AREA ALONG THE NEIGHBORING PARCEL TO |
| | THE NORTH WHERE THE EXISTING EASEMENT IS SHOWS |
| | COMPLIANT LANDSCAPE; HOWEVER, THIS EASEMENT NEEDS TO BE |
| | AMENDED TO PERMIT THE TREES AS SHOWN. A LATER COMMENT |
| | ADDRESSES THIS. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THIS WAIVER |
| | REQUEST. |
| | |
| | C. NUMBER OF SIGNS ON THE BJS - 3 PERMITTED, 6 |
| | PROPOSED. MEETS SF ALLOWANCE. THE MORE DESIRABLE AND |
| | ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE PROVISION OF A TRUE |
| | BIOSWALE WITH FULL BOARDWALK CAN OFFSET THIS WAIVER |
| | REQUEST. STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THIS WAIVER REQUEST. |
| | |
| | D. SIGNS ON THE SHORT END OF THE FUEL CANOPY EXCEED |
| | REQUIRED SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWANCE. THE |
| | PERMITTED SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE IS 4.32 ON EACH SHORT END |
| | OF THE CANOPY. THE SIGN PACKAGE SHOWS THESE SIGNS AS |
| | 22.1 SQUARE FEET IN AREA. THE PROPOSED SIGNS ARE |
| | APPROXIMATELY 5 TIMES LARGER THAN IS PERMITTED. IF BJS |
| | WISHES TO HAVE THESE SIGNS, THEN A WAIVER TO THE SIZE |
| | OF THE SIGNS IS REQUIRED. NOTE: NO DIMENSIONS FOR THE |
| | SIGNS WERE PROVIDED ON THE FUEL STATION ELEVATION. THIS |
| | WAIVER IS REQUESTED IN THE RESPONSE COMMENTS BY NOT |
| | LISTED AS A WAIVER REQUEST ELSEWHERE (TO INCLUDE IN THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT). PLEASE UPDATE IF YOU ARE |
| | REQUESTING THIS WAIVER. |
| | |
| | E. THE DOUBLE ROW OF COMPACT PARKING CONTAINS 11 |
| | PARKING SPACES IN A ROW, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED UNLESS |
| | THE STAGGERED INTERIOR PARKING ISLAND PROVISION IS |
| | USED. THIS HAS NOT BEEN LISTED AS A WAIVER REQUEST. |
| | NOTE: STAFF IS NOT PREPARED TO SUPPORT THIS THIS |
| | PROPOSED WAIVER. |
| | |
| | SUBDIVISION |
| | |
| | 4) THE SITE REQUIRES A MINOR SUBDIVISION. AS STATED IN |
| | THE ORIGINAL COMMENTS FOR THE PROJECT, THE MINOR |
| | SUBDIVISION (PLAT REVIEW) REQUIRES THE SUBMITTAL OF A |
| | MINOR SUBDIVISION (PLAT) APPLICATION, WHICH WAS NOT |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE REVISED PLAT. |
| | |
| | PARKING |
| | |
| | 5) NOT ALL THE COMPACT PARKING SPACES MAY BE LABELED AS |
| | EMPLOYEE ONLY. |
| | |
| | 6) THE THREE WESTERNMOST COMPACT SPACES ON THE NORTH |
| | SIDE OF THE BJS BUILDING DO NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED 24 |
| | FOOT BACK UP AREA FOR 90-DEGREE PARKING SPACES AND THUS |
| | ARE NOT PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 7) THE EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE |
| | 0.34-ACRE DRY DETENTION AREA HAD THE WHEEL STOPS |
| | REMOVED AND THE SIGNS MOVED BACK SO THAT THERE IS NOW A |
| | TWO-FOOT OVERHANG AREA, WHICH MAKES THESE 18-FOOT-DEEP |
| | PARKING SPACES AND NO LONGER COMPACT PARKING SPACES. |
| | UPDATE THE PLANS AND THE PARKING TABLE ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 8) THE SIGNPOSTS BETWEEN THE FACING TIRE CENTER PARKING |
| | SPACES ARE ONE FOOT IN DIAMETER, WHICH ENCROACH INTO |
| | THE PARKING SPACES MAKING THE SPACES NO LONGER CODE |
| | COMPLIANT AS THEY ARE NO LONGER 18 FEET DEEP. THE SIGN |
| | DETAILS WERE NOT UPDATED. |
| | |
| | 9) THE SIGNPOSTS BETWEEN THE FACING MEMBER WITH INFANT |
| | PARKING SPACES ARE ONE FOOT IN DIAMETER, WHICH ENCROACH |
| | INTO THE PARKING SPACES MAKING THE SPACES NO LONGER |
| | CODE COMPLIANT AS THEY ARE NO LONGER 18 FEET DEEP. THE |
| | SIGN DETAILS WERE NOT UPDATED. |
| | |
| | 10) THE LIGHT POSTS IN THE PARKING ROWS ON THE EASTERN |
| | PARKING AREA MUST BE LOCATED IN THE CORNER WHERE THE |
| | FOUR SPACES MEET, NOT IN THE MIDDLE AS SHOWN AS THIS |
| | RENDERS THE PARKING SPACES NON-COMPLIANT BASED ON THE |
| | PARKING SPACE NO LONGER BEING 18 FEET DEEP. ONE LIGHT |
| | POLE IS STILL INCORRECTLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 11) PARKING PROVIDED - THIS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED BASED |
| | ON THE COMMENTS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 12) BICYCLE PARKING |
| | |
| | A. THANK YOU FOR UPDATING THE PARKING TABLE TO SHOW |
| | THAT 39 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND THAT |
| | YOU PLAN TO INSTALL 40 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. |
| | B. THE PLANS MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE NUMBER OF BICYCLE |
| | PARKING SPACES PROVIDED AT EACH LOCATION SO THAT STAFF |
| | CAN VERIFY THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES PROVIDED. |
| | C. THE CODE COMPLIANT DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE RACK |
| | PADS IS REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | D. THE BICYCLE RACK STYLE DETAILS. WITH DIMENSIONS, IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEET. NOTE: THE |
| | WAVE STYLE THAT IS SHOWN IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE CITY. |
| | E. A BICYCLE PAD DETAIL, WITH DIMENSIONS, IS REQUIRED |
| | FOR EACH SET OF BICYCLE RACKS. THE RACK LOCATION ON THE |
| | PADS MUST CLEARLY BE SHOWN TO MEET CITY STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | SITE CIRCULATION |
| | |
| | 13) THE CARWASH APPLICANT PROVIDED A COPY OF THE |
| | EASEMENT WITH COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS COVERING THE |
| | CROSS-ACCESS AREA. IT INDICATES THAT BEST BUY HAS AN |
| | INTEREST IN THE CROSS ACCESS, SPECIFICALLY A DRIVE TO |
| | EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION |
| | THAT BEST BUY HAS RELEASED THEIR INTEREST IN THE |
| | EASEMENT. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS LANDSCAPING OBSTRUCTING |
| | BEST BUY FROM UTILIZING THE EASEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | REGARDLESS OF WHAT IS STATED IN THE EASEMENT, BEST BUY |
| | HAS NO RIGHTS TO THE INSTALLATION OF AN OFF-PREMISE |
| | SIGN, WHICH WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. NO EVIDENCE THAT BEST BUY |
| | NO LONGER HAS RIGHTS OR AN INTEREST IN THE CROSS ACCESS |
| | HAS BEEN PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE |
| | |
| | 14) ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS |
| | MUST BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SO THAT STAFF CAN |
| | VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED PLANS |
| | OR THAT PROPER ROOT BARRIERS ARE PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | A. THE EXISTING STORMWATER PIPE FROM BEST BUY TO |
| | EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE IS NOT SHOWN. AS PART OF THE |
| | APPROVALS FOR THE TWO NEIGHBORING DEVELOPMENTS, THE |
| | STORMWATER EASEMENT IS PLANNED TO BE REDUCED TO 12 FOOT |
| | IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE STORMWATER PIPE. THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO SHOW VERIFICATION THAT THE |
| | LANDSCAPE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THIS FUTURE REDUCED |
| | EASEMENT. THE LANDSCAPE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CURRENT |
| | EASEMENT, WHICH WOULD NOT BE PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | B. THE EXISTING WATER AND SANITARY LINES THAT TRAVERSE |
| | THE SITE TO THE EXISTING LIFT STATION ARE NOT SHOWN ON |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SHOW POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH |
| | THE PROPOSED TREES IN THE PARKING DIVIDER ROWS AND |
| | ISLANDS. |
| | |
| | 15) REMOVE THE UTILITY LINES THAT WILL BE NO LONGER |
| | EXIST FROM THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. THERE IS AT LEAST ONE |
| | WATER LINE AND ONE STORMWATER LINE THAT AT SHOWN BEING |
| | REMOVED ON THE CIVIL DEMOLITION PLANS THAT ARE STILL |
| | SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 16) THERE ARE TWO TERMINAL ISLANDS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE |
| | REQUIRED TREES. |
| | |
| | A. ONE CONTAINS THE PROPOSED SIGN ALONG I95. |
| | |
| | B. ONE IS NEAR THE LIFT STATION BY THE FUEL PUMP AREA. |
| | |
| | 17) THE WIDTH OF ALL OF THE TERMINAL ISLAND TREES IN |
| | THE SOUTH PARKING AREA WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE PLANS |
| | MUST CLEARLY SHOW THAT THESE TERMINAL ISLANDS HAVE THE |
| | REQUIRED EIGHT (8) FEET OF WIDTH FOR THE LENGTH OF THE |
| | PARKING STALL. |
| | |
| | CONDITION - PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE FPL MUST |
| | PROVIDE A RELEASE OF THE EASEMENTS WHICH CONFLICT WITH |
| | THE PROPOSED BJS BUILDING. |
| | |
| | CONDITION - ALL TRANSFORMERS MUST BE SCREENED. |
| | |
| | CONDITION - ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE |
| | SCREENED TO THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT. |
| | |
| | CONDITION - CROSS UTILITY AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| |
Print |
